Heart FailurePhase 4NCT00391846
Evaluation of Heart Failure Treatment Guided by N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP) vs Clinical Symptoms and Signs Alone
A Phase 4 study testing Captopril, Enalapril and Lisinopril in people with Heart Failure and Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, run by AstraZeneca at 39 sites in Sweden.
Trial summary
The purpose is to study if HF treatment guided by NTproBNP in addition to clinical symptoms and signs is more effective than treatment guided by clinical symptoms and signs alone in patients with HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
- What is being tested?
- Captopril, Enalapril and Lisinopril
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 252 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesSweden
- Study dates
- Oct 2006to Jan 2009
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female/male, over 18 years with previously verified HF with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
- New York Heart Association(NYHA) class II-IV,
- NTproBNP males>800 ng/L, females >1000 ng/L
Who cannot join
- Planned CV hospitalisation, stroke or acute myocardial infarction (MI) last 3 months,
- Mitral/aortic stenosis,
- Patients already receiving optimal HF treatment,
- Severe reduction of kidney function
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 1 country.
39 sites in 1 country
Sweden39 sites
Research Site
Alvesta
Research Site
Arvika
Research Site
Bjuv
Research Site
Borensberg
Research Site
Bromma
Research Site
Dalby
Research Site
Eskilstuna
Research Site
Gagnef
Research Site
Gothenburg
Research Site
Hisings Kärra
Research Site
Huddinge
Research Site
Huskvarna
Research Site
Jönköping
Research Site
Kalmar
Research Site
Kungälv
Research Site
Lerum
Research Site
Lessebo
Research Site
Lidköping
Research Site
Lilla Edet
Research Site
Linköping
Research Site
Ludvika
Research Site
Lyckeby
Research Site
Malmö
Research Site
Moheda
Research Site
Motala
Research Site
Örebro
Research Site
Östersund
Research Site
Skanör
Research Site
Söderåkra
Research Site
Stenungsund
Research Site
Stocksund
Research Site
Timrå
Research Site
Uddevalla
Research Site
Ulricehamn
Research Site
Umeå
Research Site
Uppsala
Research Site
Västerås
Research Site
Västervik
Research Site
Vaxjo
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Single Blind, Multicentre, 9-month, Phase IV Study, Comparing Treatment Guided by Clinical Symptoms and Signs and NT-proBNP vs Treatment Guided by Clinical Symptoms and Signs Alone, in Patients With Heart Failure (HF) and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
The purpose is to study if HF treatment guided by NTproBNP in addition to clinical symptoms and signs is more effective than treatment guided by clinical symptoms and signs alone in patients with HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
- Being tested
- Captopril, Enalapril, Lisinopril, Ramipril, Trandolapril
- Keywords
- Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction, NTproBNP
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Ventricular Dysfunction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CaptoprilDrug
EnalaprilDrug
LisinoprilDrug
RamiprilDrug
TrandolaprilDrug
BisoprololDrug
CarvedilolDrug
Metoprolol succinateDrug
CandesartanDrug
Also called Atacand
ValsartanDrug
EplerenoneDrug
SpironolactoneDrug
DiureticsDrug
HF treatment according to Swedish guidelinesDrug
Blood samplesProcedure or surgery
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)Procedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Guided by NT-proBNP | Other | Treatment guided by clinical symptoms and signs + NTproBNP Receives: Drug: Captopril; Drug: Enalapril; Drug: Lisinopril; Drug: Ramipril; Drug: Trandolapril; Drug: Bisoprolol; Drug: Carvedilol; Drug: Metoprolol succinate; Drug: Candesartan; Drug: Valsartan; Drug: Eplerenone; Drug: Spironolactone; Drug: Diuretics; Drug: HF treatment according to Swedish guidelines; Procedure: Blood samples; Procedure: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) |
| Not Guided by NT-proBNP | Other | Treatment guided by clinical symptoms and signs Receives: Drug: Captopril; Drug: Enalapril; Drug: Lisinopril; Drug: Ramipril; Drug: Trandolapril; Drug: Bisoprolol; Drug: Carvedilol; Drug: Metoprolol succinate; Drug: Candesartan; Drug: Valsartan; Drug: Eplerenone; Drug: Spironolactone; Drug: Diuretics; Drug: HF treatment according to Swedish guidelines; Procedure: Blood samples; Procedure: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Composite Value of 3 Variables After 9 Months: Cardiovascular Death (Days Alive), Cardiovascular Hospitalization (Days Out of Hospital), Heart Failure Symptoms (Symptom Score Subset of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Questions 3,5,7,9)
The non-parametric scale is constructed from 3 variables, modified after Cleland. Each patient receives a rank score from 1 to 246 (246-number of patients in the study). The lowest score receive patients who die (due to CV event), next patients still alive at end-of-study with the worst composite score, the best alive patients with 0 days in hospital and the largest improvement in the KCCQ (self-administered by patient symptom score, where the higher score reflect better health status). Scores will be summarized using non-parametric calculations. The mean of non-parametric scores is presented
Measured: 9 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Number of CV Deaths
Number of deaths
Measured: 9 months
Number of Days in Hospital for CV Reason
Each overnight stay is counted as one day. The lower the better
Measured: 9 months
Changes in Heart Failure Symptoms
Changes from baseline in the symptom score subset (question 3, 5, 7 and 9) of KCCQ (swelling, fatigue, shortness of breath, shortness of breath night time). KCCQ is a self-administered by patient symptom score, where higher score reflect better health status. Scale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100. This mean that the KCCQ scale is from 0 to 100 with the higher value showing a better health status.
Measured: 9 months and baseline
Changes in NT-proBNP Values Over Time in All Patients
The 95% confidential interval (CI) is given as measure of dispersion
Measured: 9 months and baseline
Changes in Health-related Quality of Life
Change range -100 to 100. The higher the better.
Measured: 9 months and baseline
Total Number of Titration Steps in Prescribed Heart Failure Treatment
Each titration step in prescribed medication is counted as one step, either up or down. One step up indicates an increase of dose in prescribed medication and one step down indicates a decrease of dose in prescribed medication. The sum of steps is given as a score. Score is given for each arm as a total number of titration steps for all patients in arm.
Measured: 9 months
Discontinuations
Number of patients discontinued due to adverse events'
Measured: 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2006
- Primary completionJan 2009
- Study completionJan 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AstraZenecaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 252 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- AstraZeneca Sweden Medical Director, MD, Study director, AstraZenecaHans Persson, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Danderyd Hospital, SwedenBjorn Eriksson, MD, Study director, AstraZeneca
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00391846
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D2452L00010
- Other IDs
- EUDRACT No. 2006-001259-36, SIGNAL HF
- Status last verified
- Jun 2012
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Single Blind, Multicentre, 9-month, Phase IV Study, Comparing Treatment Guided by Clinical Symptoms and Signs and NT-proBNP vs Treatment Guided by Clinical Symptoms and Signs Alone, in Patients With Heart Failure (HF) and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00391846
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- D2452L00010
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
- Keywords
- Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction, NTproBNP
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 252 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZenecaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2006
- Primary completion
- Jan 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Jun 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose is to study if HF treatment guided by NTproBNP in addition to clinical symptoms and signs is more effective than treatment guided by clinical symptoms and signs alone in patients with HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Guided by NT-proBNP | Other | Drug: Captopril, Drug: Enalapril, Drug: Lisinopril, Drug: Ramipril, Drug: Trandolapril, Drug: Bisoprolol, Drug: Carvedilol, Drug: Metoprolol succinate, Drug: Candesartan, Drug: Valsartan, Drug: Eplerenone, Drug: Spironolactone, Drug: Diuretics, Drug: HF treatment according to Swedish guidelines, Procedure: Blood samples, Procedure: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)Treatment guided by clinical symptoms and signs + NTproBNP |
| Not Guided by NT-proBNP | Other | Drug: Captopril, Drug: Enalapril, Drug: Lisinopril, Drug: Ramipril, Drug: Trandolapril, Drug: Bisoprolol, Drug: Carvedilol, Drug: Metoprolol succinate, Drug: Candesartan, Drug: Valsartan, Drug: Eplerenone, Drug: Spironolactone, Drug: Diuretics, Drug: HF treatment according to Swedish guidelines, Procedure: Blood samples, Procedure: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)Treatment guided by clinical symptoms and signs |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Female/male, over 18 years with previously verified HF with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
- New York Heart Association(NYHA) class II-IV,
- NTproBNP males>800 ng/L, females >1000 ng/L
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Planned CV hospitalisation, stroke or acute myocardial infarction (MI) last 3 months,
- Mitral/aortic stenosis,
- Patients already receiving optimal HF treatment,
- Severe reduction of kidney function
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Captopril | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| Enalapril | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| Lisinopril | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| Ramipril | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| Trandolapril | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| Bisoprolol | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| Carvedilol | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| Metoprolol succinate | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| CandesartanAlso: Atacand | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| Valsartan | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| Eplerenone | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| Spironolactone | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| Diuretics | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| HF treatment according to Swedish guidelines | Drug | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| Blood samples | Procedure or surgery | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
| The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) | Procedure or surgery | Guided by NT-proBNP, Not Guided by NT-proBNP |
Primary outcome
Composite Value of 3 Variables After 9 Months: Cardiovascular Death (Days Alive), Cardiovascular Hospitalization (Days Out of Hospital), Heart Failure Symptoms (Symptom Score Subset of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Questions 3,5,7,9)
Time frame: 9 months
The non-parametric scale is constructed from 3 variables, modified after Cleland. Each patient receives a rank score from 1 to 246 (246-number of patients in the study). The lowest score receive patients who die (due to CV event), next patients still alive at end-of-study with the worst composite score, the best alive patients with 0 days in hospital and the largest improvement in the KCCQ (self-administered by patient symptom score, where the higher score reflect better health status). Scores will be summarized using non-parametric calculations. The mean of non-parametric scores is presented
7 secondary outcomes
Number of CV Deaths
Time frame: 9 months
Number of Days in Hospital for CV Reason
Time frame: 9 months
Changes in Heart Failure Symptoms
Time frame: 9 months and baseline
Changes in NT-proBNP Values Over Time in All Patients
Time frame: 9 months and baseline
Changes in Health-related Quality of Life
Time frame: 9 months and baseline
Total Number of Titration Steps in Prescribed Heart Failure Treatment
Time frame: 9 months
Discontinuations
Time frame: 9 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Bimagrumab in Participants With HFpEF
Heart Failure, Diastolic, Diastolic Heart Failure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a French Hospital Discharge Therapeutic Education Program by Nurses for Heart Failure Patient (EduSor)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruiting
RELIEVE-HFrEF TRIAL: REducing Lung congestIon Symptoms Using the v-wavE Shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure With Reduced EF
Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
AstraZeneca Sweden Medical Director, MD study director
AstraZeneca
Hans Persson, MD, PhD principal investigator
Danderyd Hospital, Sweden
Bjorn Eriksson, MD study director
AstraZeneca
39 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Captopril, Enalapril and Lisinopril in people with Heart Failure and Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, run by AstraZeneca at 39 sites in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Jun 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Composite Value of 3 Variables After 9 Months: Cardiovascular Death (Days Alive), Cardiovascular Hospitalization (Days Out of Hospital), Heart Failure Symptoms (Symptom Score Subset of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Questions 3,5,7,9) (time frame: 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2012.