AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical Cancer ScreeningHPVFOCALNCT00461760

HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening Study

A study testing Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positive in people with Cervical Cancer Screening, run by University of British Columbia at 4 sites in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomised controlled trial of HPV testing with cytology triage for HPV positive women compared to liquid-based cervical cytology (LBC). Although LBC is not widely used for cervical cancer screening in Canada at present, the Pan-Canadian Cervical Cancer Forum has recommended its use and as it is likely to be… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 65 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Cancer Screening
What is being tested?
Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positive
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
25,223 participants
Where
4 sitesCanada
Study dates
Mar 2007to 30 Jun 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women from 25 to 65 years of age, registered with the Medical Services Plain in BC attending a collaborating healthcare provider for routine cervical screening in Metro Vancouver or Greater Victoria.

Who cannot join

  • pregnant
  • history of invasive cervical cancer
  • no cervix
  • HIV positive or on immunosuppressive treatments
  • unable or unwilling to give informed consent
  • Treatment of moderate or greater dysplasia within last 5 years

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

Canada4 sites
  • Laurie Smith

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4G8

  • BC Cancer

    Vancouver, British Columbia

  • BC Center for Disease Control

    Vancouver, British Columbia

  • Vancouver General Hospital

    Vancouver, British Columbia

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Evaluation of HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening

This is a randomised controlled trial of HPV testing with cytology triage for HPV positive women compared to liquid-based cervical cytology (LBC). Although LBC is not widely used for cervical cancer screening in Canada at present, the Pan-Canadian Cervical Cancer Forum has recommended its use and as it is likely to be the standard of care by the time these data are published, the trial has been designed to account for this. Further, LBC will improve the cost-effectiveness of HPV testing because the LBC medium is suitable for both HPV testing as well as cytology and thereby allows the triage testing to be undertaken from the same sample without having to recall the women.

Read the detailed description

There is now an overwhelming body of data to show that HPV testing has the potential to improve the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs and thereby reduce rates of cervical cancer. As a result, there is a growing ethical dilemma in that we potentially have the means to prevent disease and death among Canadian women, and yet the studies that have been undertaken do not offer the standard of evidence that is required to change large-scale public health programs such as cervical cancer screening. In recognition of this, the Pan-Canadian Cervical Cancer Forum (PCCCF) has called for the evaluation of HPV testing within the context of a Canadian organised cervical cancer screening program. Given the potential health benefits that could be achieved, and that a pan-Canadian expert group has issued a consensus statement calling for the evaluation of HPV testing for primary screening, it is now an imperative that a properly designed and powered study be conducted to definitively establish whether it will provide the hypothesised health benefits within Canada.

The results of this trial will demonstrate whether or not the use of HPV testing as a single primary screening test within an organised Canadian cervical cancer screening program will be able to 1) provide further reductions in cervical cancer incidence, 2) allow the screening interval to be extended and 3) improve the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening. If this trial demonstrates that HPV testing will provide these benefits, the BCCA will implement HPV testing as a single primary screening test within the provincial cervical cancer screening program and the trial will directly influence the provision of this service in BC. In addition, many other Canadian provinces and territories are either implementing or have plans to implement screening programs similar to the one in BC and by the time this trial is completed, many will have these programs operating. Therefore, the results of this trial will be directly applicable to these programs and constitute a demonstration project for the rest of Canada.

A list of women who are due for cervical screening will be sent to study collaborating Family Physicians (FPs) each month from the study centre in the provincial screening program. An invitation letter will be sent by the FP to potentially eligible women due for cervical cancer screening. If women are interested in participating, they will contact the study centre for more information. Study staff discuss the details of the trial with them, confirm eligibility and administer a short survey. Women who consent to the trial will visit the FP for their screening test and samples will be obtained and sent to the BC Central Laboratory Service (BC-CLS) where it will be randomized into one of the study arms:

Note: Recruitment to the safety arm was complete December 31, 2010 and from that point forward, women randomized 1:1 into the control or intervention arms only. A total of ~25,000 women (~9140 each in the Control and Intervention arms respectively, and ~6,000 in the Safety arm) will be enrolled in the FOCAL trial.

Control arm:

Sample tested with LBC.

  • Those with negative results will be recalled for next screen at 2 years and if negative again, for the exit screen at 4 years. Those with positive cytology results have reflex HPV testing, or referral to colposcopy based on results.
  • Exit screen testing is both HPV and cytology testing 2-year safety-check arm: Sample tested for HPV.
  • HPV negatives recalled at 2-years for the exit screen with cytology
  • Women who are HPV positive will have their residual LBC specimen processed for cytology and be managed according to the same protocol as HPV-positive women in the 4-year intervention arm. 4-year intervention arm: Sample tested for HPV.
  • HPV negatives will be recalled at 4 years for their exit screen with HPV and cytology testing
  • Women who are HPV positive will undergo reflex cytology testing and those cytology negative will be recalled at 12 months for HPV testing and cytology. At 12 mos, participants will be referred to colposcopy if > or =ASC-US or HPV positive. If HPV and cytology negative at 12 months returned to the routine screening pool for this arm and recalled for the exit screen at 4-years.
  • Women who are HPV positive and > or = ASC-US will be referred to colposcopy and managed according to colposcopy results.
Being tested
Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positive
Keywords
HPV Screening/Testing for cervical cancer screening

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positiveProcedure or surgery

    See Detailed Description.

  • Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positiveProcedure or surgery

    See detailed description.

Study groups in NCT00461760
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorWomen with normal cytology at recruitment will be recalled for their next routine screen at 2 years and if negative again, for their exit screen at 4 years, all according to current provincial guidelines.
Receives: Procedure: Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positive
2Active comparatorWomen with abnormal cytology at recruitment or at the 2 year screen will be followed according to provincial guidelines based on their cytology results.
Receives: Procedure: Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positive

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Histologically confirmed greater than or equal to CIN2 detected at 2 years in both the control and the safety-check arms.

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Histologically confirmed greater than or equal to CIN3 detected over the 4 years post recruitment in the control and intervention arms will be evaluated and compared as a surrogate marker for estimating reductions in the incidence of cervical cancer.

    Measured: 4 years

  3. Detection of histologically confirmed greater than or equal to CIN3 in the participants allocated to 6-month retesting.

  4. The total estimated cost per woman screened and the total estimated cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained for each technology.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Clearance of HPV infection in women who are HPV positive at recruitment

  2. HPV type specific prevalence in the screening population

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Apr 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2007
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2017
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
25,223 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00461760
Sponsor's protocol ID
H06-04032
Acronym
HPVFOCAL
Status last verified
Jun 2019
First submitted
13 Apr 2007
Last updated
19 Jun 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Smith LW, Racey CS, Gondara L, Krajden M, Lee M, Martin RE, Stuart G, Peacock S, Coldman AJ, Franco EL, van Niekerk D, Ogilvie GS. Women's acceptability of and experience with primary human papillomavirus testing for cervix screening: HPV FOCAL trial cross-sectional online survey results. BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 7;11(10):e052084. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052084.

    PubMed 34620663

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cervical cancer screening undertaken by HPV testing as a single primary screening test with cytology triage of women who are HPV positive in people with Cervical Cancer Screening, run by University of British Columbia at 4 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Histologically confirmed greater than or equal to CIN2 detected at 2 years in both the control and the safety-check arms. (time frame: 2 years). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00461760, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in