Disc Herniation With RadiculopathyNCT00384007
A Randomized Trial Comparing SpineJet® Hydrodiscectomy to Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy Due to Disc Herniation
A study testing Hydrodiscectomy with Spinejet in people with Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy, run by Pinnacle Pain Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare a standard surgical procedure, open surgical microdiscectomy, used primarily to relieve leg pain and repair disc herniation to a newer surgical procedure, hydrodiscectomy with Spinejet®. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy
- What is being tested?
- Hydrodiscectomy with Spinejet
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2006to not given
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient ages 18-75, both sexes
- Posterolateral single lumbar contained disc herniation, any level, up to 1/3 of spinal canal sagittal diameter, concordant radicular pain +/- back pain, and MRI confirmed nerve root contact/compression
- Failed trial of at least one NSAID within 6 months
- Failed at least 2 weeks physical therapy within 6 months
- Failed at least 2 epidural steroid injection (ESIs), no less than 2 weeks apart within 6 months
- Initial or recurrent episode of radiculitis
- Willingness to sign IRB-approved consent
Who cannot join
- Strength < 4/5 in major muscle group of ipsilateral lower extremity
- Large extruded or sequestered HNP
- Greater than mild central canal, lateral recess, or neuroforamenal stenosis
- Previous surgery at affected level
- Other level lumbar HNP on affected side
- Significant (>50%) loss of disc height compared to the adjacent higher level
Show all 12Show fewer
- Local infection at needle insertion site
- Epidural extravasation on discography
- Pregnancy
- ASA status IV/V
- Diseases transmitted by blood
- Any illness, condition, or medication that would make a patient unsuitable for a surgical procedure
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Pinnacle Anesthesia Consultants, P.A. d.b.a. Pinnacle Pain Medicine
Dallas, Texas, 75240
About this study
The purpose of this study is to compare a standard surgical procedure, open surgical microdiscectomy, used primarily to relieve leg pain and repair disc herniation to a newer surgical procedure, hydrodiscectomy with Spinejet®. The study will examine how well each procedure reduces subject pain and disability over a one-year period. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-use of a magnetic field to produce an image) of the lower spinal column taken before and after surgery will also be looked at to determine what physical changes have taken place over the course of a year. Subjects enrolled in this study will also be asked to keep track of their medical expenses related to treating their back pain to see if the surgeries being compared reduce out of pocket expenses.
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized multi-clinic study supported by HydroCision, Inc. to compare open lumbar microdiscectomy to percutaneous lumbar discectomy with Spinejet® for patients with contained or small extruded disc herniation with nerve root contact and concordant radiculopathy. Initially this pilot study will enroll 20 patients over 6 months after which statistical analysis will be performed to evaluate the merit of continuing the study. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. If a study participant has been randomized to receive open lumbar microdiscectomy a referral to a neurosurgeon will be made for the patient. All patients participating in study must be screened, meet all study inclusion/exclusion criteria and sign informed consent and HIPAA forms prior to any research participation. Once randomization to receive either hydrodiscectomy with Spinejet® or open lumbar microdiscectomy has occurred study participants will be evaluated within two weeks of scheduled procedure. If a patient randomized to either group refuses the proposed treatment plan, they will be removed as a study participant. At the pre-op visit patient demographics, history, healthcare coverage, duration of symptoms, concomitant medications, level of HNP, MRI, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Beck's Inventory Depression (BID) scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score as well as Lumbar Spine Outcomes questionnaire (LSOQ) will be collected. At the time of surgery all patients will have discography at the surgical level with 2cc Isovue contrast injected at 0.04cc/sec. Evidence of epidural extravasation would exclude a patient from further study participation. At the completion of the procedure device run time and length of procedure will be recorded. Post-operative patients will return to clinic for 5 follow-up visits, being evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 12 month intervals. Blinded observers will record sensory deficits to touch, pain, temperature, motor strength of major muscle groups, patient reflexes(0-4 scale),SLR (degrees in prone position) analgesics dose and frequency. Patients will also complete VAS, BID, LSOQ, and ODI score calculated at each follow-up visit. MRIs will be performed at 1month follow-up visit for patients having hydrodiscectomy with all study participants having an MRI at the 12 month visit. MRIs will be read by a radiologist blinded to study procedure to determine type, size of protrusion and nerve root contact. Patients will be asked about any adverse events, changes in medications, or any health concerns at each follow-visit. Over the course of the study patients will also be asked to keep a study-specific log of expenses incurred due to back pain. Physicians and patients participating in the study will each be paid $50.00 per study visit for a maximum of $300.00. Imaging studies and hydrodiscectomy procedures will be provided to the patient at no charge other than copay/deductibles if paid by a third party payer.
- Conditions
- Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy
- Being tested
- Hydrodiscectomy with Spinejet
- Keywords
- back pain, herniated disc, leg pain, pinched nerves, sciatica, radiculopathy
- Medical subject headings
- Back Pain, Intervertebral Disc Displacement, Sciatica, Radiculopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hydrodiscectomy with SpinejetProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain reduction
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Disc Herniation With RadiculopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pinnacle Pain Medicine
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- HydroCision, Inc.
- Investigators
- Jeffery Wasserman, M.D., Principal investigator, Pinnacle Pain Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00384007
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HS-SJ-1001
- Status last verified
- Jun 2009
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 5 Jun 2009
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jun 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Trial Comparing SpineJet® Hydrodiscectomy to Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy Due to Disc Herniation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00384007
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HS-SJ-1001
- Conditions
- Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy
- Keywords
- back pain, herniated disc, leg pain, pinched nerves, sciatica, radiculopathy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Pinnacle Pain MedicineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- HydroCision, Inc.
- Study start
- Oct 2006
- First posted
- 4 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare a standard surgical procedure, open surgical microdiscectomy, used primarily to relieve leg pain and repair disc herniation to a newer surgical procedure, hydrodiscectomy with Spinejet®. The study will examine how well each procedure reduces subject pain and disability over a one-year period. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-use of a magnetic field to produce an image) of the lower spinal column taken before and after surgery will also be looked at to determine what physical changes have taken place over the course of a year. Subjects enrolled in this study will also be asked to keep track of their medical expenses related to treating their back pain to see if the surgeries being compared reduce out of pocket expenses.
Detailed description
This is a randomized multi-clinic study supported by HydroCision, Inc. to compare open lumbar microdiscectomy to percutaneous lumbar discectomy with Spinejet® for patients with contained or small extruded disc herniation with nerve root contact and concordant radiculopathy. Initially this pilot study will enroll 20 patients over 6 months after which statistical analysis will be performed to evaluate the merit of continuing the study. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. If a study participant has been randomized to receive open lumbar microdiscectomy a referral to a neurosurgeon will be made for the patient. All patients participating in study must be screened, meet all study inclusion/exclusion criteria and sign informed consent and HIPAA forms prior to any research participation. Once randomization to receive either hydrodiscectomy with Spinejet® or open lumbar microdiscectomy has occurred study participants will be evaluated within two weeks of scheduled procedure. If a patient randomized to either group refuses the proposed treatment plan, they will be removed as a study participant. At the pre-op visit patient demographics, history, healthcare coverage, duration of symptoms, concomitant medications, level of HNP, MRI, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Beck's Inventory Depression (BID) scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score as well as Lumbar Spine Outcomes questionnaire (LSOQ) will be collected. At the time of surgery all patients will have discography at the surgical level with 2cc Isovue contrast injected at 0.04cc/sec. Evidence of epidural extravasation would exclude a patient from further study participation. At the completion of the procedure device run time and length of procedure will be recorded. Post-operative patients will return to clinic for 5 follow-up visits, being evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 12 month intervals. Blinded observers will record sensory deficits to touch, pain, temperature, motor strength of major muscle groups, patient reflexes(0-4 scale),SLR (degrees in prone position) analgesics dose and frequency. Patients will also complete VAS, BID, LSOQ, and ODI score calculated at each follow-up visit. MRIs will be performed at 1month follow-up visit for patients having hydrodiscectomy with all study participants having an MRI at the 12 month visit. MRIs will be read by a radiologist blinded to study procedure to determine type, size of protrusion and nerve root contact. Patients will be asked about any adverse events, changes in medications, or any health concerns at each follow-visit. Over the course of the study patients will also be asked to keep a study-specific log of expenses incurred due to back pain. Physicians and patients participating in the study will each be paid $50.00 per study visit for a maximum of $300.00. Imaging studies and hydrodiscectomy procedures will be provided to the patient at no charge other than copay/deductibles if paid by a third party payer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient ages 18-75, both sexes
- Posterolateral single lumbar contained disc herniation, any level, up to 1/3 of spinal canal sagittal diameter, concordant radicular pain +/- back pain, and MRI confirmed nerve root contact/compression
- Failed trial of at least one NSAID within 6 months
- Failed at least 2 weeks physical therapy within 6 months
- Failed at least 2 epidural steroid injection (ESIs), no less than 2 weeks apart within 6 months
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Strength < 4/5 in major muscle group of ipsilateral lower extremity
- Large extruded or sequestered HNP
- Greater than mild central canal, lateral recess, or neuroforamenal stenosis
- Previous surgery at affected level
- Other level lumbar HNP on affected side
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrodiscectomy with Spinejet | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Pain reduction
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jun 2009.
Related trials for Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy
Not yet recruiting
Selective Nerve Root Block Versus Sham to Reduce Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbar Radiculopathy
Not yet recruiting
Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy
Cervical Disc Herniation, Cervical Foraminal Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Randomized Evaluation of Lumbar Injection Effectiveness and Function
Lumbar Radiculopathy, Lumbar Disc Herniation
Recruiting
TFESI and Neuropathic Pain in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Lumbosacral Radiculopathy, Neuropathic Pain From Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Recruiting
Acute Effects of Neurodynamics on Strength and Endurance in Athletes
Sciatic Leg Pain, Hamstring Muscle Tightness
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeffery Wasserman, M.D. principal investigator
Pinnacle Pain Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hydrodiscectomy with Spinejet in people with Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy, run by Pinnacle Pain Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain reduction. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2009.