Postdural Puncture HeadacheNCT00465166
Lumbar Spine Ultrasound of Patients With Previous Accidental Dural Puncture During Labour Epidural
An observational study of Postdural Puncture Headache, run by Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Accidental dural puncture is a potential complication of epidural analgesia for labour and delivery. When it happens, it may cause debilitating headaches and other symptoms that prevent mothers from talking care of their newborns. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Postdural Puncture Headache
- What is being tested?
- Ultrasound
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Feb 2007to Jul 2007
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who had a documented, accidental dural puncture during placement of their labor epidural.
Who may be able to join
- Previous dural puncture during labour epidural
Who cannot join
- none
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Accidental dural puncture is a potential complication of epidural analgesia for labour and delivery. When it happens, it may cause debilitating headaches and other symptoms that prevent mothers from talking care of their newborns. Accidental dural puncture is related to the operator performance and to individual anatomical variations of the spine. The purpose of this study is to do a lumbar spine ultrasound on the patients who have had accidental dural punctures and analyze if there is any abnormal anatomy seen. Then, we will compare the position of any spinal abnormality to the position of the dural puncture reported in the anaesthesia record.
Read the detailed description
Effective epidural analgesia depends on accurate identification of the epidural space for delivery of analgesic mixtures. The technique of loss of resistance to either saline or air is the most commonly used method to locate the epidural space. Although this technique has a high success rate, it is associated with a significant incidence of accidental dural punctures. Accidental dural punctures might be related to the operator performance or to individual anatomical variations.
A normal ligamentum flavum is fundamental in the loss of resistance technique. However, many cadaver dissection and radiological studies in the literature have showed that the ligamentum flavum may in fact not fuse at the midline; thereby leaving a gap between its left and right portions. Ligamentum flavum midline gaps are thought to be a potential cause of failed recognition of loss of resistance during epidural needle placement and consequently accidental dural puncture. Therefore, if it were feasible to avoid inserting the epidural needle at the same level where a ligamentum flavum midline gap exists, then dural punctures may be less likely.
Lumbar spine ultrasound has been very useful in consistently identifying important anatomical landmarks for epidural needle placement including the ligamentum flavum. It is unknown at this time whether ultrasound is a useful modality to detect abnormal anatomy. Our study will evaluate by ultrasound scan the lumbar vertebral column of patients who have had a previously recognized accidental dural puncture. Our objective is to determine whether or not there is a correlation between accidental dural punctures and abnormalities of ligamentum flavum as seen by ultrasound imaging. Our hypothesis is that patients who have had accidental dural punctures have abnormal anatomy of ligamentum flavum that can be detected by lumbar spine ultrasound.
Lumbar ultrasound imaging from L1-S1 will be performed with the patient in the sitting position. The best possible image captured at the transverse approach for each of the interspaces from L5-S1 to L1-L2 will be saved for analysis of both ligamentum flavum (primary outcome) and symmetry (secondary outcome). A normal ligamentum flavum is described as a hyperechoic continuous midline band, which is aligned with the hyperechoic signal of the transverse processes. An abnormal ligamentum flavum will be described as a non-continuous or even absent signal. The presence of symmetric anatomy is defined as an equal distant between the left and right articular processes and the transverse processes to the midline.
Incidence of abnormal ligamentum flavum and asymmetry will be presented in a descriptive way and the level of anatomical abnormality detected by ultrasound will be correlated to the level of dural puncture reported on the anaesthesia record.
- Conditions
- Postdural Puncture Headache
- Being tested
- Ultrasound
- Keywords
- Accidental dural puncture, Labour epidural, Ultrasound, Ligamentum flavum
- Medical subject headings
- Post-Dural Puncture Headache
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
UltrasoundProcedure or surgery
Lumbar ultrasound from L1-S1, carried out using a portable ultrasound system equipped with a 2-5 MHz curved array probe.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patients who had a documented, accidental dural puncture during placement of their labor epidural. Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound |
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2007
- Study completionJul 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Postdural Puncture HeadacheStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Jose CA Carvalho, MD PhD, Principal investigator, MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00465166
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 07-05
- Other IDs
- 07-0002-E
- Status last verified
- Dec 2007
- First submitted
- 23 Apr 2007
- Last updated
- 17 Dec 2007
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Dec 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lumbar Spine Ultrasound of Patients With Previous Accidental Dural Puncture During Labour Epidural
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00465166
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 07-05
- Conditions
- Postdural Puncture Headache
- Keywords
- Accidental dural puncture, Labour epidural, Ultrasound, Ligamentum flavum
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2007
- Study completion
- Jul 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Accidental dural puncture is a potential complication of epidural analgesia for labour and delivery. When it happens, it may cause debilitating headaches and other symptoms that prevent mothers from talking care of their newborns. Accidental dural puncture is related to the operator performance and to individual anatomical variations of the spine. The purpose of this study is to do a lumbar spine ultrasound on the patients who have had accidental dural punctures and analyze if there is any abnormal anatomy seen. Then, we will compare the position of any spinal abnormality to the position of the dural puncture reported in the anaesthesia record.
Detailed description
Effective epidural analgesia depends on accurate identification of the epidural space for delivery of analgesic mixtures. The technique of loss of resistance to either saline or air is the most commonly used method to locate the epidural space. Although this technique has a high success rate, it is associated with a significant incidence of accidental dural punctures. Accidental dural punctures might be related to the operator performance or to individual anatomical variations.
A normal ligamentum flavum is fundamental in the loss of resistance technique. However, many cadaver dissection and radiological studies in the literature have showed that the ligamentum flavum may in fact not fuse at the midline; thereby leaving a gap between its left and right portions. Ligamentum flavum midline gaps are thought to be a potential cause of failed recognition of loss of resistance during epidural needle placement and consequently accidental dural puncture. Therefore, if it were feasible to avoid inserting the epidural needle at the same level where a ligamentum flavum midline gap exists, then dural punctures may be less likely.
Lumbar spine ultrasound has been very useful in consistently identifying important anatomical landmarks for epidural needle placement including the ligamentum flavum. It is unknown at this time whether ultrasound is a useful modality to detect abnormal anatomy. Our study will evaluate by ultrasound scan the lumbar vertebral column of patients who have had a previously recognized accidental dural puncture. Our objective is to determine whether or not there is a correlation between accidental dural punctures and abnormalities of ligamentum flavum as seen by ultrasound imaging. Our hypothesis is that patients who have had accidental dural punctures have abnormal anatomy of ligamentum flavum that can be detected by lumbar spine ultrasound.
Lumbar ultrasound imaging from L1-S1 will be performed with the patient in the sitting position. The best possible image captured at the transverse approach for each of the interspaces from L5-S1 to L1-L2 will be saved for analysis of both ligamentum flavum (primary outcome) and symmetry (secondary outcome). A normal ligamentum flavum is described as a hyperechoic continuous midline band, which is aligned with the hyperechoic signal of the transverse processes. An abnormal ligamentum flavum will be described as a non-continuous or even absent signal. The presence of symmetric anatomy is defined as an equal distant between the left and right articular processes and the transverse processes to the midline.
Incidence of abnormal ligamentum flavum and asymmetry will be presented in a descriptive way and the level of anatomical abnormality detected by ultrasound will be correlated to the level of dural puncture reported on the anaesthesia record.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Procedure: UltrasoundPatients who had a documented, accidental dural puncture during placement of their labor epidural. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who had a documented, accidental dural puncture during placement of their labor epidural.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Previous dural puncture during labour epidural
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- none
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| UltrasoundLumbar ultrasound from L1-S1, carried out using a portable ultrasound system equipped with a 2-5 MHz curved array probe. | Procedure or surgery | 1 |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Dec 2007.
Related trials for Postdural Puncture Headache
RecruitingObservational study
Epidural Hydroxyethyl Starch for Post-Dural Puncture Headache in Parturients
Parturients, Accidental Puncture of Dura During Anaesthesia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Effect of Magnesium on Post-spinal Headaches
Post-spinal Headache
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Oral Gabapentin Versus Intravenous Neostigmine/Atropine Versus Combination of Both for Prevention of PDPH
Postdural Puncture Headache (PDPH)
Not yet recruiting
Dural Puncture Epidural With 27G vs 26G Needles Versus Standard Epidural for Elective Cesarean Delivery
Cesarean Section, Anesthesia, Obstetrical
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Spinal, Epidural, and Dural Puncture Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: Hemodynamics and Block Quality
Hypotension After Neuraxial Anesthesia, Cesarean Section
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jose CA Carvalho, MD PhD principal investigator
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Postdural Puncture Headache, run by Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2007.