AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2NCT00403741

Consultations in Adapted Physical Activity on Behaviours in Physical Exercise by Type 2 Diabetics

A study testing motivational interviewing in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by University Hospital, Grenoble.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Assesment the impact of three individuals consultations in adapted physical activity by type 2 diabetics Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What is being tested?
motivational interviewing
How many people
120 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2007to Jul 2009
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • type 2 diabetics
  • age < 80 years
  • to be able to read and to understand French
  • to be affiliate national insurance
  • to give a light and read consent

Who cannot join

  • incapacity to carry out a questionnaire

About this study

Official title: Effects of Individuals Consultations in Adapted Physical Activity on Behaviours in Physical Exercise by Type 2 Diabetics

Assesment the impact of three individuals consultations in adapted physical activity by type 2 diabetics

Read the detailed description

Regular physical activity is now recognized for its beneficial effects on physiological and psychological characteristics of type 2 diabetic individuals.

However, initiating a physical activity program for type 2 diabetics strikes in practice to somatic and psychological obstacles which explain many results studies on compliance.

Instituting educational strategies in physical activity seems essential in order to provoke changes in patients' behaviours and to modify incompatible habits with the disease.

The main objective of for this study is to assess the impact of three individual consultations in Adapted Physical Activity (APA) on the self-determined motivation for physical exercise of type 2 diabetics. These three consultations will be proposed fifteen months after a therapeutic education session and based on the principles of motivational interviewing developed by Miller \& Rollnick (2002).

The secondary objectives of this study are to assess the impact of these three consultations on other psychological (perceived competence in physical exercise, perceived support, quality of life, locus of control, health beliefs) and behavioural (Physical activity compliance, health condition) characteristics.

120 persons type 2 diabetics, aged between 18 and 80, will be recruited after the day which estimate the therapeutic education training proposed in the Department of Diabetic Education of Grenoble University Hospital. Two groups will randomized: 60 patients in experimental group and 60 patients in control group.

Self-determined motivation will be estimated by a french version of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ ; Ryan \& Connell, 1989 ; Williams, Freedman \& Deci, 1998).

Health behaviour compliance related to diabetic disease and its treatment will be assessed with the " revised Summary of Diabetes Self-Cares Activities " (SDSCA) (Toobert, Hampson, \& Glasgow, 2000).

Perceived competence in physical exercise will be measured with a french version of the Perceveid Competence Diabetes Scale (PCDS) (Williams, Freedman \& Deci, 1998).

Perceptions of autonomy, competence and relatedness support will be assessed with the Health Care Climate Quetionnaire (HCCQ) (Williams, Grow, Freedman, Ryan \& Deci, 1996) and the Interpersonal Behaviours Scale (Otis \& Pelletier, in press).

Patient's quality of life will be evaluated with the Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL) adapted for type 2 diabetics by Senez, Felicciolo, Moreau and Le Goaziou (2004).

The locus control will be assessed with the Diabetes Locus of Control Scale (DLCS ; Pruyn et al., (1988; Watson et al., 1990).

The person's health condition will be measured by the HbA1c amount and the lipid profile (cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides)

Four times for estimations variables will be realized:

  • Time 1 : the day which estimates the therapeutic education training
  • Time 2 : + 3 mois
  • Time 3 : + 9 mois
  • Time 4 : + 15 mois The control group will receive therapeutic education training in Department Education Diabetic of the University Hospital of Grenoble and a "day test" (one day which estimate this training).

For the experimental group, three consultations in Adapted Physical Activity (APA) will be proposed after the "day test".

Being tested
motivational interviewing
Keywords
behavior, physical activity, motivation
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Behavior, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • motivational interviewingBehavioural

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Score on Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire(TSRQ)at Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) at 3 months, 9 months and 15 months after assesment's day of the education period.

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Modifiable Activity Questionnaire(MAQ)at 3 months, 9 months and 15 months after assesment's day of the education period.

  2. Perceveid Competence Scale (PCS)at assesment's day of the education period and at 3 months, 9 months and 15 months after assesment's day of the education period.

  3. Interpersonal behaviors scale at assesment's day of the education period and at 3 months, 9 months and 15 months after assesment's day of the education period.

  4. Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL) at assesment's day of the education period and at 15 months after assesment's day of the education period.

  5. Diabetes Locus of Control Scale (DLCS)at assesment's day of the education period and at 15 months after assesment's day of the education period.

  6. HbA1c et lipid profile at 3 months, 9 months and 15 months after assesment's day of the education period.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Nov 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2007
  3. Primary completionJan 2007
  4. Study completionJul 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00403741
Sponsor's protocol ID
0621
Status last verified
Feb 2010
First submitted
24 Nov 2006
Last updated
1 Mar 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing motivational interviewing in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by University Hospital, Grenoble.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Score on Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire(TSRQ)at Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) at 3 months, 9 months and 15 months after assesment's day of the education period.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in