Heart FailureREDUCEhfNCT00354159
Reducing Decompensation Events Utilizing Intracardiac Pressures in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (HF) (REDUCEhf)
A study testing Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD) in people with Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 52 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this clinical research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the investigational implantable hemodynamic monitor (IHM), and of the IHM in combination with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 442 participants
- Where
- 52 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2006to Jan 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects with heart failure that only sometimes interferes with daily activities (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class II (1)) or subjects with heart failure which severely limits daily activities (NYHA Class III (2)) at baseline
- Subject has appropriate medical therapy for heart failure (such as diuretic, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and beta blocker) for at least three months prior to the baseline evaluation.
- Subject has been on stable medications maximized to the subject's tolerance of ACE or ARB and beta blockers as determined by the study investigator for at least 30 days prior to baseline evaluation. (Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or a 50% decrease in dose.) If a subject is intolerant of ACE, ARB or beta blockers documented evidence must be available.
- Subject has had at least one heart failure-related hospitalization or at least one heart failure-related emergency department or urgent care visit necessitating heart failure-related intravenous therapy (e.g. diuretic administration) within 12 months prior to the baseline evaluation
- To be considered for Chronicle ICD: Subject has, or is at risk of having, a heart beat that is too fast and his/her doctor has determined he/she needs an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).
- Class II Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or angina.
- Class III Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or angina.
Who cannot join
- Subjects with severe heart failure who should always be resting (NYHA Class IV(3)) or Stage D(4) refractory heart failure.
- Subjects with severe renal dysfunction.
- Subjects with severe non-cardiac condition limiting 12-month survival.
- Subjects in concurrent studies that may confound the results.
- (3)Class IV Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure or the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
- (4)Stage D refractory heart failure: Patients who have marked symptoms at rest despite maximal medical therapy (e.g., those who are recurrently hospitalized or cannot be safely discharged from the hospital without specialized interventions)
Trial locations and contacts
52 sites in 1 country.
52 sites in 1 country
United States52 sites
Lehigh Valley Heart Specialists
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103
St Joseph Mercy Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Crawford Long/Emory University Hospitals
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Brigham & Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Lahey Clinic Medical Center
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805
Fletcher Allen Health Care
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
Presbyterian Hospital Mid Carolinas Cardiology
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
The Christ Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Mercy Hospital Metropolitan Cardiology Consultants
Coon Rapids, Minnesota, 55433
Baylor Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75226
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Genesis Hospital Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation
Davenport, Iowa, 52803
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Inova Fairfax Hospital
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042
University of FL Shands
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
Mid America Heart Institute/St. Lukes
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Scripps Green Hospital
La Jolla, California, 92037
Lancaster Heart & Stroke Foundation
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17603
Bryan LGH Heart Institute
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68506
Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, 92354
Midwest Heart Foundation
Lombard, Illinois, 60148
Long Beach Memorial
Long Beach, California, 90806
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Doctors Medical Center Modesto
Modesto, California, 95350
Morristown Memorial Hospital
Morristown, New Jersey, 07962
Baptist Hospital
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
St Thomas
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
Yale University, School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Mt Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
Christiana Care Hospital
Newark, Delaware, 19718
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
University of Oklahoma
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Oklahoma Heart Hospital
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120
Drexel University College of Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Spartanburg Regional
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
North Mississippi Medical Center
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
Iowa Heart Center
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266
Forsyth Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
Lankenau Hospital
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
About this study
Official title: Reducing Decompensation Events Utilizing Intracardiac Pressures in Patients With Chronic HF (REDUCEhf)
The purpose of this clinical research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the investigational implantable hemodynamic monitor (IHM), and of the IHM in combination with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The investigational IHM has the ability to record and report the force with which the heart pumps blood (heart pressures). When combined with the ICD, the device has the additional ability to send a strong electrical impulse, or shock, to the heart when it detects dangerously fast heartbeats to return it to a normal rhythm. The IHM and IHM/ICD are implanted surgically just under the skin in the upper chest area. This study will also determine how doctors use the information related to heart pressures in the management of heart failure.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD)
- Keywords
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Intracardiac pressures
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD)Device
Also called Chronicle® IHM, Chronicle® ICD
Surgical implantation of hemodynamic device (IHM), or IHM/ICD, and intracardiac leads.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Arm | Experimental | Physicians have access to device-based hemodynamic monitor information to guide patient management Receives: Device: Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD) |
| Control Arm | Placebo comparator | Physicians do not have access to device-based hemodynamic monitor information to guide patient management Receives: Device: Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent of Subjects With an Attempted Implant of the Chronicle ICD System Free From System-related Chronicle ICD Complications at 6-months Post-implant.
A Chronicle ICD system-related complication was defined as any system-related adverse event that occurred during the clinical investigation which is (1) treated with invasive means (including intravenous drug therapy), (2) results in death or serious injury of subject, (3) results in the explant of any Chronicle ICD component,and/or (4) causes permanent loss of significant function of the implanted system.
Measured: Within 6 months post-implant
Percent of Subjects With an Attempted Chronicle IHM Implant Free From Chronicle IHM System-related Complications at 6-months Post-implant
A Chronicle IHM system-related complication was defined as any system-related adverse event that occurred during the clinical investigation which is (1) treated with invasive means (including intravenous drug therapy), (2) results in death or serious injury of subject, (3) results in the explant of any Chronicle IHM component,and/or (4) causes permanent loss of significant function of the implanted system.
Measured: 6 months post implant
Relative Risk Reduction of All Heart Failure Related Events in the Treatment Group Compared to the Control Group
The rate of HF-related events (hospitalizations >24h, hospitalizations <24h with IV therapy, ED visits with IV therapy, and urgent clinic visits with IV therapy) during the 12-month randomized follow-up period was compared between the Chronicle and Control groups.
Measured: 12 months post-implant
Secondary outcomes (18)
Cumulative Days in the Hospital for Heart Failure
The endpoint for this objective was defined as the cumulative days in hospital for heart failure (HF) expressed as a percentage of hospital free follow-up days during the 12-month randomized period. The relatedness of the events was based on the primary reason for which the subject was originally admitted to the hospital or seen in the emergency department or at an urgent visit, not on the development of new events that occur during hospitalization.
Measured: 12 months post-implant
Relative Risk Reduction of Cardiovascular Related Events in the Treatment Group Compared to the Control Group
The rate of CV-related events (hospitalizations >24h, hospitalizations <24h with IV therapy, ED visits with IV therapy, and urgent clinic visits with IV therapy) during the 12-month randomized follow-up period was compared between the Chronicle and Control groups.
Measured: 12 months post-implant
Freedom From All Cause Death or Heart Failure Hospitalization
Death from any cause or heart failure related hospitalization greater than 24 hours during the 12-month randomized period
Measured: 12 months post-implant
Relative Risk of All-cause Events
All-cause events were defined as hospitalizations, hospitalizations <24 hours necessitating intravenous therapy, emergency department visits necessitating intravenous therapy or urgent visits necessitating intravenous therapy.
Measured: 12 months post-implant
Percentage of Randomized Subjects at Each Level of the Composite Response Endpoint Between the Treatment Arm and the Control Arm.
The definitions of worsened, improved, and unchanged are as follows:
Worsened: Subject dies, is hospitalized for worsening heart failure, permanently discontinues blinded randomized assignment and has worsening heart failure at time of study discontinuation, demonstrates worsening NYHA Class at LOCF, or moderate-marked worsening of global assessment score at LOCF.
Improved: Subject has not worsened, and demonstrates improvement in NYHA class and/or moderate-marked improvement in subject global assessment score.
Unchanged: Subject is neither worsened nor improved.
Measured: 12 months post implant
Characterize Health Resource Utilization
Percentage of randomized days spent in the intensive care unit for heart failure. Reason for hospitalization was determined by the adverse event adjudication committee.
Measured: 12 months post implant
Characterize Randomized Days Alive Out of Hospital
Randomized days alive outside of the hospital was computed for each subject as the total number of randomized days minus the number of randomized days spent in the hospital for any cause.
Measured: 12 months post implant
Characterize Subject Survival
Death from any cause during the 12-month randomization period
Measured: 12 months post implant
Characterize Medication Usage
The rate of change of cardiovascular medications in changes per subject month were computed and compared between treatment groups.
Measured: 12 months post implant
Characterize Intracardiac Pressure
The average daily median estimated pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure (ePAD) was computed for each subject with at least 90 days of ePAD data available and compared between the Treatment and Control arms.
Measured: 12 months post implant
Characterize Intracardiac Pressure Changes in Response to Subject Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure Events
The average daily median estimated pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure (ePAD) was computed for each subject with at least 90 days of ePAD data available and compared between the Control Arm subjects with and without a heart failure related event during the 12-month randomized period.
Measured: 12 months post implant
Characterize NYHA Functional Class
The outcome is the change in NYHA functional class between the baseline visit and the 12-month follow-up visit. At baseline subjects were required to be NYHA functional class II or III. The outcome will show the percentage of subjects that were functional class II and III at baseline and functional class I, II, III, or IV at the 12-month visit. The percent improvement from baseline is calculated as the percentage of subjects with a lower NYHA functional class at the 12-month visit compared to their NHYA functional class at baseline.
Measured: baseline to 12 months post implant
Characterize Distance Walked in Six Minutes
The outcome is the change in distance walked in 6-minutes in meters between the baseline visit and the 12-month follow-up visit. The change in distance walked was calculated within each subject as the distance walked in 6-minutes at the 12-month visit minus the distance walked in 6-minutes at the baseline visit. Positive values indicate an increase in the distance walked in 6-minutes from baseline.
Measured: baseline to 12 months post implant
Characterize Renal Function at the Baseline and 12-month Visit
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline to the 12-month follow-up visit. eGFR was estimated using the MDRD forumula from the National Kidney Foundation (American Journal of Kidney Diseases 39: S1-299). Change in eGFR was computed as the 12-month eGFR value minus the baseline eGFR value. Positive values indicate an increase in eGFR from baseline and negative values indicate a decrease in eGFR from baseline.
Measured: baseline to 12 months post implant
Characterize Intracardiac Pressure Monitoring Following Defibrillation Testing (Chronicle ICD Subjects Only)
Intracardiac pressure monitoring was deemed successful following defibrillation testing if physiological pressure waveforms were present following defibrillation testing.
Measured: implant
Characterize Defibrillation Threshold Testing Efficacy (Chronicle ICD Subjects Only)
The outcome measure is the percentage of subjects implanted with the Chronicle ICD who completed defibrillation testing and had a 10 Joule safety margin
Measured: Implant
Characterize Quality of Life at Baseline and 12-month Visit
The outcome is the change in the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure® (MNLWHF) questionnaire response from baseline to the 12-month follow-up visit. The MNLWHF questionnaire is a 21 question questionnaire scored from zero (no impact of heart failure) to 5 (severe impact of heart failure). The composite MNLWHF score ranges from 0 (no impact of heart failure) to 105 (severe impact of heart failure). Change in MNLWHF score was computed as the 12-month minus the baseline score.
Measured: baseline to 12 months post implant
Characterize Arrhythmic Events
The rate of spontaneous VT (ventricular tachycardia)/VF (ventricular fibrillation) episodes during the 12-month follow-up period in episodes per subject month was compared between the Treatment Arm and the Control Arm
Measured: 12 months post implant
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2006 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2006
- Primary completionJan 2011
- Study completionJan 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 442 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Phillip Adamson, MD, Study chair, Oklahoma Heart HospitalMichael Gold, MD, Study chair, Medical University of South Carolina
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00354159
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 103
- Acronym
- REDUCEhf
- Status last verified
- Aug 2012
- First submitted
- 19 Jul 2006
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Reiter MJ, Stromberg KD, Whitman TA, Adamson PB, Benditt DG, Gold MR. Influence of intracardiac pressure on spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias in patients with systolic heart failure: insights from the REDUCEhf trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr;6(2):272-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000223. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
PubMed 23515265Adamson PB, Conti JB, Smith AL, Abraham WT, Aaron MF, Aranda JM Jr, Baker J, Bourge RC, Warner-Stevenson L, Sparks B. Reducing events in patients with chronic heart failure (REDUCEhf ) study design: continuous hemodynamic monitoring with an implantable defibrillator. Clin Cardiol. 2007 Nov;30(11):567-75. doi: 10.1002/clc.20250.
PubMed 18000962
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reducing Decompensation Events Utilizing Intracardiac Pressures in Patients With Chronic HF (REDUCEhf)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00354159
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REDUCEhf / 103
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Keywords
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Intracardiac pressures
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 442 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2006
- Primary completion
- Jan 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Aug 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this clinical research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the investigational implantable hemodynamic monitor (IHM), and of the IHM in combination with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The investigational IHM has the ability to record and report the force with which the heart pumps blood (heart pressures). When combined with the ICD, the device has the additional ability to send a strong electrical impulse, or shock, to the heart when it detects dangerously fast heartbeats to return it to a normal rhythm. The IHM and IHM/ICD are implanted surgically just under the skin in the upper chest area. This study will also determine how doctors use the information related to heart pressures in the management of heart failure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Arm | Experimental | Device: Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD)Physicians have access to device-based hemodynamic monitor information to guide patient management |
| Control Arm | Placebo comparator | Device: Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD)Physicians do not have access to device-based hemodynamic monitor information to guide patient management |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subjects with heart failure that only sometimes interferes with daily activities (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class II (1)) or subjects with heart failure which severely limits daily activities (NYHA Class III (2)) at baseline
- Subject has appropriate medical therapy for heart failure (such as diuretic, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and beta blocker) for at least three months prior to the baseline evaluation.
- Subject has been on stable medications maximized to the subject's tolerance of ACE or ARB and beta blockers as determined by the study investigator for at least 30 days prior to baseline evaluation. (Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or a 50% decrease in dose.) If a subject is intolerant of ACE, ARB or beta blockers documented evidence must be available.
- Subject has had at least one heart failure-related hospitalization or at least one heart failure-related emergency department or urgent care visit necessitating heart failure-related intravenous therapy (e.g. diuretic administration) within 12 months prior to the baseline evaluation
- To be considered for Chronicle ICD: Subject has, or is at risk of having, a heart beat that is too fast and his/her doctor has determined he/she needs an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subjects with severe heart failure who should always be resting (NYHA Class IV(3)) or Stage D(4) refractory heart failure.
- Subjects with severe renal dysfunction.
- Subjects with severe non-cardiac condition limiting 12-month survival.
- Subjects in concurrent studies that may confound the results.
- (3)Class IV Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure or the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD)Also: Chronicle® IHM, Chronicle® ICDSurgical implantation of hemodynamic device (IHM), or IHM/ICD, and intracardiac leads. | Device | Control Arm, Treatment Arm |
Primary outcome
Percent of Subjects With an Attempted Implant of the Chronicle ICD System Free From System-related Chronicle ICD Complications at 6-months Post-implant.
Time frame: Within 6 months post-implant
A Chronicle ICD system-related complication was defined as any system-related adverse event that occurred during the clinical investigation which is (1) treated with invasive means (including intravenous drug therapy), (2) results in death or serious injury of subject, (3) results in the explant of any Chronicle ICD component,and/or (4) causes permanent loss of significant function of the implanted system.
Percent of Subjects With an Attempted Chronicle IHM Implant Free From Chronicle IHM System-related Complications at 6-months Post-implant
Time frame: 6 months post implant
A Chronicle IHM system-related complication was defined as any system-related adverse event that occurred during the clinical investigation which is (1) treated with invasive means (including intravenous drug therapy), (2) results in death or serious injury of subject, (3) results in the explant of any Chronicle IHM component,and/or (4) causes permanent loss of significant function of the implanted system.
Relative Risk Reduction of All Heart Failure Related Events in the Treatment Group Compared to the Control Group
Time frame: 12 months post-implant
The rate of HF-related events (hospitalizations >24h, hospitalizations <24h with IV therapy, ED visits with IV therapy, and urgent clinic visits with IV therapy) during the 12-month randomized follow-up period was compared between the Chronicle and Control groups.
18 secondary outcomes
Cumulative Days in the Hospital for Heart Failure
Time frame: 12 months post-implant
Relative Risk Reduction of Cardiovascular Related Events in the Treatment Group Compared to the Control Group
Time frame: 12 months post-implant
Freedom From All Cause Death or Heart Failure Hospitalization
Time frame: 12 months post-implant
Relative Risk of All-cause Events
Time frame: 12 months post-implant
Percentage of Randomized Subjects at Each Level of the Composite Response Endpoint Between the Treatment Arm and the Control Arm.
Time frame: 12 months post implant
Characterize Health Resource Utilization
Time frame: 12 months post implant
Characterize Randomized Days Alive Out of Hospital
Time frame: 12 months post implant
Characterize Subject Survival
Time frame: 12 months post implant
Characterize Medication Usage
Time frame: 12 months post implant
Characterize Intracardiac Pressure
Time frame: 12 months post implant
Characterize Intracardiac Pressure Changes in Response to Subject Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure Events
Time frame: 12 months post implant
Characterize NYHA Functional Class
Time frame: baseline to 12 months post implant
Characterize Distance Walked in Six Minutes
Time frame: baseline to 12 months post implant
Characterize Renal Function at the Baseline and 12-month Visit
Time frame: baseline to 12 months post implant
Characterize Intracardiac Pressure Monitoring Following Defibrillation Testing (Chronicle ICD Subjects Only)
Time frame: implant
Characterize Defibrillation Threshold Testing Efficacy (Chronicle ICD Subjects Only)
Time frame: Implant
Characterize Quality of Life at Baseline and 12-month Visit
Time frame: baseline to 12 months post implant
Characterize Arrhythmic Events
Time frame: 12 months post implant
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23515265Reiter MJ, Stromberg KD, Whitman TA, Adamson PB, Benditt DG, Gold MR. Influence of intracardiac pressure on spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias in patients with systolic heart failure: insights from the REDUCEhf trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr;6(2):272-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000223. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18000962Adamson PB, Conti JB, Smith AL, Abraham WT, Aaron MF, Aranda JM Jr, Baker J, Bourge RC, Warner-Stevenson L, Sparks B. Reducing events in patients with chronic heart failure (REDUCEhf ) study design: continuous hemodynamic monitoring with an implantable defibrillator. Clin Cardiol. 2007 Nov;30(11):567-75. doi: 10.1002/clc.20250.
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Bimagrumab in Participants With HFpEF
Heart Failure, Diastolic, Diastolic Heart Failure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a French Hospital Discharge Therapeutic Education Program by Nurses for Heart Failure Patient (EduSor)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruiting
RELIEVE-HFrEF TRIAL: REducing Lung congestIon Symptoms Using the v-wavE Shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure With Reduced EF
Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Phillip Adamson, MD study chair
Oklahoma Heart Hospital
Michael Gold, MD study chair
Medical University of South Carolina
52 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor (Chronicle® IHM), and IHM in combination with single chamber ICD (Chronicle ICD) in people with Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 52 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 52 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Aug 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent of Subjects With an Attempted Implant of the Chronicle ICD System Free From System-related Chronicle ICD Complications at 6-months Post-implant. (time frame: Within 6 months post-implant). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00354159, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2012.