AzTrials
AzTrials

Perinatal DepressionNCT00536159

Medicaid Enhanced Prenatal/Postnatal Services Using a Nurse-Community Health Worker Team

A study testing Medicaid Maternal and Infant Support Services and Nurse-CHW team in people with Perinatal Depression and Stress, run by Michigan State University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Our objective was to test whether there were advantages to Nurse-CHW team home visiting designed to combine the strengths of both visitors, with a focus on maternal stress and mental health, when compared with standard of Community Care (CC) that included professional home visitors in a state-sponsored Medicaid… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
Medicaid Maternal and Infant Support Services and Nurse-CHW team
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
613 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 1997to Aug 2000
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Medicaid eligible
  • residency in the county and no plans to move within 18 months
  • at least 16 years of age
  • speaks Spanish or English

Who cannot join

  • no pre-existing relationship with a home visiting nurse
  • no diagnosis or treatment for a pre-existing mental health condition within the last two years

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Spectrum Health Hospitals

    Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Improving the Health and Development of Low-Income Pregnant Women

Our objective was to test whether there were advantages to Nurse-CHW team home visiting designed to combine the strengths of both visitors, with a focus on maternal stress and mental health, when compared with standard of Community Care (CC) that included professional home visitors in a state-sponsored Medicaid program. We conducted the study under usual community conditions in a population of women eligible for state-sponsored Medicaid programs. We predicted that during pregnancy and infancy, women in the Nurse-CHW team intervention would report 1) less perceived stress; 2) fewer depressive symptoms; and 3) increased levels of psychosocial resources (self-esteem, mastery, and social support) than women in CC. Benefits were expected to be most pronounced for women with low psychosocial resources and high stress at enrollment.

Read the detailed description

Impoverished pregnant and parenting women have greater exposure to environmental stress with adverse effects for their own mental and physical health that may have long term consequences for their children's health and development. The mental health consequences of stress are pervasive in low income pregnant women and mothers with almost half screening positive for depressive symptoms and a quarter meeting diagnostic criteria for major or minor depression. While national home visiting models have demonstrated improvement in health, developmental, and parenting outcomes for women willing to participate, they have had less success in reducing depressive symptoms during pre and postnatal periods, and often programs struggle to engage women with unmet mental health needs.

We conducted a community-based, multi-site, randomized, controlled trial that included longitudinal assessment on five occasions during pregnancy and infancy to determine temporal program effects. We used a CC comparison group because Medicaid insured women in Michigan are eligible for home visiting through enhanced prenatal and infant services, and our goal was to determine if there was any advantage to the team approach when compared to community implementation of the state-sponsored home visiting program.

Pregnant women, who telephoned one of five public clinics in Kent County, Michigan, a county that includes urban (Grand Rapids) and rural areas, were contacted and invited to participate in the trial. We enrolled women considered harder to reach with cultural, language, and literacy barriers to participation and with chronic or current medical problems-populations traditionally served by state-sponsored programs. Participation was not dependent on women coming to a research or health facility, participating in prenatal or child health care or the enhanced services, having reliable transportation, consistent phone service, or stable housing.

Being tested
Medicaid Maternal and Infant Support Services, Nurse-CHW team
Keywords
nurse-community health worker team, perinatal depression, stress, Medicaid enhanced prenatal programs

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Medicaid Maternal and Infant Support ServicesOther

    Enhanced services include home visiting, transportation, psychosocial counseling, multidisciplinary planning, case management, nutritional guidance, and pregnancy and parenting education during pregnancy and infancy. The services are delivered primarily by nurses with occasional visits by social workers or nutritionists. In the county of the study (Kent), women who were assessed were provided intervention services.

  • Nurse-CHW teamOther

    A nurse and two CHWs functioned as a team, using visit and clinical guidelines that detailed expected care. Each team provided services for approximately 50-60 families. While occasional visits were made by both providers, most visits were made by either provider alone. Nurses guided the CHW care, led a multidisciplinary team assessment (with social workers, nutritionists, and others), provided crisis intervention and case management, assessed and managed health problems (including screening for depression and mental health care), and had periodic office visits with prenatal providers. CHWs provided relationship-based support by attempting weekly prenatal contact that alternated phone and face-to-face visits and used peer role modeling and personal empowerment approaches.

Study groups in NCT00536159
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Community CareActive comparatorMedicaid eligible/insured pregnant women and their infants are eligible for risk assessment and up to 18 home visits (9/pregnancy and 9/infancy) from community professional providers as part of a state-sponsored enhanced prenatal and postnatal Medicaid program.
Receives: Other: Medicaid Maternal and Infant Support Services
Nurse-CHW TeamExperimentalNurse-CHW team provided both nursing care, with additional focus on mental health and stress, and intensive relationship-based support from a CHW similar in characteristics to women served in the context of state-sponsored Medicaid program.
Receives: Other: Nurse-CHW team

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. depressive symptoms

    Measured: <24 weeks gestation to 12 months post birth

  2. perceived stress

    Measured: <24 weeks gestation to 12 months post birth

  3. mastery

    Measured: <24 weeks gestation to 12 months postbirth

  4. self esteem

    Measured: <24 weeks gestation to 12 months post birth

  5. social support

    Measured: <24 weeks gestation to 12 months postbirth

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. infant motor, mental development

    Measured: 6 and 12 months postbirth

  2. maternal-infant interaction

    Measured: 6 and 12 months postbirth

  3. Medicaid (maternal and infant)and program costs

    Measured: <24 weeks gestation to 12 months

  4. health risk behaviors (smoking, drug, alcohol)

    Measured: <24 weeks gestation to 12 months postbirth

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Sep 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 1997
  3. Study completionAug 2000

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
613 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00536159
Sponsor's protocol ID
R50 MC00045-04 R2
Status last verified
Sep 2007
First submitted
18 Sep 2007
Last updated
27 Sep 2007
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Roman LA, Lindsay JK, Moore JS, Duthie PA, Peck C, Barton LR, Gebben MR, Baer LJ. Addressing mental health and stress in Medicaid-insured pregnant women using a nurse-community health worker home visiting team. Public Health Nurs. 2007 May-Jun;24(3):239-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2007.00630.x.

    PubMed 17456125

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Medicaid Maternal and Infant Support Services and Nurse-CHW team in people with Perinatal Depression and Stress, run by Michigan State University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Sep 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

depressive symptoms (time frame: <24 weeks gestation to 12 months post birth). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00536159, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Sep 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in