Myocardial InfarctionPhase 2/3NCT00435266
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Primary PCI
A Phase 2/3 study testing Remote ischemic preconditioning in people with Myocardial Infarction, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred treatment in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The infarct-related artery (IRA) can be opened in more than 90% of the patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- Remote ischemic preconditioning
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Feb 2007to Feb 2009
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Acute chest pain or equivalent symptoms during > 30 minutes.
- Duration of symptoms < 12 hours.
- Cumulated ST elevation > 2 mm in two contiguous leads.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Previous by-pass surgery.
- Pulseless femoral artery.
- Left bundle branch block in ECG (LBBB).
- Acute MI and/or treatment with thrombolysis within 30 days.
- Patients treated with cooling or patients who have had cardiac arrest.
- Diabetic patients
- Patients with arteriovenous shunts for the purpose of hemodialysis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Aarhus N, 8200
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Remote Preconditioning in Primary Percutaneous Intervention of Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred treatment in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The infarct-related artery (IRA) can be opened in more than 90% of the patients. However, STEMI patients still end up with a persistent perfusion defect of highly variable magnitude indicating that adjunctive treatment may add further protection against tissue damage. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is an intervention by which myocardium threatened by ischemia is exposed to short and repeated sublethal ischemic episodes prior to sustained ischemia (local IPC). A systemic response with protection of more remote organs (remote IPC (rIPC)) also can be induced. We have recently found that the infarct reducing effect can be obtained by obstruction of an extremity even though the remote stimulus is initiated during sustained occlusion of a coronary artery, the so-called remote preconditioning (rPerC). The clinical perspective is now to examine if rPerC can reduce the infarct size in patients with unpredictable ischemia in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We perform a randomized study where patients en route for pPCI are allocated to either rPerC or a standard treatment to evaluate whether the tissue damage can be reduced. Effect measure will be infarct size determined by scintigraphy (final infarct size and salvage).
Read the detailed description
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred treatment in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The infarct-related artery (IRA) can be opened in more than 90% of the patients. However, STEMI patients still end up with a persistent perfusion defect of highly variable magnitude indicating that adjunctive treatment may add further protection against tissue damage. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is an intervention by which myocardium threatened by ischemia is exposed to short and repeated sublethal ischemic episodes prior to sustained ischemia (local IPC). A systemic response with protection of more remote organs (remote IPC (rIPC)) also can be induced. We have recently found that the infarct reducing effect can be obtained by obstruction of an extremity even though the remote stimulus is initiated after sustained occlusion of a coronary artery, the so-called remote preconditioning (rPerC). The clinical perspective is now to examine if rPerC can reduce the infarct size in patients with unpredictable ischemia in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We perform a randomized study where patients en route for pPCI are allocated to either rPerC or a standard treatment to evaluate whether the tissue damage can be reduced. Effect measure will be infarct size determined by scintigraphy (final infarct size and salvage).
Purpose
The purpose of the present study is to examine the utility of rPerC in STEMI patients treated with pPCI. The effect will be evaluated by 1) limitation of infarct size (salvage and final infarct size) determined by myocardial scintigraphy (SPECT), 2) electrocardiographic and angiographic signs of tissue perfusion, 3) release of ischemic markers 5) echocardiographic markers of left ventricular function and 5) clinical end-points (Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE: death, reinfarction, need for revascularisation, invalidating stroke)) at discharge and after 30 days.
Description and evaluation of the ethical aspects of the study
Study patients treated with pPCI are randomized to pretreatment with rPerC or no pretreatment (control group). The randomization will take place in the ambulance or at the local hospital. With the aim of not causing unnecessary delays, the pretreatment is discontinued if the patient arrives at the cath. lab. before the pretreatment is completed.The discomfort in connection with the pretreatment has been shown to be minimal.
Information regarding study population
The patients are recruited among patients admitted or transferred to Department of Cardiology B, Skejby Sygehus for pPCI treatment for STEMI.
Review on the methods used
rPerC The pretreatment in the rPerC group comprises 4 x (5 min. occlusion of right upper extremity followed by 5 min. reperfusion) which is performed during the transportation towards Skejby Sygehus. The occlusion is obtained by inflation of a blood pressure tourniquet placed on the patient's right thigh to 200 mm Hg or 25 mmHg above the patient's systolic blood pressure when higher than 200 mm Hg.
Angiography The initial angiography is performed in at least two planes after administration of nitroglycerin 0.2 mg intracoronary and filmed at 25 frames/sec. The lesion should be placed centrally in the picture with the tip of the guiding catheter visual in the picture.
The final angiography is performed in the same planes as the initial angiography and after administration of nitroglycerin 0.2 mg intracoronary. The angiography is filmed at 25 frames/sec. and the filming is continued until a clear projection of sinus coronarius. The angiogram is filmed with and without magnification with the aim of projecting the periphery of the vessels.
The final angiography is performed two minutes after the last dilatation - provided that the patient is hemodynamically stable.
Percutaneous intervention and antithrombotic treatment The patients will have PCI performed in accordance with the existing procedures and guidelines at Skejby Hospital.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) and monitoring Continuous 12-lead ST-monitoring is initiated on scene by use of a commercial monitor-defibrillator (LIFEPAK 12, Medtronic Emergency Response Systems, USA), and continued during transport to the local hospital (if not bypassed) and during transfer to the interventional hospital. On arrival at the interventional hospital traditional ECG electrodes are replaced by radiolucent carbon fiber lead wire electrodes (Ambu Blue Sensor QR electrodes, Ambu A/S, Denmark) enabling ST-monitoring to be continued during and 90 minutes following PCI. The analog ECG signals sampled by the system are digitized at a sample rate of 500 Hz for processing by the GE/Marquette Medical Systems 12SL ECG interpretive algorithm. At 30-second interval the ST-monitoring program generates a median QRST-complex for all 12 leads based on a 10-second epoch of ECG data. From each of these median QRST-complexes the program estimates the ST-deviation at the STM point, halfway between the J-point of the QRS complex and the start of the T-wave. If a 0.1 mV change in ST-deviation lasts for 2.5 minutes then the software automatically acquires and stores a 10-second 12-lead ECG waveform. All 12-lead ECG waveforms and continuous ST-monitoring data are transferred to a personal computer and stored by a random key for subsequent blinded analysis at the Core Lab. at Skejby Sygehus.
Biochemical ischemia markers Circulating concentrations of troponin T (TnT) is measured at arrival, 8-12 hours, 20-24 hours and finally 90-102 hours after symptom onset.
Scintigraphic methods Two scintigraphic examinations are performed to determination of area at risk (AAR), final infarct size (FIS), regional wall motion and regional wall thickening respectively.
Area at risk (AAR): (That part of left ventricle that is without perfusion prior to PCI) Determined by tracer injection during ongoing coronary occlusion which means tracer injection prior to PCI but imaging after pPCI.
Final infarct size (FIS): (That part of left ventricle that is without perfusion 1 month after PCI) Determined by myocardial scintigraphy at rest 1 month after pPCI.
The following parameters are calculated:
Salvage : AAR minus FIS (% of left ventricle) Salvage index (%): Salvage / AAR. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%): (EDV - ESV)/EDV. Each myocardial scintigraphy is performed after administration of 700 ± 10% MBq 99mTc-Sestamibi as an intravenous bolus injection. Acquisition is performed as gated SPECT within 8 hours after tracer injection. The myocardial perfusion is analyzed and quantitized by the use of the interpretation software QPS and QGS. At each examination partly myocardial perfusion defect as a percentage of left ventricular myocardium, partly left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume (EDV and ESV) and partly regional wall motion and wall thickening is determined.
Design and data registration The patients are randomized to pPCI treatment with or without prior rIPC. All data analyzes from the study will be analyzed blinded regarding to the patient's randomization.
For each participant included in the study, a case record form (CRF) is filled in.
Definition and characteristic of effect parameters and other registered data A consecutive patient registration is performed by a characteristic of the study population and a registration of causes of exclusion. Clinical, angiographic and procedure related variables as in the West-Danish Heart Database will be used.
Data evaluation For each of the primary and secondary clinical effect parameters, a comparative examination of the rPerC and not rPerC treated patient groups is performed.
Statistics Dimensioning the study: Previous investigations have shown that area at risk in connection with STEMI is approximately 30% of left ventricle. Experiences from investigations at Department of Cardiology B and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Skejby Sygehus, have shown that the final infarct size in STEMI patients treated with pPCI is approximately 15%.
It is estimated that a 20% reduction in infarct size (e.g. from 15% to 12%) will be clinically relevant. With a spreading of the infarct size of 15%, which are in accordance with our previous findings, detection of such a reduction with a risk of type 2 errors of 80% (2α=0.80) will require 109 patients in each group. We plan inclusion of a total of 250 patients to secure complete data.
The study will be analyzed after intention-to-treat principles. A final specification will be performed with unpaired parametric or non parametric statistics.
- Conditions
- Myocardial Infarction
- Being tested
- Remote ischemic preconditioning
- Keywords
- myocardial infarction, remote, preconditioning, perconditioning, cardioprotection
- Medical subject headings
- Myocardial Infarction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Remote ischemic preconditioningProcedure or surgery
Inflation of blood pressure cuff 4 x 5 minutes during transportation to primary PCI
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Remote ischemic preconditioning Receives: Procedure: Remote ischemic preconditioning |
| 2 | No intervention | Not described Receives: Procedure: Remote ischemic preconditioning |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Salvage index (% of left ventricle): Salvage / Area at Risk (AAR) by SPECT
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (21)
Final infarct size.
Measured: 30 days
Proportion of patients achieving ≥70% ST-resolution 90 minutes following pPCI
Measured: 90 minutes
Proportion of patients achieving spontaneous ST-resolution before pPCI
Measured: Immediate
Proportion of patients with increase in ST-elevation during pPCI.
Measured: Immediate
Time from first ECG to ≥70% ST-resolution (continuous parameter)
Measured: Minutes
Time from first wire to ≥70% ST-resolution (continuous parameter)
Measured: Minutes
ST resolution immediately after ending the procedure (evaluated in relation to ST elevation on ECG obtained just prior to the pPCI procedure).
Measured: Minutes
Prompt angiographic success:
Measured: Immediate
Corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC).
Measured: Minutes
TIMI flow measured immediately after ending the interventional procedure.
Measured: Minutes
Myocardial blush.
Measured: Minutes
Procedure duration.
Measured: Minutes
Total duration of hospitalisation.
Measured: Days
MACE after 30 days.
Measured: 30 days
TnT release - determined 90-102 hours after symptom onset.
Measured: 90-102 hours
Echocardiographic data (acute and after 1 month):
Measured: 30 days
WMI.
Measured: 30 days
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%): (EDV - ESV)/EDV.
Measured: 30 days
Myocardial scintigraphy data:
Measured: 30 days
Regional wall motion and regional thickening.
Measured: 30 days
Technical success.
Measured: Immediate
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2007
- Primary completionNov 2008
- Study completionFeb 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myocardial InfarctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Falck, Denmark, Doctor's ambulance Services, Aarhus, Denmark, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, The Hospital for Sick Children
- Investigators
- Torsten T Nielsem, MD, Study director, Aarhus University HospitalHans Erik Bøtker, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Aarhus University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00435266
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 95093546-1
- Status last verified
- Feb 2009
- First submitted
- 13 Feb 2007
- Last updated
- 17 Feb 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Schmidt MR, Smerup M, Konstantinov IE, Shimizu M, Li J, Cheung M, White PA, Kristiansen SB, Sorensen K, Dzavik V, Redington AN, Kharbanda RK. Intermittent peripheral tissue ischemia during coronary ischemia reduces myocardial infarction through a KATP-dependent mechanism: first demonstration of remote ischemic perconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 Apr;292(4):H1883-90. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00617.2006. Epub 2006 Dec 15.
PubMed 17172279Kristiansen SB, Henning O, Kharbanda RK, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Schmidt MR, Redington AN, Nielsen TT, Botker HE. Remote preconditioning reduces ischemic injury in the explanted heart by a KATP channel-dependent mechanism. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005 Mar;288(3):H1252-6. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00207.2004. Epub 2004 Oct 21.
PubMed 15498829Kristiansen SB, Lofgren B, Stottrup NB, Khatir D, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Nielsen TT, Botker HE, Flyvbjerg A. Ischaemic preconditioning does not protect the heart in obese and lean animal models of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2004 Oct;47(10):1716-21. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1514-4. Epub 2004 Oct 7.
PubMed 15480537Kharbanda RK, Mortensen UM, White PA, Kristiansen SB, Schmidt MR, Hoschtitzky JA, Vogel M, Sorensen K, Redington AN, MacAllister R. Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic preconditioning in vivo. Circulation. 2002 Dec 3;106(23):2881-3. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000043806.51912.9b.
PubMed 12460865Cheung MM, Kharbanda RK, Konstantinov IE, Shimizu M, Frndova H, Li J, Holtby HM, Cox PN, Smallhorn JF, Van Arsdell GS, Redington AN. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on children undergoing cardiac surgery: first clinical application in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jun 6;47(11):2277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.066. Epub 2006 May 15.
PubMed 16750696Pryds K, Bottcher M, Sloth AD, Munk K, Rahbek Schmidt M, Botker HE; CONDI Investigators. Influence of preinfarction angina and coronary collateral blood flow on the efficacy of remote ischaemic conditioning in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: post hoc subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 24;6(11):e013314. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013314.
PubMed 27884851Pryds K, Terkelsen CJ, Sloth AD, Munk K, Nielsen SS, Schmidt MR, Botker HE; CONDI Investigators. Remote ischaemic conditioning and healthcare system delay in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Heart. 2016 Jul 1;102(13):1023-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308980. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
PubMed 26911520Sloth AD, Schmidt MR, Munk K, Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT, Botker HE; CONDI Investigators. Impact of cardiovascular risk factors and medication use on the efficacy of remote ischaemic conditioning: post hoc subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 2;5(4):e006923. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006923.
PubMed 25838505Botker HE, Kharbanda R, Schmidt MR, Bottcher M, Kaltoft AK, Terkelsen CJ, Munk K, Andersen NH, Hansen TM, Trautner S, Lassen JF, Christiansen EH, Krusell LR, Kristensen SD, Thuesen L, Nielsen SS, Rehling M, Sorensen HT, Redington AN, Nielsen TT. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 27;375(9716):727-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62001-8.
PubMed 20189026
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Feb 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Remote Preconditioning in Primary Percutaneous Intervention of Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00435266
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 95093546-1
- Conditions
- Myocardial Infarction
- Keywords
- myocardial infarction, remote, preconditioning, perconditioning, cardioprotection
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AarhusUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Falck, Denmark, Doctor's ambulance Services, Aarhus, Denmark, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, The Hospital for Sick Children
- Study start
- Feb 2007
- Primary completion
- Nov 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred treatment in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The infarct-related artery (IRA) can be opened in more than 90% of the patients. However, STEMI patients still end up with a persistent perfusion defect of highly variable magnitude indicating that adjunctive treatment may add further protection against tissue damage. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is an intervention by which myocardium threatened by ischemia is exposed to short and repeated sublethal ischemic episodes prior to sustained ischemia (local IPC). A systemic response with protection of more remote organs (remote IPC (rIPC)) also can be induced. We have recently found that the infarct reducing effect can be obtained by obstruction of an extremity even though the remote stimulus is initiated during sustained occlusion of a coronary artery, the so-called remote preconditioning (rPerC). The clinical perspective is now to examine if rPerC can reduce the infarct size in patients with unpredictable ischemia in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We perform a randomized study where patients en route for pPCI are allocated to either rPerC or a standard treatment to evaluate whether the tissue damage can be reduced. Effect measure will be infarct size determined by scintigraphy (final infarct size and salvage).
Detailed description
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred treatment in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The infarct-related artery (IRA) can be opened in more than 90% of the patients. However, STEMI patients still end up with a persistent perfusion defect of highly variable magnitude indicating that adjunctive treatment may add further protection against tissue damage. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is an intervention by which myocardium threatened by ischemia is exposed to short and repeated sublethal ischemic episodes prior to sustained ischemia (local IPC). A systemic response with protection of more remote organs (remote IPC (rIPC)) also can be induced. We have recently found that the infarct reducing effect can be obtained by obstruction of an extremity even though the remote stimulus is initiated after sustained occlusion of a coronary artery, the so-called remote preconditioning (rPerC). The clinical perspective is now to examine if rPerC can reduce the infarct size in patients with unpredictable ischemia in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We perform a randomized study where patients en route for pPCI are allocated to either rPerC or a standard treatment to evaluate whether the tissue damage can be reduced. Effect measure will be infarct size determined by scintigraphy (final infarct size and salvage).
Purpose
The purpose of the present study is to examine the utility of rPerC in STEMI patients treated with pPCI. The effect will be evaluated by 1) limitation of infarct size (salvage and final infarct size) determined by myocardial scintigraphy (SPECT), 2) electrocardiographic and angiographic signs of tissue perfusion, 3) release of ischemic markers 5) echocardiographic markers of left ventricular function and 5) clinical end-points (Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE: death, reinfarction, need for revascularisation, invalidating stroke)) at discharge and after 30 days.
Description and evaluation of the ethical aspects of the study
Study patients treated with pPCI are randomized to pretreatment with rPerC or no pretreatment (control group). The randomization will take place in the ambulance or at the local hospital. With the aim of not causing unnecessary delays, the pretreatment is discontinued if the patient arrives at the cath. lab. before the pretreatment is completed.The discomfort in connection with the pretreatment has been shown to be minimal.
Information regarding study population
The patients are recruited among patients admitted or transferred to Department of Cardiology B, Skejby Sygehus for pPCI treatment for STEMI.
Review on the methods used
rPerC The pretreatment in the rPerC group comprises 4 x (5 min. occlusion of right upper extremity followed by 5 min. reperfusion) which is performed during the transportation towards Skejby Sygehus. The occlusion is obtained by inflation of a blood pressure tourniquet placed on the patient's right thigh to 200 mm Hg or 25 mmHg above the patient's systolic blood pressure when higher than 200 mm Hg.
Angiography The initial angiography is performed in at least two planes after administration of nitroglycerin 0.2 mg intracoronary and filmed at 25 frames/sec. The lesion should be placed centrally in the picture with the tip of the guiding catheter visual in the picture.
The final angiography is performed in the same planes as the initial angiography and after administration of nitroglycerin 0.2 mg intracoronary. The angiography is filmed at 25 frames/sec. and the filming is continued until a clear projection of sinus coronarius. The angiogram is filmed with and without magnification with the aim of projecting the periphery of the vessels.
The final angiography is performed two minutes after the last dilatation - provided that the patient is hemodynamically stable.
Percutaneous intervention and antithrombotic treatment The patients will have PCI performed in accordance with the existing procedures and guidelines at Skejby Hospital.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) and monitoring Continuous 12-lead ST-monitoring is initiated on scene by use of a commercial monitor-defibrillator (LIFEPAK 12, Medtronic Emergency Response Systems, USA), and continued during transport to the local hospital (if not bypassed) and during transfer to the interventional hospital. On arrival at the interventional hospital traditional ECG electrodes are replaced by radiolucent carbon fiber lead wire electrodes (Ambu Blue Sensor QR electrodes, Ambu A/S, Denmark) enabling ST-monitoring to be continued during and 90 minutes following PCI. The analog ECG signals sampled by the system are digitized at a sample rate of 500 Hz for processing by the GE/Marquette Medical Systems 12SL ECG interpretive algorithm. At 30-second interval the ST-monitoring program generates a median QRST-complex for all 12 leads based on a 10-second epoch of ECG data. From each of these median QRST-complexes the program estimates the ST-deviation at the STM point, halfway between the J-point of the QRS complex and the start of the T-wave. If a 0.1 mV change in ST-deviation lasts for 2.5 minutes then the software automatically acquires and stores a 10-second 12-lead ECG waveform. All 12-lead ECG waveforms and continuous ST-monitoring data are transferred to a personal computer and stored by a random key for subsequent blinded analysis at the Core Lab. at Skejby Sygehus.
Biochemical ischemia markers Circulating concentrations of troponin T (TnT) is measured at arrival, 8-12 hours, 20-24 hours and finally 90-102 hours after symptom onset.
Scintigraphic methods Two scintigraphic examinations are performed to determination of area at risk (AAR), final infarct size (FIS), regional wall motion and regional wall thickening respectively.
Area at risk (AAR): (That part of left ventricle that is without perfusion prior to PCI) Determined by tracer injection during ongoing coronary occlusion which means tracer injection prior to PCI but imaging after pPCI.
Final infarct size (FIS): (That part of left ventricle that is without perfusion 1 month after PCI) Determined by myocardial scintigraphy at rest 1 month after pPCI.
The following parameters are calculated:
Salvage : AAR minus FIS (% of left ventricle) Salvage index (%): Salvage / AAR. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%): (EDV - ESV)/EDV. Each myocardial scintigraphy is performed after administration of 700 ± 10% MBq 99mTc-Sestamibi as an intravenous bolus injection. Acquisition is performed as gated SPECT within 8 hours after tracer injection. The myocardial perfusion is analyzed and quantitized by the use of the interpretation software QPS and QGS. At each examination partly myocardial perfusion defect as a percentage of left ventricular myocardium, partly left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume (EDV and ESV) and partly regional wall motion and wall thickening is determined.
Design and data registration The patients are randomized to pPCI treatment with or without prior rIPC. All data analyzes from the study will be analyzed blinded regarding to the patient's randomization.
For each participant included in the study, a case record form (CRF) is filled in.
Definition and characteristic of effect parameters and other registered data A consecutive patient registration is performed by a characteristic of the study population and a registration of causes of exclusion. Clinical, angiographic and procedure related variables as in the West-Danish Heart Database will be used.
Data evaluation For each of the primary and secondary clinical effect parameters, a comparative examination of the rPerC and not rPerC treated patient groups is performed.
Statistics Dimensioning the study: Previous investigations have shown that area at risk in connection with STEMI is approximately 30% of left ventricle. Experiences from investigations at Department of Cardiology B and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Skejby Sygehus, have shown that the final infarct size in STEMI patients treated with pPCI is approximately 15%.
It is estimated that a 20% reduction in infarct size (e.g. from 15% to 12%) will be clinically relevant. With a spreading of the infarct size of 15%, which are in accordance with our previous findings, detection of such a reduction with a risk of type 2 errors of 80% (2α=0.80) will require 109 patients in each group. We plan inclusion of a total of 250 patients to secure complete data.
The study will be analyzed after intention-to-treat principles. A final specification will be performed with unpaired parametric or non parametric statistics.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Procedure: Remote ischemic preconditioningRemote ischemic preconditioning |
| 2 | No intervention | Procedure: Remote ischemic preconditioning |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Acute chest pain or equivalent symptoms during > 30 minutes.
- Duration of symptoms < 12 hours.
- Cumulated ST elevation > 2 mm in two contiguous leads.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Previous by-pass surgery.
- Pulseless femoral artery.
- Left bundle branch block in ECG (LBBB).
- Acute MI and/or treatment with thrombolysis within 30 days.
- Patients treated with cooling or patients who have had cardiac arrest.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Remote ischemic preconditioningInflation of blood pressure cuff 4 x 5 minutes during transportation to primary PCI | Procedure or surgery | 1, 2 |
Primary outcome
Salvage index (% of left ventricle): Salvage / Area at Risk (AAR) by SPECT
Time frame: 30 days
21 secondary outcomes
Final infarct size.
Time frame: 30 days
Proportion of patients achieving ≥70% ST-resolution 90 minutes following pPCI
Time frame: 90 minutes
Proportion of patients achieving spontaneous ST-resolution before pPCI
Time frame: Immediate
Proportion of patients with increase in ST-elevation during pPCI.
Time frame: Immediate
Time from first ECG to ≥70% ST-resolution (continuous parameter)
Time frame: Minutes
Time from first wire to ≥70% ST-resolution (continuous parameter)
Time frame: Minutes
ST resolution immediately after ending the procedure (evaluated in relation to ST elevation on ECG obtained just prior to the pPCI procedure).
Time frame: Minutes
Prompt angiographic success:
Time frame: Immediate
Corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC).
Time frame: Minutes
TIMI flow measured immediately after ending the interventional procedure.
Time frame: Minutes
Myocardial blush.
Time frame: Minutes
Procedure duration.
Time frame: Minutes
Total duration of hospitalisation.
Time frame: Days
MACE after 30 days.
Time frame: 30 days
TnT release - determined 90-102 hours after symptom onset.
Time frame: 90-102 hours
Echocardiographic data (acute and after 1 month):
Time frame: 30 days
WMI.
Time frame: 30 days
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%): (EDV - ESV)/EDV.
Time frame: 30 days
Myocardial scintigraphy data:
Time frame: 30 days
Regional wall motion and regional thickening.
Time frame: 30 days
Technical success.
Time frame: Immediate
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Feb 2009.
- Results publication: PubMed 17172279Schmidt MR, Smerup M, Konstantinov IE, Shimizu M, Li J, Cheung M, White PA, Kristiansen SB, Sorensen K, Dzavik V, Redington AN, Kharbanda RK. Intermittent peripheral tissue ischemia during coronary ischemia reduces myocardial infarction through a KATP-dependent mechanism: first demonstration of remote ischemic perconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 Apr;292(4):H1883-90. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00617.2006. Epub 2006 Dec 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 15498829Kristiansen SB, Henning O, Kharbanda RK, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Schmidt MR, Redington AN, Nielsen TT, Botker HE. Remote preconditioning reduces ischemic injury in the explanted heart by a KATP channel-dependent mechanism. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005 Mar;288(3):H1252-6. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00207.2004. Epub 2004 Oct 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 15480537Kristiansen SB, Lofgren B, Stottrup NB, Khatir D, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Nielsen TT, Botker HE, Flyvbjerg A. Ischaemic preconditioning does not protect the heart in obese and lean animal models of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2004 Oct;47(10):1716-21. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1514-4. Epub 2004 Oct 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 12460865Kharbanda RK, Mortensen UM, White PA, Kristiansen SB, Schmidt MR, Hoschtitzky JA, Vogel M, Sorensen K, Redington AN, MacAllister R. Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic preconditioning in vivo. Circulation. 2002 Dec 3;106(23):2881-3. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000043806.51912.9b.
- Results publication: PubMed 16750696Cheung MM, Kharbanda RK, Konstantinov IE, Shimizu M, Frndova H, Li J, Holtby HM, Cox PN, Smallhorn JF, Van Arsdell GS, Redington AN. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on children undergoing cardiac surgery: first clinical application in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jun 6;47(11):2277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.066. Epub 2006 May 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27884851Pryds K, Bottcher M, Sloth AD, Munk K, Rahbek Schmidt M, Botker HE; CONDI Investigators. Influence of preinfarction angina and coronary collateral blood flow on the efficacy of remote ischaemic conditioning in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: post hoc subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 24;6(11):e013314. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013314.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26911520Pryds K, Terkelsen CJ, Sloth AD, Munk K, Nielsen SS, Schmidt MR, Botker HE; CONDI Investigators. Remote ischaemic conditioning and healthcare system delay in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Heart. 2016 Jul 1;102(13):1023-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308980. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25838505Sloth AD, Schmidt MR, Munk K, Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT, Botker HE; CONDI Investigators. Impact of cardiovascular risk factors and medication use on the efficacy of remote ischaemic conditioning: post hoc subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 2;5(4):e006923. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006923.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20189026Botker HE, Kharbanda R, Schmidt MR, Bottcher M, Kaltoft AK, Terkelsen CJ, Munk K, Andersen NH, Hansen TM, Trautner S, Lassen JF, Christiansen EH, Krusell LR, Kristensen SD, Thuesen L, Nielsen SS, Rehling M, Sorensen HT, Redington AN, Nielsen TT. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 27;375(9716):727-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62001-8.
- Aarhus University webpageLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Myocardial Infarction
Recruiting
Reducing Slow/No-Reflow With Prophylactic High-Dose Intracoronary Adenosine Protocol in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction The REFLOW AMI Trial
ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Selatogrel Outcome Study in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction
Acute Myocardial Infarction
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry
Cardiogenic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Breisgau PHENO-HEART MI
Myocardial Infarction, STEMI
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Evaluating SGLT2 Inhibitors for the Reduction of No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients Undergoing PCI
No Reflow Phenomenon, Reperfusion Injuries, Myocardial
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Torsten T Nielsem, MD study director
Aarhus University Hospital
Hans Erik Bøtker, MD, PhD principal investigator
Aarhus University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Remote ischemic preconditioning in people with Myocardial Infarction, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Salvage index (% of left ventricle): Salvage / Area at Risk (AAR) by SPECT (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00435266, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2009.