HealthyNCT00463944
Assessment of an Electronic Voting System Within the Tutorial Setting. A Randomised Controlled Trial
An observational study of Healthy, run by University of Adelaide at 1 site in Australia.
Trial summary
A study of an electronic voting system as a learning aid during tutorials Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Effect of an electronic voting system
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustralia
- Study dates
- Jan 2001to Dec 2001
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All fourth year students
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
A study of an electronic voting system as a learning aid during tutorials
Read the detailed description
A study of an electronic voting system as a learning aid during tutorials. This study was undertaken with clinical students over a one year period of observation
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- Effect of an electronic voting system
- Keywords
- Electronic voting system
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Effect of an electronic voting systemBehavioural
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2001
- Study completionDec 2001
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Defined population
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 130 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Adelaide
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Peter Devitt, Principal investigator, University of Adelaide
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00463944
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1
- Status last verified
- Jun 2005
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2005
- Last updated
- 20 Apr 2007
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Apr 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of an Electronic Voting System Within the Tutorial Setting. A Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00463944
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Keywords
- Electronic voting system
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 130 participants
- Lead sponsor
- University of AdelaideUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2001
- Study completion
- Dec 2001
- First posted
- 20 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A study of an electronic voting system as a learning aid during tutorials
Detailed description
A study of an electronic voting system as a learning aid during tutorials. This study was undertaken with clinical students over a one year period of observation
Study design
- Observational model
- Defined population
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All fourth year students
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Effect of an electronic voting system | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Apr 2007.
Related trials for Healthy
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Investigating the Analgesic Potential of (2R,6R)-HNK in Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
RecruitingObservational study
Collection and Analysis of Blood, Bone Marrow, and Buccal Mucosa Samples From Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
RecruitingPhase 1
Bioequivalence Study Between YHP2508A and YHR2601 in Healthy Subjects
Healthy Subjects (HS)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessing the Impact of Perceptions of Unpredictability on Objective Measures of Food Consumption and Metabolism
Healthy Volunteer, Obestity
RecruitingObservational study
Relationship Between Great Toe Strength And Symptoms of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)
Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN), Healthy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter Devitt principal investigator
University of Adelaide
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Healthy, run by University of Adelaide at 1 site in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2007.