Pulmonary EmbolismNCT00409136
Multi-Center Human Alert Trial to Prevent DVT and PE
An observational study of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 26 sites in United States.
Trial summary
To evaluate physician response to human alerts that inform the clinician that his/her patient may be eligible for thromboprophylaxis. Medical records are reviewed to evaluate prescribing decision and to evaluate rates of venous thromboembolism. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Embolism, Deep Vein Thrombosis, Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Human Alert
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 2,496 participants
- Where
- 26 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2006to Aug 2008
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Hospitalized patients that have a cumulative VTE risk score of 4 or more with no orders for prophylactic measures.
Who may be able to join
- Patients > 18 years of age
- Cumulative VTE risk score > 4
- Absence of pharmacologic or mechanical prophylaxis orders
- Patients from medical or surgical Services
Who cannot join
- VTE risk score <4
- Current active pharmacologic or mechanical prophylaxis order
- Patients from the Department of Neurology, Newborn Service, Rehab Units, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).
Trial locations and contacts
26 sites in 1 country.
26 sites in 1 country
United States26 sites
Emory-Crawford Long Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Franklin Square Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237
Lahey Clinic
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri, 65212
Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75231
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Denver, Colorado, 80262
Henry Ford Hospital K15
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
North Shore University Hospital
Great Neck, New York, 11030
Washington County Hospital
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
United Hospital System
Kenosha, Wisconsin, 53143
Long Beach VA Hospital
Long Beach, California, 90822
Norwalk Hospital
Norwalk, Connecticut, 06850
William W. Backus Hospital
Norwich, Connecticut, 06360
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
University of California - Irvine
Orange, California, 92868
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Thomas Jefferson Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
University of California - Davis
Sacramento, California, 95817
North Shore Medical Center
Salem, Massachusetts, 01970
LDS Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84103
University of Utah Medical Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
AZ Pulmonary Specialists, Ltd
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258
Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Washington Hospital
Washington, Pennsylvania, 15301
Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
St. Joseph Mercy Hospital
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197
About this study
Official title: Physician Alerts to Prevent DVT and Pulmonary Embolism in Hospitalized Patients
To evaluate physician response to human alerts that inform the clinician that his/her patient may be eligible for thromboprophylaxis. Medical records are reviewed to evaluate prescribing decision and to evaluate rates of venous thromboembolism.
Read the detailed description
Background Information and Rationale for the Study:
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is often avoidable in hospitalized patients because proven prevention strategies have been established for patients at risk. North American and European prophylaxis guidelines have been widely disseminated. However, despite intensive educational efforts, VTE prevention remains underutilized.
At Brigham and Women's Hospital, we undertook a comprehensive program aimed at increasing the frequency of VTE prophylaxis in high risk patients. This novel strategy required: 1) devising a risk score that reliably and quickly identified patients at high risk of VTE, and 2) conducting a randomized controlled trial in which high risk patients without prophylaxis were randomized into an intervention or control group. The intervention group's physicians received a single alert explaining that the patient was at high risk, was not receiving prophylaxis, and urged that prophylaxis be selected from a template of available pharmacological and mechanical options. In contrast, the control group's physicians received no alert.
Each of 8 common risk factors was weighted according to a point scale. At least 4 score points were required to be deemed at "high risk" for VTE.
3 of the 8 risk factors were considered major and were assigned a score of 3 points each:
- Cancer
- Prior VTE
- Hypercoagulability
One of the 8 risk factors, surgery, was considered intermediate and was assigned a score of 2.
4 of the 8 risk factors were considered minor and were assigned a score of 1 point each:
- Advanced age (> 70 years of age)
- Obesity (Body Mass Index > 29)
- Bed rest
- Hormone replacement therapy or oral contraceptives
There were 2,506 patients in the randomized controlled trial of a computer alert: 1255 in the intervention group and 1251 in the control group. The incidence of symptomatic VTE at 90 days was high: 8.2% in the control group. This high incidence validates the 8 risk factor and point score methodology.
The intervention group had an overall 41% reduction in VTE, without any increase in major bleeding. There was a 60% reduction in the incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism.
Identification of Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE):
A VTE risk profile will be computed for each hospitalized patient using 8 common risk factors. Each risk factor is weighted according to a point score. To be included in this trial, the point score must equal or exceed 4 points.
Minor (Low) Risk Factors (1 POINT each):
- Advanced Age (>70 years of age)
- Obesity (BMI >29, or the presence of the word "obesity" in admission exam notes)
- Bed rest / Immobility (not related to surgery)
- Female Hormone Replacement Therapy or Oral Contraceptives
Intermediate Risk Factor (2 POINTS each):
- Major Surgery (> 60 minutes)
Major (High) Risk Factors (3 POINTS each):
- Cancer (active)
- Prior VTE
- Hypercoagulability
Increased VTE risk is defined as a cumulative VTE risk score 4, so that patients with at least 1 major risk factor (cancer, prior VTE, or hypercoagulability) plus at least 1 additional intermediate risk factor (major surgery or bed rest) or minor risk factor (advanced age, obesity, or hormone replacement therapy/oral contraceptives) become eligible. In the absence of a major risk factor, patients with 1 intermediate risk factor plus at least 2 minor risk factors become eligible.
Screening for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis:
If the cumulative VTE risk score is ³4, orders are reviewed to detect ongoing mechanical or pharmacological prophylactic measures. Mechanical prophylactic measures include graduated compression stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression devices. Pharmacological prophylactic measures include unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, dalteparin, fondaparinux, tinzaparin, and warfarin.
Randomization:
Randomization Envelopes containing the statement "ALERT" (Intervention) or "NO ALERT" (Control) will be provided by Harvard Clinical Research Institute (HCRI), to randomize patients who meet all inclusion criteria.
The intervention is informing the responsible physician that: 1) his or her patient is at high risk for VTE, 2) is not receiving prophylaxis, and 3) VTE prophylaxis is recommended. For control patients, VTE prevention guidelines are available, but no specific prompt is provided to use them.
Follow Up:
Ninety-day follow-up is performed in all study patients by medical record review and through contact with the subject's Primary Care Physician.
Data Collection and Study Endpoints:
The primary endpoint is clinically diagnosed DVT or PE at 90 days. Safety endpoints include total mortality and hemorrhagic events at 30 and 90 days, respectively. We define major bleeding as intracranial, intraocular, retroperitoneal, pericardial, or bleeding that requires surgical intervention or that resulted in a hemoglobin loss greater than 3 g/l.
DVT is diagnosed if there is loss of vein compressibility by ultrasound or a filling defect by CT scan or by conventional contrast venography. PE is diagnosed by a positive contrast chest CT scan, a high-probability ventilation perfusion scan, or conventional pulmonary angiogram.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Embolism, Deep Vein Thrombosis, Cancer, Surgery
- Being tested
- Human Alert
- Keywords
- Alert, Deep Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, Venous Thromboembolism, Prophylaxis, Anticoagulation
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Embolism, Venous Thrombosis, Neoplasms, Venous Thromboembolism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Human AlertBehavioural
An alert from study staff informing a physician that his/her patient is at high risk for DVT and/or PE, but is not receiving any prophylaxis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Alert | Physicians alerted about their high risk patients who are not receiving any VTE prophylaxis. Receives: Behavioral: Human Alert | |
| No Alert | Physicians not alerted about their high risk patients who are not receiving any VTE prophylaxis. Receives: Behavioral: Human Alert |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinically diagnosed DVT and/or PE
Measured: 90 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Mortality
Measured: 30 and 90 days
Hemorrhagic events
Measured: 30 and 90 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2006
- Primary completionAug 2008
- Study completionAug 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary EmbolismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Brigham and Women's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,496 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Investigators
- Samuel Z. Goldhaber, MD, Principal investigator, Brigham and Women's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00409136
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2005-P-002527
- Status last verified
- Jan 2009
- First submitted
- 7 Dec 2006
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Goldhaber SZ, Turpie AG. Prevention of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized medical patients. Circulation. 2005 Jan 4;111(1):e1-3. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000150393.51958.54. No abstract available.
PubMed 15630031Goldhaber SZ, Dunn K, MacDougall RC. New onset of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients at Brigham and Women's Hospital is caused more often by prophylaxis failure than by withholding treatment. Chest. 2000 Dec;118(6):1680-4. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.6.1680.
PubMed 11115458Goldhaber SZ, Tapson VF; DVT FREE Steering Committee. A prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound-confirmed deep vein thrombosis. Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jan 15;93(2):259-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.09.057.
PubMed 14715365Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R, Cooper JM, Paterno MD, Soukonnikov B, Goldhaber SZ. Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):969-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041533.
PubMed 15758007Piazza G, Rosenbaum EJ, Pendergast W, Jacobson JO, Pendleton RC, McLaren GD, Elliott CG, Stevens SM, Patton WF, Dabbagh O, Paterno MD, Catapane E, Li Z, Goldhaber SZ. Physician alerts to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients. Circulation. 2009 Apr 28;119(16):2196-201. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.841197. Epub 2009 Apr 13.
PubMed 19364975
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Physician Alerts to Prevent DVT and Pulmonary Embolism in Hospitalized Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00409136
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2005-P-002527
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Embolism, Deep Vein Thrombosis, Cancer, Surgery
- Keywords
- Alert, Deep Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, Venous Thromboembolism, Prophylaxis, Anticoagulation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,496 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Study start
- Mar 2006
- Primary completion
- Aug 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate physician response to human alerts that inform the clinician that his/her patient may be eligible for thromboprophylaxis. Medical records are reviewed to evaluate prescribing decision and to evaluate rates of venous thromboembolism.
Detailed description
Background Information and Rationale for the Study:
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is often avoidable in hospitalized patients because proven prevention strategies have been established for patients at risk. North American and European prophylaxis guidelines have been widely disseminated. However, despite intensive educational efforts, VTE prevention remains underutilized.
At Brigham and Women's Hospital, we undertook a comprehensive program aimed at increasing the frequency of VTE prophylaxis in high risk patients. This novel strategy required: 1) devising a risk score that reliably and quickly identified patients at high risk of VTE, and 2) conducting a randomized controlled trial in which high risk patients without prophylaxis were randomized into an intervention or control group. The intervention group's physicians received a single alert explaining that the patient was at high risk, was not receiving prophylaxis, and urged that prophylaxis be selected from a template of available pharmacological and mechanical options. In contrast, the control group's physicians received no alert.
Each of 8 common risk factors was weighted according to a point scale. At least 4 score points were required to be deemed at "high risk" for VTE.
3 of the 8 risk factors were considered major and were assigned a score of 3 points each:
- Cancer
- Prior VTE
- Hypercoagulability
One of the 8 risk factors, surgery, was considered intermediate and was assigned a score of 2.
4 of the 8 risk factors were considered minor and were assigned a score of 1 point each:
- Advanced age (> 70 years of age)
- Obesity (Body Mass Index > 29)
- Bed rest
- Hormone replacement therapy or oral contraceptives
There were 2,506 patients in the randomized controlled trial of a computer alert: 1255 in the intervention group and 1251 in the control group. The incidence of symptomatic VTE at 90 days was high: 8.2% in the control group. This high incidence validates the 8 risk factor and point score methodology.
The intervention group had an overall 41% reduction in VTE, without any increase in major bleeding. There was a 60% reduction in the incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism.
Identification of Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE):
A VTE risk profile will be computed for each hospitalized patient using 8 common risk factors. Each risk factor is weighted according to a point score. To be included in this trial, the point score must equal or exceed 4 points.
Minor (Low) Risk Factors (1 POINT each):
- Advanced Age (>70 years of age)
- Obesity (BMI >29, or the presence of the word "obesity" in admission exam notes)
- Bed rest / Immobility (not related to surgery)
- Female Hormone Replacement Therapy or Oral Contraceptives
Intermediate Risk Factor (2 POINTS each):
- Major Surgery (> 60 minutes)
Major (High) Risk Factors (3 POINTS each):
- Cancer (active)
- Prior VTE
- Hypercoagulability
Increased VTE risk is defined as a cumulative VTE risk score 4, so that patients with at least 1 major risk factor (cancer, prior VTE, or hypercoagulability) plus at least 1 additional intermediate risk factor (major surgery or bed rest) or minor risk factor (advanced age, obesity, or hormone replacement therapy/oral contraceptives) become eligible. In the absence of a major risk factor, patients with 1 intermediate risk factor plus at least 2 minor risk factors become eligible.
Screening for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis:
If the cumulative VTE risk score is ³4, orders are reviewed to detect ongoing mechanical or pharmacological prophylactic measures. Mechanical prophylactic measures include graduated compression stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression devices. Pharmacological prophylactic measures include unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, dalteparin, fondaparinux, tinzaparin, and warfarin.
Randomization:
Randomization Envelopes containing the statement "ALERT" (Intervention) or "NO ALERT" (Control) will be provided by Harvard Clinical Research Institute (HCRI), to randomize patients who meet all inclusion criteria.
The intervention is informing the responsible physician that: 1) his or her patient is at high risk for VTE, 2) is not receiving prophylaxis, and 3) VTE prophylaxis is recommended. For control patients, VTE prevention guidelines are available, but no specific prompt is provided to use them.
Follow Up:
Ninety-day follow-up is performed in all study patients by medical record review and through contact with the subject's Primary Care Physician.
Data Collection and Study Endpoints:
The primary endpoint is clinically diagnosed DVT or PE at 90 days. Safety endpoints include total mortality and hemorrhagic events at 30 and 90 days, respectively. We define major bleeding as intracranial, intraocular, retroperitoneal, pericardial, or bleeding that requires surgical intervention or that resulted in a hemoglobin loss greater than 3 g/l.
DVT is diagnosed if there is loss of vein compressibility by ultrasound or a filling defect by CT scan or by conventional contrast venography. PE is diagnosed by a positive contrast chest CT scan, a high-probability ventilation perfusion scan, or conventional pulmonary angiogram.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Alert | – | Behavioral: Human AlertPhysicians alerted about their high risk patients who are not receiving any VTE prophylaxis. |
| No Alert | – | Behavioral: Human AlertPhysicians not alerted about their high risk patients who are not receiving any VTE prophylaxis. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Hospitalized patients that have a cumulative VTE risk score of 4 or more with no orders for prophylactic measures.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients > 18 years of age
- Cumulative VTE risk score > 4
- Absence of pharmacologic or mechanical prophylaxis orders
- Patients from medical or surgical Services
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- VTE risk score <4
- Current active pharmacologic or mechanical prophylaxis order
- Patients from the Department of Neurology, Newborn Service, Rehab Units, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Human AlertAn alert from study staff informing a physician that his/her patient is at high risk for DVT and/or PE, but is not receiving any prophylaxis. | Behavioural | Alert, No Alert |
Primary outcome
Clinically diagnosed DVT and/or PE
Time frame: 90 days
2 secondary outcomes
Mortality
Time frame: 30 and 90 days
Hemorrhagic events
Time frame: 30 and 90 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2009.
- Background: PubMed 15630031Goldhaber SZ, Turpie AG. Prevention of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized medical patients. Circulation. 2005 Jan 4;111(1):e1-3. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000150393.51958.54. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11115458Goldhaber SZ, Dunn K, MacDougall RC. New onset of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients at Brigham and Women's Hospital is caused more often by prophylaxis failure than by withholding treatment. Chest. 2000 Dec;118(6):1680-4. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.6.1680.
- Background: PubMed 14715365Goldhaber SZ, Tapson VF; DVT FREE Steering Committee. A prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound-confirmed deep vein thrombosis. Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jan 15;93(2):259-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.09.057.
- Background: PubMed 15758007Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R, Cooper JM, Paterno MD, Soukonnikov B, Goldhaber SZ. Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):969-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041533.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19364975Piazza G, Rosenbaum EJ, Pendergast W, Jacobson JO, Pendleton RC, McLaren GD, Elliott CG, Stevens SM, Patton WF, Dabbagh O, Paterno MD, Catapane E, Li Z, Goldhaber SZ. Physician alerts to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients. Circulation. 2009 Apr 28;119(16):2196-201. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.841197. Epub 2009 Apr 13.
- North American Thrombosis ForumLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Pulmonary Embolism
Not yet recruiting
CTEPH Differential Diagnosis Assisted by Enhanced Large Language Model Support
Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH), Acute Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical Management and Outcomes After Lung Scintigraphy for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department
Pulmonary Embolism (Diagnosis)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Pulmonary Embolism - Thrombus Removal With Catheter-Directed Therapy
Pulmonary Embolism
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Reduced-Dose Versus Full-Dose Alteplase for High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism
Pulmonary Embolism Acute
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Phase IIA Study of Belzutifan in EPAS1-, EGLN1-, or VHL-Mutant Erythrocytosis
Erythrocytosis, Pulmonary Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Samuel Z. Goldhaber, MD principal investigator
Brigham and Women's Hospital
26 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 26 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 26 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinically diagnosed DVT and/or PE (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00409136, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2009.