Guillain-Barre SyndromeNCT00575653
Safety Study of GBS Following Menactra Meningococcal Vaccination
An observational study of Guillain-Barre Syndrome, run by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care at 6 sites in United States.
Trial summary
We are conducting a large, record-based study to assess the risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), a serious demyelinating disease, following immunization with the tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (Menactra) that is currently recommended for all adolescents. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 11 to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Guillain-Barre Syndrome
- How many people
- 6,000,000 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2005to 31 Dec 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 11 to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: The primary study population will include adolescent health plan members 11-<19 years of age. A secondary cohort will include members 19-<22 years of age. Older adolescents are excluded from the primary cohort because an unknown proportion of immunizations to older individuals may be provided by colleges or other out-of-plan providers, and not be identifiable in health plan records.
Who may be able to join
- Enrolled health plan members for at least 6 months prior to cohort entry
- Enrolled between March 1, 2005 and August 31, 2008
- Birth dates between March 2, 1986 and August 30, 1997 for the primary study cohort
- Birth dates between March 2, 1983 to March 1, 1986 for the secondary cohort
Who cannot join
- -None
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
United States6 sites
Aetna, Inc.
Blue Bell, Pennsylvania
Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817
Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
i3 Drug Safety
Waltham, Massachusetts, 02451
HealthCore, Inc.
Wilmington, Delaware, 19801
About this study
Official title: Risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome Following Meningococcal Conjugate (MCV4) Vaccination
We are conducting a large, record-based study to assess the risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), a serious demyelinating disease, following immunization with the tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (Menactra) that is currently recommended for all adolescents. The study was requested by CDC and FDA because of an unexpected number of case reports to the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
The study protocol was designed by the investigators, with input from FDA, CDC, and the vaccine's manufacturer, Sanofi-Pasteur. An external advisory board that includes CDC representation, provides input regarding important decisions. The manufacturer is not participating in the conduct of the study and has no control over the analysis or dissemination of results.
The study is derived from five large US health plans with a total membership of approximately 50 million over the study time period. America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) serves as liaison between the health plans and the Coordinating Center at the Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention of Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, and is the contracting organization with the health plans.
Read the detailed description
Through a partnership that uses the data and other resources of three national and two regional health plans and insurers, we are conducting a multi-site retrospective study of the relationship between immunization with tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in adolescents (ages 11-21 years of age) over the 42-month period of March 1, 2005 to August 31, 2008. This collaboration has several features of a distributed data network, and so provides an instructive example of the feasibility of large scale population-based post-market evidence development.
Participants include five research organizations that are either part of, or closely affiliated with, a health plan or insurer: HealthCore Inc. (affiliated with WellPoint), Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield of Pennsylvania, i3 Drug Safety, Aetna, Inc., and Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research of Hawaii. There is a coordinating center at the Harvard Medical School Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care.
The organizations provide coverage for approximately 80 million individuals (all ages), of whom the information for approximately 50 million will be available for analysis. Each organization provides scientific, informatics, and management expertise regarding its own population and data, and the overall design and conduct of the study.
This retrospective study uses a hybrid design with three analytic components: 1) characterization of the entire cohort with regard to demographics, eligible time under observation, immunization status, incidence rates of GBS during various categories of person time (never immunized, before immunization, during the 42 days after immunization, etc.), and comorbidities and other covariates, 2) a nested case-control study assessing risk associated with immunization, and 3) a self-controlled case series assessing immunization associated risk.
Cohort analysis
Sites will use programs distributed by the coordinating center to compute incidence rates of GBS according to age, sex, season, and MCV4 vaccination status among the full base population (health plan enrollees who meet age and cohort eligibility criteria). Additionally, vaccination rates for MCV4 according to age, sex, and calendar year will be computed among all cohort members. Incidence rates of GBS provided by these analyses will be used to calculate the attributable risk of GBS following MCV4 vaccination should a significant relationship be identified.
Nested case control analysis
A nested case-control analysis utilizing pooled analytic datasets from all sites will be used to estimate the risk of GBS during the 42 days after MCV4 vaccination relative to the risk of GBS among vaccines and non-vaccinees at other times (the study's primary objective), adjusted for age, sex, and other vaccinations among 11-<19 year olds.
All potential cases of GBS among the cohort members will be identified, and a sample of 100 non-cases from the same risk set as each case will be randomly selected and matched on age, sex, and state of residence. Their vaccination histories and other covariates will be included in analytic datasets to be transferred to the coordinating center for pooled multivariate analysis. Covariates will be estimated as of an index date assigned within each case-control set which is the date of GBS onset for the associated case.
The relative risk of GBS associated with MCV4 vaccination will be estimated using conditional logistic regression analysis in SAS.
Variables will include:
- Dependent variable: GBS case status
- Main independent variable: Analysis A: MCV4 vaccination in 1-42 days prior to index date; Analysis B: MCV4 vaccination in 1-7, 8-14, 15-28, 29-42 days prior to index date
- Matching factors: Age; sex; study site; state of residence
- Other covariates: Exposure to Tdap, Td, Hepatitis B, HPV, tetanus, and influenza vaccine during the 42 days prior to the GBS onset date; exposure to MPSV4 vaccine during the 42 days prior to the GBS onset date(separate model from model with MCV4 exposure)
We also will assess the potential effect modification between the different vaccines, and according to age, season, and geographic region, through stratified analysis and the testing of interaction terms within the conditional logistic regression model.
Self-Control Analysis
An additional case-series analysis (to be referred to as "Analysis C") will be performed among the subset of adjudicated GBS cases with prior MCV4 vaccination. Date of MCV4 vaccination will serve as the index date for each patient. The relative incidence rate of GBS during a "control" period of 43 or more days following vaccination will be compared to the incidence during the "exposed" risk window of 1-42 days following vaccination using log linear modeling with terms for the exposed and control periods.
Variables will include:
- Dependent variable: Time to GBS
- Main independent variable: Analysis C: Time period 1-42 days post vaccination compared with 43 or more days post vaccination
- Other covariates (to be included as sample size permits): Time periods corresponding to 1-42 days following each of: Tdap, Td, Hepatitis B, HPV, tetanus, and influenza vaccinations
We also will assess the potential effect modification between the different vaccines, and according to age, season, geographic region, and race/ethnicity, through stratified analysis and the testing of interaction terms within the log linear model, as sample size permits.
Analysis C will be performed once at the end of the study period.
GBS Case Descriptive Analysis
Several additional secondary objectives will be addressed from evaluation of GBS cases based on review of abstracted information from their medical charts, and administrative claims data.
Cases of GBS identified among cohort members 19-<22 years old will be identified from administrative claims data, and adjudicated through review of abstracted medical record information in a manner equivalent to that for cohort members 11-<19 years old. These cases will be quantified, and their clinical presentation described and compared with that of cases among 11-<19 year olds, with regard to at least the following factors: proportion of cases classified as definite GBS cases, severity of illness as measured by mortality, hospitalization for GBS, total duration of hospitalizations in days, mechanical ventilation required, total number of days of mechanical ventilation, intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, plasmapheresis, and immunosuppressive therapy. Similar comparisons will be made regarding the clinical presentation of GBS among MCV4 vaccinees compared to non-vaccinees.
The number of GBS cases with history of each of the other vaccines included in the study in the 42 days prior to GBS onset will also be described.
A line list will be created for all potential cases of GBS. For adjudicated cases of GBS, the listing will indicate the final case status, elements of the case definition that were and were not met, immunization status (MCV4, MPSV4, Tdap, Td, HepB, HPV, tetanus, and influenza) and indicators of infection or febrile illness in the prior 42 days, gender, age, month and year of GBS onset, and a brief description of disease severity. Additional line lists will be created for censored cases (adjudicated non-cases) that include the reason for censoring, and for potential cases for which charts could not be obtained or insufficient information was obtained from the chart to adjudicate case status.
- Conditions
- Guillain-Barre Syndrome
- Keywords
- Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Meningococcal vaccines, Tetravalent Meningococcal Vaccine, Vaccination, Vaccines, Vaccines, Conjugate
- Medical subject headings
- Guillain-Barre Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 11-18 (Primary) | Enrolled members of one of the participating health plans who are ages 11-18 at any time during the study period, March 1, 2005 through August 31, 2008. | |
| 19-21 (Secondary) | Enrolled members of one of the participating health plans who are ages 19-21 at any time during the study period, March 1, 2005 through August 31, 2008. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), verified through neurologist review of medical records
Measured: within 42 days following vaccination
Secondary outcomes (1)
Clinical presentation and severity of GBS
Measured: following vaccination
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2005
- Primary completion31 Dec 2009
- Study completion31 Dec 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Guillain-Barre SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 6,000,000 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aetna, Inc., HealthCore, Inc., Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield, i3 Drug Safety, Kaiser Permanente
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Richard Platt, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
- Investigators
- Richard Platt, MD, MS, Principal investigator, Dept. of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, HMS/HPHCPriscilla Velentgas, PhD, Study director, Dept. of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, HMS/HPHC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00575653
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PH000274A
- Status last verified
- Dec 2007
- First submitted
- 17 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome Following Meningococcal Conjugate (MCV4) Vaccination
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00575653
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PH000274A
- Conditions
- Guillain-Barre Syndrome
- Keywords
- Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Meningococcal vaccines, Tetravalent Meningococcal Vaccine, Vaccination, Vaccines, Vaccines, Conjugate
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 6,000,000 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Harvard Pilgrim Health CareUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aetna, Inc., HealthCore, Inc., Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield, i3 Drug Safety, Kaiser Permanente
- Study start
- Mar 2005
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
We are conducting a large, record-based study to assess the risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), a serious demyelinating disease, following immunization with the tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (Menactra) that is currently recommended for all adolescents. The study was requested by CDC and FDA because of an unexpected number of case reports to the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
The study protocol was designed by the investigators, with input from FDA, CDC, and the vaccine's manufacturer, Sanofi-Pasteur. An external advisory board that includes CDC representation, provides input regarding important decisions. The manufacturer is not participating in the conduct of the study and has no control over the analysis or dissemination of results.
The study is derived from five large US health plans with a total membership of approximately 50 million over the study time period. America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) serves as liaison between the health plans and the Coordinating Center at the Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention of Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, and is the contracting organization with the health plans.
Detailed description
Through a partnership that uses the data and other resources of three national and two regional health plans and insurers, we are conducting a multi-site retrospective study of the relationship between immunization with tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in adolescents (ages 11-21 years of age) over the 42-month period of March 1, 2005 to August 31, 2008. This collaboration has several features of a distributed data network, and so provides an instructive example of the feasibility of large scale population-based post-market evidence development.
Participants include five research organizations that are either part of, or closely affiliated with, a health plan or insurer: HealthCore Inc. (affiliated with WellPoint), Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield of Pennsylvania, i3 Drug Safety, Aetna, Inc., and Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research of Hawaii. There is a coordinating center at the Harvard Medical School Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care.
The organizations provide coverage for approximately 80 million individuals (all ages), of whom the information for approximately 50 million will be available for analysis. Each organization provides scientific, informatics, and management expertise regarding its own population and data, and the overall design and conduct of the study.
This retrospective study uses a hybrid design with three analytic components: 1) characterization of the entire cohort with regard to demographics, eligible time under observation, immunization status, incidence rates of GBS during various categories of person time (never immunized, before immunization, during the 42 days after immunization, etc.), and comorbidities and other covariates, 2) a nested case-control study assessing risk associated with immunization, and 3) a self-controlled case series assessing immunization associated risk.
Cohort analysis
Sites will use programs distributed by the coordinating center to compute incidence rates of GBS according to age, sex, season, and MCV4 vaccination status among the full base population (health plan enrollees who meet age and cohort eligibility criteria). Additionally, vaccination rates for MCV4 according to age, sex, and calendar year will be computed among all cohort members. Incidence rates of GBS provided by these analyses will be used to calculate the attributable risk of GBS following MCV4 vaccination should a significant relationship be identified.
Nested case control analysis
A nested case-control analysis utilizing pooled analytic datasets from all sites will be used to estimate the risk of GBS during the 42 days after MCV4 vaccination relative to the risk of GBS among vaccines and non-vaccinees at other times (the study's primary objective), adjusted for age, sex, and other vaccinations among 11-<19 year olds.
All potential cases of GBS among the cohort members will be identified, and a sample of 100 non-cases from the same risk set as each case will be randomly selected and matched on age, sex, and state of residence. Their vaccination histories and other covariates will be included in analytic datasets to be transferred to the coordinating center for pooled multivariate analysis. Covariates will be estimated as of an index date assigned within each case-control set which is the date of GBS onset for the associated case.
The relative risk of GBS associated with MCV4 vaccination will be estimated using conditional logistic regression analysis in SAS.
Variables will include:
- Dependent variable: GBS case status
- Main independent variable: Analysis A: MCV4 vaccination in 1-42 days prior to index date; Analysis B: MCV4 vaccination in 1-7, 8-14, 15-28, 29-42 days prior to index date
- Matching factors: Age; sex; study site; state of residence
- Other covariates: Exposure to Tdap, Td, Hepatitis B, HPV, tetanus, and influenza vaccine during the 42 days prior to the GBS onset date; exposure to MPSV4 vaccine during the 42 days prior to the GBS onset date(separate model from model with MCV4 exposure)
We also will assess the potential effect modification between the different vaccines, and according to age, season, and geographic region, through stratified analysis and the testing of interaction terms within the conditional logistic regression model.
Self-Control Analysis
An additional case-series analysis (to be referred to as "Analysis C") will be performed among the subset of adjudicated GBS cases with prior MCV4 vaccination. Date of MCV4 vaccination will serve as the index date for each patient. The relative incidence rate of GBS during a "control" period of 43 or more days following vaccination will be compared to the incidence during the "exposed" risk window of 1-42 days following vaccination using log linear modeling with terms for the exposed and control periods.
Variables will include:
- Dependent variable: Time to GBS
- Main independent variable: Analysis C: Time period 1-42 days post vaccination compared with 43 or more days post vaccination
- Other covariates (to be included as sample size permits): Time periods corresponding to 1-42 days following each of: Tdap, Td, Hepatitis B, HPV, tetanus, and influenza vaccinations
We also will assess the potential effect modification between the different vaccines, and according to age, season, geographic region, and race/ethnicity, through stratified analysis and the testing of interaction terms within the log linear model, as sample size permits.
Analysis C will be performed once at the end of the study period.
GBS Case Descriptive Analysis
Several additional secondary objectives will be addressed from evaluation of GBS cases based on review of abstracted information from their medical charts, and administrative claims data.
Cases of GBS identified among cohort members 19-<22 years old will be identified from administrative claims data, and adjudicated through review of abstracted medical record information in a manner equivalent to that for cohort members 11-<19 years old. These cases will be quantified, and their clinical presentation described and compared with that of cases among 11-<19 year olds, with regard to at least the following factors: proportion of cases classified as definite GBS cases, severity of illness as measured by mortality, hospitalization for GBS, total duration of hospitalizations in days, mechanical ventilation required, total number of days of mechanical ventilation, intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, plasmapheresis, and immunosuppressive therapy. Similar comparisons will be made regarding the clinical presentation of GBS among MCV4 vaccinees compared to non-vaccinees.
The number of GBS cases with history of each of the other vaccines included in the study in the 42 days prior to GBS onset will also be described.
A line list will be created for all potential cases of GBS. For adjudicated cases of GBS, the listing will indicate the final case status, elements of the case definition that were and were not met, immunization status (MCV4, MPSV4, Tdap, Td, HepB, HPV, tetanus, and influenza) and indicators of infection or febrile illness in the prior 42 days, gender, age, month and year of GBS onset, and a brief description of disease severity. Additional line lists will be created for censored cases (adjudicated non-cases) that include the reason for censoring, and for potential cases for which charts could not be obtained or insufficient information was obtained from the chart to adjudicate case status.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 11-18 (Primary) | – | –Enrolled members of one of the participating health plans who are ages 11-18 at any time during the study period, March 1, 2005 through August 31, 2008. |
| 19-21 (Secondary) | – | –Enrolled members of one of the participating health plans who are ages 19-21 at any time during the study period, March 1, 2005 through August 31, 2008. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 11 to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- The primary study population will include adolescent health plan members 11-<19 years of age. A secondary cohort will include members 19-<22 years of age. Older adolescents are excluded from the primary cohort because an unknown proportion of immunizations to older individuals may be provided by colleges or other out-of-plan providers, and not be identifiable in health plan records.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Enrolled health plan members for at least 6 months prior to cohort entry
- Enrolled between March 1, 2005 and August 31, 2008
- Birth dates between March 2, 1986 and August 30, 1997 for the primary study cohort
- Birth dates between March 2, 1983 to March 1, 1986 for the secondary cohort
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), verified through neurologist review of medical records
Time frame: within 42 days following vaccination
1 secondary outcome
Clinical presentation and severity of GBS
Time frame: following vaccination
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2017.
Related trials for Guillain-Barre Syndrome
Recruiting
High-Tech Rehabilitation Pathway for Acute Adult Neuromuscular Diseases - Fit4MedRob-Acute MND Project
Critical Illness Myopathy, Guillain Barré Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Empasiprubart as Add-On Therapy to IVIg in Adult Participants With Guillain-Barré Syndrome
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
RecruitingPhase 3
An Open Label Clinical Study to Evaluate Tanruprubart (Also Commonly Known as ANX005) in Participants With Guillain-Barré Syndrome (FORWARD Study)
Guillain-Barre Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Peripheral Nerve Ultrasound in Children With Guillain-Barré Syndrome
Guillain-Barre Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Early vs. Late Tracheostomy in Patients With Guillain -Barre Syndrome
Guillain Barre Syndrome, Mechanical Ventilation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Richard Platt, MD, MS principal investigator
Dept. of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, HMS/HPHC
Priscilla Velentgas, PhD study director
Dept. of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, HMS/HPHC
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Guillain-Barre Syndrome, run by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care at 6 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), verified through neurologist review of medical records (time frame: within 42 days following vaccination). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2017.