Cardiogenic ShockCSWGNCT04682483
Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry
An observational study of Cardiogenic Shock, run by Tufts Medical Center at 16 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group is a multicenter registry where we collect de-identified clinical variables from the medical records and follow-up phone calls of shock patients from multiple institutions and centralize this data to a single registry for analysis of clinical outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiogenic Shock
- What is being tested?
- Vasopressor, Inotrope and Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 5,000 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 Dec 2017to 1 Jun 2026
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Year
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: People who are 18 or older who have an official diagnosis of cardiogenic shock.
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have cardiogenic shock.
- Cardiogenic shock is defined by at least one of the two categories below:
- At least 2 of the following concurrently at any point during the index hospitalization:
- Cardiac Index < 2.2
- PAPI < 1.0
- Cardiac Power Output ≤ 0.6
Show all 11Show fewer
- MAP < 60mmHg or a >30mmHg drop in MAP from baseline
- SBP < 90mmHg or a >30mmHg drop in SBP from baseline
- Pulse > 100
- Require at least one acute mechanical circulatory support device, vasopressor or inotrope to maintain values above the above target.
- Post-cardiotomy patients must meet the inclusion criteria 72 hours after their surgery to be included in this registry.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
16 sites in 1 country
United States16 sites, 16 recruiting
- Recruiting
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Navin K Kapur, MD, 6176366140, nkapur@tuftsmedicalcenter.org
Navin Kapur, MD
- Recruiting
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Arthur R Garan
Arthur R Garan, MD
- Recruiting
Northwestern Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Esther Vorovich, MD
Esther Vorovich
- Recruiting
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Sandeep Nathan, MD
Sandeep Nathan, MD
- Recruiting
Baylor Scott & White Advanced Heart Failure Clinic
Dallas, Texas, 75201
Detlef Wencker, MD
Detlef Wencker, MD
- Recruiting
Inova Health System
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042
Shashank Sinha, MD, MSc
Shashank Sinha, MD, MSc
- Recruiting
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555
Wissam Khalife, MD
Wissam Khalife
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Haroon Faraz, MD
Haroon Faraz, MD
- Recruiting
Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
: Ju H Kim, MD
Ju H Kim, MD
- Recruiting
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Justin Fried, MD
Justin Fried, MD
- Recruiting
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Manreet Kanwar, MD
Manreet Kanwar, MD
- Recruiting
University Of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261
Gavin Hickey, MD
Gavin Hickey, MD
- Recruiting
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, 04102
Andrew Schwartzman, MD
Andrew Schwartzman, MD
- Recruiting
Providence St. Vincent Heart Clinic
Portland, Oregon, 97225
Jacob Abraham, MD
Jacob Abraham, MD
- Recruiting
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195-9472
Claudius Mahr, DO
Claudius Mahr, DO
- Recruiting
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, 33331
Jaime Hernandez-Montfort, MD MPH
Jaime Hernandez-Montfort, MD MPH
About this study
The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group is a multicenter registry where we collect de-identified clinical variables from the medical records and follow-up phone calls of shock patients from multiple institutions and centralize this data to a single registry for analysis of clinical outcomes.
Read the detailed description
The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group is an Academic Research Consortium involving multiple medical centers within the United States and includes a multicenter registry for patients with cardiogenic shock. De-identified clinical variables are collected from medical records and follow-up phone calls. There is currently no central database for cardiogenic shock, therefore analysis of cardiogenic shock on a larger scale is limited. A goal of the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group is to create a centralized registry, compiled of data from multiple institutions, to analyze clinical outcomes. The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry will include a retrospective arm, where data is collected during the course of the hospital stay, and a prospective arm, where long-term outcomes will be assessed.
- Conditions
- Cardiogenic Shock
- Being tested
- Vasopressor, Inotrope, Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
- Keywords
- Cardiogenic Shock, mechanical circulatory support, hemodynamics, heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, registry, critical care, clinical outcomes research
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Cardiogenic, Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VasopressorDrug
The vasopressors include phenylephrine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine and vasopressin.
InotropeDrug
Inotropes include dobutamine and milrinone.
Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support DevicesDevice
Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support devices include ECMO (VV), ECMO (VA), Impella CP, Impella 2.5, Impella 5.0, Impella 5.5, Impella RP, IABP, Centrimag, Tandem Heart and ProTek Duo.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiogenic Shock Patients | Cardiogenic Shock patients eligible for this study are defined by at least one of the two categories below.
1. Patients have at least 2 of the following concurrently at any point during the index hospitalization: MAP < 60mmHg or a >30mmHg drop in MAP from baseline, SBP < 90mmHg or a >30mmHg drop in SBP from baseline, Pulse > 100, Cardiac Index < 2.2, Cardiac Power Output ≤ 0.6 or PAPI < 1.0.
2. Patients require the use of at least 1 vasopressor, inotrope or acute mechanical circulatory support device to maintain values above the above targets. Receives: Drug: Vasopressor; Drug: Inotrope; Device: Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of Mortality
Death in subjects during the time frame.
Measured: 30 days after discharge
Rate of Mortality
Death in subjects during the time frame.
Measured: 1 year after discharge
Secondary outcomes (4)
Rate of Re-hospitalization
We will be observing if patient was hospitalized again during the 1 year-time frame. We will collect information on surgeries and interventions during the course of rehospitalization.
Measured: 30 day after discharge
Rate of Re-hospitalization
We will be observing if patient was hospitalized again during the 1 year-time frame. We will collect information on surgeries and interventions during the course of rehospitalization.
Measured: 1 year after discharge
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
NYHA Classification provides a way to classify the stages of heart failure. Class I- No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II- Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity Class IV - Severe limitations
Measured: 30 day after discharge
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
NYHA Classification provides a way to classify the stages of heart failure. Class I- No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II- Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity Class IV - Severe limitations
Measured: 1 year after discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Dec 2020
- Study start4 Dec 2017
- Primary completion1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiogenic ShockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 5,000 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 1 Year
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tufts Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Abbott, Boston Scientific Corporation, Abiomed Inc., Getinge Group
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Reshad Garan, MD, Study director, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterClaudius Mahr, DO, Study director, University of WashingtonJaime Hernandez-Montfort, MD, Study director, Cleveland Clinic Foundation-FloridaDaniel Burkhoff, MD PhD, Study director, CardioVascular Research Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04682483
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12670
- Acronym
- CSWG
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 6 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kapur NK, Thayer KL, Zweck E. Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):16-21. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-16-1-16.
PubMed 32280413Pahuja M, Chehab O, Ranka S, Mishra T, Ando T, Yassin AS, Thayer KL, Shah P, Kimmelstiel CD, Salehi P, Kapur NK. Incidence and clinical outcomes of stroke in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 1;97(2):217-225. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28919. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
PubMed 32352638Thayer KL, Zweck E, Ayouty M, Garan AR, Hernandez-Montfort J, Mahr C, Morine KJ, Newman S, Jorde L, Haywood JL, Harwani NM, Esposito ML, Davila CD, Wencker D, Sinha SS, Vorovich E, Abraham J, O'Neill W, Udelson J, Burkhoff D, Kapur NK. Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment and Classification of In-Hospital Mortality Risk Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock. Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Sep;13(9):e007099. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007099. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
PubMed 32900234Whitehead E, Thayer K, Kapur NK. Clinical trials of acute mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2020 Jul;35(4):332-340. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000751.
PubMed 32487943Kapur NK, Whitehead EH, Thayer KL, Pahuja M. The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety. F1000Res. 2020 Jul 29;9:F1000 Faculty Rev-794. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25518.1. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32765837Garan AR, Kanwar M, Thayer KL, Whitehead E, Zweck E, Hernandez-Montfort J, Mahr C, Haywood JL, Harwani NM, Wencker D, Sinha SS, Vorovich E, Abraham J, O'Neill W, Burkhoff D, Kapur NK. Complete Hemodynamic Profiling With Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In-Hospital Mortality. JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;8(11):903-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.08.012.
PubMed 33121702Whitehead EH, Thayer KL, Burkhoff D, Uriel N, Ohman EM, O'Neill W, Kapur NK. Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Aug 28;7:155. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00155. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33005634Pahuja M, Ranka S, Chehab O, Mishra T, Akintoye E, Adegbala O, Yassin AS, Ando T, Thayer KL, Shah P, Kimmelstiel CD, Salehi P, Kapur NK. Incidence and clinical outcomes of bleeding complications and acute limb ischemia in STEMI and cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 1;97(6):1129-1138. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29003. Epub 2020 May 30.
PubMed 32473083Hernandez-Montfort J, Kanwar M, Sinha SS, Garan AR, Blumer V, Kataria R, Whitehead EH, Yin M, Li B, Zhang Y, Thayer KL, Baca P, Dieng F, Harwani NM, Guglin M, Abraham J, Hickey G, Nathan S, Wencker D, Hall S, Schwartzman A, Khalife W, Li S, Mahr C, Kim J, Vorovich E, Pahuja M, Burkhoff D, Kapur NK. Clinical Presentation and In-Hospital Trajectory of Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock. JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;11(2):176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
PubMed 36342421Kapur NK, Kanwar M, Sinha SS, Thayer KL, Garan AR, Hernandez-Montfort J, Zhang Y, Li B, Baca P, Dieng F, Harwani NM, Abraham J, Hickey G, Nathan S, Wencker D, Hall S, Schwartzman A, Khalife W, Li S, Mahr C, Kim JH, Vorovich E, Whitehead EH, Blumer V, Burkhoff D. Criteria for Defining Stages of Cardiogenic Shock Severity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jul 19;80(3):185-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.049.
PubMed 35835491
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04682483
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CSWG / 12670
- Conditions
- Cardiogenic Shock
- Keywords
- Cardiogenic Shock, mechanical circulatory support, hemodynamics, heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, registry, critical care, clinical outcomes research
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 5,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tufts Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Abbott, Boston Scientific Corporation, Abiomed Inc., Getinge Group
- Study start
- 4 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group is a multicenter registry where we collect de-identified clinical variables from the medical records and follow-up phone calls of shock patients from multiple institutions and centralize this data to a single registry for analysis of clinical outcomes.
Detailed description
The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group is an Academic Research Consortium involving multiple medical centers within the United States and includes a multicenter registry for patients with cardiogenic shock. De-identified clinical variables are collected from medical records and follow-up phone calls. There is currently no central database for cardiogenic shock, therefore analysis of cardiogenic shock on a larger scale is limited. A goal of the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group is to create a centralized registry, compiled of data from multiple institutions, to analyze clinical outcomes. The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry will include a retrospective arm, where data is collected during the course of the hospital stay, and a prospective arm, where long-term outcomes will be assessed.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Target follow-up
- 1 Year
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiogenic Shock Patients | – | Drug: Vasopressor, Drug: Inotrope, Device: Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support DevicesCardiogenic Shock patients eligible for this study are defined by at least one of the two categories below. 1. Patients have at least 2 of the following concurrently at any point during the index hospitalization: MAP < 60mmHg or a >30mmHg drop in MAP from baseline, SBP < 90mmHg or a >30mmHg drop in SBP from baseline, Pulse > 100, Cardiac Index < 2.2, Cardiac Power Output ≤ 0.6 or PAPI < 1.0. 2. Patients require the use of at least 1 vasopressor, inotrope or acute mechanical circulatory support device to maintain values above the above targets. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- People who are 18 or older who have an official diagnosis of cardiogenic shock.
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients must have cardiogenic shock.
- At least 2 of the following concurrently at any point during the index hospitalization:
- Require at least one acute mechanical circulatory support device, vasopressor or inotrope to maintain values above the above target.
- Post-cardiotomy patients must meet the inclusion criteria 72 hours after their surgery to be included in this registry.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VasopressorThe vasopressors include phenylephrine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine and vasopressin. | Drug | Cardiogenic Shock Patients |
| InotropeInotropes include dobutamine and milrinone. | Drug | Cardiogenic Shock Patients |
| Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support DevicesAcute Mechanical Circulatory Support devices include ECMO (VV), ECMO (VA), Impella CP, Impella 2.5, Impella 5.0, Impella 5.5, Impella RP, IABP, Centrimag, Tandem Heart and ProTek Duo. | Device | Cardiogenic Shock Patients |
Primary outcome
Rate of Mortality
Time frame: 30 days after discharge
Death in subjects during the time frame.
Rate of Mortality
Time frame: 1 year after discharge
Death in subjects during the time frame.
4 secondary outcomes
Rate of Re-hospitalization
Time frame: 30 day after discharge
Rate of Re-hospitalization
Time frame: 1 year after discharge
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Time frame: 30 day after discharge
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Time frame: 1 year after discharge
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jun 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 32280413Kapur NK, Thayer KL, Zweck E. Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):16-21. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-16-1-16.
- Results publication: PubMed 32352638Pahuja M, Chehab O, Ranka S, Mishra T, Ando T, Yassin AS, Thayer KL, Shah P, Kimmelstiel CD, Salehi P, Kapur NK. Incidence and clinical outcomes of stroke in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 1;97(2):217-225. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28919. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 32900234Thayer KL, Zweck E, Ayouty M, Garan AR, Hernandez-Montfort J, Mahr C, Morine KJ, Newman S, Jorde L, Haywood JL, Harwani NM, Esposito ML, Davila CD, Wencker D, Sinha SS, Vorovich E, Abraham J, O'Neill W, Udelson J, Burkhoff D, Kapur NK. Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment and Classification of In-Hospital Mortality Risk Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock. Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Sep;13(9):e007099. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007099. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 32487943Whitehead E, Thayer K, Kapur NK. Clinical trials of acute mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2020 Jul;35(4):332-340. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000751.
- Results publication: PubMed 32765837Kapur NK, Whitehead EH, Thayer KL, Pahuja M. The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety. F1000Res. 2020 Jul 29;9:F1000 Faculty Rev-794. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25518.1. eCollection 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 33121702Garan AR, Kanwar M, Thayer KL, Whitehead E, Zweck E, Hernandez-Montfort J, Mahr C, Haywood JL, Harwani NM, Wencker D, Sinha SS, Vorovich E, Abraham J, O'Neill W, Burkhoff D, Kapur NK. Complete Hemodynamic Profiling With Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In-Hospital Mortality. JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;8(11):903-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.08.012.
- Results publication: PubMed 33005634Whitehead EH, Thayer KL, Burkhoff D, Uriel N, Ohman EM, O'Neill W, Kapur NK. Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Aug 28;7:155. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00155. eCollection 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 32473083Pahuja M, Ranka S, Chehab O, Mishra T, Akintoye E, Adegbala O, Yassin AS, Ando T, Thayer KL, Shah P, Kimmelstiel CD, Salehi P, Kapur NK. Incidence and clinical outcomes of bleeding complications and acute limb ischemia in STEMI and cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 1;97(6):1129-1138. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29003. Epub 2020 May 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36342421Hernandez-Montfort J, Kanwar M, Sinha SS, Garan AR, Blumer V, Kataria R, Whitehead EH, Yin M, Li B, Zhang Y, Thayer KL, Baca P, Dieng F, Harwani NM, Guglin M, Abraham J, Hickey G, Nathan S, Wencker D, Hall S, Schwartzman A, Khalife W, Li S, Mahr C, Kim J, Vorovich E, Pahuja M, Burkhoff D, Kapur NK. Clinical Presentation and In-Hospital Trajectory of Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock. JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;11(2):176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35835491Kapur NK, Kanwar M, Sinha SS, Thayer KL, Garan AR, Hernandez-Montfort J, Zhang Y, Li B, Baca P, Dieng F, Harwani NM, Abraham J, Hickey G, Nathan S, Wencker D, Hall S, Schwartzman A, Khalife W, Li S, Mahr C, Kim JH, Vorovich E, Whitehead EH, Blumer V, Burkhoff D. Criteria for Defining Stages of Cardiogenic Shock Severity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jul 19;80(3):185-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.049.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cardiogenic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Changes in Skeletal Muscle Thickness in Patients With Acute Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Muscle Atrophy
Recruiting
Routine Versus Provisional Distal Perfusion Catheter Placement in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support
Cardiogenic Shock, Acute Myocardial Infarction of Inferior Wall
RecruitingObservational study
Factors Influencing Outcomes in ECMO and Impella Patients: Metabolic and Thyroid Hormone Dynamics
Cardiogenic Shock, Euthyroid Sick Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
CytOSorb TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS Registry
Septic Shock, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Recruiting
Assessing Catecholamine Treatment Initiation Options: Norepinephrine vs Dopamine for Cardiogenic Shock
Cardiogenic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Reshad Garan, MD study director
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Claudius Mahr, DO study director
University of Washington
Jaime Hernandez-Montfort, MD study director
Cleveland Clinic Foundation-Florida
16 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiogenic Shock, run by Tufts Medical Center at 16 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Navin K Kapur, MD (6176368252, nkapur@tuftsmedicalcenter.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of Mortality (time frame: 30 days after discharge). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04682483, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2025.