Ischemic StrokePhase 3SAMMPRISNCT00576693
Stenting vs. Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis
A Phase 3 study testing intracranial angioplasty and stenting and intensive medical management in people with Ischemic Stroke, run by Medical University of South Carolina at 50 sites in United States.
Trial summary
PRIMARY HYPOTHESIS: Compared with intensive medical therapy alone, intracranial angioplasty and stenting combined with intensive medical therapy will decrease the risk of the primary endpoint by 35% over a mean follow-up of two years in high-risk patients patients with 70% - 99% intracranial stenosis who had a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ischemic Stroke
- What is being tested?
- intracranial angioplasty and stenting and intensive medical management
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 451 participants
- Where
- 50 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2008to Apr 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or non-severe stroke within 30 days of enrollment attributed to 70-99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery (carotid artery, MCA stem (M1), vertebral artery, or basilar artery)
- may be diagnosed byTranscranial Doppler (TCD), Magnetic Resonance Angiogram (MRA), or computed tomography angiography (CTA) to qualify for angiogram performed as part of the study protocol but must be confirmed by catheter angiography for enrollment in the trial
- Modified Rankin score of ≤ 3
- Target area of stenosis in an intracranial artery that has a normal diameter of 2.00 mm to 4.50 mm
- Target area of stenosis is less than or equal to 14 mm in length
- Age ≥ 30 years and ≤ 80 years.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Patients 30-49 years are required to meet at least one additional criteria (i-vi) provided in the table below to qualify for the study. This additional requirement is to increase the likelihood that the symptomatic intracranial stenosis in patients 30-49 years is atherosclerotic.
- insulin dependent diabetes for at least 15 years ii. at least 2 of the following atherosclerotic risk factors: hypertension (BP > 140/90 or on antihypertensive therapy); dyslipidemia (LDL > 130 mg /dl or HDL < 40 mg/dl or fasting triglycerides > 150 mg/dl or on lipid lowering therapy); smoking; non-insulin dependent diabetes or insulin dependent diabetes of less than 15 years duration; family history of any of the following: myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass, coronary angioplasty or stenting, stroke, carotid endarterectomy or stenting, peripheral vascular surgery in parent or sibling who was < 55 years of age for men or < 65 for women at the time of the event ii. history of any of the following: myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass, coronary angioplasty or stenting, carotid endarterectomy or stenting, or peripheral vascular surgery for atherosclerotic disease iv. any stenosis of an extracranial carotid or vertebral artery, another intracranial artery, subclavian artery, coronary artery, iliac or femoral artery, other lower or upper extremity artery, mesenteric artery, or renal artery that was documented by non-invasive vascular imaging or catheter angiography and is considered atherosclerotic v. aortic arch atheroma documented by non-invasive vascular imaging or catheter angiography vi. any aortic aneurysm documented by non-invasive vascular imaging or catheter angiography that is considered atherosclerotic
- Negative pregnancy test in a female who has had any menses in the last 18 months
- Patient is willing and able to return for all follow-up visits required by the protocol
- Patient is available by phone
- Patient understands the purpose and requirements of the study, can make him/herself understood, and has provided informed consent
Who cannot join
- Tandem extracranial or intracranial stenosis (70%-99%) or occlusion that is proximal or distal to the target intracranial lesion (NOTE: an exception is allowed if the occlusion involves a single vertebral artery proximal to a symptomatic basilar artery stenosis and the contralateral vertebral artery is supplying the basilar artery)
- Bilateral intracranial vertebral artery stenosis of 70%-99% and uncertainty about which artery is symptomatic (e.g. if patient has pontine, midbrain, or temporal - occipital symptoms)
- Stenting, angioplasty, or endarterectomy of an extracranial (carotid or vertebral artery) or intracranial artery within 30 days prior to expected enrollment date
- Previous treatment of target lesion with a stent, angioplasty, or other mechanical device, or plan to perform staged angioplasty followed by stenting of target lesion
- Plan to perform concomitant angioplasty or stenting of an extracranial vessel tandem to an intracranial stenosis
- Presence of intraluminal thrombus proximal to or at the target lesion
Show all 29Show fewer
- Any aneurysm proximal to or distal to stenotic intracranial artery
- Intracranial tumor (except meningioma) or any intracranial vascular malformation
- CT or angiographic evidence of severe calcification at target lesion
- Thrombolytic therapy within 24 hours prior to enrollment
- Progressive neurological signs within 24 hours prior to enrollment
- Brain infarct within previous 30 days of enrollment that is of sufficient size (> 5 cms) to be at risk of hemorrhagic conversion during or after stenting
- Any hemorrhagic infarct within 14 days prior to enrollment
- Any hemorrhagic infarct within 15 - 30 days that is associated with mass effect
- Any history of a primary intracerebral (parenchymal) hemorrhage (ICH)
- Any other intracranial hemorrhage (subarachnoid, subdural, epidural) within 30 days
- Any untreated chronic subdural hematoma of greater than 5 mm in thickness
- Intracranial arterial stenosis due to arterial dissection, Moya Moya disease; any known vasculitic disease; herpes zoster, varicella zoster or other viral vasculopathy; neurosyphilis; any other intracranial infection; any intracranial stenosis associated with Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis; radiation induced vasculopathy; fibromuscular dysplasia; sickle cell disease; neurofibromatosis; benign angiopathy of central nervous system; post-partum angiopathy; suspected vasospastic process, suspected recanalized embolus
- Presence of any of the following unequivocal cardiac sources of embolism: chronic or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, mitral stenosis, mechanical valve, endocarditis, intracardiac clot or vegetation, myocardial infarction within three months, dilated cardiomyopathy, left atrial spontaneous echo contrast, ejection fraction less than 30%
- Known allergy or contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, nitinol, local or general anesthesia
- History of life-threatening allergy to contrast dye. If not life threatening and can be effectively pretreated, patient can be enrolled at physician's discretion
- Active peptic ulcer disease, major systemic hemorrhage within 30 days, active bleeding diathesis, platelets < 100,000, hematocrit < 30, International normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5, clotting factor abnormality that increases the risk of bleeding, current alcohol or substance abuse, uncontrolled severe hypertension (systolic pressure > 180 mm Hg or diastolic pressure > 115 mm Hg), severe liver impairment Aspartate Transaminase (AST) or Alanine transaminase (ALT) > 3 x normal, cirrhosis, creatinine > 3.0 (unless on dialysis)
- Major surgery (including open femoral, aortic, or carotid surgery) within previous 30 days or planned in the next 90 days after enrollment
- Indication for warfarin or heparin beyond enrollment (NOTE: exceptions allowed for use of systemic heparin during stenting procedure or subcutaneous heparin for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis while hospitalized)
- Severe neurological deficit that renders the patient incapable of living independently
- Dementia or psychiatric problem that prevents the patient from following an outpatient program reliably
- Co-morbid conditions that may limit survival to less than 3 years
- Pregnancy or of childbearing potential and unwilling to use contraception for the duration of this study
- Enrollment in another study that would conflict with the current study
Trial locations and contacts
50 sites in 1 country.
50 sites in 1 country
United States50 sites
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30388
Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
UAB Medical Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
University of Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, 14209
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
Erlanger Medical Center
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Riverside Methodist
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
UT Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Wayne State
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Henry Ford Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Inova Fairfax Hospital
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042
University of Florida - Shands
Gainesville, Florida, 32611
Glendale Adventist
Glendale, California, 91203
Moses Cone Medical Center
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401
Baylor St. Luke's
Houston, Texas, 77030
Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Mississippi
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Cedars Sinai
Los Angeles, California, 90048
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
West Virginia University
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
NYU Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, 10065
Sentera
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19170
Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
Mayo
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Oregon Health Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
UCSF
San Francisco, California, 94143
Providence St. John
Southfield, Michigan, 48075
Sacred Heart Medical Center
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Stony Brook University Medical Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11790
MultiCare
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Scott & White - Texas A&M
Temple, Texas, 76508
Washington Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Central DuPage Hospital
Winfield, Illinois, 60190
Forsyth Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Florida Hospital
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
About this study
PRIMARY HYPOTHESIS:
Compared with intensive medical therapy alone, intracranial angioplasty and stenting combined with intensive medical therapy will decrease the risk of the primary endpoint by 35% over a mean follow-up of two years in high-risk patients patients with 70% - 99% intracranial stenosis who had a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke within 30 days prior to enrollment) with symptomatic stenosis of a major intracranial artery.
Read more
SUMMARY:
The best treatment for prevention of another stroke or TIA in patients with narrowing of one of the arteries in the brain is uncertain. A common treatment is the use of anti-clotting medications to prevent blood clots from forming in the narrowed vessel. There are a variety of medicines used for this purpose. These medications are usually taken for the rest of a patient's life.
However, a treatment that has been used successfully together with anti-clotting medications in patients with narrowing of the blood vessels of the heart is now being studied in the blood vessels of the brain. This treatment is called stenting.
Recent research has also indicated a benefit in prevention of recurring stroke by Intensive Medical Therapy, which is defined as treating risk factors for stroke like high blood pressure, elevated LDL (low density lipids - the "bad" form of cholesterol) and diabetes. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of either Intensive Medical Therapy PLUS Stenting or Intensive Medical Therapy ONLY in preventing stroke, heart attacks or death.
The study will enroll patients over a 5 year period. Each participant will be involved in the study for a minimum of 1 year and a maximum of 3 years.
Fifty different medical centers in the United States are part of this study. Both the Clinical Coordinating Center and the Statistical Coordinating Center for the entire study will be located at Emory University.
Read the detailed description
This will be an investigator initiated and designed Phase III multicenter trial in which patients with TIA or non-disabling stroke within 30 days prior to enrollment that is caused by 70% - 99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery (MCA, carotid, vertebral, or basilar) will be randomized (1:1) at approximately 50 sites to:
intensive medical therapy alone (aspirin 325 mg / day for entire follow-up, clopidogrel 75mg per day for 90 days after enrollment unless cardiologist recommends continuing clopidogrel beyond 90 days for a cardiac indication, and aggressive risk factor management primarily targeting blood pressure < 140 / 90 mm Hg (< 130 / 80 if diabetic) and LDL < 70 mg / dl)
OR
intracranial angioplasty and stenting using the Gateway balloon and Wingspan self-expanding nitinol stent (or any future FDA approved iterations of the balloon, stent, or the delivery systems) plus intensive medical therapy (aspirin 325 mg / day for entire follow-up, clopidogrel 75mg per day for 90 days after enrollment unless cardiologist recommends continuing clopidogrel beyond 90 days for a cardiac indication, and aggressive risk factor management primarily targeting blood pressure < 140 / 90 mm Hg (< 130 / 80 if diabetic) and LDL < 70 mg / dl).
Risk factor management will be performed by the study neurologist at each site who will be assisted by an innovative, evidence-based, educational, lifestyle modification program (INTERxVENT) that will be administered at regularly scheduled times to all patients throughout the study.
All patients enrolled in the trial will be followed until the first of the following: 90 days after a primary endpoint, death, or the close-out visit in the trial, which will occur within a window from 60 days before March 31, 2012 to 30 days after March 31, 2013. Patients who do not die or have a primary endpoint during follow-up will be followed for 2-4.5 years.
- Conditions
- Ischemic Stroke
- Being tested
- intracranial angioplasty and stenting, intensive medical management
- Keywords
- ischemic stroke, intracranial stenting, vascular risk factor management
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
intracranial angioplasty and stentingDevice
Also called Wingspan stent, Gateway balloon
intracranial angioplasty and stenting using the Gateway balloon and Wingspan self-expanding nitinol stent (or any future FDA approved iterations of the balloon, stent, or the delivery systems) plus intensive medical therapy (aspirin 325 mg / day for entire follow-up, clopidogrel 75mg per day for 90 days after enrollment unless cardiologist recommends continuing clopidogrel beyond 90 days for a cardiac indication, and aggressive risk factor management primarily targeting blood pressure < 140 / 90 mm Hg (< 130 / 80 if diabetic) and LDL < 70 mg / dl).
intensive medical managementOther
intensive medical therapy alone (aspirin 325 mg / day for entire follow-up, clopidogrel 75mg per day for 90 days after enrollment unless cardiologist recommends continuing clopidogrel beyond 90 days for a cardiac indication, and aggressive risk factor management primarily targeting blood pressure < 140 / 90 mm Hg (< 130 / 80 if diabetic) and LDL < 70 mg / dl)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intensive medical management plus stenting | Experimental | intracranial angioplasty and stenting using the Gateway balloon and Wingspan self-expanding nitinol stent (or any future FDA approved iterations of the balloon, stent, or the delivery systems) plus intensive medical therapy (aspirin 325 mg / day for entire follow-up, clopidogrel 75mg per day for 90 days after enrollment unless cardiologist recommends continuing clopidogrel beyond 90 days for a cardiac indication, and aggressive risk factor management primarily targeting blood pressure < 140 / 90 mm Hg (< 130 / 80 if diabetic) and LDL < 70 mg / dl). Receives: Device: intracranial angioplasty and stenting |
| intensive medical management alone | Experimental | Intensive medical therapy alone (aspirin 325 mg / day for entire follow-up, clopidogrel 75mg per day for 90 days after enrollment unless cardiologist recommends continuing clopidogrel beyond 90 days for a cardiac indication, and aggressive risk factor management primarily targeting blood pressure < 140 / 90 mm Hg (< 130 / 80 if diabetic) and LDL < 70 mg / dl) Receives: Other: intensive medical management |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Any Stroke or Death Within 30 Days of Enrollment or Any Revascularization Procedure OR an Ischemic Stroke in the Territory of the Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Beyond 30 Days After Enrollment.
Any stroke (ischemic, parenchymal brain hemorrhage, subarachnoid or intraventricular hemorrhage) or death within 30 days after enrollment OR any stroke (ischemic, parenchymal brain hemorrhage, subarachnoid or intraventricular hemorrhage) or death within 30 days of any revascularization procedure of the qualifying symptomatic intracranial artery done during follow-up, OR an ischemic stroke in the territory of the symptomatic intracranial artery from day 31 after study entry to completion of follow-up.
Measured: Mean length of follow-up was 2.4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2008
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionApr 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ischemic StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical University of South CarolinaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 451 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of South Carolina
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marc Chimowitz, Medical University of South Carolina
- Investigators
- Marc I Chimowitz, MBChB, Principal investigator, Medical University of South Carolina
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00576693
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01NS058728-01A1
- Other IDs
- NINDS, CRC, 1U01NS058728-01A1
- Acronym
- SAMMPRIS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 7 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 30 May 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Lynn MJ, Barnwell SL, Zaidat OO, Meyers PM, Gobin YP, Dion J, Lane BF, Turan TN, Janis LS, Chimowitz MI; SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Impact of operator and site experience on outcomes after angioplasty and stenting in the SAMMPRIS trial. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Nov;5(6):528-33. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010504. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
PubMed 22977278Turan TN, Lynn MJ, Nizam A, Lane B, Egan BM, Le NA, Lopes-Virella MF, Hermayer KL, Benavente O, White CL, Brown WV, Caskey MF, Steiner MR, Vilardo N, Stufflebean A, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Janis S, Chimowitz MI; SAMMPRIS Investigators. Rationale, design, and implementation of aggressive risk factor management in the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):e51-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966911. No abstract available.
PubMed 22991350Fiorella D, Derdeyn CP, Lynn MJ, Barnwell SL, Hoh BL, Levy EI, Harrigan MR, Klucznik RP, McDougall CG, Pride GL Jr, Zaidat OO, Lutsep HL, Waters MF, Hourihane JM, Alexandrov AV, Chiu D, Clark JM, Johnson MD, Torbey MT, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ, Turan TN, Lane BF, Janis LS, Chimowitz MI; SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Detailed analysis of periprocedural strokes in patients undergoing intracranial stenting in Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS). Stroke. 2012 Oct;43(10):2682-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661173. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
PubMed 22984008Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, Turan TN, Fiorella D, Lane BF, Janis LS, Lutsep HL, Barnwell SL, Waters MF, Hoh BL, Hourihane JM, Levy EI, Alexandrov AV, Harrigan MR, Chiu D, Klucznik RP, Clark JM, McDougall CG, Johnson MD, Pride GL Jr, Torbey MT, Zaidat OO, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ; SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):993-1003. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
PubMed 21899409Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Fiorella D, Turan TN, Janis LS, Montgomery J, Nizam A, Lane BF, Lutsep HL, Barnwell SL, Waters MF, Hoh BL, Hourihane JM, Levy EI, Alexandrov AV, Harrigan MR, Chiu D, Klucznik RP, Clark JM, McDougall CG, Johnson MD, Pride GL Jr, Lynch JR, Zaidat OO, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ; Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis Trial Investigators. Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):333-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62038-3. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
PubMed 24168957Hegde S, Tariq MB, Kaneko N, Hinman JD, Liebeskind DS. Territorial Stroke in SAMMPRIS: Critical Analyses of Stroke Prevention in Intracranial Atherosclerosis. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2026 Jun 23;6(4):e002100. doi: 10.1161/SVIN.125.002100. eCollection 2026 Jul.
PubMed 42404828Siegler JE, Badillo Goicoechea E, Yaghi S, Morsi RZ, Arevalo A, Smith MM, Kothari S, Desai H, Sehgal N, Rana R, Kellogg CA, Jhaveri A, de Havenon A, Dunne T, Cameron K, Chaturvedi S, Ghannam M, Prabhakaran S, Coleman E, Brorson JR, Mehendale R, Kass-Hout T. Estimated Theoretical Benefit of Aggressive LDL Lowering in Patients With Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis. Neurology. 2025 Jul 8;105(1):e213768. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213768. Epub 2025 May 30.
PubMed 40446174Wang T, Luo J, Li T, Almallouhi E, Gao P, Gong H, Zhang X, Wang J, Lu T, Yang Y, Yang R, Xing Z, Wang H, Derdeyn CP, Jiao L. Stenting versus medical treatment alone for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis: a preplanned pooled individual patient data analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Sep 12;17(10):1032-1039. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-022189.
PubMed 39147573Yaghi S, Khatri P, de Havenon A, Yeatts S, Chang AD, Cutting S, Mac Grory B, Burton T, Jayaraman MV, McTaggart RA, Fiorella D, Derdeyn C, Zaidat OO, Dehkharghani S, Amin-Hanjani S, Furie K, Prahbakaran S, Liebeskind D. Peri-procedural stroke or death in stenting of symptomatic severe intracranial stenosis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):374-379. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015225. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
PubMed 31484697Wabnitz AM, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella DJ, Lynn MJ, Cotsonis GA, Liebeskind DS, Waters MF, Lutsep H, Lopez-Cancio E, Turan TN, Montgomery J, Janis LS, Lane B, Chimowitz MI; SAMMPRIS Investigators. Hemodynamic Markers in the Anterior Circulation as Predictors of Recurrent Stroke in Patients With Intracranial Stenosis. Stroke. 2019 Jan;50(1):143-147. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020840. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
PubMed 30580705Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Lynn MJ, Turan TN, Cotsonis GA, Lane BF, Montgomery J, Janis LS, Chimowitz MI; SAMMPRIS Investigators. Nonprocedural Symptomatic Infarction and In-Stent Restenosis After Intracranial Angioplasty and Stenting in the SAMMPRIS Trial (Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for the Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis). Stroke. 2017 Jun;48(6):1501-1506. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014537. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
PubMed 28455321Turan TN, Nizam A, Lynn MJ, Egan BM, Le NA, Lopes-Virella MF, Hermayer KL, Harrell J, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Janis LS, Lane B, Montgomery J, Chimowitz MI. Relationship between risk factor control and vascular events in the SAMMPRIS trial. Neurology. 2017 Jan 24;88(4):379-385. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003534. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
PubMed 28003500Waters MF, Hoh BL, Lynn MJ, Kwon HM, Turan TN, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Khanna A, Sheehan TO, Lane BF, Janis S, Montgomery J, Chimowitz MI; Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) Trial Investigators. Factors Associated With Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in the Medical Group of the SAMMPRIS Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2016 Mar;73(3):308-15. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.4315.
PubMed 26747792Kwon HM, Lynn MJ, Turan TN, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Lane BF, Montgomery J, Janis LS, Rumboldt Z, Chimowitz MI; SAMMPRIS Investigators. Frequency, Risk Factors, and Outcome of Coexistent Small Vessel Disease and Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: Results From the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2016 Jan;73(1):36-42. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3145.
PubMed 26618534Lutsep HL, Lynn MJ, Cotsonis GA, Derdeyn CP, Turan TN, Fiorella D, Janis LS, Lane BF, Montgomery J, Chimowitz MI; SAMMPRIS Investigators. Does the Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Therapy Trial Support Stenting for Subgroups With Intracranial Stenosis? Stroke. 2015 Nov;46(11):3282-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009846. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
PubMed 26382173
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Stenting vs. Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00576693
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SAMMPRIS / R01NS058728-01A1
- Conditions
- Ischemic Stroke
- Keywords
- ischemic stroke, intracranial stenting, vascular risk factor management
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 451 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of South CarolinaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Study start
- Oct 2008
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Jul 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
PRIMARY HYPOTHESIS:
Compared with intensive medical therapy alone, intracranial angioplasty and stenting combined with intensive medical therapy will decrease the risk of the primary endpoint by 35% over a mean follow-up of two years in high-risk patients patients with 70% - 99% intracranial stenosis who had a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke within 30 days prior to enrollment) with symptomatic stenosis of a major intracranial artery.
SUMMARY:
The best treatment for prevention of another stroke or TIA in patients with narrowing of one of the arteries in the brain is uncertain. A common treatment is the use of anti-clotting medications to prevent blood clots from forming in the narrowed vessel. There are a variety of medicines used for this purpose. These medications are usually taken for the rest of a patient's life.
However, a treatment that has been used successfully together with anti-clotting medications in patients with narrowing of the blood vessels of the heart is now being studied in the blood vessels of the brain. This treatment is called stenting.
Recent research has also indicated a benefit in prevention of recurring stroke by Intensive Medical Therapy, which is defined as treating risk factors for stroke like high blood pressure, elevated LDL (low density lipids - the "bad" form of cholesterol) and diabetes. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of either Intensive Medical Therapy PLUS Stenting or Intensive Medical Therapy ONLY in preventing stroke, heart attacks or death.
The study will enroll patients over a 5 year period. Each participant will be involved in the study for a minimum of 1 year and a maximum of 3 years.
Fifty different medical centers in the United States are part of this study. Both the Clinical Coordinating Center and the Statistical Coordinating Center for the entire study will be located at Emory University.
Detailed description
This will be an investigator initiated and designed Phase III multicenter trial in which patients with TIA or non-disabling stroke within 30 days prior to enrollment that is caused by 70% - 99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery (MCA, carotid, vertebral, or basilar) will be randomized (1:1) at approximately 50 sites to:
intensive medical therapy alone (aspirin 325 mg / day for entire follow-up, clopidogrel 75mg per day for 90 days after enrollment unless cardiologist recommends continuing clopidogrel beyond 90 days for a cardiac indication, and aggressive risk factor management primarily targeting blood pressure < 140 / 90 mm Hg (< 130 / 80 if diabetic) and LDL < 70 mg / dl)
OR
intracranial angioplasty and stenting using the Gateway balloon and Wingspan self-expanding nitinol stent (or any future FDA approved iterations of the balloon, stent, or the delivery systems) plus intensive medical therapy (aspirin 325 mg / day for entire follow-up, clopidogrel 75mg per day for 90 days after enrollment unless cardiologist recommends continuing clopidogrel beyond 90 days for a cardiac indication, and aggressive risk factor management primarily targeting blood pressure < 140 / 90 mm Hg (< 130 / 80 if diabetic) and LDL < 70 mg / dl).
Risk factor management will be performed by the study neurologist at each site who will be assisted by an innovative, evidence-based, educational, lifestyle modification program (INTERxVENT) that will be administered at regularly scheduled times to all patients throughout the study.
All patients enrolled in the trial will be followed until the first of the following: 90 days after a primary endpoint, death, or the close-out visit in the trial, which will occur within a window from 60 days before March 31, 2012 to 30 days after March 31, 2013. Patients who do not die or have a primary endpoint during follow-up will be followed for 2-4.5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intensive medical management plus stenting | Experimental | Device: intracranial angioplasty and stentingintracranial angioplasty and stenting using the Gateway balloon and Wingspan self-expanding nitinol stent (or any future FDA approved iterations of the balloon, stent, or the delivery systems) plus intensive medical therapy (aspirin 325 mg / day for entire follow-up, clopidogrel 75mg per day for 90 days after enrollment unless cardiologist recommends continuing clopidogrel beyond 90 days for a cardiac indication, and aggressive risk factor management primarily targeting blood pressure < 140 / 90 mm Hg (< 130 / 80 if diabetic) and LDL < 70 mg / dl). |
| intensive medical management alone | Experimental | Other: intensive medical managementIntensive medical therapy alone (aspirin 325 mg / day for entire follow-up, clopidogrel 75mg per day for 90 days after enrollment unless cardiologist recommends continuing clopidogrel beyond 90 days for a cardiac indication, and aggressive risk factor management primarily targeting blood pressure < 140 / 90 mm Hg (< 130 / 80 if diabetic) and LDL < 70 mg / dl) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or non-severe stroke within 30 days of enrollment attributed to 70-99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery (carotid artery, MCA stem (M1), vertebral artery, or basilar artery)
- Modified Rankin score of ≤ 3
- Target area of stenosis in an intracranial artery that has a normal diameter of 2.00 mm to 4.50 mm
- Target area of stenosis is less than or equal to 14 mm in length
- Age ≥ 30 years and ≤ 80 years.
Key exclusion criteria (29 listed)
- Tandem extracranial or intracranial stenosis (70%-99%) or occlusion that is proximal or distal to the target intracranial lesion (NOTE: an exception is allowed if the occlusion involves a single vertebral artery proximal to a symptomatic basilar artery stenosis and the contralateral vertebral artery is supplying the basilar artery)
- Bilateral intracranial vertebral artery stenosis of 70%-99% and uncertainty about which artery is symptomatic (e.g. if patient has pontine, midbrain, or temporal - occipital symptoms)
- Stenting, angioplasty, or endarterectomy of an extracranial (carotid or vertebral artery) or intracranial artery within 30 days prior to expected enrollment date
- Previous treatment of target lesion with a stent, angioplasty, or other mechanical device, or plan to perform staged angioplasty followed by stenting of target lesion
- Plan to perform concomitant angioplasty or stenting of an extracranial vessel tandem to an intracranial stenosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| intracranial angioplasty and stentingAlso: Wingspan stent, Gateway balloonintracranial angioplasty and stenting using the Gateway balloon and Wingspan self-expanding nitinol stent (or any future FDA approved iterations of the balloon, stent, or the delivery systems) plus intensive medical therapy (aspirin 325 mg / day for entire follow-up, clopidogrel 75mg per day for 90 days after enrollment unless cardiologist recommends continuing clopidogrel beyond 90 days for a cardiac indication, and aggressive risk factor management primarily targeting blood pressure < 140 / 90 mm Hg (< 130 / 80 if diabetic) and LDL < 70 mg / dl). | Device | intensive medical management plus stenting |
| intensive medical managementintensive medical therapy alone (aspirin 325 mg / day for entire follow-up, clopidogrel 75mg per day for 90 days after enrollment unless cardiologist recommends continuing clopidogrel beyond 90 days for a cardiac indication, and aggressive risk factor management primarily targeting blood pressure < 140 / 90 mm Hg (< 130 / 80 if diabetic) and LDL < 70 mg / dl) | Other | intensive medical management alone |
Primary outcome
Any Stroke or Death Within 30 Days of Enrollment or Any Revascularization Procedure OR an Ischemic Stroke in the Territory of the Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Beyond 30 Days After Enrollment.
Time frame: Mean length of follow-up was 2.4 years
Any stroke (ischemic, parenchymal brain hemorrhage, subarachnoid or intraventricular hemorrhage) or death within 30 days after enrollment OR any stroke (ischemic, parenchymal brain hemorrhage, subarachnoid or intraventricular hemorrhage) or death within 30 days of any revascularization procedure of the qualifying symptomatic intracranial artery done during follow-up, OR an ischemic stroke in the territory of the symptomatic intracranial artery from day 31 after study entry to completion of follow-up.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 May 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 22977278Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Lynn MJ, Barnwell SL, Zaidat OO, Meyers PM, Gobin YP, Dion J, Lane BF, Turan TN, Janis LS, Chimowitz MI; SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Impact of operator and site experience on outcomes after angioplasty and stenting in the SAMMPRIS trial. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Nov;5(6):528-33. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010504. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 22991350Turan TN, Lynn MJ, Nizam A, Lane B, Egan BM, Le NA, Lopes-Virella MF, Hermayer KL, Benavente O, White CL, Brown WV, Caskey MF, Steiner MR, Vilardo N, Stufflebean A, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Janis S, Chimowitz MI; SAMMPRIS Investigators. Rationale, design, and implementation of aggressive risk factor management in the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):e51-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966911. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 22984008Fiorella D, Derdeyn CP, Lynn MJ, Barnwell SL, Hoh BL, Levy EI, Harrigan MR, Klucznik RP, McDougall CG, Pride GL Jr, Zaidat OO, Lutsep HL, Waters MF, Hourihane JM, Alexandrov AV, Chiu D, Clark JM, Johnson MD, Torbey MT, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ, Turan TN, Lane BF, Janis LS, Chimowitz MI; SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Detailed analysis of periprocedural strokes in patients undergoing intracranial stenting in Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS). Stroke. 2012 Oct;43(10):2682-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661173. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 21899409Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, Turan TN, Fiorella D, Lane BF, Janis LS, Lutsep HL, Barnwell SL, Waters MF, Hoh BL, Hourihane JM, Levy EI, Alexandrov AV, Harrigan MR, Chiu D, Klucznik RP, Clark JM, McDougall CG, Johnson MD, Pride GL Jr, Torbey MT, Zaidat OO, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ; SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):993-1003. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 24168957Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Fiorella D, Turan TN, Janis LS, Montgomery J, Nizam A, Lane BF, Lutsep HL, Barnwell SL, Waters MF, Hoh BL, Hourihane JM, Levy EI, Alexandrov AV, Harrigan MR, Chiu D, Klucznik RP, Clark JM, McDougall CG, Johnson MD, Pride GL Jr, Lynch JR, Zaidat OO, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ; Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis Trial Investigators. Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):333-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62038-3. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42404828Hegde S, Tariq MB, Kaneko N, Hinman JD, Liebeskind DS. Territorial Stroke in SAMMPRIS: Critical Analyses of Stroke Prevention in Intracranial Atherosclerosis. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2026 Jun 23;6(4):e002100. doi: 10.1161/SVIN.125.002100. eCollection 2026 Jul.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40446174Siegler JE, Badillo Goicoechea E, Yaghi S, Morsi RZ, Arevalo A, Smith MM, Kothari S, Desai H, Sehgal N, Rana R, Kellogg CA, Jhaveri A, de Havenon A, Dunne T, Cameron K, Chaturvedi S, Ghannam M, Prabhakaran S, Coleman E, Brorson JR, Mehendale R, Kass-Hout T. Estimated Theoretical Benefit of Aggressive LDL Lowering in Patients With Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis. Neurology. 2025 Jul 8;105(1):e213768. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213768. Epub 2025 May 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39147573Wang T, Luo J, Li T, Almallouhi E, Gao P, Gong H, Zhang X, Wang J, Lu T, Yang Y, Yang R, Xing Z, Wang H, Derdeyn CP, Jiao L. Stenting versus medical treatment alone for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis: a preplanned pooled individual patient data analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Sep 12;17(10):1032-1039. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-022189.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31484697Yaghi S, Khatri P, de Havenon A, Yeatts S, Chang AD, Cutting S, Mac Grory B, Burton T, Jayaraman MV, McTaggart RA, Fiorella D, Derdeyn C, Zaidat OO, Dehkharghani S, Amin-Hanjani S, Furie K, Prahbakaran S, Liebeskind D. Peri-procedural stroke or death in stenting of symptomatic severe intracranial stenosis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):374-379. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015225. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30580705Wabnitz AM, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella DJ, Lynn MJ, Cotsonis GA, Liebeskind DS, Waters MF, Lutsep H, Lopez-Cancio E, Turan TN, Montgomery J, Janis LS, Lane B, Chimowitz MI; SAMMPRIS Investigators. Hemodynamic Markers in the Anterior Circulation as Predictors of Recurrent Stroke in Patients With Intracranial Stenosis. Stroke. 2019 Jan;50(1):143-147. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020840. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28455321Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Lynn MJ, Turan TN, Cotsonis GA, Lane BF, Montgomery J, Janis LS, Chimowitz MI; SAMMPRIS Investigators. Nonprocedural Symptomatic Infarction and In-Stent Restenosis After Intracranial Angioplasty and Stenting in the SAMMPRIS Trial (Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for the Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis). Stroke. 2017 Jun;48(6):1501-1506. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014537. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28003500Turan TN, Nizam A, Lynn MJ, Egan BM, Le NA, Lopes-Virella MF, Hermayer KL, Harrell J, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Janis LS, Lane B, Montgomery J, Chimowitz MI. Relationship between risk factor control and vascular events in the SAMMPRIS trial. Neurology. 2017 Jan 24;88(4):379-385. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003534. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
- Clinical AlertLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Active, not recruiting
Improving Visual Field Deficits With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation
Visual Field Defect, Peripheral, Stroke
Recruiting
Biomarkers of Paired VNS
Stroke, Ischemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marc I Chimowitz, MBChB principal investigator
Medical University of South Carolina
50 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing intracranial angioplasty and stenting and intensive medical management in people with Ischemic Stroke, run by Medical University of South Carolina at 50 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 50 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Jul 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Any Stroke or Death Within 30 Days of Enrollment or Any Revascularization Procedure OR an Ischemic Stroke in the Territory of the Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Beyond 30 Days After Enrollment. (time frame: Mean length of follow-up was 2.4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00576693, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2018.