AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary ACL TearsNCT00364897

Investigation of Clinical Outcome of ACL Reconstruction Utilizing Two Tibial Fixation Techniques, Concentric Tapered Interference Screws and Interference Screw and Sheath

An observational study of Primary ACL Tears, run by Hadassah Medical Organization.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Tibial fixation is the weak link when using soft tissue grafts and interference screws for fixation in a bony tunnel in ACL reconstruction. The Objective is to study two groups of patients undergoing double loop hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction and compare between the two tibial fixation devices: the tapered… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 40 years
Conditions the study is for
Primary ACL Tears
How many people
140 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Start not givento not given
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males and females between ages 21 and 40 years.
  • Primary ACL tears.
  • Signed Informed consent.
  • Availability during follow up period.

Who cannot join

  • Additional meniscal injury requiring suture.
  • Articular cartilage injury requiring surgical management.
  • Concomitant ligament injuries to the same knee requiring surgery.
  • Bilateral ACL injury.
  • Revision ACL surgery.
  • Concurrent fractures of the lower limbs caused by the same accident.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Post operative wound infection.
  • Post operative nerve injury
  • Cardiovascular compromise.
  • Professional sports people.
  • Soldiers on active military service.
  • Patients actively seeking compensation for injury.
  • Patients on other research protocols.
  • Patients receiving medications which alter bone metabolism: corticosteriods, Calcitonin, Flourides, Biphosphonates, Vitamin D and its derivatives, Cytotoxic drugs.
  • Non compliance. • Pregnancy

About this study

Official title: Comparison Between Two Tibial Fixation Techniques in ACL Reconstruction

Tibial fixation is the weak link when using soft tissue grafts and interference screws for fixation in a bony tunnel in ACL reconstruction. The Objective is to study two groups of patients undergoing double loop hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction and compare between the two tibial fixation devices: the tapered Deltascrew and the Intrafix screw and sheath .

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Aug 2006 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Defined population
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
140 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00364897
Sponsor's protocol ID
ACL001-HMO-CTIL
Status last verified
Feb 2007
First submitted
15 Aug 2006
Last updated
11 Apr 2007
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Primary ACL Tears, run by Hadassah Medical Organization.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in