AzTrials
AzTrials

Branch Retinal Vein OcclusionPhase 4NCT00406107

Evaluation of Macugen Treatment of Macular Edema Due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

A Phase 4 study testing pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) in people with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion, run by Palmetto Retina Center, LLC at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of intravitreal injections of Macugen every 6 weeks for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
What is being tested?
pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2006to Apr 2008
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Macular edema secondary to BRVO involving the foveal center in male or female patients at least 18 years of age
  • Duration of BRVO macular edema less than 6 months prior to baseline visit
  • Best corrected ETDRS visual acuity 20/40-20/320 (Snellen equivalent) using the 4 meters testing method.
  • Central foveal thickness greater than or equal to 250 microns using the OCT-3
  • Less than 25% of foveal capillary ring disruption
  • Less than 2 disc areas of capillary non-perfusion within 1000 microns of the foveal center
  • Absence of hemorrhage or lipid in the foveal center
  • Investigator comfortable deferring macular laser for 18 weeks from baseline and intravitreous steroid for 36 weeks from baseline

Who cannot join

  • Ocular conditions other than BRVO related macular edema such as significant cataract, diabetic retinopathy, AMD, glaucoma, uveitis, epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular traction or tumor.
  • Intraocular surgery within past 3 months
  • Significant enlargement of foveal avascular zone(>25% disruption of capillary ring) or greater than 2 disc areas of nonperfusion within 1000 microns of foveal center.
  • Likelihood of evidence driven indication for peripheral photocoagulation in the next 6 months.
  • Patients who have shown evidence of spontaneous improvement within the preceding 3 months, as determined by an improvement of >15 letters of vision or thinning of the Center Point on OCT of >20% from baseline determination
  • Prior grid laser within 4 months of baseline or more than one prior grid laser treatment.
  • No prior intravitreous or periocular steroid injections in the study eye.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Cumberland Valley Retina Center

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • Jules Stein Eye Institute

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Palmetto Retina Center

    West Columbia, South Carolina, 29169

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Open Label Macugen for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of intravitreal injections of Macugen every 6 weeks for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). We hypothesize that macular edema secondary to BRVO is mediated by VEGF 165 and that chronic suppression of VEGF 165 will successfully treat BRVO related macular edema.

Read the detailed description

Retinal venous occlusive disease, which includes central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), is second only to diabetic retinopathy as a cause of vision loss due to retinal disease. The main cause of vision loss in all of these disorders is the development of macular edema. Current clinical practice based on randomized controlled clinical trials (ETDRS, BVOS) employs laser photocoagulation, either in a focal or grid pattern, to treat macular edema associated with diabetic retinopathy and branch retinal vein occlusion. Unfortunately, laser photocoagulation is ineffective in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), and no proven therapy exists for CRVO.

The pathogenesis of macular edema in retinal vascular diseases is generally accepted to be increased levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) due to ischemic or other stimuli. VEGF is known to be one of the most potent stimulators of vascular leakage in humans. Therefore, it seems sensible to study inhibition of VEGF to reduce vascular leakage, reduce macular edema, and improve vision in these retinal vascular disorders.

Phase 2 randomized, controlled clinical trials of Macugen in diabetic macular edema and in macular edema associated with CRVO have been conducted. In the diabetes trial, patients treated with Macugen had improved vision, reduced macular edema as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and reduced need for laser treatment compared to patients treated with sham injections. In the CRVO trial, patients treated with Macugen 1 mg every 6 weeks for 24 weeks had improved vision and reduced macular edema at week 30 compared to sham. This is the first randomized trial of treatment for CRVO to show a benefit over control. Based on these positive findings, we plan to study Macugen treatment of macular edema due to BRVO.

Being tested
pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)
Keywords
branch retinal vein occlusion, macular edema, pegaptanib sodium, vascular endothelial growth factor
Medical subject headings
Retinal Vein Occlusion, Macular Edema

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)Drug

    Also called Macugen

    Subjects were randomized 3:1 to intravitreous injections of pegaptanib 0.3mg or 1mg at baseline and at weeks 6 and 12 with subsequent injections at 6-week intervals at investigator discretion until week 48.

Study groups in NCT00406107
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pegaptanib Sodium 0.3mg (Macugen)Active comparatorIntravitreous injections of Macugen 0.3mg given at baseline, week 6 and week 12 with subsequent injections at six weekly intervals at the discretion of the investigator until week 54.
Receives: Drug: pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)
Pegaptanib Sodium 1 mg (Macugen)Active comparatorIntravitreous injections of Macugen 1.0mg given at baseline, week 6 and week 12 with subsequent injections at six weekly intervals at the discretion of the investigator until week 54.
Receives: Drug: pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in ETDRS Best Corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline at 54 Weeks

    Measured: 54 Weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Standardized Change From Baseline in Macular Thickening Measured by OCT3 Using the Central Point of the Central Subfield

    Measured: 54 Weeks

  2. Safety Parameters

    Safety endpoints incuded all investigator reported ocular and systemic adverse events. All events were graded as mild moderate or severe and assessed as related or unrelated to the injection procedure and the study drug.

    Measured: 54 Weeks

  3. Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT From Baseline to Week 54

    Measured: 54 Weeks

  4. Change in Macular Volume on OCT From Baseline to Week 54

    Measured: 54 Weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Dec 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2006
  3. Primary completionDec 2007
  4. Study completionApr 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00406107
Sponsor's protocol ID
PRC-001
Other IDs
Pfizer Reference # 20050548
Status last verified
Sep 2014
First submitted
30 Nov 2006
Last updated
12 Sep 2014
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Dec;103(12):1796-806.

    PubMed 2866759
  • Argon laser photocoagulation for macular edema in branch vein occlusion. The Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Sep 15;98(3):271-82. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90316-7.

    PubMed 6383055
  • Evaluation of grid pattern photocoagulation for macular edema in central vein occlusion. The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group M report. Ophthalmology. 1995 Oct;102(10):1425-33. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30849-4.

    PubMed 9097788
  • Cunningham ET Jr, Adamis AP, Altaweel M, Aiello LP, Bressler NM, D'Amico DJ, Goldbaum M, Guyer DR, Katz B, Patel M, Schwartz SD; Macugen Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group. A phase II randomized double-masked trial of pegaptanib, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor aptamer, for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2005 Oct;112(10):1747-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.06.007.

    PubMed 16154196
  • Aiello LP, Avery RL, Arrigg PG, Keyt BA, Jampel HD, Shah ST, Pasquale LR, Thieme H, Iwamoto MA, Park JE, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disorders. N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 1;331(22):1480-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199412013312203.

    PubMed 7526212
  • Funatsu H, Yamashita H, Ikeda T, Nakanishi Y, Kitano S, Hori S. Angiotensin II and vascular endothelial growth factor in the vitreous fluid of patients with diabetic macular edema and other retinal disorders. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Apr;133(4):537-43. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01323-5.

    PubMed 11931788

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) in people with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion, run by Palmetto Retina Center, LLC at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Sep 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in ETDRS Best Corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline at 54 Weeks (time frame: 54 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00406107, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in