Deep Vein ThrombosisPhase 4DACUSNCT00438230
Residual Vein Thrombosis Establishes the Optimal Duration of Oral Anticoagulants
A Phase 4 study testing Warfarin in people with Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico.
Trial summary
ABSTRACT Background The optimal duration of oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism is still uncertain . The present study addressed the possible role of the Residual Vein Thrombosis in assessing the need for a prolonged anticoagulation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Deep Vein Thrombosis
- What is being tested?
- Warfarin
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Nov 2003to Sep 2006
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- First episode of unprovoked and provoked proximal DVT of the lower limbs and treated for 3 month with oral anticoagulants
Who cannot join
- Active cancer,
- Limited life expectancy,
- Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, or an other known thrombophilic status (such as antithrombin deficiency),
- Serious liver disease,
- Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL).
About this study
Official title: Residual Vein Thrombosis (RVT) Establishes the Optimal Duration of Oral Anticoagulants After a First Episode of Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Limbs
ABSTRACT Background The optimal duration of oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism is still uncertain . The present study addressed the possible role of the Residual Vein Thrombosis in assessing the need for a prolonged anticoagulation.
Methods Patients with a first episode of symptomatic unprovoked or provoked proximal Vein Thrombosis (VT) were given Oral Anticoagulant Treatment (OAT) for 3 months. Residual Vein Thrombosis (RVT), ultrasonographically-detected, will be then assessed. Patients without RVT did not continue OAT, whereas those with RVT will be randomized to either stop or continue OAT for 9 more months. Patients were followed-up prospectively focusing on the study outcomes: occurrence of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding over a period of at least 12 months after OAT discontinuation.
Read the detailed description
INTRODUCTION Long-term anticoagulant treatment with adjusted doses of vitamin K antagonists is highly effective in preventing recurrent events after a first episode of unprovoked Venous ThromboEmbolism (VTE), even if the optimal duration of this therapy is still uncertain. Since the risk of recurrency is greatest in the first year after the initial thrombotic episode and gradually diminishes thereafter, the benefit of an extended course of anticoagulant treatment may be offset over time by the persisting risk of clinically important bleeding.
A potential clinically relevant approach for establishing the optimal duration of Oral AntCoagulant Therapy (OAT) is that of predicting the individual risk for thrombotic recurrency after the index Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT). Although the current scheme for establishing the duration of OAT is based on the nature of index DVT (idiopathic or provoked), some new data starting to select other parameters to optimize this decision. Recently, the use of D-dimer has been proven to be effective for selecting OAC duration; however, this investigation evaluated only patients with idiopathic DVT and, moreover, the use of D-dimer can not be easily handle by most of Institutions.
In earlier prospective studies conducted in patients with symptomatic DVT, the presence of a residual thrombus was associated with an increased risk of thrombotic recurrencies either in idiopathic or provoked venous thrombosis. Interestingly, recurrent events occurred not only in the previously affected veins but also in other sites, thus suggesting that Residual Vein Thrombosis (RVT) may express a pro-thrombotic status. Based on these findings, the detection of RVT may be, therefore, of help in establishing the duration of anticoagulation.
To test this hypothesis, we planned a randomized, prospective, follow-up study in patients with a first episode of symptomatic DVT treated with OAT for 3 months. Patients without RVT will not continue anticoagulation, whereas those with RVT will be randomized to either stop or resume anticoagulation.
METHODS Study patients. Patients with a first episode of documented unprovoked and provoked proximal DVT will be eligible for the study if they had completed at least three months of OAT (target INR 2.5, range 2.0-3.0). Provoked DVTs are defined as thrombotic episodes associated with pregnancy or puerperium, recent (i.e. within three months) fracture or plaster casting of a leg, immobilization with confinement to bed for three consecutive days and surgery with general anesthesia lasting longer than 30 minutes. Unprovoked DVTs are defined as thrombotic episodes occurred in apparently healthy individuals. Patients with active cancer, limited life expectancy, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, or an other known thrombophilic status (such as antithrombin deficiency), serious liver disease, renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL), those who lived too far from the center will be excluded from the study. The study has been approved by the institutional review boards of all participating centers. All enrolled patients will provide written informed consent.
Study Design. This is a multicenter prospective study in patients with a first episode of symptomatic (either provoked or idiopathic) proximal DVT detected by Compression UltraSonography (C-US) and receiving OAT [warfarin (Coumadin, Bristol Myers Squibb) for 3 months. At this time, subjects who agreed to participate in the study have a physical examination to assess baseline clinical conditions and to exclude contraindications. C-US of the proximal deep vein system in both legs will be performed, measuring the diameters of any detectable thrombus in the Common Femoral Vein (CFV) and Popliteal Veins (PV). Images will be obtained in transverse section only. Lumen compressibility will be then evaluated on CFV and PV by gentle pressure of the probe, as previously described. Briefly, the major and the minor diameters of the vein segment are measured and recorded before and after compression. C-US findings are scored as "absence of RVT" when residual thrombus occupied, at maximum compressibility, less than 40% of the vein area. Patients without RVT will not continue anticoagulation, whereas those with RVT will be randomized to either stop or continue OAT (INR 2.0-3.0) for additional 9 months. A different randomization sequence for each different study site is computer generated and encapsulated in a randomization computer program. The sequences are balanced by blocks of ten.
Study outcomes and Follow-up. From the assignment visit, patients will be followed up for at least one year after OAT discontinuation; during the follow-up period, patients will be contacted by the clinical centers every 3 months. C-US will be performed only when recurrent symptomatic DVT is suspected. The study outcome is the composite of confirmed recurrent venous thromboembolism (including DVT and/or fatal or non-fatal pulmonary embolism) and major bleeding events from the index DVT to the last day of follow-up. In cases of suspected DVT recurrence the results of ultrasonography will be compared with the previous examination. A diagnosis of recurrent venous thrombosis is made if a previously fully compressible segment (contralateral or ipsilateral) became incompressible. In absence of a previous normal C-US, DVT recurrence is diagnosed if a previously non-occlusive thrombus shifted to occlusive thrombus, provided the vein area before compression had increased by more than 50%); in undetermined cases, contrast venography was performed. In patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, diagnosis of recurrence is based on objective algorithms using clinical probability, ventilation-perfusion lung scanning/helical computed tomography, compression ultrasonography and/or D-dimer if indicated. The diagnosis of clinically relevant haemorrhage will be made in case of decrease of haemoglobin levels > 2.0 gr/dl, retroperitoneal, intracranial or life-threatening. Patients has been instructed to contact the clinical center immediately if symptoms developed suggestive of venous thromboembolism or bleeding. All suspected outcome events and all deaths will be evaluated by a central adjudication committee whose members were unaware of the name of the subject, the enrolling center, the C-US findings and the assigned group.
Statistical analysis. Baseline differences between groups will be assessed by the chi-square test (Yates' correction) for categorical variables and t-test or Mann-Withney U test for continuous variables, as appropriate. Data will be analyzed on intention-to-treat basis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves are plotted to estimate the cumulative incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding. Patients who during the study will develop clinical conditions interfering with the study outcomes (such as ischemic heart disease, cancer, stroke, superficial vein thrombosis, etc) and left the assigned group will be regularly followed-up and included in analysis. Hazard ratios and their 95 percent confidence intervals will be calculated using the Cox's proportional hazards model. The data will be analyzed using the Prism statistical software package (Version 3.0, GraphPad Software Incorporated, San Diego, CA) and the SPSS statistical package (Version 14.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
- Conditions
- Deep Vein Thrombosis
- Being tested
- Warfarin
- Keywords
- Residual vein thrombosis, Optimal duration, Oral anticoagulants
- Medical subject headings
- Venous Thrombosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
WarfarinDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism
major and minor haemorrhage
death
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2003
- Study completionSep 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Deep Vein ThrombosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 250 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Sergio Siragusa, MD, Study chair, University Hospital of Palermo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00438230
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 000743
- Acronym
- DACUS
- Status last verified
- Feb 2007
- First submitted
- 20 Feb 2007
- Last updated
- 22 Feb 2007
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Siragusa S, Malato A, Anastasio R, Cigna V, Milio G, Amato C, Bellisi M, Attanzio MT, Cormaci O, Pellegrino M, Dolce A, Casuccio A, Bajardi G, Mariani G. Residual vein thrombosis to establish duration of anticoagulation after a first episode of deep vein thrombosis: the Duration of Anticoagulation based on Compression UltraSonography (DACUS) study. Blood. 2008 Aug 1;112(3):511-5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-131656. Epub 2008 May 22.
PubMed 18497320
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Feb 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Residual Vein Thrombosis (RVT) Establishes the Optimal Duration of Oral Anticoagulants After a First Episode of Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Limbs
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00438230
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DACUS / 000743
- Conditions
- Deep Vein Thrombosis
- Keywords
- Residual vein thrombosis, Optimal duration, Oral anticoagulants
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 250 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria PoliclinicoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2003
- Study completion
- Sep 2006
- First posted
- 22 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
ABSTRACT Background The optimal duration of oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism is still uncertain . The present study addressed the possible role of the Residual Vein Thrombosis in assessing the need for a prolonged anticoagulation.
Methods Patients with a first episode of symptomatic unprovoked or provoked proximal Vein Thrombosis (VT) were given Oral Anticoagulant Treatment (OAT) for 3 months. Residual Vein Thrombosis (RVT), ultrasonographically-detected, will be then assessed. Patients without RVT did not continue OAT, whereas those with RVT will be randomized to either stop or continue OAT for 9 more months. Patients were followed-up prospectively focusing on the study outcomes: occurrence of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding over a period of at least 12 months after OAT discontinuation.
Detailed description
INTRODUCTION Long-term anticoagulant treatment with adjusted doses of vitamin K antagonists is highly effective in preventing recurrent events after a first episode of unprovoked Venous ThromboEmbolism (VTE), even if the optimal duration of this therapy is still uncertain. Since the risk of recurrency is greatest in the first year after the initial thrombotic episode and gradually diminishes thereafter, the benefit of an extended course of anticoagulant treatment may be offset over time by the persisting risk of clinically important bleeding.
A potential clinically relevant approach for establishing the optimal duration of Oral AntCoagulant Therapy (OAT) is that of predicting the individual risk for thrombotic recurrency after the index Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT). Although the current scheme for establishing the duration of OAT is based on the nature of index DVT (idiopathic or provoked), some new data starting to select other parameters to optimize this decision. Recently, the use of D-dimer has been proven to be effective for selecting OAC duration; however, this investigation evaluated only patients with idiopathic DVT and, moreover, the use of D-dimer can not be easily handle by most of Institutions.
In earlier prospective studies conducted in patients with symptomatic DVT, the presence of a residual thrombus was associated with an increased risk of thrombotic recurrencies either in idiopathic or provoked venous thrombosis. Interestingly, recurrent events occurred not only in the previously affected veins but also in other sites, thus suggesting that Residual Vein Thrombosis (RVT) may express a pro-thrombotic status. Based on these findings, the detection of RVT may be, therefore, of help in establishing the duration of anticoagulation.
To test this hypothesis, we planned a randomized, prospective, follow-up study in patients with a first episode of symptomatic DVT treated with OAT for 3 months. Patients without RVT will not continue anticoagulation, whereas those with RVT will be randomized to either stop or resume anticoagulation.
METHODS Study patients. Patients with a first episode of documented unprovoked and provoked proximal DVT will be eligible for the study if they had completed at least three months of OAT (target INR 2.5, range 2.0-3.0). Provoked DVTs are defined as thrombotic episodes associated with pregnancy or puerperium, recent (i.e. within three months) fracture or plaster casting of a leg, immobilization with confinement to bed for three consecutive days and surgery with general anesthesia lasting longer than 30 minutes. Unprovoked DVTs are defined as thrombotic episodes occurred in apparently healthy individuals. Patients with active cancer, limited life expectancy, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, or an other known thrombophilic status (such as antithrombin deficiency), serious liver disease, renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL), those who lived too far from the center will be excluded from the study. The study has been approved by the institutional review boards of all participating centers. All enrolled patients will provide written informed consent.
Study Design. This is a multicenter prospective study in patients with a first episode of symptomatic (either provoked or idiopathic) proximal DVT detected by Compression UltraSonography (C-US) and receiving OAT [warfarin (Coumadin, Bristol Myers Squibb) for 3 months. At this time, subjects who agreed to participate in the study have a physical examination to assess baseline clinical conditions and to exclude contraindications. C-US of the proximal deep vein system in both legs will be performed, measuring the diameters of any detectable thrombus in the Common Femoral Vein (CFV) and Popliteal Veins (PV). Images will be obtained in transverse section only. Lumen compressibility will be then evaluated on CFV and PV by gentle pressure of the probe, as previously described. Briefly, the major and the minor diameters of the vein segment are measured and recorded before and after compression. C-US findings are scored as "absence of RVT" when residual thrombus occupied, at maximum compressibility, less than 40% of the vein area. Patients without RVT will not continue anticoagulation, whereas those with RVT will be randomized to either stop or continue OAT (INR 2.0-3.0) for additional 9 months. A different randomization sequence for each different study site is computer generated and encapsulated in a randomization computer program. The sequences are balanced by blocks of ten.
Study outcomes and Follow-up. From the assignment visit, patients will be followed up for at least one year after OAT discontinuation; during the follow-up period, patients will be contacted by the clinical centers every 3 months. C-US will be performed only when recurrent symptomatic DVT is suspected. The study outcome is the composite of confirmed recurrent venous thromboembolism (including DVT and/or fatal or non-fatal pulmonary embolism) and major bleeding events from the index DVT to the last day of follow-up. In cases of suspected DVT recurrence the results of ultrasonography will be compared with the previous examination. A diagnosis of recurrent venous thrombosis is made if a previously fully compressible segment (contralateral or ipsilateral) became incompressible. In absence of a previous normal C-US, DVT recurrence is diagnosed if a previously non-occlusive thrombus shifted to occlusive thrombus, provided the vein area before compression had increased by more than 50%); in undetermined cases, contrast venography was performed. In patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, diagnosis of recurrence is based on objective algorithms using clinical probability, ventilation-perfusion lung scanning/helical computed tomography, compression ultrasonography and/or D-dimer if indicated. The diagnosis of clinically relevant haemorrhage will be made in case of decrease of haemoglobin levels > 2.0 gr/dl, retroperitoneal, intracranial or life-threatening. Patients has been instructed to contact the clinical center immediately if symptoms developed suggestive of venous thromboembolism or bleeding. All suspected outcome events and all deaths will be evaluated by a central adjudication committee whose members were unaware of the name of the subject, the enrolling center, the C-US findings and the assigned group.
Statistical analysis. Baseline differences between groups will be assessed by the chi-square test (Yates' correction) for categorical variables and t-test or Mann-Withney U test for continuous variables, as appropriate. Data will be analyzed on intention-to-treat basis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves are plotted to estimate the cumulative incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding. Patients who during the study will develop clinical conditions interfering with the study outcomes (such as ischemic heart disease, cancer, stroke, superficial vein thrombosis, etc) and left the assigned group will be regularly followed-up and included in analysis. Hazard ratios and their 95 percent confidence intervals will be calculated using the Cox's proportional hazards model. The data will be analyzed using the Prism statistical software package (Version 3.0, GraphPad Software Incorporated, San Diego, CA) and the SPSS statistical package (Version 14.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- First episode of unprovoked and provoked proximal DVT of the lower limbs and treated for 3 month with oral anticoagulants
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Active cancer,
- Limited life expectancy,
- Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, or an other known thrombophilic status (such as antithrombin deficiency),
- Serious liver disease,
- Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Warfarin | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism
major and minor haemorrhage
death
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Feb 2007.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18497320Siragusa S, Malato A, Anastasio R, Cigna V, Milio G, Amato C, Bellisi M, Attanzio MT, Cormaci O, Pellegrino M, Dolce A, Casuccio A, Bajardi G, Mariani G. Residual vein thrombosis to establish duration of anticoagulation after a first episode of deep vein thrombosis: the Duration of Anticoagulation based on Compression UltraSonography (DACUS) study. Blood. 2008 Aug 1;112(3):511-5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-131656. Epub 2008 May 22.
Related trials for Deep Vein Thrombosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 in Adult Participants for Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) for Venous Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adult Participants
Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Active, not recruiting
This Research Proposal Focuses on Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Nursing Care Protocol in Preventing Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in Patients Undergoing On-pump Cardiac Surgery. The Study Will Include an Intervention Group That Receives the Nursing Protocol and a Control Group That Receives Routine
On-pump Cardiac Surgery - Prevention - Intervention - Experimental Group - Control Group - Incidence - Complications, DVT - Deep Vein Thrombosis
Recruiting
DEFIANCE: RCT of ClotTriever System Versus Anticoagulation In Deep Vein Thrombosis
Venous Thromboembolism, Deep Venous Thrombosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sergio Siragusa, MD study chair
University Hospital of Palermo
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Warfarin in people with Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Feb 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism. The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00438230, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Feb 2007.