AzTrials
AzTrials

Penetrating KeratoplastyPhase 2/3NCT00463723

Topical FK506 (Tacrolimus) for Prevention of Immune Reactions Following Penetrating Keratoplasty

A Phase 2/3 study testing FK506 0.06% (eye drops) in people with Penetrating Keratoplasty, run by University Hospital Freiburg.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Patients following allogeneic keratoplasty are treated with topical and frequently with systemic steroids to prevent immune reactions. Steroids are known to yield good results, but exert a wide range of side effects. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Penetrating Keratoplasty
What is being tested?
FK506 0.06% (eye drops)
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Start not givento not given
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Penetrating keratoplasty for Keratoconus
  • Penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophie
  • Penetrating keratoplasty for Bullous keratopathy

Who cannot join

  • Glaucoma
  • Limbal stem cell deficiency
  • Herpetic eye disease
  • Repeat Keratoplasty

About this study

Background: Patients following allogeneic keratoplasty are treated with topical and frequently with systemic steroids to prevent immune reactions. Steroids are known to yield good results, but exert a wide range of side effects. The efficacy of topial FK506 in preventing immune reactions has already been demonstrated experimentally. FK506, an IL-2-inhibitor like Cyclosporin A (CSA), is known to be approximately 100 fold more potent than CSA. Aim of the study: In this study the efficacy and safety of topical FK506 will be compared to our standard treatment (i.e. steroids) after penetrating normal-risk keratoplasty.

Being tested
FK506 0.06% (eye drops)
Keywords
penetrating keratoplasty, graft rejection, immunosuppression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FK506 0.06% (eye drops)Drug

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Apr 2007 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00463723
Sponsor's protocol ID
FR-2000-2003
Status last verified
Aug 1999
First submitted
18 Apr 2007
Last updated
20 Apr 2007
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Reinhard T, Mayweg S, Reis A, Sundmacher R. Topical FK506 as immunoprophylaxis after allogeneic penetrating normal-risk keratoplasty: a randomized clinical pilot study. Transpl Int. 2005 Feb;18(2):193-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2004.00006.x.

    PubMed 15691272

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing FK506 0.06% (eye drops) in people with Penetrating Keratoplasty, run by University Hospital Freiburg.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00463723, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in