Cervical Cancer ScreeningHPVFOCALNCT00461760
HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening Study
A study testing Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positive in people with Cervical Cancer Screening, run by University of British Columbia at 4 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
This is a randomised controlled trial of HPV testing with cytology triage for HPV positive women compared to liquid-based cervical cytology (LBC). Although LBC is not widely used for cervical cancer screening in Canada at present, the Pan-Canadian Cervical Cancer Forum has recommended its use and as it is likely to be… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 65 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer Screening
- What is being tested?
- Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positive
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25,223 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Mar 2007to 30 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 65 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women from 25 to 65 years of age, registered with the Medical Services Plain in BC attending a collaborating healthcare provider for routine cervical screening in Metro Vancouver or Greater Victoria.
Who cannot join
- pregnant
- history of invasive cervical cancer
- no cervix
- HIV positive or on immunosuppressive treatments
- unable or unwilling to give informed consent
- Treatment of moderate or greater dysplasia within last 5 years
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Canada4 sites
Laurie Smith
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4G8
BC Cancer
Vancouver, British Columbia
BC Center for Disease Control
Vancouver, British Columbia
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Evaluation of HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening
This is a randomised controlled trial of HPV testing with cytology triage for HPV positive women compared to liquid-based cervical cytology (LBC). Although LBC is not widely used for cervical cancer screening in Canada at present, the Pan-Canadian Cervical Cancer Forum has recommended its use and as it is likely to be the standard of care by the time these data are published, the trial has been designed to account for this. Further, LBC will improve the cost-effectiveness of HPV testing because the LBC medium is suitable for both HPV testing as well as cytology and thereby allows the triage testing to be undertaken from the same sample without having to recall the women.
Read the detailed description
There is now an overwhelming body of data to show that HPV testing has the potential to improve the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs and thereby reduce rates of cervical cancer. As a result, there is a growing ethical dilemma in that we potentially have the means to prevent disease and death among Canadian women, and yet the studies that have been undertaken do not offer the standard of evidence that is required to change large-scale public health programs such as cervical cancer screening. In recognition of this, the Pan-Canadian Cervical Cancer Forum (PCCCF) has called for the evaluation of HPV testing within the context of a Canadian organised cervical cancer screening program. Given the potential health benefits that could be achieved, and that a pan-Canadian expert group has issued a consensus statement calling for the evaluation of HPV testing for primary screening, it is now an imperative that a properly designed and powered study be conducted to definitively establish whether it will provide the hypothesised health benefits within Canada.
The results of this trial will demonstrate whether or not the use of HPV testing as a single primary screening test within an organised Canadian cervical cancer screening program will be able to 1) provide further reductions in cervical cancer incidence, 2) allow the screening interval to be extended and 3) improve the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening. If this trial demonstrates that HPV testing will provide these benefits, the BCCA will implement HPV testing as a single primary screening test within the provincial cervical cancer screening program and the trial will directly influence the provision of this service in BC. In addition, many other Canadian provinces and territories are either implementing or have plans to implement screening programs similar to the one in BC and by the time this trial is completed, many will have these programs operating. Therefore, the results of this trial will be directly applicable to these programs and constitute a demonstration project for the rest of Canada.
A list of women who are due for cervical screening will be sent to study collaborating Family Physicians (FPs) each month from the study centre in the provincial screening program. An invitation letter will be sent by the FP to potentially eligible women due for cervical cancer screening. If women are interested in participating, they will contact the study centre for more information. Study staff discuss the details of the trial with them, confirm eligibility and administer a short survey. Women who consent to the trial will visit the FP for their screening test and samples will be obtained and sent to the BC Central Laboratory Service (BC-CLS) where it will be randomized into one of the study arms:
Note: Recruitment to the safety arm was complete December 31, 2010 and from that point forward, women randomized 1:1 into the control or intervention arms only. A total of ~25,000 women (~9140 each in the Control and Intervention arms respectively, and ~6,000 in the Safety arm) will be enrolled in the FOCAL trial.
Control arm:
Sample tested with LBC.
- Those with negative results will be recalled for next screen at 2 years and if negative again, for the exit screen at 4 years. Those with positive cytology results have reflex HPV testing, or referral to colposcopy based on results.
- Exit screen testing is both HPV and cytology testing 2-year safety-check arm: Sample tested for HPV.
- HPV negatives recalled at 2-years for the exit screen with cytology
- Women who are HPV positive will have their residual LBC specimen processed for cytology and be managed according to the same protocol as HPV-positive women in the 4-year intervention arm. 4-year intervention arm: Sample tested for HPV.
- HPV negatives will be recalled at 4 years for their exit screen with HPV and cytology testing
- Women who are HPV positive will undergo reflex cytology testing and those cytology negative will be recalled at 12 months for HPV testing and cytology. At 12 mos, participants will be referred to colposcopy if > or =ASC-US or HPV positive. If HPV and cytology negative at 12 months returned to the routine screening pool for this arm and recalled for the exit screen at 4-years.
- Women who are HPV positive and > or = ASC-US will be referred to colposcopy and managed according to colposcopy results.
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer Screening
- Being tested
- Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positive
- Keywords
- HPV Screening/Testing for cervical cancer screening
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positiveProcedure or surgery
See Detailed Description.
Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positiveProcedure or surgery
See detailed description.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Women with normal cytology at recruitment will be recalled for their next routine screen at 2 years and if negative again, for their exit screen at 4 years, all according to current provincial guidelines. Receives: Procedure: Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positive |
| 2 | Active comparator | Women with abnormal cytology at recruitment or at the 2 year screen will be followed according to provincial guidelines based on their cytology results. Receives: Procedure: Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positive |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Histologically confirmed greater than or equal to CIN2 detected at 2 years in both the control and the safety-check arms.
Measured: 2 years
Histologically confirmed greater than or equal to CIN3 detected over the 4 years post recruitment in the control and intervention arms will be evaluated and compared as a surrogate marker for estimating reductions in the incidence of cervical cancer.
Measured: 4 years
Detection of histologically confirmed greater than or equal to CIN3 in the participants allocated to 6-month retesting.
The total estimated cost per woman screened and the total estimated cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained for each technology.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Clearance of HPV infection in women who are HPV positive at recruitment
HPV type specific prevalence in the screening population
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2007
- Primary completion30 Apr 2017
- Study completion30 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical Cancer ScreeningStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 25,223 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gina Ogilvie, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- Andrew Coldman, PhD, Principal investigator, University of British ColumbiaGina Ogilvie, MD, Principal investigator, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00461760
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H06-04032
- Acronym
- HPVFOCAL
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 13 Apr 2007
- Last updated
- 19 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Smith LW, Racey CS, Gondara L, Krajden M, Lee M, Martin RE, Stuart G, Peacock S, Coldman AJ, Franco EL, van Niekerk D, Ogilvie GS. Women's acceptability of and experience with primary human papillomavirus testing for cervix screening: HPV FOCAL trial cross-sectional online survey results. BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 7;11(10):e052084. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052084.
PubMed 34620663
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Evaluation of HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00461760
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HPVFOCAL / H06-04032
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer Screening
- Keywords
- HPV Screening/Testing for cervical cancer screening
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25,223 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- Mar 2007
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomised controlled trial of HPV testing with cytology triage for HPV positive women compared to liquid-based cervical cytology (LBC). Although LBC is not widely used for cervical cancer screening in Canada at present, the Pan-Canadian Cervical Cancer Forum has recommended its use and as it is likely to be the standard of care by the time these data are published, the trial has been designed to account for this. Further, LBC will improve the cost-effectiveness of HPV testing because the LBC medium is suitable for both HPV testing as well as cytology and thereby allows the triage testing to be undertaken from the same sample without having to recall the women.
Detailed description
There is now an overwhelming body of data to show that HPV testing has the potential to improve the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs and thereby reduce rates of cervical cancer. As a result, there is a growing ethical dilemma in that we potentially have the means to prevent disease and death among Canadian women, and yet the studies that have been undertaken do not offer the standard of evidence that is required to change large-scale public health programs such as cervical cancer screening. In recognition of this, the Pan-Canadian Cervical Cancer Forum (PCCCF) has called for the evaluation of HPV testing within the context of a Canadian organised cervical cancer screening program. Given the potential health benefits that could be achieved, and that a pan-Canadian expert group has issued a consensus statement calling for the evaluation of HPV testing for primary screening, it is now an imperative that a properly designed and powered study be conducted to definitively establish whether it will provide the hypothesised health benefits within Canada.
The results of this trial will demonstrate whether or not the use of HPV testing as a single primary screening test within an organised Canadian cervical cancer screening program will be able to 1) provide further reductions in cervical cancer incidence, 2) allow the screening interval to be extended and 3) improve the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening. If this trial demonstrates that HPV testing will provide these benefits, the BCCA will implement HPV testing as a single primary screening test within the provincial cervical cancer screening program and the trial will directly influence the provision of this service in BC. In addition, many other Canadian provinces and territories are either implementing or have plans to implement screening programs similar to the one in BC and by the time this trial is completed, many will have these programs operating. Therefore, the results of this trial will be directly applicable to these programs and constitute a demonstration project for the rest of Canada.
A list of women who are due for cervical screening will be sent to study collaborating Family Physicians (FPs) each month from the study centre in the provincial screening program. An invitation letter will be sent by the FP to potentially eligible women due for cervical cancer screening. If women are interested in participating, they will contact the study centre for more information. Study staff discuss the details of the trial with them, confirm eligibility and administer a short survey. Women who consent to the trial will visit the FP for their screening test and samples will be obtained and sent to the BC Central Laboratory Service (BC-CLS) where it will be randomized into one of the study arms:
Note: Recruitment to the safety arm was complete December 31, 2010 and from that point forward, women randomized 1:1 into the control or intervention arms only. A total of ~25,000 women (~9140 each in the Control and Intervention arms respectively, and ~6,000 in the Safety arm) will be enrolled in the FOCAL trial.
Control arm:
Sample tested with LBC.
- Those with negative results will be recalled for next screen at 2 years and if negative again, for the exit screen at 4 years. Those with positive cytology results have reflex HPV testing, or referral to colposcopy based on results.
- Exit screen testing is both HPV and cytology testing 2-year safety-check arm: Sample tested for HPV.
- HPV negatives recalled at 2-years for the exit screen with cytology
- Women who are HPV positive will have their residual LBC specimen processed for cytology and be managed according to the same protocol as HPV-positive women in the 4-year intervention arm. 4-year intervention arm: Sample tested for HPV.
- HPV negatives will be recalled at 4 years for their exit screen with HPV and cytology testing
- Women who are HPV positive will undergo reflex cytology testing and those cytology negative will be recalled at 12 months for HPV testing and cytology. At 12 mos, participants will be referred to colposcopy if > or =ASC-US or HPV positive. If HPV and cytology negative at 12 months returned to the routine screening pool for this arm and recalled for the exit screen at 4-years.
- Women who are HPV positive and > or = ASC-US will be referred to colposcopy and managed according to colposcopy results.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Procedure: Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positiveWomen with normal cytology at recruitment will be recalled for their next routine screen at 2 years and if negative again, for their exit screen at 4 years, all according to current provincial guidelines. |
| 2 | Active comparator | Procedure: Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positiveWomen with abnormal cytology at recruitment or at the 2 year screen will be followed according to provincial guidelines based on their cytology results. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women from 25 to 65 years of age, registered with the Medical Services Plain in BC attending a collaborating healthcare provider for routine cervical screening in Metro Vancouver or Greater Victoria.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- pregnant
- history of invasive cervical cancer
- no cervix
- HIV positive or on immunosuppressive treatments
- unable or unwilling to give informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positiveSee Detailed Description. | Procedure or surgery | 1 |
| Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positiveSee detailed description. | Procedure or surgery | 2 |
Primary outcome
Histologically confirmed greater than or equal to CIN2 detected at 2 years in both the control and the safety-check arms.
Time frame: 2 years
Histologically confirmed greater than or equal to CIN3 detected over the 4 years post recruitment in the control and intervention arms will be evaluated and compared as a surrogate marker for estimating reductions in the incidence of cervical cancer.
Time frame: 4 years
Detection of histologically confirmed greater than or equal to CIN3 in the participants allocated to 6-month retesting.
The total estimated cost per woman screened and the total estimated cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained for each technology.
2 secondary outcomes
Clearance of HPV infection in women who are HPV positive at recruitment
HPV type specific prevalence in the screening population
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jun 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34620663Smith LW, Racey CS, Gondara L, Krajden M, Lee M, Martin RE, Stuart G, Peacock S, Coldman AJ, Franco EL, van Niekerk D, Ogilvie GS. Women's acceptability of and experience with primary human papillomavirus testing for cervix screening: HPV FOCAL trial cross-sectional online survey results. BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 7;11(10):e052084. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052084.
Related trials for Cervical Cancer Screening
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Audit of Cervical Cytology Services in an Early Cancer Detection Unit
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Not yet recruiting
Remote Robotic Surgery for Gynecologic Cancer: A Safety and Effectiveness Study
Endometrial Cancer, Cervical Cancer (Early Detection)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Prospective Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Screening Using Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Analysis
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Active, not recruiting
Addressing Stigma in Screening and Diagnostic Delay for Cervical Cancer
Cervical Cancer Screening
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Targeted Therapy Directed by Genetic Testing in Treating Patients With Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors, Lymphomas, or Multiple Myeloma (The MATCH Screening Trial)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrew Coldman, PhD principal investigator
University of British Columbia
Gina Ogilvie, MD principal investigator
University of British Columbia
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positive in people with Cervical Cancer Screening, run by University of British Columbia at 4 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Histologically confirmed greater than or equal to CIN2 detected at 2 years in both the control and the safety-check arms. (time frame: 2 years). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00461760, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2019.