AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory Distress SyndromeNCT00418353

Antenatal Betamethasone Compared to Dexamethasone - "BETACODE TRIAL"

A study testing Betamethasone(Celestone soluspan) and Dexamethasone in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Intraventricular Hemorrhage, run by University of Oklahoma at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Antenatal corticosteroids result in substantial decrease in neonatal morbidity and mortality by specifically reducing the risk of respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage and neonatal death among premature infants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
What is being tested?
Betamethasone(Celestone soluspan) and Dexamethasone
How many people
Not given
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2002to Apr 2005
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women in preterm labor with intact membranes
  • Women with preterm premature rupture of membranes
  • Women been delivered for fetal and maternal indications
  • Gestational age between 24 and 33 6/7 weeks'.

Who cannot join

  • Clinical chorioamnionitis
  • known major fetal structural anomalies,
  • known fetal chromosomal abnormalities,
  • prior antenatal steroid exposure,
  • quadruplets and higher order multiple gestation
  • Women who declined enrollment.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Stony Brook University Hospital

    Stony Brook, New York, 117913

Other trials in United States

About this study

Antenatal corticosteroids result in substantial decrease in neonatal morbidity and mortality by specifically reducing the risk of respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage and neonatal death among premature infants. No human randomized study has formally compared betamethasone and dexamethasone, the preferred corticosteroids for antenatal therapy, with regards to their effectiveness in reducing neonatal morbidities and mortality. Our objective was to compare betamethasone with dexamethasone in terms of effectiveness in reducing perinatal morbidities and mortality among preterm infants.

Read the detailed description

We conducted a double blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of antenatal betamethasone compared to dexamethasone among women at risk of preterm deliveries at Stony Brook University Hospital from August 1, 2002 through July 31, 2004. We excluded women with clinical chorioamnionitis, major fetal structural anomalies, fetal chromosomal abnormalities, prior antenatal steroid exposure, and use of betamethasone or dexamethasone for other medical indications, quadruplets and higher order multiple gestation and those who declined enrollment. Consenting women were randomly allocated to one of two groups by the Pharmacy using computer generated random numbers. The statistical analysis was performed in accordance of the intention-to-treat principle. Student t test, Chi square and Fisher exact test were used for analysis. A P value of < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Being tested
Betamethasone(Celestone soluspan) and Dexamethasone
Keywords
Antenatal corticosteroids, Betamethasone, Dexamethasone, Premature
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Premature Birth

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Betamethasone(Celestone soluspan) and DexamethasoneDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Respiratory distress syndrome

  2. Intraventricular hemorrhage

  3. Neonatal mortality

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Periventricular leukomalacia

  2. Necrotizing enterocolitis

  3. Neonatal sepsis

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jan 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2002
  3. Study completionApr 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00418353
Sponsor's protocol ID
20024615
Status last verified
Jan 2007
First submitted
2 Jan 2007
Last updated
4 Jan 2007
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Elimian A, Garry D, Figueroa R, Spitzer A, Wiencek V, Quirk JG. Antenatal betamethasone compared with dexamethasone (betacode trial): a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;110(1):26-30. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000268281.36788.81.

    PubMed 17601892

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Betamethasone(Celestone soluspan) and Dexamethasone in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Intraventricular Hemorrhage, run by University of Oklahoma at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Respiratory distress syndrome. The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00418353, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in