Pancreatic CancerPhase 3NCT00440167
Capecitabine/Erlotinib Followed of Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine/Erlotinib Followed of Capecitabine
A Phase 3 study testing Gemcitabine, Capecitabine and Erlotinib in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by PD Dr. med. Volker Heinemann.
Trial summary
This crossover trial is performed in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer not previously exposed to chemotherapy. The study compares a standard arm with gemcitabine plus erlotinib to an experimental arm with capecitabine plus erlotinib. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Gemcitabine, Capecitabine and Erlotinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 280 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2006to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 and 75 years
- Histologically proven pancreatic cancer stage III or IV (T1-3 N1M0 or T1 3N0 1M1)
- No option for resection with curative intent
- At least one measurable or not measurable lesion (according to RECIST)
- No previous chemotherapy or other systemic tumor therapy
- No previous radiation
Show all 19Show fewer
- Performance-Status 0-2 according to WHO/ECOG
- Life expectancy of at least 3 months
- Adequate kidney-, liver- and bone marrow function, defined as
- Absolute neutrophil count * 1,5 x 109/l
- Hemoglobin * 8 g/dl
- Thrombocytes * 100 x 109/l
- Bilirubin * 2 x upper norm (with liver mets < 5-fold)
- Serum Creatinine * 1,25 x upper norm
- Creatinine clearance > 30 ml/min (Cockroft/Gault)
- Transaminases * 2,5 x upper norm (with liver mets < 5-fold)
- Possibility of regular long-term follow-up
- Negative pregnancy test in women at childbearing age
- All patients must have signed an informed consent before study entry.
Who cannot join
- Known secondary cancer other than curatively treated basalioma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri
- Clinically unstable CNS-metastases
- Known hypersensitivity against study medication
- Severe impairment of renal function (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min)
- Severe impairment of liver function (bilirubin > 2,0 x above upper norm, transaminases > 2,5 x upper norm, or with known liver metastasis >5 x upper norm)
- Clinically relevant disease of the cardiovascular system or other vital organs
Show all 14Show fewer
- Known polyneuropathy
- Known DPD-deficiency (screening not required)
- Simultaneous treatment with the antiviral agent sorivudin or chemically related agents such as brivudin
- Pregnancy, lactation or lack of reliable contraception in women at childbearing age
- Mental disease, drug- or alcohol abuse
- Participation in another clinical trial within the last 4 weeks
- All other diseases which may prevent adequate participation in the trial
- Indication of lack of compliance with study regulations
About this study
Official title: Randomized Phase III Trial With Capecitabine/Erlotinib Followed of Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine/Erlotinib Followed of Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
This crossover trial is performed in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer not previously exposed to chemotherapy. The study compares a standard arm with gemcitabine plus erlotinib to an experimental arm with capecitabine plus erlotinib. It is the first trial of its kind to incorporate second-line treatment into the study design. Patient who fail on first-line therapy are switched to the comparator chemotherapy without erlotinib. The trial therefore not only compares two different regimens of first-line treatment, it also compares two sequential treatment strategies.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Being tested
- Gemcitabine, Capecitabine, Erlotinib
- Keywords
- capecitabine, gemcitabine, Erlotinib, pancreatic cancer, advanced
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GemcitabineDrug
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m², d 1, 8 , 15, q d28
CapecitabineDrug
Capecitabine 2 x 1000 mg/m²/ d oral, d 1 - 14 followed by 7 days Pause ("Flat Dosing")
ErlotinibDrug
Erlotinib 150 mg/d oral, daily without break
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Capecitabine; Drug: Erlotinib |
| Arm B | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Gemcitabine; Drug: Erlotinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
TTF2
Time to treatment failure, after 2nd line (crossover) therapy
Measured: approximate 6 months after first line treatment
Secondary outcomes (7)
TTF1
Time to treatment failure
Measured: approximate 6 months after randomization
Remission Rate
Measured: approximate 6 months after randomization
Overall Survival
Measured: 42 months after randomization
Clinical Benefit Response
Measured: approximate 6 months after randomization
Tumor marker CA19-9 characteristics
Measured: approximate 6 months after randomization
Quality of Life
Measured: approximate 6 months after randomization
Toxicity
Measured: approximate 6 months after randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2006
- Primary completionDec 2011
- Study completionDec 2012 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pancreatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- PD Dr. med. Volker Heinemann
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Roche Pharma AG
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, PD Dr. med. Volker Heinemann, Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
- Investigators
- Volker Heinemann, MD, Principal investigator, University of Munich - Klinikum Grosshadern
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00440167
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RC-57 crossover
- Status last verified
- Jul 2012
- First submitted
- 22 Feb 2007
- Last updated
- 9 Jul 2012
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Weiss L, Heinemann V, Fischer LE, Gieseler F, Hoehler T, Mayerle J, Quietzsch D, Reinacher-Schick A, Schenk M, Seipelt G, Siveke JT, Stahl M, Vehling-Kaiser U, Waldschmidt DT, Dorman K, Zhang D, Westphalen CB, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Boeck S, Haas M. Three-month life expectancy as inclusion criterion for clinical trials in advanced pancreatic cancer: is it really a valid tool for patient selection? Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 May;26(5):1268-1272. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03323-1. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
PubMed 37794220Guenther M, Surendran SA, Haas M, Heinemann V, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Engel J, Werner J, Boeck S, Ormanns S. TPX2 expression as a negative predictor of gemcitabine efficacy in pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2023 Jul;129(1):175-182. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02295-x. Epub 2023 May 4.
PubMed 37142730Guenther M, Haas M, Heinemann V, Kruger S, Westphalen CB, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Mayerle J, Werner J, Kirchner T, Boeck S, Ormanns S. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide as negative predictor of gemcitabine efficacy in advanced pancreatic cancer - translational results from the AIO-PK0104 Phase 3 study. Br J Cancer. 2020 Oct;123(9):1370-1376. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01029-7. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
PubMed 32830200Ormanns S, Siveke JT, Heinemann V, Haas M, Sipos B, Schlitter AM, Esposito I, Jung A, Laubender RP, Kruger S, Vehling-Kaiser U, Winkelmann C, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Clemens MR, Gauler TC, Marten A, Geissler M, Greten TF, Kirchner T, Boeck S. pERK, pAKT and p53 as tissue biomarkers in erlotinib-treated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a translational subgroup analysis from AIO-PK0104. BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 28;14:624. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-624.
PubMed 25164437Heinemann V, Vehling-Kaiser U, Waldschmidt D, Kettner E, Marten A, Winkelmann C, Klein S, Kojouharoff G, Gauler TC, von Weikersthal LF, Clemens MR, Geissler M, Greten TF, Hegewisch-Becker S, Rubanov O, Baake G, Hohler T, Ko YD, Jung A, Neugebauer S, Boeck S. Gemcitabine plus erlotinib followed by capecitabine versus capecitabine plus erlotinib followed by gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: final results of a randomised phase 3 trial of the 'Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie' (AIO-PK0104). Gut. 2013 May;62(5):751-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302759. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
PubMed 22773551
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jul 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Phase III Trial With Capecitabine/Erlotinib Followed of Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine/Erlotinib Followed of Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00440167
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RC-57 crossover
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Keywords
- capecitabine, gemcitabine, Erlotinib, pancreatic cancer, advanced
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- PD Dr. med. Volker HeinemannUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Roche Pharma AG
- Study start
- Jun 2006
- Primary completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This crossover trial is performed in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer not previously exposed to chemotherapy. The study compares a standard arm with gemcitabine plus erlotinib to an experimental arm with capecitabine plus erlotinib. It is the first trial of its kind to incorporate second-line treatment into the study design. Patient who fail on first-line therapy are switched to the comparator chemotherapy without erlotinib. The trial therefore not only compares two different regimens of first-line treatment, it also compares two sequential treatment strategies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Active comparator | Drug: Capecitabine, Drug: Erlotinib |
| Arm B | Active comparator | Drug: Gemcitabine, Drug: Erlotinib |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Age between 18 and 75 years
- Histologically proven pancreatic cancer stage III or IV (T1-3 N1M0 or T1 3N0 1M1)
- No option for resection with curative intent
- At least one measurable or not measurable lesion (according to RECIST)
- No previous chemotherapy or other systemic tumor therapy
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Known secondary cancer other than curatively treated basalioma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri
- Clinically unstable CNS-metastases
- Known hypersensitivity against study medication
- Severe impairment of renal function (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min)
- Severe impairment of liver function (bilirubin > 2,0 x above upper norm, transaminases > 2,5 x upper norm, or with known liver metastasis >5 x upper norm)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GemcitabineGemcitabine 1000 mg/m², d 1, 8 , 15, q d28 | Drug | Arm B |
| CapecitabineCapecitabine 2 x 1000 mg/m²/ d oral, d 1 - 14 followed by 7 days Pause ("Flat Dosing") | Drug | Arm A |
| ErlotinibErlotinib 150 mg/d oral, daily without break | Drug | Arm A, Arm B |
Primary outcome
TTF2
Time frame: approximate 6 months after first line treatment
Time to treatment failure, after 2nd line (crossover) therapy
7 secondary outcomes
TTF1
Time frame: approximate 6 months after randomization
Remission Rate
Time frame: approximate 6 months after randomization
Overall Survival
Time frame: 42 months after randomization
Clinical Benefit Response
Time frame: approximate 6 months after randomization
Tumor marker CA19-9 characteristics
Time frame: approximate 6 months after randomization
Quality of Life
Time frame: approximate 6 months after randomization
Toxicity
Time frame: approximate 6 months after randomization
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jul 2012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37794220Weiss L, Heinemann V, Fischer LE, Gieseler F, Hoehler T, Mayerle J, Quietzsch D, Reinacher-Schick A, Schenk M, Seipelt G, Siveke JT, Stahl M, Vehling-Kaiser U, Waldschmidt DT, Dorman K, Zhang D, Westphalen CB, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Boeck S, Haas M. Three-month life expectancy as inclusion criterion for clinical trials in advanced pancreatic cancer: is it really a valid tool for patient selection? Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 May;26(5):1268-1272. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03323-1. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37142730Guenther M, Surendran SA, Haas M, Heinemann V, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Engel J, Werner J, Boeck S, Ormanns S. TPX2 expression as a negative predictor of gemcitabine efficacy in pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2023 Jul;129(1):175-182. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02295-x. Epub 2023 May 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32830200Guenther M, Haas M, Heinemann V, Kruger S, Westphalen CB, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Mayerle J, Werner J, Kirchner T, Boeck S, Ormanns S. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide as negative predictor of gemcitabine efficacy in advanced pancreatic cancer - translational results from the AIO-PK0104 Phase 3 study. Br J Cancer. 2020 Oct;123(9):1370-1376. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01029-7. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25164437Ormanns S, Siveke JT, Heinemann V, Haas M, Sipos B, Schlitter AM, Esposito I, Jung A, Laubender RP, Kruger S, Vehling-Kaiser U, Winkelmann C, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Clemens MR, Gauler TC, Marten A, Geissler M, Greten TF, Kirchner T, Boeck S. pERK, pAKT and p53 as tissue biomarkers in erlotinib-treated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a translational subgroup analysis from AIO-PK0104. BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 28;14:624. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-624.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22773551Heinemann V, Vehling-Kaiser U, Waldschmidt D, Kettner E, Marten A, Winkelmann C, Klein S, Kojouharoff G, Gauler TC, von Weikersthal LF, Clemens MR, Geissler M, Greten TF, Hegewisch-Becker S, Rubanov O, Baake G, Hohler T, Ko YD, Jung A, Neugebauer S, Boeck S. Gemcitabine plus erlotinib followed by capecitabine versus capecitabine plus erlotinib followed by gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: final results of a randomised phase 3 trial of the 'Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie' (AIO-PK0104). Gut. 2013 May;62(5):751-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302759. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
Related trials for Pancreatic Cancer
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Volker Heinemann, MD principal investigator
University of Munich - Klinikum Grosshadern
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Gemcitabine, Capecitabine and Erlotinib in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by PD Dr. med. Volker Heinemann.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
TTF2 (time frame: approximate 6 months after first line treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00440167, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2012.