AzTrials
AzTrials

HeadacheNCT00450060

Juvenile Postlumbar Puncture Headache After Puncture With Needles With Quincke Tip or With Sprotte Tip

A study testing lumbar puncture with Quincke-design needles and lumbar puncture with Sprotte-design needles in people with Headache, run by Heidelberg University at 2 sites in Germany.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare postlumbar puncture complaints as headache or backache after lumbar puncture with needles with Quincke design or with Sprotte design in children and adolescents. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Headache
What is being tested?
lumbar puncture with Quincke-design needles and lumbar puncture with Sprotte-design needles
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
150 participants
Where
2 sitesGermany
Study dates
Jan 2007to Dec 2007
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • lumbar puncture necessary for diagnostic reasons

Who cannot join

  • intrathecal instillation at lumbar puncture
  • patients in whom severity of disease make it impossible to judge endpoint criteria

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Germany2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • University Pediatric Hospital

    Heidelberg, 69120

    Friedrich Ebinger, DM, #49-6221-568488, friedrich.ebinger@med.uni-heidelberg.de

    Friedrich Ebinger, DM

    Recruiting
  • Klinik für Kinderheilkunde und Jugendmedizin

    Heilbronn, 74078

    Recruiting

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Postlumbar Puncture Complaints After Lumbar Punctures in Children and Adolescents: Frequency and Impact by Compariosn of Two Needle Designs

The purpose of this study is to compare postlumbar puncture complaints as headache or backache after lumbar puncture with needles with Quincke design or with Sprotte design in children and adolescents.

Read the detailed description

After lumbar puncture patients may develop complaints as position dependent headache, other headache or backache. Several though not all studies in adults showed that the frequency of complaints can be reduced by using non-traumatic Sprotte-design needles instead of cutting Quincke-design needles. In children and adolescents there are no comparable data published. In most pediatric hospitals in Germany Quincke needles are used.

Comparison: Children and adolescents from 4 to 18 years of age who have to undergo a lumbar puncture are randomly attributed to puncture with Quincke needle or with Sprotte needle. During the following days headache (main criterium), position-dependent headache, backache, vomitus, and malaise are noted. Pain is measured with a visual analogue scale/faces scale.

Conditions
Headache
Being tested
lumbar puncture with Quincke-design needles, lumbar puncture with Sprotte-design needles
Keywords
postlumbar puncture headache, atraumatic needle, Sprotte, Quincke, lumbar puncture, headache, backache
Medical subject headings
Headache, Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • lumbar puncture with Quincke-design needlesDevice

  • lumbar puncture with Sprotte-design needlesDevice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. headache frequency

  2. headache intensity

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. position dependent-headache frequency

  2. position dependent-headache intensity

  3. backache frequency

  4. backache intensity

  5. practicability of needle designs (multiple punctures necessary?, longer lasting?

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Mar 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2007
  3. Study completionDec 2007 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
150 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00450060
Sponsor's protocol ID
PLPH-01/07
Status last verified
Mar 2007
First submitted
19 Mar 2007
Last updated
21 Mar 2007
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Ebinger F, Kosel C, Pietz J, Rating D. Headache and backache after lumbar puncture in children and adolescents: a prospective study. Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):1588-92. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1588.

    PubMed 15173478
  • Ebinger F, Kosel C, Pietz J, Rating D. Strict bed rest following lumbar puncture in children and adolescents is of no benefit. Neurology. 2004 Mar 23;62(6):1003-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000115387.67958.0f.

    PubMed 15037713

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing lumbar puncture with Quincke-design needles and lumbar puncture with Sprotte-design needles in people with Headache, run by Heidelberg University at 2 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Friedrich Ebinger, DM (#49-6221-568488, friedrich.ebinger@med.uni-heidelberg.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

headache frequency. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00450060, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in