AzTrials
AzTrials

Infection PreventionPhase 4NCT00370149

Study of Catheter-related Infections Using Antibiotic-coated Versus Conventional Catheters in Children

A Phase 4 study testing Antibiotic-impregnated Catheters (M/R) and Non-impregnated Catheters (C/S) in people with Infection Prevention, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary purpose of the study is to determine if a therapeutic difference exists between central venous catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampin and conventional catheters not impregnated with antibiotics when used in children at high risk for bloodstream infections (CABSI) after cardiac surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Infection Prevention
What is being tested?
Antibiotic-impregnated Catheters (M/R) and Non-impregnated Catheters (C/S)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
326 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2006to May 2010
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Age < 18 years
  • Cardiovascular surgery patient with a case complexity warranting CVC placement longer than 3 days
  • Study devices of appropriate size for patient use without modification
  • Informed consent obtained prior to patient entering the operating room

Who cannot join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Drug allergy to minocycline, other tetracyclines, or rifampin
  • Ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy
  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy
  • Patients undergoing cardiac transplant
  • Any active infection or being treated for bacteremia at the time of randomization

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Riley Hospital for Children

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Catheter Related Infectious Event Rates Using Antibiotic-impregnated Catheters vs. Conventional Catheters in Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery Patients

The primary purpose of the study is to determine if a therapeutic difference exists between central venous catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampin and conventional catheters not impregnated with antibiotics when used in children at high risk for bloodstream infections (CABSI) after cardiac surgery.

Read the detailed description

The standard central venous catheter (CVC) is now commonly used for infants, children, and adults. The antibiotic-coated CVC is a newer CVC gaining popularity for use in adults. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Disease Control (CDC) support use of the antibiotic-coated CVC for adult patients. But the FDA and CDC have not yet endorsed use of the antibiotic-coated CVC for infants and children due to lack of research on this CVC in infants and children.

Being tested
Antibiotic-impregnated Catheters (M/R), Non-impregnated Catheters (C/S)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Antibiotic-impregnated Catheters (M/R)Device

    Patients randomized to this arm will have the antibiotic-impregnated catheters inserted intra-operatively. The catheters are sized to accommodate children in different size ranges.

  • Non-impregnated Catheters (C/S)Device

    Patients randomized to this arm will have the central venous catheter inserted intra-operatively. The catheters are sized to accommodate children in different size ranges.

Study groups in NCT00370149
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Antibiotic-impregnated Catheters (M/R)Active comparatorInterventions is insertion intra-operatively of catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampin to determine if their is a therapeutic difference between this catheter and the placebo (non-impregnated) catheter. The catheters are sized to accommodate children in different size ranges: Cook Inc. Double Lumen 4 Fr., 8 cm long, (C-UDLM-401J-ABRM-HC), 5 Fr., 8 cm long, (C-UDLM-501J-ABRM-HC), and 5 Fr., 12 cm long, (C-UDLMY-501J-RSC-ABRM-HC).
Receives: Device: Antibiotic-impregnated Catheters (M/R)
Non-impregnated Catheter (C/S)Placebo comparatorIntervention is insertion intra-operatively of conventional, non-impregnated catheters. There are two sizes to accommodate children in different size ranges: Cook Incorporated Double Lumen Polyurethane Central Venous Catheters, 4 Fr., 8 cm long, (C-UDLM-401J), 5 Fr., 8 cm long, (C-UDLM-501J), and 5 Fr., 12 cm long (C-UDLM-501J-RSC).
Receives: Device: Non-impregnated Catheters (C/S)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of Catheter-related Bloodstream Infections (CRBSI) Per 1000 Catheter Days

    Rates of CRBSI defined as 1. micro-organism isolated from a blood culture; 2. Clinical manifestations of infection such as fever (≥38 C) and/or hypotension (defined according to age-related practice guidelines for systolic blood pressure); 3. No apparent source for the bloodstream infection except for the catheter.

    Measured: Participants were followed for the duration of the hospital stay, an average of 6 days.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Episodes of Clinical Sepsis and/or Infection With Identified Source Other Than Catheter

    A secondary outcome measure was episodes of clinical sepsis and/or infection with identified source other than the CVC.

    Measured: Participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days.

  2. Death

    Patient Death during hospitalization.

    Measured: Participants were followed for the duration of the hospital stay, an average of 6 days.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Aug 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2006
  3. Primary completionMay 2010
  4. Study completionMay 2010

Why it stopped: Blinded interim analysis resulted in early termination of the study.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
326 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00370149
Sponsor's protocol ID
0512-37
Status last verified
Jan 2016
First submitted
28 Aug 2006
Last updated
24 Feb 2016
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cox EG, Knoderer CA, Jennings A, Brown JW, Rodefeld MD, Walker SG, Turrentine MW. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Catheter-Related Infectious Event Rates Using Antibiotic-Impregnated Catheters Versus Conventional Catheters in Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery Patients. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2013 Mar;2(1):67-70. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pis066. Epub 2012 Jul 4.

    PubMed 26619445

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Antibiotic-impregnated Catheters (M/R) and Non-impregnated Catheters (C/S) in people with Infection Prevention, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of Catheter-related Bloodstream Infections (CRBSI) Per 1000 Catheter Days (time frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the hospital stay, an average of 6 days.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00370149, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in