AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoporosisNCT00359047

Recognizing Osteoporosis and Its Consequences in Quebec (ROCQ) Programme

A study testing Documentation and Video in people with Osteoporosis, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the ROCQ programme is to improve the use of evidence based osteoporosis diagnostic and treatment strategies for women 50 years and over who have suffered a fragility fracture. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Osteoporosis
What is being tested?
Documentation and Video
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,830 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jun 2003to Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female, aged 50 years and over.
  • Not residing in a long-term care hospital before the fracture.
  • Able to understand the programme information and consent form.
  • Must voluntarily accept to participate in this programme and sign the consent form.
  • Participants must have a fragility or traumatic fracture of one of the following sites: wrist, forearm, humerus, scapula, clavicle, sternum, thoracic or lumbar vertebrae, pelvis, sacrum, hip, femur, proximal and distal tibia, fibula (including ankle), and foot.
  • Participants must be able to answer the questionnaires via phone interviews

Who cannot join

  • Unable to understand the purpose of the programme.
  • Participants with a traumatic fracture of one of the following sites: cervical, skull and face, hand and finger, toe, metatarsus, and patella.
  • Pathological fracture.
  • Women currently participating in a clinical trial requiring them to take a medication for osteoporosis.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • CHUdeQuebec, CHUL

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

The aim of the ROCQ programme is to improve the use of evidence based osteoporosis diagnostic and treatment strategies for women 50 years and over who have suffered a fragility fracture. This objective will be achieved by concentrating on a realistic evaluation of the present diagnosis and treatment rate of osteoporosis following a fragility fracture and comparing it to an optimal situation (care gap) and proposing interventions that promote new approaches to treating osteoporosis by health professionals as well as providing targeted interventions for the patient. The efficacy of these interventions will be evaluated using a randomized control design.

Read the detailed description

ROCQ is a patient health-management programme and prospective cohort study. Within the ROCQ programme, educational interventions to improve osteoporosis management will be evaluated using a randomized-control design. The programme is composed of a promotional campaign, three main phases and a 20-year follow-up.

At phase 1, 0 to 16 weeks after the fracture, participants with fragility and traumatic fractures will be recruited and will be asked information regarding their fracture.

At phase 2, 6 to 8 months after the fracture, all participants will complete questionnaires to evaluate demographic and clinical features, risk factors for osteoporosis, co-morbidities, status of diagnosis and treatment, and the EQ-5D. The current medical management of osteoporosis (or the care gap in diagnosis and treatment) will be measured using this questionnaire at phase 2. Once the phase 2 questionnaire has been completed, Only participants with fragility fractures will be randomized to one of the three following educational intervention groups: 1) the Educational Video Group, 2) the Documentation Group, or 3) the Control Group.

At phase 3, 12 to 14 months after randomization, the effectiveness of the interventions will be assessed by re-administering the questionnaires to participants who experienced a fragility fracture at baseline. The questionnaires evaluate the status of diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis, modifiable risk factors and the health-related quality of life (EQ-5D). The impact of the interventions on the participants will be assessed by comparing diagnosis and treatments rates in each intervention arm.

If the long-term viability of the programme is secured, participants with fragility and traumatic fractures will be followed for a maximum period of 20 years using specific encoded personal data contained in the RAMQ and Quebec's drug plan databases.

Conditions
Osteoporosis
Being tested
Documentation, Video
Keywords
Osteoporosis, Fragility fracture, Women, Randomised control trial, Patient education, Diagnosis, Treatment
Medical subject headings
Osteoporosis, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DocumentationBehavioural

    Participants will receive written educational material for themselves as well as the Guidelines document for their physician (same written material as in the Educational Video Group). They will be asked to revisit their physician and provide written documentation inviting him/her to consider a complementary investigation and an adequate treatment according to the 2002 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis in Canada

  • VideoBehavioural

    Participants will receive a 15-minute educational video on osteoporosis. They will also receive written educational material for themselves and a Guidelines document for their physician. They will be asked to revisit their physician and provide the written documentation inviting her/him to consider a complementary investigation and an adequate treatment according to the 2002 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis in Canada. Should participants wish to obtain additional information on osteoporosis, they will be provided with a toll-free number (1-866-571-ROCQ) to contact

Study groups in NCT00359047
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DocumentationExperimentalWritten educational material on osteoporosis for the participant and the physician.
Receives: Behavioral: Documentation
VideoExperimentalA 15-minute educational video on osteoporosis as well as written documentation on osteoporosis for the participant and the physician.
Receives: Behavioral: Video

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The present diagnostic and treatment rates of osteoporosis 6 months after a fragility fracture

    Measured: June 2007

  2. The osteoporosis diagnostic rate and on the osteoporosis pharmacological treatment rate 12 months after the educational interventions

    Measured: June 2007

  3. The average 5-year, 10-year, 15-year, and 20-year probabilities of a fragility fracture by age, site of previous fragility fracture, and type of ROCQ intervention.

    Measured: July 2009

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Changes of modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis 12 months after the intervention

    Measured: September 2009

  2. Proportion of fragility versus traumatic fractures.

    Measured: June 2007

  3. Health care resource utilization associated with specific types of fragility fracture and recurrent fractures.

    Measured: September 2010

  4. Assess health utility index (EQ-5D) after a fragility fracture.

    Measured: September 2010

  5. Satisfaction with the process of care before and after implementing ROCQ's interventions.

    Measured: June 2010

  6. One-year mortality rate following a fragility fracture.

    Measured: May 2009

  7. Persistence to pharmacological treatment 12 months after the intervention

    Measured: October 2009

  8. Incidence of recurrent fracture and health care resources utilization between women who previously had a fragility fracture and those who had a traumatic fracture.

    Measured: November 2010

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Aug 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2003
  3. Primary completionOct 2007
  4. Study completionDec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,830 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00359047
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHUL 61.05.05
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
28 Jul 2006
Last updated
21 Nov 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Bessette L, Ste-Marie LG, Jean S, Davison KS, Beaulieu M, Baranci M, Bessant J, Brown JP. Recognizing osteoporosis and its consequences in Quebec (ROCQ): background, rationale, and methods of an anti-fracture patient health-management programme. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Mar;29(2):194-210. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.07.007. Epub 2007 Jul 24.

    PubMed 17766187
  • Bessette L, Jean S, Davison KS, Roy S, Ste-Marie LG, Brown JP. Factors influencing the treatment of osteoporosis following fragility fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2009 Nov;20(11):1911-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0898-x. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

    PubMed 19333675
  • Beaudoin C, Bessette L, Jean S, Ste-Marie LG, Brown JP. The impact of educational interventions on modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis after a fragility fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2014 Jul;25(7):1821-30. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2618-4. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

    PubMed 24519745
  • Bessette L, Jean S, Lapointe-Garant MP, Belzile EL, Davison KS, Ste-Marie LG, Brown JP. Direct medical costs attributable to peripheral fractures in Canadian post-menopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2012 Jun;23(6):1757-68. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1785-9. Epub 2011 Sep 17.

    PubMed 21927921
  • Bessette L, Davison KS, Jean S, Roy S, Ste-Marie LG, Brown JP. The impact of two educational interventions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after fragility fracture: a population-based randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2011 Dec;22(12):2963-72. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1533-1. Epub 2011 Feb 11.

    PubMed 21311871
  • Bessette L, Ste-Marie LG, Jean S, Davison KS, Beaulieu M, Baranci M, Bessant J, Brown JP. The care gap in diagnosis and treatment of women with a fragility fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2008 Jan;19(1):79-86. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0426-9. Epub 2007 Jul 20.

    PubMed 17641811

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Documentation and Video in people with Osteoporosis, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The present diagnostic and treatment rates of osteoporosis 6 months after a fragility fracture (time frame: June 2007). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00359047, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in