AzTrials
AzTrials

Telangiectasia, Hereditary HemorrhagicPhase 3NCT00355108

ATERO : A Randomised Study With Tranexamic Acid in Epistaxis of Rendu Osler Syndrome

A Phase 3 study testing tranexamic acid in people with Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic and Osler-Rendu Disease, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Scientific Objectives Primary objective : Demonstrate that oral intake of tranexamic acid significantly reduces the risk of epistaxis occurrence, estimated by the average monthly duration of episodes of epistaxis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
What is being tested?
tranexamic acid
How many people
170 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Sep 2006to May 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Repeated, spontaneous epistaxis in a known Rendu Osler patient who wants global caring, these must be daily epistaxis (> 28 a month) or a total amount of 60 minutes of bleeding a month (50 % Rendu-Osler patients bleed before 20 and 99 % at 50 when penetrance is complete).
  • Good completion of the grid of control by recording the number and duration of epistaxis over a period of three month.

Who cannot join

  • Rendu Osler syndrome with specific phenotype : absence of epistaxis or occasional epistaxis, no need for particular care.
  • Maintained expectations of an ENT treatment of epistaxis in a delay of three months.
  • Incapacity of detailing the number of epistaxis, especially, at least, within three months before entering the study.
  • No informed consent obtained after informing the patient on his participation to the study.
  • Expected lack of observance because of an incapacity to compel to the daily treatment.
  • Formal indication to Tranexamic Acid (angioneurotic oedema as a disease modifying treatment of 3 to 4 g/ day).
  • Contra-indications to Tranexamic acid: history of convulsion, arterial or veinous thrombosis, , positivity of veinous echo doppler of the inferior limbs; Serum creatinine > 250 µmol/l.
  • N.B. Cases of bad observance are not frequent, patients being highly concerned with a treatment to reduce their discomfort and anaemia. They are more likely ready to move to a centre insuring this handling. Nevertheless, lack of observance will be detected over a period of 15 days of placebo in simple blind, before randomization.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Henri PLAUCHU

    Lyon, 69002

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: ATERO : A Randomised Study With Tranexamic Acid in Epistaxis of Rendu Osler Syndrome. Beneficial or Iatrogenic Effects.

Scientific Objectives Primary objective : Demonstrate that oral intake of tranexamic acid significantly reduces the risk of epistaxis occurrence, estimated by the average monthly duration of episodes of epistaxis.

Secondary objectives :

Read more
  • Document the benefit of tranexamic acid on the amount of haemoglobine and quality of life of patients.
  • Identify scalable and genetic factors of response to the treatment by tranexamic acid.
  • Describe compliance and tolerance of the treatment. Method Experimental Design We suggest the realisation of a randomised comparative clinical trial versus placebo, with a crossover of random alternated periods of three months over a total of six months.

Study Population 213 affected patients, displaying sufficiently invalidating epistaxis to require a basal treatment, will be recruited and followed every 3 months. Recruitment will lean on teams who are part of the national French network in close collaboration with the reference centre for the Rendu-Osler disorder, appointed to Lyon on the 19th of November 2004. Follow up of the study will be carried out by the Clinical Investigational Centre of the related towns.

Outcome measures The main criterion of efficacy is the average duration of epistaxis, the secondary criterion of efficacy is the average number of epistaxis measured per month. Tolerance will be analysed according to the occurrence of venal or arterial thrombosis and allergic accidents. Venal thrombosis will systematically be sought by an inferior limbs echodoppler. Response markers will be sought through modelisation incorporating environmental, phenotypic and genetic factors.

Read the detailed description

Argumentation Rendu-Osler syndrome, rare but ubiquitary, affects at least 8000 persons in France. This genetic disorder is characterised by a dominant autosomal hereditary transmission of telangiectasis and arteriovenous fistulae. The most apparent expression of the disorder, often the cause of chronic anaemia, is the occurrence of spontaneous, repeated, frequent and sometimes abundant epistaxis to the extent that continuous martial treatment and multiple transfusions are necessary. The handling of this major symptom of the disorder is badly coded and often demands local ENT treatments or medication whose efficacy is not sufficiently documented. Among them, an anti-fibrinolytic, tranexamic acid, has been evaluated several times with a low level of proof, so that it is regularly prescribed with a good impression of efficacy for certain patients. It therefore seems essential that these prescriptions should be based on more reliable data thereby providing clearer information to patients regarding the expected benefits. The recent report of a high frequency of thrombophlebitis in RO patients and the ancient concept of coagulation disorders or thrombosis (Bick 1981) have lead to a restriction of the inclusion criteria and a systematic search for a possible iatrogenic effect (inferior limbs venous echodoppler).

Scientific Objectives Primary objective : Demonstrate that oral intake of tranexamic acid significantly reduces the risk of epistaxis occurrence, estimated by the average monthly duration of episodes of epistaxis.

Secondary objectives :

  • Document the benefit of tranexamic acid on the amount of haemoglobine and quality of life of patients.
  • Identify scalable and genetic factors of response to the treatment by tranexamic acid.
  • Describe compliance and tolerance of the treatment. Method Experimental Design We suggest the realisation of a randomised comparative clinical trial versus placebo, with a crossover of random alternated periods of three months over a total of six months.

Study Population 213 affected patients, displaying sufficiently invalidating epistaxis to require a basal treatment, will be recruited and followed every 3 months. Recruitment will lean on teams who are part of the national French network in close collaboration with the reference centre for the Rendu-Osler disorder, appointed to Lyon on the 19th of November 2004. Follow up of the study will be carried out by the Clinical Investigational Centre of the related towns.

Outcome measures The main criterion of efficacy is the average duration of epistaxis, the secondary criterion of efficacy is the average number of epistaxis measured per month. Tolerance will be analysed according to the occurrence of venal or arterial thrombosis and allergic accidents. Venal thrombosis will systematically be sought by an inferior limbs echodoppler. Response markers will be sought through modelisation incorporating environmental, phenotypic and genetic factors.

Expected benefits From an individual point of view, the knowledge of the response to tranexamic acid measured the most precisely possible, represents a benefit for each study participant, who will be able to continue the treatment knowingly if it proves efficient. From a general point of view, the ATERO study will aid in the decision whether to continue this course of action which despite its lack of proof is justified by its efficacy as well as its cost and absence of adverse effects. The precise documentation of its innocuousness may be necessary by the means of a specific study depending on the results on the ATERO study.

Being tested
tranexamic acid
Keywords
Rendu Osler syndrome, Epistaxis, Tranexamic acid, clinical trial
Medical subject headings
Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic, Epistaxis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tranexamic acidDrug

    2 3-month-periods in cross-over: placebo or 3g/day of tranexamic acid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary efficacy criterion is the average monthly duration of epistaxis.

    Measured: after first 3 month period treatment or placebo and after second 3 month period treatment or placebo

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. the average monthly number of epistaxis,

    Measured: after first 3 month period treatment or placebo and after second 3 month period treatment or placebo

  2. the average duration of one episode of epistaxis measured over a month,

    Measured: after first 3 month period treatment or placebo and after second 3 month period treatment or placebo

  3. the Haemoglobin level

    Measured: after first 3 month period treatment or placebo and after second 3 month period treatment or placebo

  4. estimation of Quality of life.

    Measured: over first 3 month period treatment or placebo and over second 3 month period treatment or placebo

  5. Outcome of following Adverse Event: arterial or veinous thrombosis, allergic accident

    Measured: during first 3 month period treatment or placebo and over second 3 month period treatment or placebo

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jul 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2006
  3. Primary completionMay 2010
  4. Study completionMay 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
170 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00355108
Sponsor's protocol ID
2005.405
Status last verified
Dec 2010
First submitted
20 Jul 2006
Last updated
28 May 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Gaillard S, Dupuis-Girod S, Boutitie F, Riviere S, Moriniere S, Hatron PY, Manfredi G, Kaminsky P, Capitaine AL, Roy P, Gueyffier F, Plauchu H; ATERO Study Group. Tranexamic acid for epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia patients: a European cross-over controlled trial in a rare disease. J Thromb Haemost. 2014 Sep;12(9):1494-502. doi: 10.1111/jth.12654. Epub 2014 Jul 29.

    PubMed 25040799

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing tranexamic acid in people with Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic and Osler-Rendu Disease, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary efficacy criterion is the average monthly duration of epistaxis. (time frame: after first 3 month period treatment or placebo and after second 3 month period treatment or placebo). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00355108, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in