Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal LigamentNCT04968028
Multi-centre Study to Evaluate ACAF Versus Laminoplasty in Treating Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
A study testing ACAF and Laminoplasty in people with Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament and Cervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy, run by Shanghai Changzheng Hospital at 12 sites in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and imaging outcomes between Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF) and Laminoplasty in the treatment of severe ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament, Cervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy
- What is being tested?
- ACAF and Laminoplasty
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 167 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 17 Aug 2021to 31 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient's age is 18-70 years old, regardless of gender;
- The patient was diagnosed as severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (X-ray or CT showed ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament); The imaging findings showed occupied ratio ≥ 60% or involved three or more segments;
- Symptoms of spinal cord and nerve root compression, or accompanied by spinal cord compression symptoms such as dysfunction of urination and defecation, conservative treatment was ineffective or aggravated gradually;
- The participant (or his legal guardian) can sign the informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Congenital malformations (including but not limited to occipitocervical malformations, congenital cervical fusion, cervical related neurovascular malformations), ossification of cervical ligamentum flavum, cervical trauma, cervical cancer, cervical tuberculosis and other inflammatory diseases;
- Patients with other spinal diseases such as thoracolumbar vertebrae that affect clinical symptoms; Patients with motor neuron diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other nervous system diseases;
- The symptoms were aggravated due to recent trauma;
- Patients who participated in other clinical trials in recent 3 months;
- The participant (or his legal guardian) with mental illness and cognitive impairment can not give full informed consent;
- Those who are in poor health and can not tolerate surgery; The patients were not suitable for surgical treatment after preoperative examination.
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
China12 sites
Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100053
The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
Harbin, Heilongjaing, 150086
Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University
Jining, Shandong, 272100
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
Qingdao, Shandong, 266555
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200003
Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200003
The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200086
Shanghai Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200333
Shanghai Changhai Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433
Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518036
Shanxi Bethune Hospital
Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030032
The Second Affiliated Hospital, Air Force Medical University
Xi’an, Shanxi, 710000
About this study
Official title: An Open-label Randomized Multi-centre Study to Evaluate Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion Versus Posterior Laminoplasty in Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and imaging outcomes between Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF) and Laminoplasty in the treatment of severe ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.
Read the detailed description
This is a national, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of ACAF and posterior laminoplasty in the treatment of severe ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. In this study, 164 adult patients aged 18-70 with severe copll were randomly assigned to the experimental group (using ACAF) and the control group (using lamp) according to the ratio of 1:1. The patients were followed up for 2 years.
- Being tested
- ACAF, Laminoplasty
- Keywords
- OPLL, Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy, ACAF, Laminoplasty, Multicenter Study
- Medical subject headings
- Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ACAFProcedure or surgery
Also called Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion
(1)A standard right-side Smith-Robinson approach is performed. (2) The involved disc tissues are removed. The posterior longitudinal ligament is cut down at the levels cephalic and caudal to OPLL. (3) The anterior portion of the middle vertebral bodies is removed according to the thickness of ossification. Suitable cages are placed into each intervertebral space. (4) On the left side of the vertebra, a 2-mm-wide groove is created at the medial border of the transverse foramina. After that, an curved plated is fixed with screws. (5) On the right side of the vertebrae, a similar groove was also created. (6) Finally, tightening the screws to achieve a gradual evaluation of the vertebrae with OPLL.
LaminoplastyProcedure or surgery
(1) In the prone position, the skin and nuchal ligament were cut through the posterior median incision, and the paravertebral muscles were stripped layer by layer to expose the bilateral vertebral lamina, lateral mass and articular process.(2) Part of spinous process were removed with bone biting forceps. The side with more severe symptoms was selected as the open side, bone groove was performed at 2-3 mm of the medial edge of bilateral facet joints with the medial cortex was reserved at the shaft side.(3) Slowly lift the lamina and maintained.(4)Determining the opening width of each segment by trial, and selecting the appropriate size Arch miniplate, and fixed with screws.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ACAF | Experimental | Participants underwent anterior decompression of Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion Receives: Procedure: ACAF |
| Laminoplasty | Experimental | Participants underwent posterior decompression of Laminoplasty Receives: Procedure: Laminoplasty |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
C-JOA Recovery Rate
(postoperative JOA score at 3 months follow-up - preoperative JOA score)/(17 - preoperative JOA score)* 100%
Measured: Time point of outcome: 3 months post-operative follow-up visits
C-JOA Recovery Rate
(postoperative JOA score at 6 months follow-up - preoperative JOA score)/(17 - preoperative JOA score)* 100%
Measured: Time point of outcome: 6 months post-operative follow-up visits
C-JOA Recovery Rate
(postoperative JOA score at 12 months follow-up - preoperative JOA score)/(17 - preoperative JOA score)* 100%
Measured: Time point of outcome: 12 months post-operative follow-up visits
C-JOA Recovery Rate
(postoperative JOA score at 24 months follow-up - preoperative JOA score)/(17 - preoperative JOA score)* 100%
Measured: Time point of outcome: 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
Secondary outcomes (4)
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores
Filling in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores scale. This scale involves four aspects: upper limb motor function (range, 0 to 4 points), lower limb motor function (range, 0 to 4 points), sensory function (range, 0 to 6 points), and bladder function (range, 0 to 3 points). The total C-JOA score ranged from 0 (worst) to 17 (normal condition).
Measured: 28 days before operation and 3, 6, 12, 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
Visual Analogue Scale
Filling in the Visual Analogue Scale pain score that range, 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe].
Measured: 28 days before operation and 3, 6, 12, 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
Neck Disability Index
Filling in the 10-item Neck Disability Index scale that totally range 0 to 50 points, the highest index the worst.
Measured: 28 days before operation and 3, 6, 12, 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
Nurick-Score
Filling in the 6-level Nurick disability grade scale that range 0 [mild] to 5 [severe].
Measured: 28 days before operation and 3, 6, 12, 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2021
- Study start17 Aug 2021
- Primary completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal LigamentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 167 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Tang-Du Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jiangang Shi, Doctor, Study chair, Shanghai Changzheng HospitalDan Han, Master, Study director, Shanghai Changzheng HospitalYu Chen, Doctor, Principal investigator, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04968028
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021SL029
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 13 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Chen Y, Sun J, Yuan X, Guo Y, Yang H, Chen D, Shi J. Comparison of Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion With Posterior Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective, Randomized, and Control Study With at Least 1-Year Follow Up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Aug 15;45(16):1091-1101. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003462.
PubMed 32097261Sun K, Wang S, Huan L, Sun J, Xu X, Sun X, Shi J, Guo Y. Analysis of the spinal cord angle for severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: comparison between anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) and posterior laminectomy. Eur Spine J. 2020 May;29(5):1001-1012. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06216-6. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
PubMed 31797138Chen Y, Sun J, Han D, Yuan X, Wang Y, Guo Y, Zhong X, Shi J. An open-label randomized multi-Centre study to evaluate anterior controllable Antedisplacement and fusion versus posterior Laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: study design and analysis plan (STAR). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 8;22(1):765. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04645-3.
PubMed 34496821
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-label Randomized Multi-centre Study to Evaluate Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion Versus Posterior Laminoplasty in Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04968028
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021SL029
- Keywords
- OPLL, Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy, ACAF, Laminoplasty, Multicenter Study
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 167 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Changzheng HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Tang-Du Hospital
- Study start
- 17 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and imaging outcomes between Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF) and Laminoplasty in the treatment of severe ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.
Detailed description
This is a national, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of ACAF and posterior laminoplasty in the treatment of severe ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. In this study, 164 adult patients aged 18-70 with severe copll were randomly assigned to the experimental group (using ACAF) and the control group (using lamp) according to the ratio of 1:1. The patients were followed up for 2 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ACAF | Experimental | Procedure: ACAFParticipants underwent anterior decompression of Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion |
| Laminoplasty | Experimental | Procedure: LaminoplastyParticipants underwent posterior decompression of Laminoplasty |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- The patient's age is 18-70 years old, regardless of gender;
- The patient was diagnosed as severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (X-ray or CT showed ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament); The imaging findings showed occupied ratio ≥ 60% or involved three or more segments;
- Symptoms of spinal cord and nerve root compression, or accompanied by spinal cord compression symptoms such as dysfunction of urination and defecation, conservative treatment was ineffective or aggravated gradually;
- The participant (or his legal guardian) can sign the informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Congenital malformations (including but not limited to occipitocervical malformations, congenital cervical fusion, cervical related neurovascular malformations), ossification of cervical ligamentum flavum, cervical trauma, cervical cancer, cervical tuberculosis and other inflammatory diseases;
- Patients with other spinal diseases such as thoracolumbar vertebrae that affect clinical symptoms; Patients with motor neuron diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other nervous system diseases;
- The symptoms were aggravated due to recent trauma;
- Patients who participated in other clinical trials in recent 3 months;
- The participant (or his legal guardian) with mental illness and cognitive impairment can not give full informed consent;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ACAFAlso: Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion(1)A standard right-side Smith-Robinson approach is performed. (2) The involved disc tissues are removed. The posterior longitudinal ligament is cut down at the levels cephalic and caudal to OPLL. (3) The anterior portion of the middle vertebral bodies is removed according to the thickness of ossification. Suitable cages are placed into each intervertebral space. (4) On the left side of the vertebra, a 2-mm-wide groove is created at the medial border of the transverse foramina. After that, an curved plated is fixed with screws. (5) On the right side of the vertebrae, a similar groove was also created. (6) Finally, tightening the screws to achieve a gradual evaluation of the vertebrae with OPLL. | Procedure or surgery | ACAF |
| Laminoplasty(1) In the prone position, the skin and nuchal ligament were cut through the posterior median incision, and the paravertebral muscles were stripped layer by layer to expose the bilateral vertebral lamina, lateral mass and articular process.(2) Part of spinous process were removed with bone biting forceps. The side with more severe symptoms was selected as the open side, bone groove was performed at 2-3 mm of the medial edge of bilateral facet joints with the medial cortex was reserved at the shaft side.(3) Slowly lift the lamina and maintained.(4)Determining the opening width of each segment by trial, and selecting the appropriate size Arch miniplate, and fixed with screws. | Procedure or surgery | Laminoplasty |
Primary outcome
C-JOA Recovery Rate
Time frame: Time point of outcome: 3 months post-operative follow-up visits
(postoperative JOA score at 3 months follow-up - preoperative JOA score)/(17 - preoperative JOA score)* 100%
C-JOA Recovery Rate
Time frame: Time point of outcome: 6 months post-operative follow-up visits
(postoperative JOA score at 6 months follow-up - preoperative JOA score)/(17 - preoperative JOA score)* 100%
C-JOA Recovery Rate
Time frame: Time point of outcome: 12 months post-operative follow-up visits
(postoperative JOA score at 12 months follow-up - preoperative JOA score)/(17 - preoperative JOA score)* 100%
C-JOA Recovery Rate
Time frame: Time point of outcome: 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
(postoperative JOA score at 24 months follow-up - preoperative JOA score)/(17 - preoperative JOA score)* 100%
4 secondary outcomes
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores
Time frame: 28 days before operation and 3, 6, 12, 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: 28 days before operation and 3, 6, 12, 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
Neck Disability Index
Time frame: 28 days before operation and 3, 6, 12, 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
Nurick-Score
Time frame: 28 days before operation and 3, 6, 12, 24 months post-operative follow-up visits
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 32097261Chen Y, Sun J, Yuan X, Guo Y, Yang H, Chen D, Shi J. Comparison of Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion With Posterior Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective, Randomized, and Control Study With at Least 1-Year Follow Up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Aug 15;45(16):1091-1101. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003462.
- Background: PubMed 31797138Sun K, Wang S, Huan L, Sun J, Xu X, Sun X, Shi J, Guo Y. Analysis of the spinal cord angle for severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: comparison between anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) and posterior laminectomy. Eur Spine J. 2020 May;29(5):1001-1012. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06216-6. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34496821Chen Y, Sun J, Han D, Yuan X, Wang Y, Guo Y, Zhong X, Shi J. An open-label randomized multi-Centre study to evaluate anterior controllable Antedisplacement and fusion versus posterior Laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: study design and analysis plan (STAR). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 8;22(1):765. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04645-3.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jiangang Shi, Doctor study chair
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
Dan Han, Master study director
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
Yu Chen, Doctor principal investigator
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ACAF and Laminoplasty in people with Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament and Cervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy, run by Shanghai Changzheng Hospital at 12 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
C-JOA Recovery Rate (time frame: Time point of outcome: 3 months post-operative follow-up visits). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04968028, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2026.