AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT00355836

Recovery of Hand Function Through Mental Practice.

A study testing Mental Imagery in people with Stroke, run by University of Aberdeen at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the therapeutic benefits of motor imagery training in stroke patients with persistent motor weakness. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
Mental Imagery
How many people
135 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Nov 2004to Feb 2007
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Confirmed diagnosis of stroke in the last 1-6 months Persisting upper limb weakness -

Who cannot join

  • Alcohol/ Drug abuse Psychiatric history Previous illness that has impacted on individuals Activity of Daily living
  • Dementia (assessed by MSQ) Severe Aphasia

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom2 sites
  • University of Aberdeen

    Aberdeen, AB24 3FX

  • Ninewells Hospital

    Dundee

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Can Motor Imagery Enhance Recovery of Hand Function After Stroke? Evaluation of Motor Imagery Training.

The purpose of this study is to assess the therapeutic benefits of motor imagery training in stroke patients with persistent motor weakness.

Read the detailed description

Stroke is a common and highly debilitating illness. Many patients (41-45%) experience chronic motor impairments (Dijkerman et al., 1996) and limitations in activities of daily living (Wade \& Langton Hewer, 1987) even after extensive neurological rehabilitation. They often result in long-term dependence at a considerable cost to the carers and the health service. It is therefore crucial to optimise motor recovery after stroke. This study investigates the therapeutic benefits of motor imagery training in stroke patients with a motor weakness.

Evidence for the idea that motor imagery training could enhance the recovery of hand function comes from several separate bases of evidence: the sports literature; neurophysiological evidence; evidence from health psychology research; as well as preliminary findings using motor imagery techniques in stroke patients.

There is evidence to suggest that mental rehearsal of movement can produce effects normally attributed to practising the actual movements. Imagining hand movements could stimulate the redistribution of brain activity, which accompanies recovery of hand function, thus resulting in a reduced motor deficit. Patients are assessed before and after a four-week evaluation period. In this randomised controlled trial 45 patients daily mentally rehearse movements with their affected hand under close supervision. Their recovery is compared to 45 patients who perform closely supervised non-motor mental rehearsal, and 45 patients who are not engaged in a training program.

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
Mental Imagery
Keywords
Motor Imagery, Stroke, Neuro-rehabilitation, health psychology, neuroscience, randomised controlled trial
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mental ImageryBehavioural

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) (Lyle, 1981)

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Grip strength (dynamometer; Heller et al., 1987),

  2. Nine hole pegboard task (Mathiowetz et al., 1985, Wade [ref]),

  3. Function Limitation Profile

  4. Barthel Index

  5. Recovery Locus of Control

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jul 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2004
  3. Primary completionFeb 2007
  4. Study completionFeb 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
135 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00355836
Sponsor's protocol ID
CZH/4/153
Status last verified
Nov 2015
First submitted
24 Jul 2006
Last updated
5 Nov 2015
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mental Imagery in people with Stroke, run by University of Aberdeen at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) (Lyle, 1981). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2015.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in