Cervical Spondylotic MyelopathyPhase 3CSMNCT00506558
The CSM Trial: A Multicenter Study Comparing Ventral to Dorsal Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
A Phase 3 study testing Ventral Surgical Decompression with Instrumented Fusion and Dorsal Decompression With or Without Fusion in people with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy, run by Greenwich Hospital at 7 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the optimal surgical approach (ventral versus dorsal) for patients with multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). There are no established guidelines for the management of patients with CSM, which slowly causes spinal cord injury in afflicted patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
- What is being tested?
- Ventral Surgical Decompression with Instrumented Fusion and Dorsal Decompression With or Without Fusion
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 103 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2006to May 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy (2 or more levels of spinal cord compression)
Who cannot join
- C2-C7 kyphosis>5˚ (measured on lateral cervical spine image in extension)
- Segmental kyphotic deformity defined as 3 or more levels of disc-osteophyte extend dorsal to a line drawn from the dorsal caudal point of C2 to the dorsal caudal point of C7.
- Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)
- Developmental narrow canal (<12 mm-canal diameter measured on lateral plain cervical spine film)
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
United States7 sites
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Lahey Clinic
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Danbury Hospital
Danbury, Connecticut, 06810
Greenwich Hospital
Greenwich, Connecticut, 06830
University of Medicine and Dentistry - New Jersey
Newark, New Jersey, 07103
University of Utah HSC
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132-2303
About this study
The purpose of the study is to determine the optimal surgical approach (ventral versus dorsal) for patients with multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). There are no established guidelines for the management of patients with CSM, which slowly causes spinal cord injury in afflicted patients.
This study aims to test the hypothesis that ventral surgery (decompressing the spinal cord from the front of the neck) and dorsal surgery (decompressing the spinal cord from the back of the neck) might differ in their overall outcome or major complication rate.
Read the detailed description
- Purpose To determine the optimal surgical approach (ventral versus dorsal) for patients with multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
- Background There are no established guidelines for the management of patients with CSM. It is estimated that up to 30 percent of patients have an unsatisfactory outcome after surgery for CSM. It remains uncertain how dorsal and ventral approaches differ in their success rates and in their complication rates. This study aims to test the hypothesis that ventral and dorsal surgical approaches differ in their outcomes or major complication rates. A secondary hypothesis is that fusion might improve outcome by reducing repetitive shear injury to the spinal cord.
- Specific Location of Study
This is a multi-center trial. Subjects will be entered into the study from 9 separate centers. At this site, subjects will be recruited from the office of Dr. Zoher Ghogawala. All subjects at this site will undergo surgery at Greenwich Hospital.
- Probable Duration of Project
Subjects will be recruited into the study for one year. All subjects will be followed for 1 year.
- Research Plan
- Prospective, non-randomized multicenter trial. Approximately 100-200 patients would be recruited over one year with follow-up at one year.
- Subjects (aged 40-85 years) with spinal cord compression (2 or more levels) from degenerative cervical spondylosis with clinical myelopathy will be treated with either ventral decompression/fusion or dorsal decompression with or without fusion.
- Subjects with cervical kyphosis > 5˚, a segmental kyphotic deformity defined as 3 or more disc-osteophytes that extend dorsal to a line drawn from the dorsal caudal point of C2 to the dorsal caudal point of C7, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), or developmental spinal canal narrowing (12mm) would be excluded from the study.
- Functional outcomes will be determined using well-known quantitative scales (SF-36, Oswestry Neck, mJOA, Nurick, and EuroQol-5D). These instruments will be administered pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-op.
- Two independent neuroradiologists will review the initial films to confirm eligibility and review post-operative films (3 months, 6 months, and 1 year) to determine radiographic decompression and fusion as well as any complications.
- An independent study coordinator will collect data at 30 days and at 1 year to document any complications or re-operations.
- Data and Safety Monitoring Plan
- All serious unexpected adverse events (e.g. death within 30 days of operation) will be reported to the IRB within 24 hours. Any appropriate funding agencies or regulatory agencies would be notified as well.
- Any serious anticipated adverse event (e.g. wound infection, pulmonary embolus) will be reported to the IRB whenever their magnitude or frequency exceeds expectations.
- All other adverse events (including loss of privacy, significant economic harm) will be reported to the IRB on an annual basis or at the time that re-approval is sought. Any adverse event judged unlikely or unrelated to the study will also be included in an annual report for the IRB.
- Statistical Considerations
- Specific data variables being collected for the study. The data collection sheets will be submitted along with this protocol. There will be several data sheets as follows: 1) Spine surgeon's data sheet, 2) 30-day and 6-month morbidity data sheet, 3)1-year morbidity data sheet, 4) SF-36 questionnaires (pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year), 5) Oswestry Neck Disability Index questionnaires (pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year), 6)mJOA, (pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year), 7) Nurick questionnaire (pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year), 8)EuroQol-5D (pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year), 9)Radiology Review (pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years).
- Study endpoints. Patients will be followed for 1 year. The primary endpoints will be the SF-36 physical component summary score (PCS) and the Oswestry Neck Disability Index. Secondary endpoints will include the Nurick, mJOA, and EuroQol-5D scores as well as the observed complication rates. Radiographic fusion, instability, and deformity will also be secondary outcomes.
- Statistical Methods. Analysis will focus on the physical component summary (PCS) of the SF-36, the Oswestry Neck Disability index, and the major complication rate. The t-test will be used to compare the groups for continuous variables such as the SF-36 PCS and the Oswestry Neck Disability Index. The Chi-square test will be used to compare the group's complication rates. Multiple regression techniques will be applied to control for potential confounders including age, medical condition, number of stenotic levels, degree of lordosis or kyphosis, etc.
- Power Analysis.
The data generated from the SF-36 or the Oswestry Neck Disability Index will be used to calculate sample size for a future randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ventral to dorsal surgery. If no significant differences are identified in these primary outcomes measures, then a sample size calculation will be done using any differences in major complication rates.
- Conditions
- Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
- Being tested
- Ventral Surgical Decompression with Instrumented Fusion, Dorsal Decompression With or Without Fusion
- Keywords
- cervical spondylotic myelopathy, degenerative cervical spondylosis, spinal fusion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ventral Surgical Decompression with Instrumented FusionProcedure or surgery
Multi-level discectomy or Corpectomy are performed at surgeon's discretion. After decompression an instrumented fusion is performed.
Dorsal Decompression With or Without FusionProcedure or surgery
Dorsal decompressive laminectomy, laminoplasty, or laminectomy with lateral mass instrumented fusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Ventral Decompression and Instrumented Fusion Receives: Procedure: Ventral Surgical Decompression with Instrumented Fusion |
| B | Active comparator | Dorsal Decompression with or without fusion Receives: Procedure: Dorsal Decompression With or Without Fusion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Oswestry Neck Disability Index, mJOA, major complication rate
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
SF-36 physical component summary (PCS), EuroQol-5D
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jul 2007 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2006
- Primary completionMay 2012
- Study completionMay 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical Spondylotic MyelopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Greenwich Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Yale University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Zoher Ghogawala, MD, FACS, Study director, Greenwich Hospital - Yale Universtiy School of MedicineEdward C. Benzel, MD, Principal investigator, The Cleveland ClinicRobert Heary, MD, Principal investigator, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyRonald Apfelbaum, Principal investigator, University of UtahJean-Valery Coumans, MD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General HospitalSubu N Magge, MD, Principal investigator, Lahey Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00506558
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GH-CSM-382
- Other IDs
- GH-CSM-382
- Acronym
- CSM
- Status last verified
- Aug 2012
- First submitted
- 24 Jul 2007
- Last updated
- 29 Aug 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Fessler RG, Steck JC, Giovanini MA. Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 1998 Aug;43(2):257-65; discussion 265-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199808000-00044.
PubMed 9696078Edwards CC 2nd, Heller JG, Murakami H. Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 1;27(11):1168-75. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00007.
PubMed 12045513Ghogawala Z, Coumans JV, Benzel EC, Stabile LM, Barker FG 2nd. Ventral versus dorsal decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgeons' assessment of eligibility for randomization in a proposed randomized controlled trial: results of a survey of the Cervical Spine Research Society. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 15;32(4):429-36. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255068.94058.8a.
PubMed 17304133
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Aug 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The CSM Trial: A Multicenter Study Comparing Ventral to Dorsal Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00506558
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CSM / GH-CSM-382
- Conditions
- Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
- Keywords
- cervical spondylotic myelopathy, degenerative cervical spondylosis, spinal fusion
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Greenwich HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Yale University
- Study start
- Nov 2006
- Primary completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jul 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to determine the optimal surgical approach (ventral versus dorsal) for patients with multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). There are no established guidelines for the management of patients with CSM, which slowly causes spinal cord injury in afflicted patients.
This study aims to test the hypothesis that ventral surgery (decompressing the spinal cord from the front of the neck) and dorsal surgery (decompressing the spinal cord from the back of the neck) might differ in their overall outcome or major complication rate.
Detailed description
- Purpose To determine the optimal surgical approach (ventral versus dorsal) for patients with multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
- Background There are no established guidelines for the management of patients with CSM. It is estimated that up to 30 percent of patients have an unsatisfactory outcome after surgery for CSM. It remains uncertain how dorsal and ventral approaches differ in their success rates and in their complication rates. This study aims to test the hypothesis that ventral and dorsal surgical approaches differ in their outcomes or major complication rates. A secondary hypothesis is that fusion might improve outcome by reducing repetitive shear injury to the spinal cord.
- Specific Location of Study
This is a multi-center trial. Subjects will be entered into the study from 9 separate centers. At this site, subjects will be recruited from the office of Dr. Zoher Ghogawala. All subjects at this site will undergo surgery at Greenwich Hospital.
- Probable Duration of Project
Subjects will be recruited into the study for one year. All subjects will be followed for 1 year.
- Research Plan
- Prospective, non-randomized multicenter trial. Approximately 100-200 patients would be recruited over one year with follow-up at one year.
- Subjects (aged 40-85 years) with spinal cord compression (2 or more levels) from degenerative cervical spondylosis with clinical myelopathy will be treated with either ventral decompression/fusion or dorsal decompression with or without fusion.
- Subjects with cervical kyphosis > 5˚, a segmental kyphotic deformity defined as 3 or more disc-osteophytes that extend dorsal to a line drawn from the dorsal caudal point of C2 to the dorsal caudal point of C7, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), or developmental spinal canal narrowing (12mm) would be excluded from the study.
- Functional outcomes will be determined using well-known quantitative scales (SF-36, Oswestry Neck, mJOA, Nurick, and EuroQol-5D). These instruments will be administered pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-op.
- Two independent neuroradiologists will review the initial films to confirm eligibility and review post-operative films (3 months, 6 months, and 1 year) to determine radiographic decompression and fusion as well as any complications.
- An independent study coordinator will collect data at 30 days and at 1 year to document any complications or re-operations.
- Data and Safety Monitoring Plan
- All serious unexpected adverse events (e.g. death within 30 days of operation) will be reported to the IRB within 24 hours. Any appropriate funding agencies or regulatory agencies would be notified as well.
- Any serious anticipated adverse event (e.g. wound infection, pulmonary embolus) will be reported to the IRB whenever their magnitude or frequency exceeds expectations.
- All other adverse events (including loss of privacy, significant economic harm) will be reported to the IRB on an annual basis or at the time that re-approval is sought. Any adverse event judged unlikely or unrelated to the study will also be included in an annual report for the IRB.
- Statistical Considerations
- Specific data variables being collected for the study. The data collection sheets will be submitted along with this protocol. There will be several data sheets as follows: 1) Spine surgeon's data sheet, 2) 30-day and 6-month morbidity data sheet, 3)1-year morbidity data sheet, 4) SF-36 questionnaires (pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year), 5) Oswestry Neck Disability Index questionnaires (pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year), 6)mJOA, (pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year), 7) Nurick questionnaire (pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year), 8)EuroQol-5D (pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year), 9)Radiology Review (pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years).
- Study endpoints. Patients will be followed for 1 year. The primary endpoints will be the SF-36 physical component summary score (PCS) and the Oswestry Neck Disability Index. Secondary endpoints will include the Nurick, mJOA, and EuroQol-5D scores as well as the observed complication rates. Radiographic fusion, instability, and deformity will also be secondary outcomes.
- Statistical Methods. Analysis will focus on the physical component summary (PCS) of the SF-36, the Oswestry Neck Disability index, and the major complication rate. The t-test will be used to compare the groups for continuous variables such as the SF-36 PCS and the Oswestry Neck Disability Index. The Chi-square test will be used to compare the group's complication rates. Multiple regression techniques will be applied to control for potential confounders including age, medical condition, number of stenotic levels, degree of lordosis or kyphosis, etc.
- Power Analysis.
The data generated from the SF-36 or the Oswestry Neck Disability Index will be used to calculate sample size for a future randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ventral to dorsal surgery. If no significant differences are identified in these primary outcomes measures, then a sample size calculation will be done using any differences in major complication rates.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Procedure: Ventral Surgical Decompression with Instrumented FusionVentral Decompression and Instrumented Fusion |
| B | Active comparator | Procedure: Dorsal Decompression With or Without FusionDorsal Decompression with or without fusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy (2 or more levels of spinal cord compression)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- C2-C7 kyphosis>5˚ (measured on lateral cervical spine image in extension)
- Segmental kyphotic deformity defined as 3 or more levels of disc-osteophyte extend dorsal to a line drawn from the dorsal caudal point of C2 to the dorsal caudal point of C7.
- Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)
- Developmental narrow canal (<12 mm-canal diameter measured on lateral plain cervical spine film)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ventral Surgical Decompression with Instrumented FusionMulti-level discectomy or Corpectomy are performed at surgeon's discretion. After decompression an instrumented fusion is performed. | Procedure or surgery | A |
| Dorsal Decompression With or Without FusionDorsal decompressive laminectomy, laminoplasty, or laminectomy with lateral mass instrumented fusion | Procedure or surgery | B |
Primary outcome
Oswestry Neck Disability Index, mJOA, major complication rate
Time frame: 1 year
1 secondary outcome
SF-36 physical component summary (PCS), EuroQol-5D
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Aug 2012.
- Background: PubMed 9696078Fessler RG, Steck JC, Giovanini MA. Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 1998 Aug;43(2):257-65; discussion 265-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199808000-00044.
- Background: PubMed 12045513Edwards CC 2nd, Heller JG, Murakami H. Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 1;27(11):1168-75. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00007.
- Results publication: PubMed 17304133Ghogawala Z, Coumans JV, Benzel EC, Stabile LM, Barker FG 2nd. Ventral versus dorsal decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgeons' assessment of eligibility for randomization in a proposed randomized controlled trial: results of a survey of the Cervical Spine Research Society. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 15;32(4):429-36. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255068.94058.8a.
Related trials for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Biomarkers of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Multicenter Registry-Based Study Across the Spectrum of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, Non-myelopathic Degenerative Cervical Cord Compression
RecruitingObservational study
Validity of the Turkish Translation of the Modified JOA
Spondylosis, Cervical, Spinal Cord Compression
Active, not recruiting
Multi-centre Study to Evaluate ACAF Versus Laminoplasty in Treating Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament, Cervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy
Active, not recruiting
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Surgical Trial
Cervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zoher Ghogawala, MD, FACS study director
Greenwich Hospital - Yale Universtiy School of Medicine
Edward C. Benzel, MD principal investigator
The Cleveland Clinic
Robert Heary, MD principal investigator
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ventral Surgical Decompression with Instrumented Fusion and Dorsal Decompression With or Without Fusion in people with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy, run by Greenwich Hospital at 7 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Oswestry Neck Disability Index, mJOA, major complication rate (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00506558, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2012.