Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, ChronicPhase 2NCT00349349
HuMax-CD20 in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL) Patients Failing Fludarabine and Alemtuzumab
A Phase 2 study testing ofatumumab in people with Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, run by GlaxoSmithKline.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether HuMax-CD20 (ofatumumab) is effective in the treatment of patients failing both fludarabine and alemtuzumab. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- ofatumumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 223 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2006to Jun 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Tumor cell phenotype consistent with B-CLL
- Patients with active B-CLL and with an indication for treatment
- Failing at least one fludarabine-containing treatment regimen
- Failing at least one alemtuzumab-containing treatment regimen
- ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2
- Life expectancy of at least 4 months
Who cannot join
- Previous treatment with alemtuzumab within 6 weeks prior to Visit 2
- Previous autologous stem cell transplantation within 6 months prior to Visit 2
- Allogeneic stem cell transplantation
- Radioimmunotherapy
About this study
Official title: A Single-arm, International, Multi-center Trial of HuMax-CD20, a Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-CD20 Antibody, in Patients With B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Who Have Failed Fludarabine and Alemtuzumab
The purpose of this study is to determine whether HuMax-CD20 (ofatumumab) is effective in the treatment of patients failing both fludarabine and alemtuzumab.
- Conditions
- Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
- Being tested
- ofatumumab
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, B-Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ofatumumabDrug
Intravenous infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ofatumumab | Experimental | Anti-CD20 antibody therapy Receives: Drug: ofatumumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders and Non-responders for Objective Response as Assessed by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IRC) in Accordance With the National Cancer Institute Working Group (NCIWG) 1996 Guidelines
Par. with complete remission (CR), nodular partial remission (nPR), and partial remission (PR) were classified as responders, while those with stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were classified as non-responders. Per the NCIWG guideline (1996): CR; no lymphadenopathy/hepatomegaly/splenomegaly/constitutional symptoms, normal hematology, bone marrow sample as normocellular for age, <30% lymphocytes (LC), no lymphoid nodule; PR: a >=50% decrease in LC/lymphadenopathy; nPR: persistent nodules in bone marrow; PD: new lesion or increase by >=50% from baseline; SD: no CR, PR, or PD.
Measured: Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24
Secondary outcomes (22)
Duration of Response
Duration of response is defined as the time from the initial response (first visit at which response is observed) to progression or death. If the participant had progression between scheduled visits, no progression at the end of the trial, treatment discontinuation for undocumented progression, treatment discontinuation for toxicity or other reason, new anti-cancer treatment, and experienced death or progression after two or more missed visits in a row the endpoint was censored.
Measured: Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS is defined as the time from randomization until progression/death. Per the IRC, if the participant had progression between scheduled visits, died before the first assessment, or died between adequate visits, the endpoint was considered progressed. If there was no progression at the end of the trial, treatment discontinuation for undocumented progression, treatment discontinuation for toxicity/other reason, new anti-cancer treatment, and death/progression after 2 or more missed visits in a row, the endpoint was censored. Clinical progression is not considered as progression endpoint.
Measured: Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24
Time to Next Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Treatment
Time to next chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment is defined as the time from treatment allocation/randomization (Visit 2) until the time of the first administration of the next CLL treatment other than ofatumumab (or HuMaxCD20, a fully human monoclonal antibody to CD20 that is expressed on the surface of B-cells).
Measured: Time from randomization (Week 0 of Visit 2) until the time of first administration of a CLL treatment other than ofatumumab (assessed for a median of 8.7 weeks currently [or up to 13.3 months])
Overall Survival
OS is defined as the time from allocation to death. OS will also be subgrouped for responders and non-responders.
Measured: Start of randomization (Week 0 of Visit 2) until death (up to a median of 17.1 weeks)
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 7 in Peripheral CD5+CD19+ Cell Counts
The peripheral blood for each participant was collected and analyzed for CD5+CD19+ cell counts. CD is "cluster of differentiation," is a cell surface marker for immunophenotyping, and, in this case, is a surrogate for B cell malignancy (indicates malignant B cells). Percent change from Visit 2 (Week 0, Baseline) = (value at Week 7 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 7 (Visit 9)
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 7 in Peripheral CD5+CD20+ Cell Counts
The peripheral blood for each participant was collected and analyzed for CD5+CD20+ cell counts. CD is "cluster of differentiation," is a cell surface marker for immunophenotyping, and, in this case, is a surrogate for B cell malignancy (indicates malignant B cells). Percent change from Visit 2 (Week 0, Baseline) = (value at Week 7 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 7 (Visit 9)
Median Percent Change of Tumor Size (Sum of Products Dimensions [SPD]) From Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 24 (Visit 14)
Tumor size and change in tumor size will be measured by the absolute value of and the percent change in the sum of products of the diameters of the largest abnormal lymph nodes from Baseline to Week 24 (Visit 14). Percent change from Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 0) = (value at Week 24 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24 (Visit 14)
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Constitutional Symptoms at Week 24
Participants with complete resolution of constitutional symptoms were those in whom no constitutional symptoms, such as night sweats, weight loss, and fever or extreme fatigue, were observed.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 2) and Week 24
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Lymphadenopathy
Participants with complete resolution of lymphadenopathy (disease involving the lymph nodes) were defined as those in whom all observed lymph nodes were of normal size (all nodes <1 centimeters) as determined by physical examination assessed by the investigator. All palpable lymph node sizes were recorded.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 2) to end of study (up to Week 24)
Number of Participants With Improvement on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale at Week 24
ECOG performance status is a measure of the participant's ability to carry out activities of daily living on 6-point scale (0=fully active, 1=restricted in physically activity, ambulatory, 2=ambulatory [>50% of waking hours], 3=capable of only limited self care, 4=completely disabled, 5=Dead). Improvement in ECOG performance status is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one score on the ECOG scale.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 2) and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Were Positive, Negative, or Had Missing Data for the Indicated Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Prognostic Factors at Screening
The number of participants (par.) who were positive, negative, or had missing data for the following prognostic factors indicative of altered responsiveness to treatment and/or survival was measured: 17p-, 11q-, +12q, 6q-, 13q-. Par. were assessed by FISH for these chromosomal abnormalities known tobe prognostic for time to treatment and survival when detected at diagnosis. Par. were categorized by the chromosomal abnormality detected: 17 p deletion, 11q deletion (but not 17 p deletion), 12 q trisomy (but not 17 p or 111q deletion), 13q deletion only, and no chromosomal abnormalities found.
Measured: Screening (Visit 1, <=14 days prior to Visit 2)
Number of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin
The number of participants (par.) who had improvement in hemoglobin levels >=11 grams (g)/deciliter (dl) (6.8 millimoles/liter) or 50% improvement over baseline was measured.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28
Number of Participants With Improvement in Thrombocytopenia (Thromb.)
Improvement in thromb. is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 by >=1 National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI CTC) grade. Thromb. is defined as low platelet counts resulting from refractory CLL, damage from prior treatment, advanced age, or reduced bone marrow function and can be considered as an adverse condition. Adverse events (AEs) such as thromb. in a cancer indication are graded on a scale determined by the NCI called the NCI CTC: lowest, grade 1; highest, grade 5 (death). Changes in this grading can assess improvements or declines in the severity of the AE.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Hepatomegaly
Participants with complete resolution of enlarged liver (hepatomegaly) were defined as those with an enlarged palpable liver at baseline followed by the absence of hepatomegaly post- baseline (i.e., the liver was of normal size). Liver size was assessed by physical examination and documented as "centimeters" under the costal margin with relative changes in spleen size in 1 dimension calculated based on palpated numeric measurements (as per the 1996 NCIWG guidelines).
Measured: Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24
Number of Participants With Improvement in Neutropenia
Low levels of neutrophils (neutropenia) may increase the risk of developing serious infections and may be considered an adverse condition and evaluated on the NCI CTC with a grade. Improvement in neutropenia is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 (baseline) by at least one NCI CTC grade. Improvement is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 by at least one NCI CTC grade.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Splenomegaly
Participants with complete resolution of enlarged spleen (splenomegaly) were defined as those with an enlarged palpable spleen at baseline followed by the absence of splenomegaly post-baseline (i.e., the spleen was of normal size). Spleen size was assessed by physical examination and documented as "centimeters" under the costal margin with relative changes in spleen size in 1 dimension calculated based on palpated numeric measurements (as per the 1996 NCIWG guidelines).
Measured: Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24
Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A list of AEs experienced in the study with a frequency threshold of 5% can be found in the AE section of this results record.
Measured: From first infusion (Visit 2/Week 0) to Visit 21 (Month 24 of follow-up [up to Month 48]) or time of withdrawal (treatment and follow-up)
Cmax and Ctrough at Dose 1 (Visit 2, Week 0), Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7), and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Cmax is defined as the maximum concentration of drug in serum samples. Ctrough is defined as the trough serum concentration (measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval [taken directly before the next administration]). No drug was present before the first infusion; therefore, there are no Ctrough results for Dose 1
Measured: Visit 2 (Week 0), Visit 9 (Week 7), and Visit 14 (Week 24)
AUC (0-inf) and AUC(0-tau) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
AUC is defined as the area under the ofatumumab concentration-time curve as a measure of drug exposure. AUC(0-inf) is AUC from the start of infusion extrapolated to infinity. AUC(0-tau) is AUC from the start of infusion over the dosing interval.
Measured: Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24)
Half-life (t1/2) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and at Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Half-life ( t1/2) is defined as the terminal half-life and is the time required for the amount of drug in the body to decrease by half.
Measured: Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit14 (Week 24)
Clearance (CL) After Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
CL is the clearance of drug from serum, which is defined as the volume of serum from which the drug is cleared per unit time.
Measured: Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24)
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and at Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Vss is defined as the volume of distribution at steady state of ofatumumab.
Measured: Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jul 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2006
- Primary completionMay 2008
- Study completionJun 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 223 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00349349
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 111773
- Other IDs
- Hx-CD20-406
- Status last verified
- Jun 2013
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2006
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Wierda WG, Padmanabhan S, Chan GW, Gupta IV, Lisby S, Osterborg A; Hx-CD20-406 Study Investigators. Ofatumumab is active in patients with fludarabine-refractory CLL irrespective of prior rituximab: results from the phase 2 international study. Blood. 2011 Nov 10;118(19):5126-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-348656. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
PubMed 21856867Wierda WG, Kipps TJ, Mayer J, Stilgenbauer S, Williams CD, Hellmann A, Robak T, Furman RR, Hillmen P, Trneny M, Dyer MJ, Padmanabhan S, Piotrowska M, Kozak T, Chan G, Davis R, Losic N, Wilms J, Russell CA, Osterborg A; Hx-CD20-406 Study Investigators. Ofatumumab as single-agent CD20 immunotherapy in fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1749-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3187. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
PubMed 20194866Struemper H, Sale M, Patel BR, Ostergaard M, Osterborg A, Wierda WG, Hagenbeek A, Coiffier B, Jewell RC. Population pharmacokinetics of ofatumumab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, follicular lymphoma, and rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jul;54(7):818-27. doi: 10.1002/jcph.268. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
PubMed 24443277
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single-arm, International, Multi-center Trial of HuMax-CD20, a Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-CD20 Antibody, in Patients With B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Who Have Failed Fludarabine and Alemtuzumab
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00349349
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 111773
- Conditions
- Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 223 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2006
- Primary completion
- May 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jul 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Nov 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether HuMax-CD20 (ofatumumab) is effective in the treatment of patients failing both fludarabine and alemtuzumab.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ofatumumab | Experimental | Drug: ofatumumabAnti-CD20 antibody therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Tumor cell phenotype consistent with B-CLL
- Patients with active B-CLL and with an indication for treatment
- Failing at least one fludarabine-containing treatment regimen
- Failing at least one alemtuzumab-containing treatment regimen
- ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Previous treatment with alemtuzumab within 6 weeks prior to Visit 2
- Previous autologous stem cell transplantation within 6 months prior to Visit 2
- Allogeneic stem cell transplantation
- Radioimmunotherapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ofatumumabIntravenous infusion | Drug | ofatumumab |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders and Non-responders for Objective Response as Assessed by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IRC) in Accordance With the National Cancer Institute Working Group (NCIWG) 1996 Guidelines
Time frame: Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24
Par. with complete remission (CR), nodular partial remission (nPR), and partial remission (PR) were classified as responders, while those with stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were classified as non-responders. Per the NCIWG guideline (1996): CR; no lymphadenopathy/hepatomegaly/splenomegaly/constitutional symptoms, normal hematology, bone marrow sample as normocellular for age, <30% lymphocytes (LC), no lymphoid nodule; PR: a >=50% decrease in LC/lymphadenopathy; nPR: persistent nodules in bone marrow; PD: new lesion or increase by >=50% from baseline; SD: no CR, PR, or PD.
22 secondary outcomes
Duration of Response
Time frame: Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24
Time to Next Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Treatment
Time frame: Time from randomization (Week 0 of Visit 2) until the time of first administration of a CLL treatment other than ofatumumab (assessed for a median of 8.7 weeks currently [or up to 13.3 months])
Overall Survival
Time frame: Start of randomization (Week 0 of Visit 2) until death (up to a median of 17.1 weeks)
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 7 in Peripheral CD5+CD19+ Cell Counts
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 7 (Visit 9)
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 7 in Peripheral CD5+CD20+ Cell Counts
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 7 (Visit 9)
Median Percent Change of Tumor Size (Sum of Products Dimensions [SPD]) From Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 24 (Visit 14)
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24 (Visit 14)
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Constitutional Symptoms at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) and Week 24
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Lymphadenopathy
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) to end of study (up to Week 24)
Number of Participants With Improvement on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Were Positive, Negative, or Had Missing Data for the Indicated Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Prognostic Factors at Screening
Time frame: Screening (Visit 1, <=14 days prior to Visit 2)
Number of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28
Number of Participants With Improvement in Thrombocytopenia (Thromb.)
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Hepatomegaly
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24
Number of Participants With Improvement in Neutropenia
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Splenomegaly
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24
Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event
Time frame: From first infusion (Visit 2/Week 0) to Visit 21 (Month 24 of follow-up [up to Month 48]) or time of withdrawal (treatment and follow-up)
Cmax and Ctrough at Dose 1 (Visit 2, Week 0), Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7), and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Time frame: Visit 2 (Week 0), Visit 9 (Week 7), and Visit 14 (Week 24)
AUC (0-inf) and AUC(0-tau) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Time frame: Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24)
Half-life (t1/2) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and at Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Time frame: Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit14 (Week 24)
Clearance (CL) After Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Time frame: Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24)
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and at Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Time frame: Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 21856867Wierda WG, Padmanabhan S, Chan GW, Gupta IV, Lisby S, Osterborg A; Hx-CD20-406 Study Investigators. Ofatumumab is active in patients with fludarabine-refractory CLL irrespective of prior rituximab: results from the phase 2 international study. Blood. 2011 Nov 10;118(19):5126-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-348656. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
- Results publication: PubMed 20194866Wierda WG, Kipps TJ, Mayer J, Stilgenbauer S, Williams CD, Hellmann A, Robak T, Furman RR, Hillmen P, Trneny M, Dyer MJ, Padmanabhan S, Piotrowska M, Kozak T, Chan G, Davis R, Losic N, Wilms J, Russell CA, Osterborg A; Hx-CD20-406 Study Investigators. Ofatumumab as single-agent CD20 immunotherapy in fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1749-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3187. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24443277Struemper H, Sale M, Patel BR, Ostergaard M, Osterborg A, Wierda WG, Hagenbeek A, Coiffier B, Jewell RC. Population pharmacokinetics of ofatumumab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, follicular lymphoma, and rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jul;54(7):818-27. doi: 10.1002/jcph.268. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
Related trials for Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Nemtabrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (SLL) Refractory to Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor or Pirtobrutinib and Previously Treated With a BCL2 Inhibitor
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Study of Monoclonal B Cell Lymphocytosis (MBL), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL), Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma (LPL)/Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM), and Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma (SMZL)
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia, Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Nemtabrutinib Plus Venetoclax vs Venetoclax + Rituximab (VR) in Second-line (2L) + Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL) (MK-1026-010/BELLWAVE-010).
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing ofatumumab in people with Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, run by GlaxoSmithKline.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Nov 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders and Non-responders for Objective Response as Assessed by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IRC) in Accordance With the National Cancer Institute Working Group (NCIWG) 1996 Guidelines (time frame: Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00349349, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2014.