Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPhase 1NCT00462761
A Phase I Study of AC220 in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Regardless of FLT3 Status
A Phase 1 study testing AC220 in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Leukemia, run by Daiichi Sankyo at 5 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Patients received oral AC220 daily for 14 days to study the side effects, tolerability and best dose for treating relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia, regardless of FLT3 status. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- AC220
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 76 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2007to Dec 2009
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males and females age ≥ 18 years;
- Histopathologically documented primary or secondary AML, as defined by WHO criteria (Jaffe et al, 2001), confirmed by pathology review at treating institution, meeting at least one of the following:
- Refractory to at least 1 cycle of induction chemotherapy, or
- Relapsed after at least 1 cycle of induction chemotherapy, or
- Patient is not, according to the clinical judgment of the Principal Investigator, a candidate for induction chemotherapy due to age, comorbidity, or other factors;
- Patients for whom no standard therapies are anticipated to result in a durable remission, or who have failed potentially curative therapy, or who refuse standard therapy or patients for whom there is no known therapy of documented treatment benefit;
Show all 15Show fewer
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-3;
- In the absence of rapidly progressing disease, the interval from prior treatment to time of AC220 administration should be at least 2 weeks for cytotoxic agents (other than hydroxyurea, per Section 8.8), or at least 5 half-lives for noncytotoxic agents;
- Persistent chronic clinically significant toxicities from prior chemotherapy or surgery must be less than Grade 2;
- Serum creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL;
- Total serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × ULN unless considered due to Gilbert's syndrome or leukemic organ involvement;
- Serum AST or ALT ≤ 3.0 × ULN unless considered due to leukemic organ involvement;
- Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (urine β-hCG);
- Females of childbearing potential and sexually mature males must agree to use a medically accepted method of contraception throughout the study;
- Written informed consent must be provided.
Who cannot join
- Histologic diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia;
- Clinically active central nervous system leukemia;
- Persistent clinically significant toxicity from prior chemotherapy that is Grade 2 or higher by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3);
- Bone marrow transplant within 2 months prior to study;
- Active, uncontrolled infection;
- Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to study;
Show all 11Show fewer
- Radiation therapy within 4 weeks prior to, or concurrent with, study;
- Human immunodeficiency virus positivity;
- Active hepatitis B or C or other active liver disease;
- Women who are pregnant, lactating, or unwilling to use contraception if of childbearing potential;
- Medical condition, serious intercurrent illness, or other extenuating circumstance that, in the judgment of the Principal Investigator, could jeopardize patient safety or interfere with the objectives of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 2 countries.
5 sites in 2 countries
United States3 sites
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198
Georgia2 sites
Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Clinic
Tbilisi
Hematology and Chemotherapy Clinic
Tbilisi
About this study
Official title: Phase I Open-Label, Sequential Dose Escalation Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of AC220 When Administered Daily to Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Patients received oral AC220 daily for 14 days to study the side effects, tolerability and best dose for treating relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia, regardless of FLT3 status.
Read the detailed description
This is a multi-center clinical study conducted in the USA and two international sites. This open-label, dose escalation study was designed to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of orally administered AC220 as a single agent given daily for 14 days. Cohorts of 3 patients received AC220 until dose limiting toxicity was noted (DLT). At that point cohorts expanded to 6 patients until MTD was determined. Patients not experiencing DLT or significant disease progression at Day 15 may have continued receiving AC220 at the discretion of the Investigator and Sponsor. FLT3 positive and negative patients were allowed to participate.
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, AML, MDS
- Being tested
- AC220
- Keywords
- RTK, kinase, inhibitor, tyrosine, acute, FLT3, AC220, pharmacokinetic, pharmacokinetics, PK, pharmacodynamic, pharmacodynamics, mutations, PD, receptor, class III, relapsed, refractory, t(8;21), q22;q22
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Recurrence, Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 4, Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute, Primary Myelofibrosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AC220Drug
Also called Quizartinib
Powder in bottle formulation supplied as 50mg or 350 mg in glass, crimped serum vials. Requires reconstitution by a pharmacist, and must be stored securely and protected from light.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AC220 | Experimental | Determine safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of AC220 Receives: Drug: AC220 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Treatment Related Adverse Events Following Oral Administration of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days post last dose
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Treatment-related Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events By At Least 10% of All Participants By Dose Group Following Oral Administration of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days post last dose
Secondary outcomes (4)
Number of Participants Achieving a Best Disease Response by Dose Cohort in Terms of Progressive Disease Following Oral Administration of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Progressive disease response criteria included doubling of blast count % in bone marrow (biopsy or aspirate) from baseline; considering measurements starting on Study Day 15, doubling of blast count % in blood from baseline; death determined to be related to disease or disease progression; and investigator reported disease progression.
Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose, up to approximately 3 years
Number of Participants Achieving a Best Disease Response by Dose Cohort in Terms of Best Overall Response Following Oral Administration of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Complete Response (CR) response criteria included either a post-baseline bone marrow (BM) biopsy or aspiration % blasts <5%, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1×10^9/L and platelet count >100×10^9/L on the same date as the qualifying BM assessment. CRp response included all CR criteria met, except participant did not experience a platelet recovery (ANC recovery required). CRi response included a qualifying BM result, but not an ANC recovery. Participants may or may not have had a platelet recovery and were not required to be transfusion independent. Partial remission (PR) response included a decrease of ≥50% in % blasts in the BM aspirate or biopsy from baseline to a post-baseline result between 5% to 25% in the bone marrow aspirate or biopsy. Nonresponders (NR) had a pre- and 1 or more post-baseline BM assessment carried out, but results did not meet any response criteria. Participants who were not evaluable (NE) did not have at least 14 days of treatment and were not assessed.
Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose, up to approximately 3 years
Number of Participants Achieving a Best Disease Response by Dose Cohort in Terms of Best Overall Response Following Oral Administration of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Complete Response (CR) response criteria included either a post-baseline bone marrow biopsy or aspiration % blasts <5%, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1×10^9/L and platelet count >100×10^9/L on the same date as the qualifying bone marrow assessment. CRp response included all CR criteria met except participant did not experience a platelet recovery. Participants must have experienced an ANC Recovery. CRi response included a qualifying bone marrow result, but did not experience an ANC recovery. Participants may or may not have experienced a platelet recovery and were not required to be transfusion independent. Partial remission (PR) response included a decrease of ≥50% in % blasts in the bone marrow aspirate or biopsy from baseline to a post-baseline result between 5% to 25% in the bone marrow aspirate or biopsy. Nonresponders (NR) had a pre- and 1 or more post-baseline bone marrow assessment carried out, but results did not meet any of the CR or PR or progressive disease criteria.
Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose, up to approximately 3 years
Number of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Following Oral Administration of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Hematologic improvement is summarized in terms of Erythroid Response (HI-E), Platelet Response (HI-P), Neutrophil Response (HI-N), and Hematologic Improvement (HI).
For post-treatment results, HI-E major responders had >2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin for at least 1 result after first treatment and transfusion independent; minor responders 1 to 2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin for at least 1 result post first treatment and a 50% decrease in red blood cell transfusion requirements. For HI-P, major responders had ≥30 × 10^9/L increase in platelet count and transfusion independent; minor responders had 50% or more increase in platelet count with a net increase between 10 to 30 × 10^9/L and 50% decrease in platelet transfusion requirements. For HI-N, major responders had an increase in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 100% or an absolute increase of more than 0.5 × 10^9/L (whichever is greater); minor responders had an increase in ANC of 100% but an absolute increase of <0.5 × 10^9/L.
Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose, up to approximately 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2007
- Primary completionMar 2009
- Study completionDec 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloid LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Daiichi SankyoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Daiichi Sankyo
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Director, Study director, Daiichi Sankyo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00462761
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CP0001
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 17 Apr 2007
- Last updated
- 11 May 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and applicable supporting clinical trial documents may be available upon request at https://vivli.org/. In cases where clinical trial data and supporting documents are provided pursuant to our company policies and procedures, Daiichi Sankyo will continue to protect the privacy of our clinical trial participants. Details on data sharing criteria and the procedure for requesting access can be found at this web address: https://vivli.org/ourmember/daiichi-sankyo/
Publications
Cortes JE, Kantarjian H, Foran JM, Ghirdaladze D, Zodelava M, Borthakur G, Gammon G, Trone D, Armstrong RC, James J, Levis M. Phase I study of quizartinib administered daily to patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia irrespective of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication status. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 10;31(29):3681-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8783. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
PubMed 24002496
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase I Open-Label, Sequential Dose Escalation Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of AC220 When Administered Daily to Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00462761
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CP0001
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, AML, MDS
- Keywords
- RTK, kinase, inhibitor, tyrosine, acute, FLT3, AC220, pharmacokinetic
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Daiichi SankyoIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2007
- Primary completion
- Mar 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Apr 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients received oral AC220 daily for 14 days to study the side effects, tolerability and best dose for treating relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia, regardless of FLT3 status.
Detailed description
This is a multi-center clinical study conducted in the USA and two international sites. This open-label, dose escalation study was designed to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of orally administered AC220 as a single agent given daily for 14 days. Cohorts of 3 patients received AC220 until dose limiting toxicity was noted (DLT). At that point cohorts expanded to 6 patients until MTD was determined. Patients not experiencing DLT or significant disease progression at Day 15 may have continued receiving AC220 at the discretion of the Investigator and Sponsor. FLT3 positive and negative patients were allowed to participate.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AC220 | Experimental | Drug: AC220Determine safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of AC220 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Males and females age ≥ 18 years;
- Histopathologically documented primary or secondary AML, as defined by WHO criteria (Jaffe et al, 2001), confirmed by pathology review at treating institution, meeting at least one of the following:
- Patients for whom no standard therapies are anticipated to result in a durable remission, or who have failed potentially curative therapy, or who refuse standard therapy or patients for whom there is no known therapy of documented treatment benefit;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-3;
- In the absence of rapidly progressing disease, the interval from prior treatment to time of AC220 administration should be at least 2 weeks for cytotoxic agents (other than hydroxyurea, per Section 8.8), or at least 5 half-lives for noncytotoxic agents;
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Histologic diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia;
- Clinically active central nervous system leukemia;
- Persistent clinically significant toxicity from prior chemotherapy that is Grade 2 or higher by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3);
- Bone marrow transplant within 2 months prior to study;
- Active, uncontrolled infection;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AC220Also: QuizartinibPowder in bottle formulation supplied as 50mg or 350 mg in glass, crimped serum vials. Requires reconstitution by a pharmacist, and must be stored securely and protected from light. | Drug | AC220 |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Treatment Related Adverse Events Following Oral Administration of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days post last dose
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Treatment-related Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events By At Least 10% of All Participants By Dose Group Following Oral Administration of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days post last dose
4 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Achieving a Best Disease Response by Dose Cohort in Terms of Progressive Disease Following Oral Administration of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose, up to approximately 3 years
Number of Participants Achieving a Best Disease Response by Dose Cohort in Terms of Best Overall Response Following Oral Administration of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose, up to approximately 3 years
Number of Participants Achieving a Best Disease Response by Dose Cohort in Terms of Best Overall Response Following Oral Administration of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose, up to approximately 3 years
Number of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Following Oral Administration of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after the last dose, up to approximately 3 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24002496Cortes JE, Kantarjian H, Foran JM, Ghirdaladze D, Zodelava M, Borthakur G, Gammon G, Trone D, Armstrong RC, James J, Levis M. Phase I study of quizartinib administered daily to patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia irrespective of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication status. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 10;31(29):3681-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8783. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and applicable supporting clinical trial documents may be available upon request at https://vivli.org/. In cases where clinical trial data and supporting documents are provided pursuant to our company policies and procedures, Daiichi Sankyo will continue to protect the privacy of our clinical trial participants. Details on data sharing criteria and the procedure for requesting access can be found at this web address: https://vivli.org/ourmember/daiichi-sankyo/
Related trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Director study director
Daiichi Sankyo
5 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing AC220 in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Leukemia, run by Daiichi Sankyo at 5 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States, Georgia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Apr 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Treatment Related Adverse Events Following Oral Administration of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (time frame: Baseline up to 30 days post last dose). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00462761, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2020.