AzTrials
AzTrials

Gall Bladder DiseaseNCT00459472

Operating Room Outcomes After Resident Training on a Virtual Reality Simulator

A study testing laparoscopic training curriculum in people with Gall Bladder Disease, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy before and after a laparoscopic training curriculum was implemented. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Gall Bladder Disease
What is being tested?
laparoscopic training curriculum
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2006to Aug 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • General Surgery residents at NewYork Hospital/Columbia in PGY 1, 2, or 3.

Who cannot join

  • persons who are not General Surgery residents at NewYork Hospital/Columbia in PGY 1, 2, or 3.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons

    New York, New York, 10032

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy before and after a laparoscopic training curriculum was implemented.

Read the detailed description

All general surgery interns and PGY-2's AND PGY 3's will be enrolled in a laparoscopic surgery training curriculum that includes practicing surgical skills on a laparoscopic simulator. The PI has constructed an examination on the simulator that will document a significant level of laparoscopic skill. Each general surgery intern, second, AND THIRD year general surgery resident will be required to pass this examination on the simulator prior to being given more responsibility during cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Specifically, interns, second, AND THIRD year residents must pass the examination on the simulator before they are allowed to function as primary surgeon in a supervised setting during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. These interns, PGY-2's, AND PGY 3'S would then be allowed to function as primary surgeon under the supervision of an attending surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases. The outcomes of these cases would be compared to a matched group of laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases performed by second year general surgery residents in the same supervised environment (but without having trained on the simulator) one year prior.

Being tested
laparoscopic training curriculum
Keywords
resident training, laparoscopy, virtual reality, surgical education
Medical subject headings
Gallbladder Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • laparoscopic training curriculumBehavioural

    All general surgery interns and PGY-2-5's already participate in a surgery training curriculum that includes lectures, surgery, laparoscopic training, attending surgeons evaluating performance of residents at the end of surgical procedures, written tests, and skills tests.

Study groups in NCT00459472
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TrainingOtherlaparoscopic training curriculum: all general surgery interns and PGY-2-5's already participate in a surgery training curriculum that includes lectures, surgery, laparoscopic training, attending surgeons evaluating performance of residents at the end of surgical procedures, written tests, and skills tests.
Receives: Behavioral: laparoscopic training curriculum

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Operative time

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Prevalence of complications (such as bile duct injuries, bilomas, infections, bleeding)

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Mortality rate

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Average days of hospital stay

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Apr 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2006
  3. Primary completionAug 2008
  4. Study completionAug 2008

Why it stopped: Principal investigator left institution.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00459472
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAAA9177
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
10 Apr 2007
Last updated
6 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing laparoscopic training curriculum in people with Gall Bladder Disease, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Principal investigator left institution.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Operative time (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in