Visual Field Defect, PeripheralNCT05085210
Improving Visual Field Deficits With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation
A study testing transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), Computer Based Visual Training and Virtual Reality Based Visual Training in people with Visual Field Defect, Peripheral and Stroke, run by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a randomized, pilot interventional study in participants with visual field deficit (VFD) caused by cortical lesion. Damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) causes a contra-lesional, homonymous loss of conscious vision termed hemianopsia, the loss of one half of the visual field. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Visual Field Defect, Peripheral, Stroke, Visual Impairment
- What is being tested?
- transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), Computer Based Visual Training and Virtual Reality Based Visual Training
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 25 Jan 2022to Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age or older.
- Presence of some intact visual cortical areas (other than primary visual cortex) in the damaged brain hemisphere. This assessment will be made from MRI or CT scans of the subject's head, which will be obtained via standard release from their neurologist.
- First ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with damage to primary visual cortex, and rendered blind over a portion of their visual field.
- Ischemic stroke patients will be either subacute (within 6 months of their stroke) or chronic (more than 6 months)
- Hemorrhagic stroke patients will be chronic only (greater than 6 months)
- Must demonstrate a clear deficit in either simple or complex visual perception in portions of their visual field as measured by visual perimetry.
- Imaging evidence that the stroke is primarily affecting the visual cortex.
- Willing and able to participate in the study protocol and to comply with study procedures.
Who cannot join
- No evidence of damage to the primary visual cortex.
- Visual cortex damage as a result of a subsequent stroke (not primary).
- Total cortical blindness, covering both left and right visual fields.
- Unable to fixate visual targets precisely or unable to perform the visual training exercises as directed.
- Complete loss of reading abilities.
- Current or prior history of any neurological disorder other than stroke, such as epilepsy, a progressive neurologic disease (e.g. multiple sclerosis) or intracranial brain lesions other than the qualifying stroke lesion.
Show all 20Show fewer
- Current history of poorly controlled migraines including chronic medication for migraine prevention.
- History of seizures, diagnosis of epilepsy, history of abnormal (epileptiform) EEG or immediate (1st degree relative) family history of epilepsy; with the exception of a single seizure of benign etiology (e.g. febrile seizure) in the judgment of the investigator.
- History of fainting spells of unknown or undetermined etiology that might constitute seizures.
- Past or current history of major depression, bipolar disorder or psychotic disorders, or any other major psychiatric condition.
- Participants who are suffering from one-sided attentional neglect as determined by standard neuropsychological tests: figure cancellation and line bisection tasks.
- Contraindication for receiving tRNS.
- Chronic (particularly) uncontrolled medical conditions that may cause a medical emergency in case of a provoked seizure (cardiac malformation, cardiac dysrhythmia, asthma, etc.).
- Any complex, uncontrolled/unstable or terminal medical illness.
- Substance abuse or dependence within the past six months.
- Medications will be reviewed by the responsible MD (Drs. Sandeep Kumar or Dan Press) and a decision about inclusion will be made based on the following: The patient's past medical history, drug dose, history of recent medication changes or duration of treatment, and combination of CNS active drugs.
- All female participants that are pre-menopausal will be required to have a pregnancy test; any participant who is pregnant or breastfeeding will not be enrolled in the study.
- Subjects who, in the investigator's opinion, might not be suitable for the study.
- A hair style or head dress that prevents electrode contact with the scalp or would interfere with the stimulation (for example: thick braids, hair weave, afro, wig).
- Additional criteria for Group 1b only: Contraindication for using VR technology, specifically an implanted medical device such as a pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, deep brain or vagal nerve stimulator. Participants with a history of seizures are already excluded per the above criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Alisha Roby, MBA, (617) 667-0228, aroby@bidmc.harvard.edu
Lorella Battelli, PhD
About this study
Official title: Visual Restoration of Losses Caused by Cortical Damage: a New Protocol to Promote Fast Recovery
This is a randomized, pilot interventional study in participants with visual field deficit (VFD) caused by cortical lesion. Damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) causes a contra-lesional, homonymous loss of conscious vision termed hemianopsia, the loss of one half of the visual field. The goal of this project is to elaborate and refine a rehabilitation protocol for VFD participants. It is hypothesized that visual restoration training using moving stimuli coupled with noninvasive current stimulation on the visual cortex will promote and speed up recovery of visual abilities within the blind field in VFD participants. Moreover, it is expected that visual recovery positively correlates with reduction of the blind field, as measured with traditional visual perimetry: the Humphrey visual field test or an eye-tracker based visual perimetry implemented in a virtual reality (VR) headset. Finally, although results will vary among participants depending on the extent and severity of the cortical lesion, it is expected that a bigger increase in neural response to moving stimuli in the blind visual field in cortical motion area, for those participants who will show the largest behavioral improvement after training. The overarching goals for the study are as follows: Group 1a will test the basic effects of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) coupled with visual training in stroke cohorts, including (i) both chronic/subacute ischemic and chronic hemorrhagic VFD stroke participants, and (ii) longitudinal testing up to 6 months post-treatment. Group 1b will test the effects of transcranial tRNS coupled with visual training on a Virtual Reality (VR) device in stroke cohorts, including both chronic/subacute ischemic and chronic hemorrhagic VFD stroke participants. Group 2 will examine the effects of tRNS alone, without visual training, also including chronic and subacute VFD stroke participants and longitudinal testing.
Read the detailed description
Transcranial current stimulation Noninvasive transcranial current stimulation (tCS) has been safely used in human for decades. Noninvasive current stimulation techniques use battery-powered current generator devices that have a built-in circuitry to limit the current above a certain level, typically 2 mA (milliampere). tCS has been widely used during the last decade demonstrating non-significant risk to participants (Antal et al., 2017; Brunoni et al., 2011; Iyer et al., 2005; Nitsche et al., 2008; Nitsche \& Paulus, 2011) This study uses random noise (i.e. tRNS) which results in less net charge being applied than in tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation). There is limited reporting of side effects from tCS using alternating currents (tACS) or random noise (tRNS) in the literature. Studies that have used tACS, have also reported adverse effects similar in nature to effects described in the tDCS literature, for example, headache, sensations under the electrodes and visual sensations (Antal et al., 2017; Antal et al., 2008; Brignani et al., 2013). Adverse effects that have been described in the tCS literature are described here to offer a conservative assessment of possible adverse effects. The most common side effects associated with tCS according to the most recent data available are: (Antal et al., 2017; Nitsche \& Paulus, 2011; Feurra et al., 2013)
Sensations reported by subjects under the electrode for tDCS (These sensations can sometimes continue throughout and for a brief period following completion of the tCS but usually resolve shortly after the initiation of tCS):
Mild tingling (20-70%); light itching (30-40%); slight burning (10-22%); discomfort or mild pain (10-18%)
Effects reported that occur only during tCS:
Visual sensation during switching on and off the stimulation (11%)
Other effects that can occur both during and after tCS include:
Moderate fatigue (35%); skin redness (30%); headache (10-15%); difficulties in concentration (11%)
Additionally, the following rare side effects have been described:
Nausea (3%); nervousness (<5%); ringing in the ear (<1%); hypomania has been reported in a few participants receiving tDCS for bipolar disorder and depression but never in normal controls (Subjects with a history of a psychiatric disorder will be excluded from the study) Although it has never been reported in tCS, seizures are a theoretical risk. A consensus paper supports that a tCS (including tRNS used in the present protocol) related seizure has never been reported in the literature, including studies conducted in older subjects and post-stroke subjects (Antal et al., 2017).
tRNS Visits The tRNS study visits will be conducted at BIDMC. Participants will be allowed to miss up to 15% of the visits. Additional sessions will be added on to reach the expected number of visits if it is within a reasonable timeframe as determined by the investigator.
Review of tRNS side effects and adverse events will be completed daily before and after stimulation. Any changes in medication or medical history will be assessed on a daily basis.
Set up for tRNS includes placing a cap and/or band with electrodes on the participant's head and applying gel underneath electrodes - stimulation will be initiated once the visual training program is set up and ready to be launched (or immediately if the participant is not in visual stimulation group). Stimulation or sham will be administered. This will last for 20 - 30 minutes. If the participant is in the visual training group they will perform the computer or VR based task during this stimulation/sham.
Within Group 1a and Group 2, half of the cohort will be stimulated with tRNS, and the other half will be sham-stimulated. Within Group 1b, the entire cohort will be stimulated with tRNS. The V1-lesioned brain hemisphere in VFD subjects and the homologous area in the healthy hemisphere will be targeted. For tRNS, 20 - 30 min of 1.0 mA current will be delivered to electrodes bilaterally positioned over O1/O2 (Herpich et al., 2019). Current direction will oscillate randomly within a high-frequency range (101-640Hz). For sham the same stimulation parameters will be used as in the active condition, except the stimulator will be programmed to turn off after a 20s ramp-up to 1.0 mA. With this "fade in" procedure participants report similar scalp sensation for both real stimulation and sham stimulation. All devices used for stimulation have "blind modes", where the investigator and participant are blinded to the type of stimulation.
Monitoring and Safety Plan Adverse effects will be collected from the start of the experimental protocol to the end of study participation. All adverse events, regardless of attribution to tRNS or pre/post assessments, will be collected and recorded using a standard adverse event form. Participants will be asked, in an open-ended way, about the presence of any such events daily. Intensity of each adverse event will be graded as mild, moderate, or severe. If an event occurs that is not expected (e.g. is not described in the research protocol), that indicates a change from baseline in cognition or vision, and/or requires immediate attention, such as a seizure, the study MD (or covering investigator) will be informed in real time to assess the event, advise on immediate care of the participant and to determine the necessary reporting steps. Any events that are serious or unexpected in nature, severity or frequency as compared to the risks described in the study plan will be reviewed by the principal investigator to determine the relationship of the event to the study. Reportable events will be submitted to BIDMC per determined policies.
A licensed physician, credentialed at BIDMC, will be available by pager during all tRNS visits at BIDMC. Furthermore, the person applying tRNS is trained to continually assess participants during sessions to monitor for discomfort, to identify early symptoms of syncope (e.g. sweating, pallor) and recognition of seizures. In addition, all staff are trained to apply basic measures to keep the participants safe. For example, if a participant experiences pre-syncopal symptoms or a syncopal event, immediate care will be provided to relieve the symptoms (e.g. they will be placed in a reclining position). In addition, the research nurses in the Center are available to assist with a rapid assessment of the participant, implementation of recovery measures and monitoring as needed.
Recruitment Stroke patients will be recruited from the Stroke Unit at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. An initial triage will determine the original level of visual field deficit in the acute phase by inspecting the participants' charts retrospectively and looking at the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) items for visual deficits. Patients who present with visual field deficits and comply with the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be contacted and invited to participate.
Individuals interested in the study are asked to contact the Center for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation at the BIDMC. A Research Assistant will explain the aim and design of the study. If the participant is interested in the study, a telephone interview will be conducted to rule out some exclusion criteria. If the participant qualifies for the study, he or she will be invited to BIDMC where the study will be explained again in detail and the participant asked to carefully read and eventually sign the written consent form prior to entry into the study. The participant is encouraged to ask questions.
Sample Size and Cohort Splits This study is designed to test: (1) the usefulness of different visual tests, including typical psychophysical tests, in the evaluation of visual deficits after visual cortical damage in adults; and (2) the effect of visual retraining coupled with noninvasive brain stimulation in recovering visual perception after visual cortical damage in adult participants. Based on preliminary results, 92 participants with visual field defects (subacute and chronic ischemic strokes; chronic hemorrhagic strokes) will be enrolled. These numbers are based on a sample size calculation from published results, whereby the incidence of participants to respond positively was 60% (Herpich et al., 2019). It is anticipated that the study group will show a 75% incidence, with an alpha of .05 and a power of 80%. The estimated sample size is 78. However, given the potential high dropout rate (15%), 92 participants will be enrolled. Within Group 1 (Training + Stimulation), there will be 36 chronic and 10 subacute subjects. Within Group 2 (Stimulation only) there will be 36 chronic and 10 subacute subjects. Within all subgroups subjects will have a 50% chance of real vs sham stimulation. Subacute is defined as less than 6 months post stroke prior to entry into the study. Chronic is defined as more than 6 months post stroke prior to entry into the study.
Additionally 8 subjects with partial cortical blindness (subacute and chronic ischemic strokes; chronic hemorrhagic strokes) will be enrolled to use a virtual reality setup (Group 1b) which should provide power to detect a significant effect of brain stimulation on the primary outcome measure (direction difference thresholds). Sample size calculations suggest that 8 subjects are adequate to attain the goals of the project. The analyses will be within-subject tests that contrast pre- with post-training and pre- to post-stimulation performance in the same person. Two types of internal controls will also be used in each person - testing will be performed at untrained visual field locations, and at corresponding locations in the intact field of vision.
Statistical analysis The Student's t-test statistics and multifactorial ANOVA designs will be used to demonstrate significance of the effects. Based on similar experiments in animals and normal humans, and given the scientific goals, the sample size is appropriate and sufficient. The primary endpoint is: improvement in the motion discrimination task after training within the deficient visual field. Secondary endpoints are: (a) improvement in The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25); (b) reduction of the blind area in the visual fields as measured by Humphrey perimetry. Analysis will be performed using MATLAB. Data will be stored in the R drive at the BIDMC. EEG Data Analysis: Off-line inspection and removal of all EEG epochs with artifacts (e.g., eye blinks and eye movements) will be performed prior to averaging. There will be 60-100 repetitions of each condition with <15% rejected trials in all subjects. Averages will be computed for each subject for each electrode and each stimulus condition. Averaged responses will be used to identify waveform components of interest (P1, N1, N2, P2 and late peaks). Peak amplitudes and latencies of the N200 component relative to motion onset will be analyzed separately for horizontal (left, right), and radial (in, out) stimuli. Peak N200 amplitudes and latencies from all sites will be entered in mixed measures ANOVA designs with group as a between-subjects factor, and electrode site (e.g. Fz, FCz, Cz, CPz, Pz, Oz) as a within subjects factor. Greenhouse-Geisser adjustment for the degrees of freedom will be used for the recording site factor due to the inherent violations of the repeated measures assumptions of sphericity. Where appropriate, post-hoc analyses will be conducted using Tukey's HSD tests and a family-wise Type I error rate of .05.
For Group 1b (subjects using the virtual reality setup), we will first list the baseline characteristics of the experimental group of subjects. Continuous variables will be summarized by typical parameters such as mean, standard deviation, and range, and the normality of distribution will be determined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test. Categorical data will be summarized by frequency and percentage and analyzed using Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Dropouts will be replaced to ensure the planned sample size of 8 participants is met. In general, analyses will follow the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, unless otherwise specified. When the outcome variable is the change from baseline, participants will be included only if they have a baseline, the complete data from two-weeks of training, and one follow-up visit. We will look at the effect of Training +[active] tRNS vs performance in the good field at baseline. Analysis will be performed using custom scripts in Matlab and R.
Data safety and Auditing To safeguard confidentiality and privacy of protected health information, each study subject will be assigned a unique code number. A separate log linking the participant's name with study number and identifiers will be kept in a password-protected data file, accessible only by the study investigators. Names will not be provided to external sources other than the staff on the Center for Brain Science MRI protocol once the subjects have signed consent and agreed to be in the study if required. No identifying information will be published in which a participant could be distinguished. Data from this study will be entered into and stored in a secured drive available to investigators on the study behind the BIDMC firewall. All information needed at another center will be provided via secured email and/or secure file transfer.
- Conditions
- Visual Field Defect, Peripheral, Stroke, Visual Impairment, Hemianopsia, Quadrantanopia, Cortical Blindness
- Being tested
- transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), Computer Based Visual Training, Sham stimulation, Virtual Reality Based Visual Training
- Keywords
- Visual Field defects, Occipital Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, visual cortex, noninvasive brain stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, visual training, visual recovery, vision loss, quadrantanopia, Hemorrhagic stroke
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Vision Disorders, Hemianopsia, Blindness, Cortical, Ischemic Stroke, Hemorrhagic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS)Device
noninvasive current stimulation for 20 - 30 minutes stimulation on visual cortex (electrodes on surface of scalp, positioned O1 / O2 on EEG cap). 1mA max amplitude noise stimulation, frequencies from 100 Hz - 640 Hz.
Computer Based Visual TrainingBehavioural
Dynamic visual stimuli are presented on specific locations of the visual field. Participant holds fixation on center of screen during presentation of visual stimuli. Participants will be presented with multiple trials of a motion discrimination task. Training will be performed for 2 weeks (10 consecutive weekdays), 30 minutes each day.
Sham stimulationDevice
20-30 minutes sham stimulation on visual cortex. Participants receive identical setup to real stimulation. The device provides a short ramp on period to simulate the feeling of real stimulation at the start but no current is delivered otherwise.
Virtual Reality Based Visual TrainingBehavioural
- Dynamic visual stimuli are presented on specific locations of the visual field. Participant holds fixation on center point within the VR headset during presentation of visual stimuli. Participants will be presented with multiple trials of a motion discrimination task. Training will be performed for 2 weeks (10 consecutive weekdays), 30 minutes each day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Visual Training with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation | Experimental | 10 daily (Monday-Friday) 20-30 minute sessions of tRNS with visual training on the computer Receives: Device: transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS); Behavioral: Computer Based Visual Training |
| Visual Training with Sham Stimulation | Experimental | 10 daily (Monday-Friday) 20-30 minute sessions of sham stimulation with visual training on the computer Receives: Behavioral: Computer Based Visual Training; Device: Sham stimulation |
| Noninvasive Brain Stimulation without visual training | Experimental | 10 daily (Monday-Friday) 20-30 minute sessions of tRNS alone Receives: Device: transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) |
| Sham Stimulation without visual training | Sham comparator | Placebo control. Simulation of tRNS without receiving any actual stimulation Receives: Device: Sham stimulation |
| VR Visual Training with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation | Experimental | 10 daily (Monday-Friday) 20-30 minute sessions of tRNS with visual training on the computer Receives: Device: transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS); Behavioral: Virtual Reality Based Visual Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual Motion Discrimination Change
Change in the motion discrimination computer or VR task after training within the blind visual field
Measured: After 10 days training/stimulation and after 6 months training/stimulation
Secondary outcomes (2)
Quality of Life Change
Change as assessed by the National Eye Institute 25 Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25). The NEI-VFQ is a vision based questionnaire which evaluates quality of life with respect to vision in everyday life. The NEI-VFQ has multiple sub-scales for different areas of life, such as Near-Vision, General Health, or Ocular Pain. Each scale is scored from 0 to 100 with 100 representing the best possible score (perfect health or ability)
Measured: After 10 days training/stimulation and after 6 months training/stimulation
Visual Field Change
Change of the blind area in the visual fields as measured by Humphrey perimetry or an eye-tracker based visual perimetry implemented in a virtual reality (VR) headset.
Measured: After 10 days training/stimulation and after 6 months training/stimulation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Oct 2021
- Study start25 Jan 2022
- Primary completionJun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (30)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Visual Field Defect, PeripheralStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Model description
- This is a pilot interventional study in patients with visual field deficit (VFD). Participants will undergo a screening evaluation that includes a neuro-ophthalmologic, cognitive and medical assessment, a confirmation of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke diagnosis with subsequent VFD including verification of prior clinical imaging. Baseline assessments will consist of visual field perimetry, quality of life assessments and EEG/MRI for Groups 1a and 2. Group 1a aims to examine the effects of two weeks (10 days) of visual training with tRNS vs visual training with sham tRNS. Group 1b aims to examine the effects of two weeks (10 days) of visual training in a virtual reality environment with tRNS. Group 2 aims to examine the effects of two weeks (10 days) of tRNS vs 2 weeks of sham tRNS (no visual training in this group).
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lorella Battelli, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- Investigators
- Lorella Battelli, PhD, Principal investigator, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05085210
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021P000804
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gilhotra JS, Mitchell P, Healey PR, Cumming RG, Currie J. Homonymous visual field defects and stroke in an older population. Stroke. 2002 Oct;33(10):2417-20. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000037647.10414.d2.
PubMed 12364731Pollock A, Hazelton C, Rowe FJ, Jonuscheit S, Kernohan A, Angilley J, Henderson CA, Langhorne P, Campbell P. Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 23;5(5):CD008388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008388.pub3.
PubMed 31120142Dombovy ML, Sandok BA, Basford JR. Rehabilitation for stroke: a review. Stroke. 1986 May-Jun;17(3):363-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.17.3.363.
PubMed 2940735Jongbloed L. Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke. 1986 Jul-Aug;17(4):765-76. doi: 10.1161/01.str.17.4.765.
PubMed 3526649Jones SA, Shinton RA. Improving outcome in stroke patients with visual problems. Age Ageing. 2006 Nov;35(6):560-5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl074. Epub 2006 Jul 4.
PubMed 16820528Melnick MD, Tadin D, Huxlin KR. Relearning to See in Cortical Blindness. Neuroscientist. 2016 Apr;22(2):199-212. doi: 10.1177/1073858415621035. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
PubMed 26659828Das A, Tadin D, Huxlin KR. Beyond blindsight: properties of visual relearning in cortically blind fields. J Neurosci. 2014 Aug 27;34(35):11652-64. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1076-14.2014.
PubMed 25164661Huxlin KR, Williams JM, Price T. A neurochemical signature of visual recovery after extrastriate cortical damage in the adult cat. J Comp Neurol. 2008 May 1;508(1):45-61. doi: 10.1002/cne.21658.
PubMed 18300259Das A, Demagistris M, Huxlin KR. Different properties of visual relearning after damage to early versus higher-level visual cortical areas. J Neurosci. 2012 Apr 18;32(16):5414-25. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0316-12.2012.
PubMed 22514305Huxlin KR, Martin T, Kelly K, Riley M, Friedman DI, Burgin WS, Hayhoe M. Perceptual relearning of complex visual motion after V1 damage in humans. J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 1;29(13):3981-91. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4882-08.2009.
PubMed 19339594Cavanaugh MR, Zhang R, Melnick MD, Das A, Roberts M, Tadin D, Carrasco M, Huxlin KR. Visual recovery in cortical blindness is limited by high internal noise. J Vis. 2015;15(10):9. doi: 10.1167/15.10.9.
PubMed 26389544Herpich F, Melnick MD, Agosta S, Huxlin KR, Tadin D, Battelli L. Boosting Learning Efficacy with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Intact and Brain-Damaged Humans. J Neurosci. 2019 Jul 10;39(28):5551-5561. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3248-18.2019. Epub 2019 May 27.
PubMed 31133558Martin T, Huxlin KR, Kavcic V. Motion-onset visual evoked potentials predict performance during a global direction discrimination task. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Oct;48(12):3563-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
PubMed 20713072Martin T, Das A, Huxlin KR. Visual cortical activity reflects faster accumulation of information from cortically blind fields. Brain. 2012 Nov;135(Pt 11):3440-52. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws272.
PubMed 23169923Kavcic V, Triplett RL, Das A, Martin T, Huxlin KR. Role of inter-hemispheric transfer in generating visual evoked potentials in V1-damaged brain hemispheres. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Feb;68:82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
PubMed 25575450
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Visual Restoration of Losses Caused by Cortical Damage: a New Protocol to Promote Fast Recovery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05085210
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021P000804
- Conditions
- Visual Field Defect, Peripheral, Stroke, Visual Impairment, Hemianopsia, Quadrantanopia, Cortical Blindness
- Keywords
- Visual Field defects, Occipital Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, visual cortex, noninvasive brain stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, visual training, visual recovery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized, pilot interventional study in participants with visual field deficit (VFD) caused by cortical lesion. Damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) causes a contra-lesional, homonymous loss of conscious vision termed hemianopsia, the loss of one half of the visual field. The goal of this project is to elaborate and refine a rehabilitation protocol for VFD participants. It is hypothesized that visual restoration training using moving stimuli coupled with noninvasive current stimulation on the visual cortex will promote and speed up recovery of visual abilities within the blind field in VFD participants. Moreover, it is expected that visual recovery positively correlates with reduction of the blind field, as measured with traditional visual perimetry: the Humphrey visual field test or an eye-tracker based visual perimetry implemented in a virtual reality (VR) headset. Finally, although results will vary among participants depending on the extent and severity of the cortical lesion, it is expected that a bigger increase in neural response to moving stimuli in the blind visual field in cortical motion area, for those participants who will show the largest behavioral improvement after training. The overarching goals for the study are as follows: Group 1a will test the basic effects of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) coupled with visual training in stroke cohorts, including (i) both chronic/subacute ischemic and chronic hemorrhagic VFD stroke participants, and (ii) longitudinal testing up to 6 months post-treatment. Group 1b will test the effects of transcranial tRNS coupled with visual training on a Virtual Reality (VR) device in stroke cohorts, including both chronic/subacute ischemic and chronic hemorrhagic VFD stroke participants. Group 2 will examine the effects of tRNS alone, without visual training, also including chronic and subacute VFD stroke participants and longitudinal testing.
Detailed description
Transcranial current stimulation Noninvasive transcranial current stimulation (tCS) has been safely used in human for decades. Noninvasive current stimulation techniques use battery-powered current generator devices that have a built-in circuitry to limit the current above a certain level, typically 2 mA (milliampere). tCS has been widely used during the last decade demonstrating non-significant risk to participants (Antal et al., 2017; Brunoni et al., 2011; Iyer et al., 2005; Nitsche et al., 2008; Nitsche \& Paulus, 2011) This study uses random noise (i.e. tRNS) which results in less net charge being applied than in tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation). There is limited reporting of side effects from tCS using alternating currents (tACS) or random noise (tRNS) in the literature. Studies that have used tACS, have also reported adverse effects similar in nature to effects described in the tDCS literature, for example, headache, sensations under the electrodes and visual sensations (Antal et al., 2017; Antal et al., 2008; Brignani et al., 2013). Adverse effects that have been described in the tCS literature are described here to offer a conservative assessment of possible adverse effects. The most common side effects associated with tCS according to the most recent data available are: (Antal et al., 2017; Nitsche \& Paulus, 2011; Feurra et al., 2013)
Sensations reported by subjects under the electrode for tDCS (These sensations can sometimes continue throughout and for a brief period following completion of the tCS but usually resolve shortly after the initiation of tCS):
Mild tingling (20-70%); light itching (30-40%); slight burning (10-22%); discomfort or mild pain (10-18%)
Effects reported that occur only during tCS:
Visual sensation during switching on and off the stimulation (11%)
Other effects that can occur both during and after tCS include:
Moderate fatigue (35%); skin redness (30%); headache (10-15%); difficulties in concentration (11%)
Additionally, the following rare side effects have been described:
Nausea (3%); nervousness (<5%); ringing in the ear (<1%); hypomania has been reported in a few participants receiving tDCS for bipolar disorder and depression but never in normal controls (Subjects with a history of a psychiatric disorder will be excluded from the study) Although it has never been reported in tCS, seizures are a theoretical risk. A consensus paper supports that a tCS (including tRNS used in the present protocol) related seizure has never been reported in the literature, including studies conducted in older subjects and post-stroke subjects (Antal et al., 2017).
tRNS Visits The tRNS study visits will be conducted at BIDMC. Participants will be allowed to miss up to 15% of the visits. Additional sessions will be added on to reach the expected number of visits if it is within a reasonable timeframe as determined by the investigator.
Review of tRNS side effects and adverse events will be completed daily before and after stimulation. Any changes in medication or medical history will be assessed on a daily basis.
Set up for tRNS includes placing a cap and/or band with electrodes on the participant's head and applying gel underneath electrodes - stimulation will be initiated once the visual training program is set up and ready to be launched (or immediately if the participant is not in visual stimulation group). Stimulation or sham will be administered. This will last for 20 - 30 minutes. If the participant is in the visual training group they will perform the computer or VR based task during this stimulation/sham.
Within Group 1a and Group 2, half of the cohort will be stimulated with tRNS, and the other half will be sham-stimulated. Within Group 1b, the entire cohort will be stimulated with tRNS. The V1-lesioned brain hemisphere in VFD subjects and the homologous area in the healthy hemisphere will be targeted. For tRNS, 20 - 30 min of 1.0 mA current will be delivered to electrodes bilaterally positioned over O1/O2 (Herpich et al., 2019). Current direction will oscillate randomly within a high-frequency range (101-640Hz). For sham the same stimulation parameters will be used as in the active condition, except the stimulator will be programmed to turn off after a 20s ramp-up to 1.0 mA. With this "fade in" procedure participants report similar scalp sensation for both real stimulation and sham stimulation. All devices used for stimulation have "blind modes", where the investigator and participant are blinded to the type of stimulation.
Monitoring and Safety Plan Adverse effects will be collected from the start of the experimental protocol to the end of study participation. All adverse events, regardless of attribution to tRNS or pre/post assessments, will be collected and recorded using a standard adverse event form. Participants will be asked, in an open-ended way, about the presence of any such events daily. Intensity of each adverse event will be graded as mild, moderate, or severe. If an event occurs that is not expected (e.g. is not described in the research protocol), that indicates a change from baseline in cognition or vision, and/or requires immediate attention, such as a seizure, the study MD (or covering investigator) will be informed in real time to assess the event, advise on immediate care of the participant and to determine the necessary reporting steps. Any events that are serious or unexpected in nature, severity or frequency as compared to the risks described in the study plan will be reviewed by the principal investigator to determine the relationship of the event to the study. Reportable events will be submitted to BIDMC per determined policies.
A licensed physician, credentialed at BIDMC, will be available by pager during all tRNS visits at BIDMC. Furthermore, the person applying tRNS is trained to continually assess participants during sessions to monitor for discomfort, to identify early symptoms of syncope (e.g. sweating, pallor) and recognition of seizures. In addition, all staff are trained to apply basic measures to keep the participants safe. For example, if a participant experiences pre-syncopal symptoms or a syncopal event, immediate care will be provided to relieve the symptoms (e.g. they will be placed in a reclining position). In addition, the research nurses in the Center are available to assist with a rapid assessment of the participant, implementation of recovery measures and monitoring as needed.
Recruitment Stroke patients will be recruited from the Stroke Unit at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. An initial triage will determine the original level of visual field deficit in the acute phase by inspecting the participants' charts retrospectively and looking at the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) items for visual deficits. Patients who present with visual field deficits and comply with the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be contacted and invited to participate.
Individuals interested in the study are asked to contact the Center for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation at the BIDMC. A Research Assistant will explain the aim and design of the study. If the participant is interested in the study, a telephone interview will be conducted to rule out some exclusion criteria. If the participant qualifies for the study, he or she will be invited to BIDMC where the study will be explained again in detail and the participant asked to carefully read and eventually sign the written consent form prior to entry into the study. The participant is encouraged to ask questions.
Sample Size and Cohort Splits This study is designed to test: (1) the usefulness of different visual tests, including typical psychophysical tests, in the evaluation of visual deficits after visual cortical damage in adults; and (2) the effect of visual retraining coupled with noninvasive brain stimulation in recovering visual perception after visual cortical damage in adult participants. Based on preliminary results, 92 participants with visual field defects (subacute and chronic ischemic strokes; chronic hemorrhagic strokes) will be enrolled. These numbers are based on a sample size calculation from published results, whereby the incidence of participants to respond positively was 60% (Herpich et al., 2019). It is anticipated that the study group will show a 75% incidence, with an alpha of .05 and a power of 80%. The estimated sample size is 78. However, given the potential high dropout rate (15%), 92 participants will be enrolled. Within Group 1 (Training + Stimulation), there will be 36 chronic and 10 subacute subjects. Within Group 2 (Stimulation only) there will be 36 chronic and 10 subacute subjects. Within all subgroups subjects will have a 50% chance of real vs sham stimulation. Subacute is defined as less than 6 months post stroke prior to entry into the study. Chronic is defined as more than 6 months post stroke prior to entry into the study.
Additionally 8 subjects with partial cortical blindness (subacute and chronic ischemic strokes; chronic hemorrhagic strokes) will be enrolled to use a virtual reality setup (Group 1b) which should provide power to detect a significant effect of brain stimulation on the primary outcome measure (direction difference thresholds). Sample size calculations suggest that 8 subjects are adequate to attain the goals of the project. The analyses will be within-subject tests that contrast pre- with post-training and pre- to post-stimulation performance in the same person. Two types of internal controls will also be used in each person - testing will be performed at untrained visual field locations, and at corresponding locations in the intact field of vision.
Statistical analysis The Student's t-test statistics and multifactorial ANOVA designs will be used to demonstrate significance of the effects. Based on similar experiments in animals and normal humans, and given the scientific goals, the sample size is appropriate and sufficient. The primary endpoint is: improvement in the motion discrimination task after training within the deficient visual field. Secondary endpoints are: (a) improvement in The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25); (b) reduction of the blind area in the visual fields as measured by Humphrey perimetry. Analysis will be performed using MATLAB. Data will be stored in the R drive at the BIDMC. EEG Data Analysis: Off-line inspection and removal of all EEG epochs with artifacts (e.g., eye blinks and eye movements) will be performed prior to averaging. There will be 60-100 repetitions of each condition with <15% rejected trials in all subjects. Averages will be computed for each subject for each electrode and each stimulus condition. Averaged responses will be used to identify waveform components of interest (P1, N1, N2, P2 and late peaks). Peak amplitudes and latencies of the N200 component relative to motion onset will be analyzed separately for horizontal (left, right), and radial (in, out) stimuli. Peak N200 amplitudes and latencies from all sites will be entered in mixed measures ANOVA designs with group as a between-subjects factor, and electrode site (e.g. Fz, FCz, Cz, CPz, Pz, Oz) as a within subjects factor. Greenhouse-Geisser adjustment for the degrees of freedom will be used for the recording site factor due to the inherent violations of the repeated measures assumptions of sphericity. Where appropriate, post-hoc analyses will be conducted using Tukey's HSD tests and a family-wise Type I error rate of .05.
For Group 1b (subjects using the virtual reality setup), we will first list the baseline characteristics of the experimental group of subjects. Continuous variables will be summarized by typical parameters such as mean, standard deviation, and range, and the normality of distribution will be determined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test. Categorical data will be summarized by frequency and percentage and analyzed using Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Dropouts will be replaced to ensure the planned sample size of 8 participants is met. In general, analyses will follow the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, unless otherwise specified. When the outcome variable is the change from baseline, participants will be included only if they have a baseline, the complete data from two-weeks of training, and one follow-up visit. We will look at the effect of Training +[active] tRNS vs performance in the good field at baseline. Analysis will be performed using custom scripts in Matlab and R.
Data safety and Auditing To safeguard confidentiality and privacy of protected health information, each study subject will be assigned a unique code number. A separate log linking the participant's name with study number and identifiers will be kept in a password-protected data file, accessible only by the study investigators. Names will not be provided to external sources other than the staff on the Center for Brain Science MRI protocol once the subjects have signed consent and agreed to be in the study if required. No identifying information will be published in which a participant could be distinguished. Data from this study will be entered into and stored in a secured drive available to investigators on the study behind the BIDMC firewall. All information needed at another center will be provided via secured email and/or secure file transfer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 5
- Model description
- This is a pilot interventional study in patients with visual field deficit (VFD). Participants will undergo a screening evaluation that includes a neuro-ophthalmologic, cognitive and medical assessment, a confirmation of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke diagnosis with subsequent VFD including verification of prior clinical imaging. Baseline assessments will consist of visual field perimetry, quality of life assessments and EEG/MRI for Groups 1a and 2. Group 1a aims to examine the effects of two weeks (10 days) of visual training with tRNS vs visual training with sham tRNS. Group 1b aims to examine the effects of two weeks (10 days) of visual training in a virtual reality environment with tRNS. Group 2 aims to examine the effects of two weeks (10 days) of tRNS vs 2 weeks of sham tRNS (no visual training in this group).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Visual Training with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation | Experimental | Device: transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), Behavioral: Computer Based Visual Training10 daily (Monday-Friday) 20-30 minute sessions of tRNS with visual training on the computer |
| Visual Training with Sham Stimulation | Experimental | Behavioral: Computer Based Visual Training, Device: Sham stimulation10 daily (Monday-Friday) 20-30 minute sessions of sham stimulation with visual training on the computer |
| Noninvasive Brain Stimulation without visual training | Experimental | Device: transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS)10 daily (Monday-Friday) 20-30 minute sessions of tRNS alone |
| Sham Stimulation without visual training | Sham comparator | Device: Sham stimulationPlacebo control. Simulation of tRNS without receiving any actual stimulation |
| VR Visual Training with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation | Experimental | Device: transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), Behavioral: Virtual Reality Based Visual Training10 daily (Monday-Friday) 20-30 minute sessions of tRNS with visual training on the computer |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- 18 years of age or older.
- Presence of some intact visual cortical areas (other than primary visual cortex) in the damaged brain hemisphere. This assessment will be made from MRI or CT scans of the subject's head, which will be obtained via standard release from their neurologist.
- First ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with damage to primary visual cortex, and rendered blind over a portion of their visual field.
- Must demonstrate a clear deficit in either simple or complex visual perception in portions of their visual field as measured by visual perimetry.
- Imaging evidence that the stroke is primarily affecting the visual cortex.
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- No evidence of damage to the primary visual cortex.
- Visual cortex damage as a result of a subsequent stroke (not primary).
- Total cortical blindness, covering both left and right visual fields.
- Unable to fixate visual targets precisely or unable to perform the visual training exercises as directed.
- Complete loss of reading abilities.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS)noninvasive current stimulation for 20 - 30 minutes stimulation on visual cortex (electrodes on surface of scalp, positioned O1 / O2 on EEG cap). 1mA max amplitude noise stimulation, frequencies from 100 Hz - 640 Hz. | Device | Computer Visual Training with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation without visual training, VR Visual Training with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation |
| Computer Based Visual TrainingDynamic visual stimuli are presented on specific locations of the visual field. Participant holds fixation on center of screen during presentation of visual stimuli. Participants will be presented with multiple trials of a motion discrimination task. Training will be performed for 2 weeks (10 consecutive weekdays), 30 minutes each day. | Behavioural | Computer Visual Training with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Visual Training with Sham Stimulation |
| Sham stimulation20-30 minutes sham stimulation on visual cortex. Participants receive identical setup to real stimulation. The device provides a short ramp on period to simulate the feeling of real stimulation at the start but no current is delivered otherwise. | Device | Sham Stimulation without visual training, Visual Training with Sham Stimulation |
| Virtual Reality Based Visual Training• Dynamic visual stimuli are presented on specific locations of the visual field. Participant holds fixation on center point within the VR headset during presentation of visual stimuli. Participants will be presented with multiple trials of a motion discrimination task. Training will be performed for 2 weeks (10 consecutive weekdays), 30 minutes each day. | Behavioural | VR Visual Training with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation |
Primary outcome
Visual Motion Discrimination Change
Time frame: After 10 days training/stimulation and after 6 months training/stimulation
Change in the motion discrimination computer or VR task after training within the blind visual field
2 secondary outcomes
Quality of Life Change
Time frame: After 10 days training/stimulation and after 6 months training/stimulation
Visual Field Change
Time frame: After 10 days training/stimulation and after 6 months training/stimulation
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2026.
- Background: PubMed 12364731Gilhotra JS, Mitchell P, Healey PR, Cumming RG, Currie J. Homonymous visual field defects and stroke in an older population. Stroke. 2002 Oct;33(10):2417-20. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000037647.10414.d2.
- Background: PubMed 31120142Pollock A, Hazelton C, Rowe FJ, Jonuscheit S, Kernohan A, Angilley J, Henderson CA, Langhorne P, Campbell P. Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 23;5(5):CD008388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008388.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 2940735Dombovy ML, Sandok BA, Basford JR. Rehabilitation for stroke: a review. Stroke. 1986 May-Jun;17(3):363-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.17.3.363.
- Background: PubMed 3526649Jongbloed L. Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke. 1986 Jul-Aug;17(4):765-76. doi: 10.1161/01.str.17.4.765.
- Background: PubMed 16820528Jones SA, Shinton RA. Improving outcome in stroke patients with visual problems. Age Ageing. 2006 Nov;35(6):560-5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl074. Epub 2006 Jul 4.
- Background: PubMed 26659828Melnick MD, Tadin D, Huxlin KR. Relearning to See in Cortical Blindness. Neuroscientist. 2016 Apr;22(2):199-212. doi: 10.1177/1073858415621035. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
- Background: PubMed 25164661Das A, Tadin D, Huxlin KR. Beyond blindsight: properties of visual relearning in cortically blind fields. J Neurosci. 2014 Aug 27;34(35):11652-64. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1076-14.2014.
- Background: PubMed 18300259Huxlin KR, Williams JM, Price T. A neurochemical signature of visual recovery after extrastriate cortical damage in the adult cat. J Comp Neurol. 2008 May 1;508(1):45-61. doi: 10.1002/cne.21658.
- Background: PubMed 22514305Das A, Demagistris M, Huxlin KR. Different properties of visual relearning after damage to early versus higher-level visual cortical areas. J Neurosci. 2012 Apr 18;32(16):5414-25. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0316-12.2012.
- Background: PubMed 19339594Huxlin KR, Martin T, Kelly K, Riley M, Friedman DI, Burgin WS, Hayhoe M. Perceptual relearning of complex visual motion after V1 damage in humans. J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 1;29(13):3981-91. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4882-08.2009.
- Background: PubMed 26389544Cavanaugh MR, Zhang R, Melnick MD, Das A, Roberts M, Tadin D, Carrasco M, Huxlin KR. Visual recovery in cortical blindness is limited by high internal noise. J Vis. 2015;15(10):9. doi: 10.1167/15.10.9.
- Background: PubMed 31133558Herpich F, Melnick MD, Agosta S, Huxlin KR, Tadin D, Battelli L. Boosting Learning Efficacy with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Intact and Brain-Damaged Humans. J Neurosci. 2019 Jul 10;39(28):5551-5561. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3248-18.2019. Epub 2019 May 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Visual Field Defect, Peripheral
Active, not recruiting
Statistical Learning as a Novel Intervention for Cortical Blindness
Stroke, Ischemic, Hemianopia, Homonymous
Recruiting
Home-based Vision Rehabilitation Guided by Brain Imaging
Visual Field Defect, Stroke
Recruiting
Vision Improvement Through Behavioral Rehabilitation And Neuroplasticity Training
Visual Field Defect, Stroke
Recruiting
Vision Loss Impact on Navigation in Virtual Reality
Stroke, Ischemic, Quadrantanopia
Recruiting
Brain Stimulation Effects on Orientation and Mobility Skills in Adults With Vision Impairment
Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), Rod Cone Dystrophy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Lorella Battelli, PhD principal investigator
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), Computer Based Visual Training and Virtual Reality Based Visual Training in people with Visual Field Defect, Peripheral and Stroke, run by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lorella Battelli, PhD (617-667-0326, lbattell@bidmc.harvard.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual Motion Discrimination Change (time frame: After 10 days training/stimulation and after 6 months training/stimulation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05085210, which also lists 30 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2026.