Myelogenous Leukemia, ChronicPhase 3ENESTndNCT00471497
A Study of Imatinib Versus Nilotinib in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)
A Phase 3 study testing nilotinib and imatinib in people with Myelogenous Leukemia, Chronic, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 213 sites in 35 countries.
Trial summary
In this study, the efficacy and safety of two nilotinib doses, 300 mg twice daily and 400 mg twice daily, were compared with imatinib 400 mg once daily in newly diagnosed patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myelogenous Leukemia, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- nilotinib and imatinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 846 participants
- Where
- 213 sitesin 35 countries
- Study dates
- 31 Jul 2007to 21 Aug 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase patients within the first 6 months of diagnosis.
- Diagnosis of chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase with confirmation of Philadelphia chromosome of (9:22) translocations
Who cannot join
- Previously documented T315I mutation
- Treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor prior to study entry is not allowed except for no more than 2 weeks in duration of imatinib
- Any medical treatment for CML prior to study entry for longer than 2 weeks with the exception of hydroxyurea and/or anagrelide
- Impaired cardiac function.
- Severe or uncontrolled medical conditions (i.e. uncontrolled diabetes, active or uncontrolled infection).
- Use of therapeutic coumarin derivatives (i.e., warfarin, acenocoumarol, phenprocoumon)
- Currently receiving treatment with any medications that have the potential to prolong the QT interval.
Trial locations and contacts
213 sites in 35 countries.
213 sites in 35 countries
United States31 sites
Indiana Blood and Marrow Institute Dept. of Indiana Blood&Marrow
Beech Grove, Indiana, 46107
University of North Carolina UNC Lineberger Cancer Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514
Chattanooga Oncology and Hematology Assoicates, PC Chattanooga Oncology
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404
University of Chicago Section of Hematology/Oncology
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
University of Cincinnati / Barrett Cancer Center Dept.of Internal Med.
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Cleveland Clinic Foundation CCF
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Missouri Cancer Associates Dept. of Boone Hospital Center
Columbia, Missouri, 65201
Texas Cancer Center ( Medical City Dallas Hospital)
Dallas, Texas, 75230
Florida Cancer Specialists Dept. FloridaCancerSpecialists
Fort Myers, Florida, 33901
Cancer Centers of the Carolinas CC of C -Eastside
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers RMCC - Colorado Springs
Greenwood Village, Colorado
Hackensack University Medical Center Department of Research
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Dept.of U of Iowa Hosp&Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Michigan State University / Breslin Cancer Center Breslin Cancer Center
Lansing, Michigan, 48824
University of California at Los Angeles Dept. of Hematology Clinic
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Advanced Medical Specialties Research Dept.
Miami, Florida, 33176
Tennessee Oncology Dept. of Centennial Medical
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER/ LSU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE Feist-Weiller Cancer Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Clinical Trials Office
New York, New York, 10021
Cancer Centers of Florida PA Cancer Centers of FL
Ocoee, Florida, 34761
Florida Retina Institute Flordia Cancer Affilates
Orlando, Florida, 32804
Kansas City Cancer Center KCCC Business Office
Overland Park, Kansas, 66210
Northwest Cancer Specialists Compass Oncology -BKM
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Utah Cancer Specialists
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106
Cancer Care Centers of South Texas HOAST CCC of So.TX- Medical Center
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Kaiser Permanente - California Southern Dept of Kaiser South 3
San Diego, California, 92120
Hematology Oncology Consultants, Inc. Deptof Hem. Onc.Consunsultants
St Louis, Missouri, 63136
Tyler Cancer Center
Tyler, Texas, 75702
Kaiser Permanente - California Northern Vallejo Med Center/Med Offices
Vallejo, California, 94589
Kaiser Permanente - California Northern Kaiser Med
Vallejo, California, 94609
Wake Forest University Health Sciences Dept. of Industry Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Japan29 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Akita, 010-8543
Novartis Investigative Site
Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, 113 8655
Novartis Investigative Site
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519
Novartis Investigative Site
Chiba, 260 8677
Novartis Investigative Site
Chuo Ku, Tokyo, 104 0045
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192
Novartis Investigative Site
Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298
Novartis Investigative Site
Hiroshima, 734-8551
Novartis Investigative Site
Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken, 920-8641
Novartis Investigative Site
Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556
Novartis Investigative Site
Maebashi, Gunma, 371 8511
Novartis Investigative Site
Maebashi, Gunma, 371-0821
Novartis Investigative Site
Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 852-8501
Novartis Investigative Site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 453-8511
Novartis Investigative Site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 466 8560
Novartis Investigative Site
Niigata, 951 8520
Novartis Investigative Site
Nishinomiya, Hyōgo, 663 8501
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, 545-8586
Novartis Investigative Site
Ōsaka-sayama, Osaka, 589 8511
Novartis Investigative Site
Saitama, 330 8503
Novartis Investigative Site
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 003-0006
Novartis Investigative Site
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060 8648
Novartis Investigative Site
Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498
Novartis Investigative Site
Shinagawa Ku, Tokyo, 141 8625
Novartis Investigative Site
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160 8582
Novartis Investigative Site
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023
Novartis Investigative Site
Suita, Osaka, 565 0871
Novartis Investigative Site
Tsu, Mie-ken, 514-8507
Novartis Investigative Site
Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576
Italy20 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Alessandria, AL, 15100
Novartis Investigative Site
Ancona, AN, 60126
Novartis Investigative Site
Bergamo, BG, 24127
Novartis Investigative Site
Bologna, BO, 40138
Novartis Investigative Site
Catania, CT, 95123
Novartis Investigative Site
Florence, FI, 50134
Novartis Investigative Site
Genova, GE, 16132
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20162
Novartis Investigative Site
Naples, 80131
Novartis Investigative Site
Naples, 80132
Novartis Investigative Site
Pavia, PV, 27100
Novartis Investigative Site
Perugia, 06129
Novartis Investigative Site
Pescara, PE, 65124
Novartis Investigative Site
Pisa, PI, 56126
Novartis Investigative Site
Reggio Calabria, RC, 89124
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00133
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00144
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00161
Novartis Investigative Site
Siena, SI, 53100
Novartis Investigative Site
Udine, UD, 33100
Spain18 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
A Coruña, Galicia, 15006
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036
Novartis Investigative Site
Bilbao, Basque Country, 48013
Novartis Investigative Site
Donostia / San Sebastian, Basque Country, 20080
Novartis Investigative Site
Elche, Alicante, 03203
Novartis Investigative Site
Granada, Andalusia, 18014
Novartis Investigative Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08907
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28006
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28034
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28046
Novartis Investigative Site
Málaga, Andalusia, 29010
Novartis Investigative Site
Salamanca, Castille and León, 37007
Novartis Investigative Site
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, 38320
Novartis Investigative Site
Santander, Cantabria, 39008
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, 15706
Novartis Investigative Site
Valencia, Valencia, 46010
Novartis Investigative Site
Zaragoza, 50009
France16 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Angers, 49033
Novartis Investigative Site
Bordeaux, 33076
Novartis Investigative Site
Caen, Cedex, 14033
Novartis Investigative Site
Créteil, 94010
Novartis Investigative Site
Grenoble, 38043
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, 59037
Novartis Investigative Site
Marseille, 13273
Novartis Investigative Site
Nantes, 44035
Novartis Investigative Site
Nice, 06202
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, Cedex 10, 75475
Novartis Investigative Site
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Novartis Investigative Site
Poitiers, 86000
Novartis Investigative Site
Rennes, 35019
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Priest En Jarez, Pays de la Loire Region, 42270
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulouse, 31059
Novartis Investigative Site
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Germany11 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 13353
Novartis Investigative Site
Cologne, 50937
Novartis Investigative Site
Düsseldorf, 40225
Novartis Investigative Site
Eisenach, 99817
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt, 60590
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, 20246
Novartis Investigative Site
Kiel, 24105
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, 04103
Novartis Investigative Site
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68305
Novartis Investigative Site
München, 81675
Novartis Investigative Site
Ulm, 89081
Sweden9 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Gothenburg, SE-413 45
Novartis Investigative Site
Huddinge, SE-14186
Novartis Investigative Site
Luleå, SE 971 80
Novartis Investigative Site
Lund, SE-221 85
Novartis Investigative Site
Örebro, SE-701 85
Novartis Investigative Site
Stockholm, SE-171 76
Novartis Investigative Site
Sundsvall, SE-851 86
Novartis Investigative Site
Umeå, SE-901 85
Novartis Investigative Site
Uppsala, SE-751 85
Brazil8 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brasília, Federal District, 70330-150
Novartis Investigative Site
Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970
Novartis Investigative Site
Curitiba, Paraná, 80060-900
Novartis Investigative Site
Jaú, São Paulo, 17210-080
Novartis Investigative Site
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20211-030
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01224-000
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01401-901
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403 000
South Korea6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Jeollanam-do, Jeollanam-do, 519763
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Korea, 05505
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Seocho Gu, 06591
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 03080
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 06351
Novartis Investigative Site
Taegu, 41944
Belgium5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, 1000
Novartis Investigative Site
Charleroi, 6000
Novartis Investigative Site
Ghent, 9000
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, 3000
Novartis Investigative Site
Yvoir, 5530
Canada5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Québec, Quebec, G1J 1Z4
Novartis Investigative Site
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Novartis Investigative Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E3
Novartis Investigative Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
Poland5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Katowice, 40032
Novartis Investigative Site
Lublin, 20-081
Novartis Investigative Site
Rzeszów, 35 055
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 02-097
Novartis Investigative Site
Wroclaw, 50-367
South Africa5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bloemfontein, 9301
Novartis Investigative Site
Cape Town, 7925
Novartis Investigative Site
Parktown, 2193
Novartis Investigative Site
Pretoria, 0001
Novartis Investigative Site
Pretoria, 0027
United Kingdom5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Glasgow, G12 OYN
Novartis Investigative Site
Leeds, LS9 7TF
Novartis Investigative Site
Liverpool, L7 8XP
Novartis Investigative Site
London, W12 0HS
Novartis Investigative Site
Nottingham, NG5 1PB
Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Adana, 01330
Novartis Investigative Site
Ankara, 06500
Novartis Investigative Site
Istanbul, TUR, 34098
Novartis Investigative Site
Izmir, 35340
Russia3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 125167
Novartis Investigative Site
Novosibirsk, 630051
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Taiwan3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaohsiung City, 83301
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 10002
Novartis Investigative Site
Taoyuan, 33305
Thailand3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10330
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10400
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10700
Argentina2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1221ADC
Novartis Investigative Site
La Plata, Buenos Aires, B1902AVG
Austria2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Salzburg, 5020
Novartis Investigative Site
Vienna, A-1090
Colombia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bogota, Cundinamarca, 110111
Novartis Investigative Site
Bogotá, 110001
Czechia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Olomouc, CZE, 775 20
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, Czech Republic, 128 20
Denmark2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Copenhagen, DK-2100
Novartis Investigative Site
Vejle, DK-7100
Finland2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
HUS Helsinki, FIN-00029
Novartis Investigative Site
Turku, FIN-20521
Mexico2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Mexico City, Mexico City, 06726
Novartis Investigative Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
Norway2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Oslo, NO-0310
Novartis Investigative Site
Trondheim, 7006
Singapore2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Singapore, 119228
Novartis Investigative Site
Singapore, 169608
Slovakia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bratislava, Slovak Republic, 833 10
Novartis Investigative Site
Bratislava, 85107
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of Imatinib Versus Nilotinib in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)
In this study, the efficacy and safety of two nilotinib doses, 300 mg twice daily and 400 mg twice daily, were compared with imatinib 400 mg once daily in newly diagnosed patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP).
An extension protocol was included in this study design to allow patients who did not show sufficient response to their assigned treatments the opportunity to receive imatinib 400 mg BID (option available until protocol amendment 7) or nilotinib 400 mg BID, using an abbreviated safety and efficacy assessment schedule.
Read the detailed description
Primary objectives of this study:
- Compared the efficacy (major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months) of nilotinib at 400 mg bid with that of imatinib 400 mg qd in newly diagnosed, previously untreated Ph+ CML-CP patients.
- Compared the efficacy (MMR rate at 12 months) of nilotinib at 300 mg bid with that of imatinib 400 mg qd in newly diagnosed, previously untreated Ph+ CML-CP patients.
The Primary objectives of Extension Phase of the study:
- Characterized the safety and tolerability profile of nilotinib 400 mg BID after failure of imatinib or insufficiently responded to nilotinib 300 mg BID therapy and the safety and tolerability profile of imatinib therapy after failure of nilotinib therapy.
The study was designed to determine whether the treatment of newly diagnosed, previously untreated Ph+ CML-CP patients with either nilotinib 300 mg bid or 400 mg bid demonstrated improved efficacy compared to imatinib 400 mg qd. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of MMR defined as the proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 3 log reduction in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to either the standardized Baseline established in the IRIS trial (International Randomized Interferon versus STI571) (Cortes et al 2005) or to the BCR-ABL ratio ≤ 0.1% by International Scale, as detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) at 12 months.
The key secondary endpoint was to compare the rate of durable MMR between nilotinib 300 mg bid with that of imatinib, and of nilotinib 400 mg bid with that of imatinib at 24 months. This report presents the final results of efficacy and safety at the LPLV (21-Aug-2019).
The main data analysis was done at the time when all patients completed 12 cycles of treatment (or discontinued earlier). There were two primary comparisons at this time point: the MMR rate of nilotinib 400 mg versus the MMR rate of imatinib 400 mg, and the MMR rate of the nilotinib 300 mg versus the MMR rate of the imatinib 400 mg. Comparisons were done sequentially, i.e. the MMR rate of nilotinib 400 mg versus the MMR rate of imatinib 400 mg was to be compared first; if it was significant at 5% level, the MMR rate of the nilotinib 300 mg versus the MMR rate of the imatinib 400 mg was to be compared. The study had a 90% power to detect a 15% difference between the nilotinib 400 mg arm versus imatinib 400 mg arm assuming that the MMR rate of imatinib is 40% and the MMR rate of nilotinib is 55%. The study also had a 90% power to detect a 15% difference between the nilotinib 300 mg and the imatinib 400 mg arms, if the comparison between the nilotinib 400 mg and the imatinib 400 mg was significant.
The second main data analysis was done at the time when all patients completed 24 cycles of treatment (or discontinued earlier). There were two key comparisons at this time point: the rate of durable MMR at 24 months of the nilotinib 400 mg versus the imatinib 400 mg, and the rate of durable MMR at 24 months of the nilotinib 300 mg versus the imatinib 400 mg.
In order to control the overall type I error rate at or below 5%, only when the corresponding comparison on the primary efficacy endpoint(s) was (were) significant, the key secondary comparison(s) of the respective nilotinib doses (400 mg bid and/or 300 mg bid) versus imatinib 400 mg qd were tested at two-sided 5% significance level.
Patients participating after demonstrating suboptimal response/treatment failure to their assigned study treatment in the core study were offered the option to continue in the extension study and to receive imatinib 400 mg bid (option available only until protocol amendment 7) or nilotinib therapy at a dose of 400 mg bid.
- Conditions
- Myelogenous Leukemia, Chronic
- Being tested
- nilotinib, imatinib
- Keywords
- leukemia, bone marrow, leukemia symptoms, lukemia, cml, complete blood count, lymphocyte, blood cancer, leukocytes, chronic leukemia, bone marrow biopsy, leukemia research, leukemia cells, bone marrow disease, chronic myeloid leukemia, blood cancer symptoms, white blood cell diseases, chronic myelogenous leukemia, leukemia treatment, leukemia facts
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive, Leukemia, Hematologic Neoplasms, Bone Marrow Diseases, Leukemia, Myeloid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
nilotinibDrug
Also called AMN107
Nilotinib was supplied as 50 mg, 150 mg and 200 mg hard gelatin capsules and administered orally at 300 mg BID (twice a day) or 400 mg BID (twice a day)depending on the randomized dose.
imatinibDrug
Also called STI571
Imatinib was supplied as 100 mg and 400 mg tablets and administered orally at 400 mg QD (once a day).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| nilotinib 300mg bid (investigating arm) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: nilotinib |
| Nilotinb 400 mg bid (investigating arm) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: nilotinib |
| imatinib 400mg QD (control arm) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: imatinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Major Molecular Response Rate (MMR) at 12 Months Between All 3 Arms - With Imputation
MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months.
Measured: Baseline, 12 months
Percentage of Participants With MMR at 12 Months Between All 3 Arms by Sokal Risk Group With Imputation
MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (28)
Rates of Durable MMR at 24 Months Between All 3 Arms
Durable MMR at 24 months is defined as having MMR both at 12 months and at 24 months, and with no documented loss of MMR between these 12 month and 24 month time points.
Measured: 24 months
Rate of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib at 12 Months and Beyond 12 Months
CCyR is defined as 0% Ph+ metaphases based on at least 20 metaphases from bone marrow cytogenetics. Patients with no CCyR as the best response by any specific time point, all missing cytogenetic evaluations by that time point or Ph- at baseline are combined as "Nocomplete cytogenetic response".
Measured: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 months (M)
Rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) at 12 Months Between Two Nilotinib Arms
MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months based on 12-month cut-off interim data.
Measured: 12 months
Rate of MMR at 6 Months and Beyond in All 3 Treatment Arms
MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 6 months and beyond up to 120 months based on final data.
Measured: 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months
Rate of a ≥ 4 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib
Molecular response of <=0.01% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS <= 0.01% (corresponds to >=4 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value)
Measured: at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months
Rate of a ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib
This is the molecular response of <=0.0032% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS <= 0.0032% (corresponds to >=4.5 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value)
Measured: at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months
Time to First MMR
Time to MMR is defined as time from date of randomization to the date of the first documented MMR in nilotinib treatment arms, compared to imatinib in adult patients with Ph+ CML in CP.
Measured: up to 84 months
Duration of MMR
Duration of MMR for patients with MMR is defined as the time between date of MMR and the earliest of the following: loss of MMR, CML-related death or progression to AP/BC during study treatment The time will be censored at last molecular assessment (PCR) date for patients for whom none of the above events is reported.
Measured: approx. 11 years
Time to Both a ≥ 4 and ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts
Time to BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% is defined as: date of first BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% - date of randomization +1.
Measured: up to 84 months
Duration of Both a ≥ 4 and ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts
It is defined as the time from the date of first documented BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% to the earliest of the following: Loss of BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032%, respectively, CML-related death or progression to AP/BC during study treatment. The time will be censored at last molecular assessment (PCR) date for patients for whom none of the above events is reported.
Measured: approx. 11 years
Rate of Hematologic Response
Rate of hematologic response is defined as the percentage of participants in complete hematologic response (defined as the following present for at least 4 weeks: WBC count <10 x 109/L, Platelet count <450 x 109/L, Basophils <5%, No blasts and promyelocytes in peripheral blood, Myelocytes + metamyelocytes < 5% in peripheral blood, No evidence of extramedullary disease, including spleen and liver).
Measured: 12 months, 24 months, Overall on Core study (approx. 11 years)
Time to Complete Cytogenic Response (CCyR)
Time to CCyR is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented CCyR
Measured: 24 months
Duration of CCyR
Duration of CCyR is defined as the time from date of first documented CCyR to the earliest date of loss of CCyR.
Measured: up to 72 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event defined as the first documented disease progression to AP/BC or the date of death from any cause occurring in the core or extension study, or during the follow-up period after discontinuation of core or extension study
Measured: approx. 11 years
Event-free Survival (EFS)
Event-free survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first occurrence of any of the following: death due to any cause (if death is the primary reason for discontinuation), progression to AP or BC, loss of PCyR, loss of CCyR, loss of CHR
Measured: approx. 11 years
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date death. Up to 10 calendar years of follow up from the date when the last patient randomized received the first dose of study drug in all active treatment arms of adult patients with Ph+ CML CP.
Measured: approx. 11 years
Actual Dose-intensity
Actual dose intensity is defined as total dose over time on treatment
Measured: approx. 11 years
Time to Progression to AP/BC
Time to progression to AP/BC is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event defined as the first documented disease progression to AP/BC or the date of CML related death.
Measured: approx. 11 years
Pharmacokinetics: Cmax
Cmax is defined as the maximum serum concentration after dose
Measured: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration
Pharmacokinetics: Cmin
Cmin is defined as the minimum serum concentration after dose
Measured: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration
Pharmacokinetics: Tmax
Tmax is defined as the sampling time when maximum measured serum concentration occurs
Measured: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration
Pharmacokinetics: AUC0-last
AUC0-last is defined as area under concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable sample, calculated by log-linear trapezoidal method
Measured: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration
Rate of Hematologic Response on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Rate of hematologic response is defined as the percentage of participants in complete hematologic response (defined as the following present for at least 4 weeks: WBC count <10 x 109/L, Platelet count <450 x 109/L, Basophils <5%, No blasts and promyelocytes in peripheral blood, Myelocytes + metamyelocytes < 5% in peripheral blood, No evidence of extramedullary disease, including spleen and liver).
Measured: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Rate of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Rate of CCyR is defined as the percentage of participants in complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). CcyR is defined as 0% of Ph+ metaphases in the bone marrow.
Measured: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Rate of MMR is defined as the percentage pf participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR))
Measured: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Rate of a ≥ 4 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Molecular response of <=0.01% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS <= 0.01% (corresponds to >=4 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value)
Measured: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Rate of ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Molecular response of <=0.0032% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS <= 0.0032% (corresponds to >=4.5 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value)
Measured: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Presence of Newly Observed BCR-ABL Mutations in Patients Post-baseline and Correlate With Response to Treatment With Imatinib and Nilotinib (Extension)
This is the percentage of patients with any emergent mutation on extension treatment. The mutation comprised of T315T, less sensitive to nilotinib, unknown and sensitive to nilotinib.
Measured: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 May 2007 (estimated)
- Study start31 Jul 2007
- Primary completion2 Sep 2009
- Study completion21 Aug 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myelogenous Leukemia, ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 846 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00471497
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAMN107A2303
- Other IDs
- 2007-000208-34
- Acronym
- ENESTnd
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 7 May 2007
- Last updated
- 18 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Publications
Hughes TP, Hochhaus A, Kantarjian HM, Cervantes F, Guilhot F, Niederwieser D, le Coutre PD, Rosti G, Ossenkoppele G, Lobo C, Shibayama H, Fan X, Menssen HD, Kemp C, Larson RA, Saglio G. Safety and efficacy of switching to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase with suboptimal response or failure on front-line imatinib or nilotinib 300 mg twice daily. Haematologica. 2014 Jul;99(7):1204-11. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.091272. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
PubMed 24532039Hughes TP, Saglio G, Kantarjian HM, Guilhot F, Niederwieser D, Rosti G, Nakaseko C, De Souza CA, Kalaycio ME, Meier S, Fan X, Menssen HD, Larson RA, Hochhaus A. Early molecular response predicts outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with frontline nilotinib or imatinib. Blood. 2014 Feb 27;123(9):1353-60. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-510396. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
PubMed 24335106Hochhaus A, Saglio G, Larson RA, Kim DW, Etienne G, Rosti G, De Souza C, Kurokawa M, Kalaycio ME, Hoenekopp A, Fan X, Shou Y, Kantarjian HM, Hughes TP. Nilotinib is associated with a reduced incidence of BCR-ABL mutations vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Blood. 2013 May 2;121(18):3703-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-423418. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
PubMed 23502220Branford S, Kim DW, Soverini S, Haque A, Shou Y, Woodman RC, Kantarjian HM, Martinelli G, Radich JP, Saglio G, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, Muller MC. Initial molecular response at 3 months may predict both response and event-free survival at 24 months in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with nilotinib. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 10;30(35):4323-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.5217. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
PubMed 23109697Larson RA, Yin OQ, Hochhaus A, Saglio G, Clark RE, Nakamae H, Gallagher NJ, Demirhan E, Hughes TP, Kantarjian HM, le Coutre PD. Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analysis of nilotinib in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 May;68(5):723-33. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1200-7. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
PubMed 22207416Kantarjian HM, Hochhaus A, Saglio G, De Souza C, Flinn IW, Stenke L, Goh YT, Rosti G, Nakamae H, Gallagher NJ, Hoenekopp A, Blakesley RE, Larson RA, Hughes TP. Nilotinib versus imatinib for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase, Philadelphia chromosome-positive, chronic myeloid leukaemia: 24-month minimum follow-up of the phase 3 randomised ENESTnd trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):841-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70201-7. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
PubMed 21856226Cortes JE, Hochhaus A, le Coutre PD, Rosti G, Pinilla-Ibarz J, Jabbour E, Gillis K, Woodman RC, Blakesley RE, Giles FJ, Kantarjian HM, Baccarani M. Minimal cross-intolerance with nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic or accelerated phase who are intolerant to imatinib. Blood. 2011 May 26;117(21):5600-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-11-318949. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
PubMed 21467546Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, le Coutre P, Etienne G, Lobo C, Pasquini R, Clark RE, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, Gallagher N, Hoenekopp A, Dong M, Haque A, Larson RA, Kantarjian HM; ENESTnd Investigators. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 17;362(24):2251-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912614. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
PubMed 20525993
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of Imatinib Versus Nilotinib in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00471497
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ENESTnd / CAMN107A2303
- Conditions
- Myelogenous Leukemia, Chronic
- Keywords
- leukemia, bone marrow, leukemia symptoms, lukemia, cml, complete blood count, lymphocyte, blood cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 846 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 31 Jul 2007 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Sep 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Aug 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 May 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Jun 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study, the efficacy and safety of two nilotinib doses, 300 mg twice daily and 400 mg twice daily, were compared with imatinib 400 mg once daily in newly diagnosed patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP).
An extension protocol was included in this study design to allow patients who did not show sufficient response to their assigned treatments the opportunity to receive imatinib 400 mg BID (option available until protocol amendment 7) or nilotinib 400 mg BID, using an abbreviated safety and efficacy assessment schedule.
Detailed description
Primary objectives of this study:
- Compared the efficacy (major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months) of nilotinib at 400 mg bid with that of imatinib 400 mg qd in newly diagnosed, previously untreated Ph+ CML-CP patients.
- Compared the efficacy (MMR rate at 12 months) of nilotinib at 300 mg bid with that of imatinib 400 mg qd in newly diagnosed, previously untreated Ph+ CML-CP patients.
The Primary objectives of Extension Phase of the study:
- Characterized the safety and tolerability profile of nilotinib 400 mg BID after failure of imatinib or insufficiently responded to nilotinib 300 mg BID therapy and the safety and tolerability profile of imatinib therapy after failure of nilotinib therapy.
The study was designed to determine whether the treatment of newly diagnosed, previously untreated Ph+ CML-CP patients with either nilotinib 300 mg bid or 400 mg bid demonstrated improved efficacy compared to imatinib 400 mg qd. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of MMR defined as the proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 3 log reduction in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to either the standardized Baseline established in the IRIS trial (International Randomized Interferon versus STI571) (Cortes et al 2005) or to the BCR-ABL ratio ≤ 0.1% by International Scale, as detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) at 12 months.
The key secondary endpoint was to compare the rate of durable MMR between nilotinib 300 mg bid with that of imatinib, and of nilotinib 400 mg bid with that of imatinib at 24 months. This report presents the final results of efficacy and safety at the LPLV (21-Aug-2019).
The main data analysis was done at the time when all patients completed 12 cycles of treatment (or discontinued earlier). There were two primary comparisons at this time point: the MMR rate of nilotinib 400 mg versus the MMR rate of imatinib 400 mg, and the MMR rate of the nilotinib 300 mg versus the MMR rate of the imatinib 400 mg. Comparisons were done sequentially, i.e. the MMR rate of nilotinib 400 mg versus the MMR rate of imatinib 400 mg was to be compared first; if it was significant at 5% level, the MMR rate of the nilotinib 300 mg versus the MMR rate of the imatinib 400 mg was to be compared. The study had a 90% power to detect a 15% difference between the nilotinib 400 mg arm versus imatinib 400 mg arm assuming that the MMR rate of imatinib is 40% and the MMR rate of nilotinib is 55%. The study also had a 90% power to detect a 15% difference between the nilotinib 300 mg and the imatinib 400 mg arms, if the comparison between the nilotinib 400 mg and the imatinib 400 mg was significant.
The second main data analysis was done at the time when all patients completed 24 cycles of treatment (or discontinued earlier). There were two key comparisons at this time point: the rate of durable MMR at 24 months of the nilotinib 400 mg versus the imatinib 400 mg, and the rate of durable MMR at 24 months of the nilotinib 300 mg versus the imatinib 400 mg.
In order to control the overall type I error rate at or below 5%, only when the corresponding comparison on the primary efficacy endpoint(s) was (were) significant, the key secondary comparison(s) of the respective nilotinib doses (400 mg bid and/or 300 mg bid) versus imatinib 400 mg qd were tested at two-sided 5% significance level.
Patients participating after demonstrating suboptimal response/treatment failure to their assigned study treatment in the core study were offered the option to continue in the extension study and to receive imatinib 400 mg bid (option available only until protocol amendment 7) or nilotinib therapy at a dose of 400 mg bid.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| nilotinib 300mg bid (investigating arm) | Experimental | Drug: nilotinib |
| Nilotinb 400 mg bid (investigating arm) | Experimental | Drug: nilotinib |
| imatinib 400mg QD (control arm) | Experimental | Drug: imatinib |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase patients within the first 6 months of diagnosis.
- Diagnosis of chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase with confirmation of Philadelphia chromosome of (9:22) translocations
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Previously documented T315I mutation
- Treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor prior to study entry is not allowed except for no more than 2 weeks in duration of imatinib
- Any medical treatment for CML prior to study entry for longer than 2 weeks with the exception of hydroxyurea and/or anagrelide
- Impaired cardiac function.
- Severe or uncontrolled medical conditions (i.e. uncontrolled diabetes, active or uncontrolled infection).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| nilotinibAlso: AMN107Nilotinib was supplied as 50 mg, 150 mg and 200 mg hard gelatin capsules and administered orally at 300 mg BID (twice a day) or 400 mg BID (twice a day)depending on the randomized dose. | Drug | Nilotinb 400 mg bid (investigating arm), nilotinib 300mg bid (investigating arm) |
| imatinibAlso: STI571Imatinib was supplied as 100 mg and 400 mg tablets and administered orally at 400 mg QD (once a day). | Drug | imatinib 400mg QD (control arm) |
Primary outcome
Major Molecular Response Rate (MMR) at 12 Months Between All 3 Arms - With Imputation
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months
MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months.
Percentage of Participants With MMR at 12 Months Between All 3 Arms by Sokal Risk Group With Imputation
Time frame: 12 months
MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months.
28 secondary outcomes
Rates of Durable MMR at 24 Months Between All 3 Arms
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib at 12 Months and Beyond 12 Months
Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 months (M)
Rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) at 12 Months Between Two Nilotinib Arms
Time frame: 12 months
Rate of MMR at 6 Months and Beyond in All 3 Treatment Arms
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months
Rate of a ≥ 4 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib
Time frame: at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months
Rate of a ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib
Time frame: at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months
Time to First MMR
Time frame: up to 84 months
Duration of MMR
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Time to Both a ≥ 4 and ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts
Time frame: up to 84 months
Duration of Both a ≥ 4 and ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Rate of Hematologic Response
Time frame: 12 months, 24 months, Overall on Core study (approx. 11 years)
Time to Complete Cytogenic Response (CCyR)
Time frame: 24 months
Duration of CCyR
Time frame: up to 72 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Event-free Survival (EFS)
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Actual Dose-intensity
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Time to Progression to AP/BC
Time frame: approx. 11 years
Pharmacokinetics: Cmax
Time frame: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration
Pharmacokinetics: Cmin
Time frame: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration
Pharmacokinetics: Tmax
Time frame: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration
Pharmacokinetics: AUC0-last
Time frame: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration
Rate of Hematologic Response on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Time frame: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Rate of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Time frame: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Time frame: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Rate of a ≥ 4 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Time frame: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Rate of ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
Time frame: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Presence of Newly Observed BCR-ABL Mutations in Patients Post-baseline and Correlate With Response to Treatment With Imatinib and Nilotinib (Extension)
Time frame: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Nov 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24532039Hughes TP, Hochhaus A, Kantarjian HM, Cervantes F, Guilhot F, Niederwieser D, le Coutre PD, Rosti G, Ossenkoppele G, Lobo C, Shibayama H, Fan X, Menssen HD, Kemp C, Larson RA, Saglio G. Safety and efficacy of switching to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase with suboptimal response or failure on front-line imatinib or nilotinib 300 mg twice daily. Haematologica. 2014 Jul;99(7):1204-11. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.091272. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24335106Hughes TP, Saglio G, Kantarjian HM, Guilhot F, Niederwieser D, Rosti G, Nakaseko C, De Souza CA, Kalaycio ME, Meier S, Fan X, Menssen HD, Larson RA, Hochhaus A. Early molecular response predicts outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with frontline nilotinib or imatinib. Blood. 2014 Feb 27;123(9):1353-60. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-510396. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23502220Hochhaus A, Saglio G, Larson RA, Kim DW, Etienne G, Rosti G, De Souza C, Kurokawa M, Kalaycio ME, Hoenekopp A, Fan X, Shou Y, Kantarjian HM, Hughes TP. Nilotinib is associated with a reduced incidence of BCR-ABL mutations vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Blood. 2013 May 2;121(18):3703-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-423418. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23109697Branford S, Kim DW, Soverini S, Haque A, Shou Y, Woodman RC, Kantarjian HM, Martinelli G, Radich JP, Saglio G, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, Muller MC. Initial molecular response at 3 months may predict both response and event-free survival at 24 months in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with nilotinib. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 10;30(35):4323-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.5217. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22207416Larson RA, Yin OQ, Hochhaus A, Saglio G, Clark RE, Nakamae H, Gallagher NJ, Demirhan E, Hughes TP, Kantarjian HM, le Coutre PD. Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analysis of nilotinib in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 May;68(5):723-33. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1200-7. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21856226Kantarjian HM, Hochhaus A, Saglio G, De Souza C, Flinn IW, Stenke L, Goh YT, Rosti G, Nakamae H, Gallagher NJ, Hoenekopp A, Blakesley RE, Larson RA, Hughes TP. Nilotinib versus imatinib for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase, Philadelphia chromosome-positive, chronic myeloid leukaemia: 24-month minimum follow-up of the phase 3 randomised ENESTnd trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):841-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70201-7. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21467546Cortes JE, Hochhaus A, le Coutre PD, Rosti G, Pinilla-Ibarz J, Jabbour E, Gillis K, Woodman RC, Blakesley RE, Giles FJ, Kantarjian HM, Baccarani M. Minimal cross-intolerance with nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic or accelerated phase who are intolerant to imatinib. Blood. 2011 May 26;117(21):5600-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-11-318949. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20525993Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, le Coutre P, Etienne G, Lobo C, Pasquini R, Clark RE, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, Gallagher N, Hoenekopp A, Dong M, Haque A, Larson RA, Kantarjian HM; ENESTnd Investigators. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 17;362(24):2251-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912614. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Related trials for Myelogenous Leukemia, Chronic
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Overlap Syndromes and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
213 sites in 35 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing nilotinib and imatinib in people with Myelogenous Leukemia, Chronic, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 213 sites in 35 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 213 sites in United States, Japan, Italy, Spain, France and 30 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jun 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Major Molecular Response Rate (MMR) at 12 Months Between All 3 Arms - With Imputation (time frame: Baseline, 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00471497, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2020.