AzTrials
AzTrials

TachyarrhythmiasNCT00526162

ConsultaTM CRT-D Clinical Evaluation Study

A study testing Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in people with Tachyarrhythmias and Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the Consulta clinical study is to evaluate the overall system safety and clinical performance of the Consulta Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT-D). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
83 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Oct 2007to Oct 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who have an indication for a defibrillator.
  • Patients who are optimally treated with medication.
  • Patients who are New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a life expectancy less than the duration of the study.
  • Patients with medical conditions that preclude the testing required for all patients by the study protocol or that otherwise limit study participation required for all patients.
  • Patients with mechanical tricuspid heart valves.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Hospital

    Bonn

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Clinical Study to Evaluate System Safety and Clinical Performance of the ConsultaTM CRT-D Device

The purpose of the Consulta clinical study is to evaluate the overall system safety and clinical performance of the Consulta Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT-D).

Read the detailed description

The Consulta CRT-D is an investigational bi-ventricular device that provides atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmia detection and therapy, cardioversion, defibrillation and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

The study will be a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter clinical study, conducted in approximately 18 centers.

To allow for sufficient experience with the device, a maximum of 80 subjects may be implanted with the Consulta device. Data will be collected at baseline (enrollment), implant, 1-, 3-, and 6- months post implant and every 6 months thereafter or until study closure (whichever occurs first), unscheduled follow-up visits, System Modifications, Technical Observations, Study Deviations, Study Exit, upon notification of new or updated Adverse Events and in case of death.

Being tested
Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Medical subject headings
Tachycardia, Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorDevice

    Also called ConsultaTM

    Implantation of a Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Study groups in NCT00526162
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Implantation of Consulta CRT-DExperimentalPatients have an implant attempt with a Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Receives: Device: Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Freedom From Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects at 1-month Post Implant.

    Percentage of subjects without an unanticipated serious adverse device effects at 1-month post implant.Only subjects implanted with a Consulta device that were followed at least 28 days post-implant or have had a unanticipated device effect within 28 days after implant were included in the analysis.

    Measured: 1 month

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Adverse Events

    Number of Adverse Events reported in the implanted subjects.

    Measured: 1 month

  2. System Performance Assessed by Holter Records

    The first 20 digital Holter records that were successfully collected in the total of 80 implanted subjects were analysed on observation of device features, ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias.

    Measured: 1 month follow-up

  3. System Performance Assessed by Save to Disk Files

    94 Save to Disk files were reviewed on observation of device features, ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias.

    Measured: 1 month follow-up

  4. System Performance Assessed by Technical Observations

    Reported technical observations will be reviewed to determine if there are any device performance issues.

    Measured: 1 month follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Sep 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2007
  3. Primary completionJan 2008
  4. Study completionOct 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
83 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00526162
Sponsor's protocol ID
112
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
6 Sep 2007
Last updated
2 Jul 2025
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Murgatroyd FD, Helmling E, Lemke B, Eber B, Mewis C, van der Meer-Hensgens J, Chang Y, Khalameizer V, Katz A. Manual vs. automatic capture management in implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. Europace. 2010 Jun;12(6):811-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq053. Epub 2010 Mar 14.

    PubMed 20231152

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in people with Tachyarrhythmias and Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jun 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Freedom From Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects at 1-month Post Implant. (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00526162, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in