Rotavirus InfectionsPhase 2NCT00346892
To Evaluate 2 Doses of GSK Biologicals' Oral Live Attenuated Human HRV Vaccine Co-administered With Either OPV or IPV
A Phase 2 study testing Rotavirus (vaccine) in people with Rotavirus Infections, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 1 site in South Africa.
Trial summary
"The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate that co-administering HRV vaccine with OPV does not induce a significant decrease in poliovirus immune response one month after the third dose of combined vaccines. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 10 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Rotavirus Infections
- What is being tested?
- Rotavirus (vaccine)
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- How many people
- 450 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Africa
- Study dates
- Nov 2001to Mar 2003
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 10 weeks
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Inclusion criteria: Healthy infants between 5 and 10 weeks of age at first study vaccination with (after the 2002 RV season) confirmed negative HIV status of the subject's mother during pregnancy or thereafter. Exclusion criteria: History of allergic disease, any confirmed or suspected immunosuppressive or immunodeficient condition, clinically significant history of chronic gastrointestinal disease or other serious medical condition as determined by the investigator or had not received treatment prohibited by the protocol.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Reactogenicity & Immunogenicity Study of Two Doses of GSK Biologicals' Oral Live Attenuated HRV Vaccine Co-administered With Either OPV or IPV in Healthy Infants (Approximately 5-10 Weeks Old) in South Africa
"The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate that co-administering HRV vaccine with OPV does not induce a significant decrease in poliovirus immune response one month after the third dose of combined vaccines.
The primary objective was reached if one month after the third dose of polio vaccine, upper limit of the 95% CI for the difference in Seroprotection rate between the group B and C pooled and (minus) the group A was below 10% for each polio serotype."
Read the detailed description
The study had three groups: Group A: HRV + OPV + DTPa/Hib; Group B: HRV + placebo OPV + DTPa-IPV/Hib; Group C: HRV Placebo + OPV + DTPa/Hib. Two cohorts: Subjects enrolled before the 2002 RV season were to receive two doses of HRV or placebo at approximately 6 and 10 weeks of age (first cohort) and subjects enrolled after the 2002 RV season received vaccinations at approximately 10 and 14 weeks of age (second cohort). Routine EPI vaccinations were to be administered concomitantly with the study vaccines.
- Conditions
- Rotavirus Infections
- Being tested
- Rotavirus (vaccine)
- Keywords
- Prophylaxis rotavirus
- Medical subject headings
- Rotavirus Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rotavirus (vaccine)Biological
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Seroprotection for each polio serotype 1 month after the 3rd dose.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Proportion of subjects with vaccine take 1 month after each dose of study vaccine, viral shedding in a subset of subjects, presence of RV in diarrheal stools, anti-rota IgA antibody seroconversion rate and serum anti-rota IgA antibody concent
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jun 2006 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2001
- Primary completionMar 2003
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Rotavirus InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 450 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00346892
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 444563/014
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 3 Feb 2006
- Last updated
- 9 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reactogenicity & Immunogenicity Study of Two Doses of GSK Biologicals' Oral Live Attenuated HRV Vaccine Co-administered With Either OPV or IPV in Healthy Infants (Approximately 5-10 Weeks Old) in South Africa
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00346892
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 444563/014
- Conditions
- Rotavirus Infections
- Keywords
- Prophylaxis rotavirus
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 450 participants
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2001
- Primary completion
- Mar 2003 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jun 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
"The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate that co-administering HRV vaccine with OPV does not induce a significant decrease in poliovirus immune response one month after the third dose of combined vaccines.
The primary objective was reached if one month after the third dose of polio vaccine, upper limit of the 95% CI for the difference in Seroprotection rate between the group B and C pooled and (minus) the group A was below 10% for each polio serotype."
Detailed description
The study had three groups: Group A: HRV + OPV + DTPa/Hib; Group B: HRV + placebo OPV + DTPa-IPV/Hib; Group C: HRV Placebo + OPV + DTPa/Hib. Two cohorts: Subjects enrolled before the 2002 RV season were to receive two doses of HRV or placebo at approximately 6 and 10 weeks of age (first cohort) and subjects enrolled after the 2002 RV season received vaccinations at approximately 10 and 14 weeks of age (second cohort). Routine EPI vaccinations were to be administered concomitantly with the study vaccines.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 10 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rotavirus (vaccine) | Biological | – |
Primary outcome
Seroprotection for each polio serotype 1 month after the 3rd dose.
1 secondary outcome
Proportion of subjects with vaccine take 1 month after each dose of study vaccine, viral shedding in a subset of subjects, presence of RV in diarrheal stools, anti-rota IgA antibody seroconversion rate and serum anti-rota IgA antibody concent
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Sep 2016.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Rotavirus Infections
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
CDC-9 Inactivated Rotavirus Vaccine (IRV) Microneedle Patch (MNP) in Healthy Adults
Rotavirus Infections
RecruitingObservational study
Risk Assessment of Community Spread of Multiple Endemic Infectious Diseases in a One Health Perspective
Dengue, Chikungunya
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
The Efficacy of Oral Rotavirus Vaccine 116E (ROTAVAC 5D) in Chilean Infants
Rotavirus Infection of Children
Recruiting
Artificial Intelligence-driven Virtual Standardized Pediatric Patients Trial
Pneumococcal Pneumonia, Rotavirus Enteritis With Hypovolemic Shock
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Recombinant Trivalent Rotavirus Subunit Vaccine in Healthy Infants and Toddlers
Rotavirus Infections, Rotavirus Gastroenteritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Rotavirus (vaccine) in people with Rotavirus Infections, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 1 site in South Africa.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Seroprotection for each polio serotype 1 month after the 3rd dose.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2016.