AzTrials
AzTrials

ThrombocytopeniaPhase 3NCT00420914

Strategies for Transfusion of Platelets (SToP)

A Phase 3 study testing low dose of 2.25 x 10^11 platelets/transfusion (range 1.5 to 2.9) in people with Thrombocytopenia, run by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation at 6 sites in 3 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the hemostatic efficacy of a low dose platelet transfusion strategy compared to a standard dose platelet transfusion strategy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 17 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Thrombocytopenia
What is being tested?
low dose of 2.25 x 10^11 platelets/transfusion (range 1.5 to 2.9)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
130 participants
Where
6 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
Oct 2003to not given
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 17 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia who are expected to have a platelet count of ≤ 10,000/µL (10x10^9/L) for ≥ 10 days (Note: the prophylactic platelet trigger may be higher than10,000/µL (10x10^9/L) in some participating institutions; however, the patient will still be eligible for participation as long as they are expected to be thrombocytopenic for 10 days)
  • Must be an inpatient.
  • Weight between 40 and 100 kg.

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of promyelocytic leukemia.
  • A history or current diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), thrombotic thrombocytopenia (TTP), or hemolytic uremia syndrome (HUS).
  • Evidence of ≥ WHO Grade 2 bleeding while being assessed for the study entry.
  • Patients who will receive bedside Leukoreduced platelet transfusions.
  • Patients who are pregnant.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 3 countries.

6 sites in 3 countries

Canada3 sites
  • McMaster University

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N3Z5

  • Ottawa Health Research Institute

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6

  • University Health Network

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G2M9

Other trials in Canada

United States2 sites
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

    Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756

  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

Other trials in United States

Norway1 site
  • Haukeland University Hospital

    Bergen

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: Strategies for Transfusion of Platelets (SToP) [Formerly Titled "Evaluation of the Hemostatic Efficacy and Platelet Utilization Rates of Low Versus Standard Dose Platelet Therapy"]

To evaluate the hemostatic efficacy of a low dose platelet transfusion strategy compared to a standard dose platelet transfusion strategy.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:Platelet transfusions play a major role in the management of thrombocytopenic patients. Platelet transfusions may be given either in the absence of hemorrhage (prophylactic transfusions), or to control bleeding (therapeutic transfusions). Prophylactic platelet transfusion therapy is most commonly used in patients with decreased marrow platelet production (hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia) and accounts for the majority of platelets transfused to these patients. As platelet use continues to increase at a rate disproportionately higher than that of red cells, it is important to identify the most cost-effective strategies for providing platelet support. The two most important factors - within the control of the ordering physician - that will significantly influence the total amount of platelets transfused are:

  1. the prophylactic platelet transfusion "trigger" selected for transfusion;
  2. the number of platelets given per transfusion. The optimal quantity of platelets to be used per transfusion remains a highly controversial subject. No prospective platelet transfusion trials have been performed in which patients are randomized to an assigned platelet dose throughout their period of thrombocytopenia to evaluate the effects of different doses on transfusion outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: A randomized prospective platelet dose trial is proposed to determine a safe, efficient, and cost-effective dosing strategy for transfusing platelets. The trial is designed to answer two fundamental questions: 1) Are low dose platelet transfusions not inferior to standard dose platelet transfusion for patients with chemotherapy induced thrombocytopenia as measured by the frequency of WHO bleeding Grade 2 or greater; and 2) How does the dose of platelets transfused affect the interval between platelet transfusion events, and, thereby, the total number of platelets transfused?

GENERAL OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hemostatic efficacy of low dose platelet transfusions.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: This will be a non-inferiority study designed to determine if low dose prophylactic platelet transfusions can be transfused to patients with chemotherapy induced thrombocytopenia without an increase in the frequency of WHO bleeding (Grade 2 or greater ) when compared to the current transfusion strategy of using standard dose platelet products.

The low dose platelet transfusions will be targeted at 2.25 x 10^11 platelets/transfusion (range 1.5-2.9 x 10^11/product).

The standard dose platelet transfusions will be targeted at 4.5 x 10^11 platelets/transfusion (range 3.0-6.0 x 10^11/ product)

STUDY DESIGN: This will be a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in which eligible patients will be randomized to receive low dose or standard dose prophylactic platelet transfusions. Patients will be transfused prophylactically using a transfusion trigger of a platelet count equal to or below a level of 10 x 10^9/L (10,000/uL)or at a higher trigger (dependant on transfusion guidelines set by individual institutions).

Clinical evidence of bleeding will be assessed daily according to the WHO classification of bleeding. Study personnel involved in the daily hemostatic assessments of patients will be blinded as to the patient's randomization assignment. The grade of bleeding will be assigned using an Adjudication Committee blinded to the treatment that each patient is receiving. Each patient will be followed throughout their period of thrombocytopenia.

A Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) has been established and is comprised of two hematologists not associated with the study, one critical care physician, and a biostatistician. Three of these individuals have experience serving on Data Safety Monitoring Boards and all have expertise in clinical research methodology. The DSMB will receive and review any adverse events and regular reports. The information on the report will be blinded by designating treatment groups as A or B.

STRATIFICATION: There will be two levels of stratification in this study. The first level of stratification will be by center as there will be center differences in the chemotherapy and bone marrow or stem cell transplant protocols used. The second level of stratification will be by diagnostic grouping: bone marrow/stem cell transplant; and non transplant patients.

TREATMENT ALLOCATION: Eligible patients who have given written consent, will be randomized to a treatment arm when they require their first prophylactic platelet transfusion.

INTERVENTION: Patients will be randomized to one of two prophylactic platelet transfusion strategies either low dose or standard dose.

At the time of each platelet transfusion, a platelet count will be performed on the product and the weight of the platelet bag will be recorded so that the absolute number of platelets given with each platelet transfusion can be calculated. Either apheresis platelets or whole blood derived platelet concentrates will be used to achieve the required platelet dose based on product availability or the preferences of the patient's physician.

PERIOD OF FOLLOW-UP: Study patients will be followed throughout their period of thrombocytopenia until bone marrow recovery has occurred (with a platelet count of ≥ 50 x10^9/L (50,000/uL) or the patient has been on the study for 30 days, withdraws consent, dies or is discharged from hospital or to a setting that does not allow for daily assessment of bleeding.

SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS: WHO Grade 3 or 4 bleeding will be considered a serious adverse event and will be monitored throughout the study. These serious adverse events will be reported to the data coordinating center and to the relevant IRB within 24 hours.

ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: There will be two analyses performed: the first will compare the proportion of patients in each treatment group that have Grade 2 or greater bleeding: the second will be a recurrent event analysis which uses a strategy that includes the proportion of patients who bleed, the numbers of bleeds that occur and the timing of the bleed (i.e. whether it occurs early or late during the period of thrombocytopenia).

Being tested
low dose of 2.25 x 10^11 platelets/transfusion (range 1.5 to 2.9)
Keywords
Thrombocytopenia, Platelets, Dose, Bleeding
Medical subject headings
Thrombocytopenia, Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • low dose of 2.25 x 10^11 platelets/transfusion (range 1.5 to 2.9)Procedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Daily hemostatic assessments will be conducted to determine presence of WHO Grade 2 bleeding or greater.

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Number of platelets transfused during a defined period of thrombocytopenia

  2. Number of platelet transfusion events(frequency)

  3. Number of platelets transfused and frequency per thrombocytopenic day

  4. Mean duration of thrombocytopenia

  5. Percentage of days at risk of bleeding

  6. Differences in the severity of bleeding between treatment groups

  7. Correlation between the actual platelet dose given per transfusion for each patient and bleeding on the day following transfusion

  8. Correlation between the actual number between the actual number of platelets transfused/kg body weight for each patient and bleeding on the day following transfusion

  9. Pre- and post-transfusion bleeding grade in response to the dose of therapeutic platelets transfused

  10. Surrogate outcomes for hemostatic efficacy including death due to bleeding as the primary and contributory cause of mortality

  11. Platelet transfusion given above trigger

  12. Platelet transfusion more often than once a day

  13. Platelet transfusion given above their assigned dose in each case because of >/= WHO Grade 2 bleeding

  14. Number of platelets transfused

  15. Frequency of transfusions and duration of transfusions given because of bleeding

  16. Total number of RBC transfusions

  17. The mean per thrombocytopenic day for each patient

  18. Platelet response (pre-transfusion platelet counts, post-transfusion platelet counts, platelet increments, and corrected platelet count increments (at 1 and/or 24 hours)

  19. Cost analysis.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jan 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2003

Why it stopped: Stopped at the request of the Data Safety Monitoring Board for safety reasons.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
130 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00420914
Sponsor's protocol ID
SToP Study
Status last verified
May 2008
First submitted
8 Jan 2007
Last updated
28 May 2008
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Heddle NM, Cook RJ, Tinmouth A, Kouroukis CT, Hervig T, Klapper E, Brandwein JM, Szczepiorkowski ZM, AuBuchon JP, Barty RL, Lee KA; SToP Study Investigators of the BEST Collaborative. A randomized controlled trial comparing standard- and low-dose strategies for transfusion of platelets (SToP) to patients with thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2009 Feb 12;113(7):1564-73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-178236. Epub 2008 Dec 24.

    PubMed 19109560

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing low dose of 2.25 x 10^11 platelets/transfusion (range 1.5 to 2.9) in people with Thrombocytopenia, run by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation at 6 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in Canada, United States, Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Stopped at the request of the Data Safety Monitoring Board for safety reasons.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Daily hemostatic assessments will be conducted to determine presence of WHO Grade 2 bleeding or greater.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00420914, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in