AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery BypassPhase 4NCT00394303

Tight Intra-Operative Glucose Control During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

A Phase 4 study testing Intraoperative continuous insulin infusion in people with Coronary Artery Bypass, run by Rabin Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Blood glucose levels increase in response to stress, infection or other conditions faced by patients in the hospital. This occurs commonly among patients with known diabetes, but also among non-diabetic hospitalized patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Bypass
What is being tested?
Intraoperative continuous insulin infusion
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,400 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
Feb 2007to Aug 2009
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All consecutive patients >18 years undergoing CABG, without or without additional valve or other surgery at Rabin Medical Center; Beilinson campus, providing informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with diabetic ketoacidosis, or hyperosmolar coma

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Israel1 site
  • Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital

    Petah Tikvah, 49100

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: Tight Intra-Operative Glucose Control Using Continuous Insulin Infusion During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial

Blood glucose levels increase in response to stress, infection or other conditions faced by patients in the hospital. This occurs commonly among patients with known diabetes, but also among non-diabetic hospitalized patients. Tight glucose control, the maintenance of blood glucose levels within normal limits (80-120 mg/dl), has been shown to improve patient outcomes in the hospital in several settings, mainly among critically ill patients hospitalized in intensive care units.

We plan to assess the importance of tight glucose control during open-heart surgery. The prevalence of hyperglycemia (elevated blood glucose) during this operation is high. Hyperglycemia may be associated with increased vulnerability to surgical site infections, neurological damage, cardiac and renal injury. Conversely, tight glucose control may be associated with hypoglycemia (pathologically low glucose levels) that may results in neurological injury. We hypothesize that tight glucose control will improve patient outcomes following surgery.

Read the detailed description

Current evidence supports intensive glucose control for patients in the intensive care unit post-cardiac surgery. The risk-benefit ratio of tight glucose control using continuous insulin infusion during surgery has not been established. Pros for tight control include the association of hyperglycemia with neurological injury, cardiac ischemia, white blood cell dysfunction and renal failure. The cons include adverse effects, mainly hypoglycemia and hypokalemia. As with any intervention in medicine, tight intra-operative glucose control should be assessed in a randomized controlled trial.

Objectives:to assess whether tight intra-operative tight glucose control using continuous insulin infusion reduces morbidity and mortality following cardiac surgery, defined as the incidence rate of surgical site infections, adverse neurological events, renal failure and 30-day mortality following CABG.

Additional outcomes will include the effect of continuous insulin infusion on longer-term mortality; other infectious complications and antibiotic use during hospitalization; cardiovascular outcomes; the need for re-operations; length of hospital stay; readmission; hypoglycemia and other adverse events.

Design: randomized controlled trial, with blinding of outcome assessors.

Participants: all consecutive patients >18 years undergoing CABG, without or without additional valve or other surgery at Rabin Medical Center; Beilinson campus, providing informed consent.

Exclusion criteria: patients with diabetic ketoacidosis, or hyperosmolar coma.

Intervention: Continuous insulin infusion throughout the operation aimed to maintain normoglycemia using a nomogram

Control: Glucose management according to the discretion of the anesthesiologist (continuous or bolus infusion)

During the early post-operative period (ICU-stay following surgery), all patients will be treated with intensive glucose control targeting glucose levels between 80-110.

Being tested
Intraoperative continuous insulin infusion, Control
Keywords
Open heart surgery, Diabetes mellitus, Hyperglycemia, Surgical site infection, Normoglycemia
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperglycemia, Surgical Wound Infection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intraoperative continuous insulin infusionDrug

    Nomogram specified in appendix

  • ControlOther

    Glucose management according to the discretion of the anesthesiologist aimed to maintain glucose levels <200 mg.dl, reflecting current practice.

Study groups in NCT00394303
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalIntervention
Receives: Drug: Intraoperative continuous insulin infusion
2No interventionControl
Receives: Other: Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 30-day all-cause mortality.

    Measured: 30-day

  2. Deep or organ/ space (mediastinitis) surgical site infections.

    Measured: 90 days

  3. Acute renal failure during post-operative ICU stay, defined as: doubling of serum creatinine from baseline; or >50% reduction from baseline glomerular filtration rate; or need for renal replacement therapy.

    Measured: 30 days

  4. Perioperative cerebrovascular event defined as any new, temporary or permanent, focal or global neurological deficit.

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Individual components of the composite primary outcome

    Measured: 30 days

  2. 6-months and long-term survival.

    Measured: 6 ans 12 months

  3. Other infectious complications during ICU stay including pneumonia and bloodstream infections according to CDC criteria

    Measured: ICU stay

  4. Antibiotic use

    Measured: 30 days

  5. Durations of intubation, ICU and hospital stay

    Measured: hospital stay

  6. Other post-operative complications occurring during ICU stay, including re-intubation, re-operation

    Measured: ICU stay

  7. Occurrence of hypoglycemia, defined as blood glucose level of 50mg/ dl or less, during surgery and up to the first glucose measurement in ICU.

    Measured: during surgery

  8. Occurrence of severe hypokalemia, defined as K<2.5 mEq/l, during surgery

    Measured: during surgery

  9. Glucose control in ICU, during the first 2 post-operative days

    Measured: 2 post-operative days

  10. Neurological status before surgery, at discharge and 3 months following surgery:

    Measured: 3 months

  11. Adverse cardiac events occurring during ICU stay

    Measured: ICU stay

  12. Re-hospitalizations

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Nov 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2007
  3. Study completionAug 2009 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Trial suspended on 26 February, following the publication of a trial with negative results (Ann Intern Med 146(4), 2007). Pending ethics committee re-approval.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,400 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00394303
Sponsor's protocol ID
4214
Status last verified
Jun 2007
First submitted
31 Oct 2006
Last updated
1 Apr 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Intraoperative continuous insulin infusion in people with Coronary Artery Bypass, run by Rabin Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Trial suspended on 26 February, following the publication of a trial with negative results (Ann Intern Med 146(4), 2007). Pending ethics committee re-approval.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

30-day all-cause mortality. (time frame: 30-day). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in