Myeloid Leukemia, ChronicPhase 3DASISIONNCT00481247
A Phase III Study of Dasatinib vs Imatinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
A Phase 3 study testing Dasatinib and Imatinib in people with Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 109 sites in 27 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this clinical research study is to compare the confirmed complete cytogenetic response of dasatinib with that of imatinib within 12 months after randomization in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase Philadelphia positive chronic myeloid leukemia. The safety of this treatment will also be studied. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- Dasatinib and Imatinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 547 participants
- Where
- 109 sitesin 27 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2007to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female, aged 18 years and older
- Chronic phase, Philadelphia Chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0-2
Who cannot join
- Pleural Effusion
- Uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
- Significant bleeding disorder unrelated to CML
- Prior treatment with interferon/imatinib/dasatinib/anti-CML systemic treatments except anagrelide/hydroxyurea
Trial locations and contacts
109 sites in 27 countries.
109 sites in 27 countries
France13 sites
Local Institution
Brest, 29609
Local Institution
Lille, 59037
Local Institution
Limoges, 87042
Local Institution
Montpellier, 34295
Local Institution
Nantes, Cedex 1, 44093
Local Institution
Paris, 75015
Local Institution
Paris, 75475
Local Institution
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Local Institution
Poitiers, 86021
Local Institution
Rennes, 35033
Local Institution
Strasbourg, 67091
Local Institution
Toulouse, 31059
Local Institution
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Japan12 sites
Local Institution
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677
Local Institution
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 814-0180
Local Institution
Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken, 890-0064
Local Institution
Kamogawa-shi, Chiba, 2968602
Local Institution
Kyoto, Kyoto, 6028566
Local Institution
Morioka, Iwate, 020-8505
Local Institution
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 466-8650
Local Institution
Okayama, Okayama-ken, 7008558
Local Institution
Osaka, Osaka, 545-8586
Local Institution
Sendai, Miyagi
Local Institution
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 1418625
Local Institution
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024
Spain10 sites
Local Institution
A Coruña, 15706
Local Institution
Barcelona, 08003
Local Institution
Barcelona, 08036
Local Institution
Barcelona, 08907
Local Institution
Madrid, 28006
Local Institution
Madrid, 28046
Local Institution
Málaga, 29010
Local Institution
Oviedo, 33006
Local Institution
Salamanca, 37007
Local Institution
Valencia, 46009
India7 sites
Local Institution
Ahmedabad, 380009
Local Institution
Kochi, 682304
Local Institution
Mumbai, 400010
Local Institution
Mumbai, 400012
Local Institution
Mumbai, 400014
Local Institution
Trivandrum, 695011
Local Institution
Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632004
Italy7 sites
Local Institution
Bologna, 40138
Local Institution
Catania, 95124
Local Institution
Monza (mb), 20900
Local Institution
Orbassano (to), 10043
Local Institution
Pavia, 27100
Local Institution
Roma, 00144
Local Institution
Roma, 00161
Brazil6 sites
Local Institution
Campinas, São Paulo, 13083
Local Institution
Curitiba, Paraná, 80060
Local Institution
Jaú, São Paulo, 17210
Local Institution
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20230130
Local Institution
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01401
Local Institution
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403
Mexico5 sites
Local Institution
Culiacán, Sinaloa, 80230
Local Institution
Mexico City, Mexico City, 02990
Local Institution
Mexico City, Mexico City, 14000
Local Institution
Mexico, D. F., Mexico City, 06726
Local Institution
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
Poland5 sites
Local Institution
Chorzów, 41-500
Local Institution
Krakow, 31501
Local Institution
Lodz, 93-510
Local Institution
Poznan, 60869
Local Institution
Warsaw, 02776
Australia4 sites
Local Institution
Brisbane, Queensland, 4029
Local Institution
Greenslopes, Queensland, 4120
Local Institution
Perth, Western Australia, WA 6000
Local Institution
Waratah, New South Wales, 2298
China4 sites
Local Institution
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100044
Local Institution
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001
Local Institution
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025
Local Institution
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300020
Czechia4 sites
Local Institution
Brno, 625 00
Local Institution
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Local Institution
Olomouc, 775 20
Local Institution
Prague, 128 20
Germany4 sites
Local Institution
Berlin, 13353
Local Institution
Rostock, 18055
Local Institution
Tübingen, 72076
Local Institution
Ulm, 89081
Argentina3 sites
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1021
Local Institution
Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, 1280
Local Institution
Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, C1114AAN
Peru3 sites
Local Institution
Arequipa, Arequipa
Local Institution
Lima, Lima Province, 11
Local Institution
Lima, Lima Province, 34
Russia3 sites
Local Institution
Moscow, 125167
Local Institution
Rostov-on-Don, 344022
Local Institution
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Austria2 sites
Local Institution
Innsbruck, 6020
Local Institution
Vienna, 1090
Colombia2 sites
Local Institution
Bogotá
Local Institution
Colombia, Bogota D.C.
Hungary2 sites
Local Institution
Budapest, 1097
Local Institution
Debrecen, 4012
Netherlands2 sites
Local Institution
Groningen, 9700 RB
Local Institution
Nijmegen, 6500 HB
South Korea2 sites
Local Institution
Seoul, 137-040
Local Institution
Seoul, 138-736
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
Local Institution
Ankara, 06100
Local Institution
Kayseri, 38039
About this study
Official title: An Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Trial of Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®) vs. Standard Dose Imatinib (400 mg) in the Treatment of Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
The purpose of this clinical research study is to compare the confirmed complete cytogenetic response of dasatinib with that of imatinib within 12 months after randomization in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase Philadelphia positive chronic myeloid leukemia. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.
- Conditions
- Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic
- Being tested
- Dasatinib, Imatinib
- Keywords
- Chronic Phase Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DasatinibDrug
Also called Sprycel®, BMS-354825
Tablets, oral, dasatinib 50-140 mg once daily (QD)
ImatinibDrug
Tablets, oral, imatinib 200-800 mg, QD
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dasatinib | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Dasatinib |
| Imatinib | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Imatinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Best Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR) Within 12 Months
Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells in metaphase from bone marrow (BM) sample. (Ideally, 25 metaphases but at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were evaluated). Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)=0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. A cCCyR=those in which all measurements up to at least 28 days after the initial response show an equivalent or better CCyR.
Measured: Pretreatment, every 3 months up to 12 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Percentage of Participants Remaining in Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR)
Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells in metaphase from bone marrow (BM) sample. (Ideally, 25 metaphases but at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were evaluated). Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)=0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. A cCCyR=those in which all measurements up to at least 28 days after the initial response show an equivalent or better CCyR.
Percentage of participants in cCCyR at years 2, 3, 4 and 5 was computed for all randomized participants who achieved cCCyR as measured from the time of first confirmation until the date of progression or death. Participants with cCCyR who neither progress nor die are censored on the date of their last cytogenetic assessment. Participants without cCCyR are considered to have progressed on Day 1.
Measured: Years 2, 3, 4 and 5
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Any Time
Molecular response was assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction. MMR is defined as a ratio BCR-ABL/ABL ≤0.1% on the international scale (ie, at least 3 log reduction from a standardized baseline value).
Measured: Planned total follow-up duration of 5 years
Time to Confirmed Complete Cytogenic Response (cCCyR) Overall
The time to cCCyR for all randomized participants is defined as the time from the randomization date until criteria are first met for complete cytogenic response (provided it is confirmed later). The time to cCCyR analysis censors nonresponders who do not progress at their last cytogenetic assessments and nonresponders who progress at the maximum time of all randomized participants.
.
Measured: Day 1 to 5 years
Time to Major Molecular Response (MMR) Overall
The time to MMR for all randomized participants is defined as the time from randomization date until measurement criteria are first met for MMR. The time to MMR analysis censors nonresponders who do not progress at their last molecular assessments and nonresponders who progress at the maximum time of all randomized participants.
Measured: Day 1 to 5 years
Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization until progression (any progression/death within 30 days of last dosing date, or between 30-60 days of last dosing prior to start of secondary therapy). Those who did not progress/die or who progressed/died after 60 days of last dose were censored at last on-study hematologic/cytogenetic assessment; those with progression/death 30-60 days of last dosing date and after start date of secondary therapy censored at last on-study hematologic/cytogenetic assessment prior to start of secondary therapy; those who had not received study treatment censored on date randomized.
Measured: Participants were followed-up for at least 5 years
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. If the participant had not died, survival was censored on last date the participant was known to be alive.
Measured: Participants were followed-up for at least 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2007
- Primary completionDec 2009
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myeloid Leukemia, ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 547 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00481247
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CA180-056
- Other IDs
- 2006-005712-27
- Acronym
- DASISION
- Status last verified
- Dec 2016
- First submitted
- 30 May 2007
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Glauche I, Kuhn M, Baldow C, Schulze P, Rothe T, Liebscher H, Roy A, Wang X, Roeder I. Quantitative prediction of long-term molecular response in TKI-treated CML - Lessons from an imatinib versus dasatinib comparison. Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 17;8(1):12330. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29923-4.
PubMed 30120281Hughes TP, Saglio G, Quintas-Cardama A, Mauro MJ, Kim DW, Lipton JH, Bradley-Garelik MB, Ukropec J, Hochhaus A. BCR-ABL1 mutation development during first-line treatment with dasatinib or imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Leukemia. 2015 Sep;29(9):1832-8. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.168. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
PubMed 26118315Fujisawa S, Nakamae H, Ogura M, Ishizawa K, Taniwaki M, Utsunomiya A, Matsue K, Takamatsu Y, Usuki K, Tanimoto M, Ishida Y, Akiyama H, Onishi S. Efficacy and safety of dasatinib versus imatinib in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP): Subset analysis of the DASISION trial with 2-year follow-up. Int J Hematol. 2014 Feb;99(2):141-53. doi: 10.1007/s12185-013-1470-1. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
PubMed 24357015Jabbour E, Kantarjian HM, Saglio G, Steegmann JL, Shah NP, Boque C, Chuah C, Pavlovsky C, Mayer J, Cortes J, Baccarani M, Kim DW, Bradley-Garelik MB, Mohamed H, Wildgust M, Hochhaus A. Early response with dasatinib or imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: 3-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood. 2014 Jan 23;123(4):494-500. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-511592. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
PubMed 24311723Kantarjian HM, Shah NP, Cortes JE, Baccarani M, Agarwal MB, Undurraga MS, Wang J, Ipina JJ, Kim DW, Ogura M, Pavlovsky C, Junghanss C, Milone JH, Nicolini FE, Robak T, Van Droogenbroeck J, Vellenga E, Bradley-Garelik MB, Zhu C, Hochhaus A. Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood. 2012 Feb 2;119(5):1123-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-376087. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
PubMed 22160483Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Hochhaus A, Cortes J, Shah S, Ayala M, Moiraghi B, Shen Z, Mayer J, Pasquini R, Nakamae H, Huguet F, Boque C, Chuah C, Bleickardt E, Bradley-Garelik MB, Zhu C, Szatrowski T, Shapiro D, Baccarani M. Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 17;362(24):2260-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002315. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
PubMed 20525995
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Trial of Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®) vs. Standard Dose Imatinib (400 mg) in the Treatment of Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00481247
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DASISION / CA180-056
- Conditions
- Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic
- Keywords
- Chronic Phase Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 547 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2007
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Mar 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this clinical research study is to compare the confirmed complete cytogenetic response of dasatinib with that of imatinib within 12 months after randomization in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase Philadelphia positive chronic myeloid leukemia. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dasatinib | Experimental | Drug: Dasatinib |
| Imatinib | Active comparator | Drug: Imatinib |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male or female, aged 18 years and older
- Chronic phase, Philadelphia Chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0-2
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pleural Effusion
- Uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
- Significant bleeding disorder unrelated to CML
- Prior treatment with interferon/imatinib/dasatinib/anti-CML systemic treatments except anagrelide/hydroxyurea
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DasatinibAlso: Sprycel®, BMS-354825Tablets, oral, dasatinib 50-140 mg once daily (QD) | Drug | Dasatinib |
| ImatinibTablets, oral, imatinib 200-800 mg, QD | Drug | Imatinib |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Best Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR) Within 12 Months
Time frame: Pretreatment, every 3 months up to 12 months
Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells in metaphase from bone marrow (BM) sample. (Ideally, 25 metaphases but at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were evaluated). Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)=0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. A cCCyR=those in which all measurements up to at least 28 days after the initial response show an equivalent or better CCyR.
6 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Remaining in Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR)
Time frame: Years 2, 3, 4 and 5
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Any Time
Time frame: Planned total follow-up duration of 5 years
Time to Confirmed Complete Cytogenic Response (cCCyR) Overall
Time frame: Day 1 to 5 years
Time to Major Molecular Response (MMR) Overall
Time frame: Day 1 to 5 years
Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Participants were followed-up for at least 5 years
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Participants were followed-up for at least 5 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30120281Glauche I, Kuhn M, Baldow C, Schulze P, Rothe T, Liebscher H, Roy A, Wang X, Roeder I. Quantitative prediction of long-term molecular response in TKI-treated CML - Lessons from an imatinib versus dasatinib comparison. Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 17;8(1):12330. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29923-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26118315Hughes TP, Saglio G, Quintas-Cardama A, Mauro MJ, Kim DW, Lipton JH, Bradley-Garelik MB, Ukropec J, Hochhaus A. BCR-ABL1 mutation development during first-line treatment with dasatinib or imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Leukemia. 2015 Sep;29(9):1832-8. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.168. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24357015Fujisawa S, Nakamae H, Ogura M, Ishizawa K, Taniwaki M, Utsunomiya A, Matsue K, Takamatsu Y, Usuki K, Tanimoto M, Ishida Y, Akiyama H, Onishi S. Efficacy and safety of dasatinib versus imatinib in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP): Subset analysis of the DASISION trial with 2-year follow-up. Int J Hematol. 2014 Feb;99(2):141-53. doi: 10.1007/s12185-013-1470-1. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24311723Jabbour E, Kantarjian HM, Saglio G, Steegmann JL, Shah NP, Boque C, Chuah C, Pavlovsky C, Mayer J, Cortes J, Baccarani M, Kim DW, Bradley-Garelik MB, Mohamed H, Wildgust M, Hochhaus A. Early response with dasatinib or imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: 3-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood. 2014 Jan 23;123(4):494-500. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-511592. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22160483Kantarjian HM, Shah NP, Cortes JE, Baccarani M, Agarwal MB, Undurraga MS, Wang J, Ipina JJ, Kim DW, Ogura M, Pavlovsky C, Junghanss C, Milone JH, Nicolini FE, Robak T, Van Droogenbroeck J, Vellenga E, Bradley-Garelik MB, Zhu C, Hochhaus A. Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood. 2012 Feb 2;119(5):1123-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-376087. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20525995Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Hochhaus A, Cortes J, Shah S, Ayala M, Moiraghi B, Shen Z, Mayer J, Pasquini R, Nakamae H, Huguet F, Boque C, Chuah C, Bleickardt E, Bradley-Garelik MB, Zhu C, Szatrowski T, Shapiro D, Baccarani M. Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 17;362(24):2260-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002315. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
Related trials for Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Overlap Syndromes and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
109 sites in 27 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Dasatinib and Imatinib in people with Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 109 sites in 27 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 109 sites in France, Japan, Spain, India, Italy and 22 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Mar 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Best Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR) Within 12 Months (time frame: Pretreatment, every 3 months up to 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00481247, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2017.