The Focus of This Study Are New Pulse Sequences.NCT00590252
Clinical Testing of New MR Pulse Sequences
An observational study of The Focus of This Study Are New Pulse Sequences., run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To test and validate newly developed magnetic resonance (MR) pulse sequences for their ability to enhance the collection of morphological, biomedical, and functional information from the human body. To test clinical protocols on the various MR systems available at Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- The Focus of This Study Are New Pulse Sequences.
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2007to Jul 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Community sample.
Who may be able to join
- Healthy volunteers
- Patients undergoing clinical indicated MRI
Who cannot join
- Patients with contraindication for MRI
- Pregnant women will be excluded from this study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Frank J Rybicki, MD, PhD, 617-732-7206, frybicki@partners.org
Jill M Goldstein, PhD
About this study
To test and validate newly developed magnetic resonance (MR) pulse sequences for their ability to enhance the collection of morphological, biomedical, and functional information from the human body. To test clinical protocols on the various MR systems available at Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH).
Read the detailed description
Magnetic resonance (MR) scanners use computer software, called pulse sequences, to extract different types of information from the human body. Though MR has largely matured to become a routine clinical imaging modality, substantial development is still underway in order to fully exploit the technology. BWH Radiology has been a leader in pulse sequence development and the protocol under review has played a large part in this development over the last several years.
The importance of further development in MR cannot be understated. In particular, biochemical information, detailed properties of water diffusion and perfusion in tissue, cardiac imaging, and high-resolution brain imaging, all hold great potential for improving medical diagnosis and monitoring.
MR pulse sequence software is typically developed in small incremental steps. For example, an investigator may receive a new state of the art sequence from the manufacturer of the scanner equipment. (S)he may then decide to add flow-sensitizing gradients. This process is not straightforward, but requires extensive testing, first in phantoms and then in-vivo, to determine if the pulse sequence is capable of performing the new task and, moreover, to see if the new feature does not introduce undesired artifacts.
Some modifications, like the introduction diffusion-sensitizing gradients, must be tested in patients, since changes of tissue diffusion can only be observed in stroke victims. Once the researcher attained the first goal, (s)he may proceed with other modifications, e.g., modifications which will improve the temporal resolution. The completion of a new sequence, which ultimately may be used in a large normal subject or patient study, may involve a large number of design steps, where each step must be tested in one or a few subjects before development proceeds. Another scenario is the application of an existing patient protocol to different, existing, and FDA approved equipment. For example the need may arise to use a different radiofrequency coil (surface coil instead of head coil) or a scanner system with different magnetic field strength (3.0 Tesla instead of 1.5 Tesla). Several parameters, such as signal-to-noise ratio, or T1 and T2 weighting may change under such circumstances. In most cases only a study in a subject will reveal if protocol parameter settings are adequate. Therefore, this protocol is different from a conventional study, where exactly the same protocol will be applied to each of a large number of subjects. However, the protocol and the general procedures of data handling used during the different scans is similar enough, so it can be summarized into a general development protocol.
The purpose of this protocol is to test and validate newly developed MR pulse sequences.
- Keywords
- Magnetic Resonance, Imaging, Spectroscopy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled for an MRI | Clinically Indicated Adults |
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2007
- Primary completionJul 2013 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2013 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for The Focus of This Study Are New Pulse Sequences.Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Brigham and Women's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Frank John Rybicki, MD, PhD, Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Investigators
- Frank J Rybicki, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Brigham and Women's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00590252
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2001-P-000545
- Status last verified
- May 2012
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 15 May 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Mulkern RV, Barnes AS, Haker SJ, Hung YP, Rybicki FJ, Maier SE, Tempany CM. Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Jun;24(5):563-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.12.008. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
PubMed 16735177Ersoy H, Goldhaber SZ, Cai T, Luu T, Rosebrook J, Mulkern R, Rybicki F. Time-resolved MR angiography: a primary screening examination of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and contraindications to administration of iodinated contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 May;188(5):1246-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.0901.
PubMed 17449767McDannold N, Barnes AS, Rybicki FJ, Oshio K, Chen NK, Hynynen K, Mulkern RV. Temperature mapping considerations in the breast with line scan echo planar spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Dec;58(6):1117-23. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21322.
PubMed 18046702
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 May 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Testing of New MR Pulse Sequences
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00590252
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2001-P-000545
- Keywords
- Magnetic Resonance, Imaging, Spectroscopy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2007
- Primary completion
- Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2013 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To test and validate newly developed magnetic resonance (MR) pulse sequences for their ability to enhance the collection of morphological, biomedical, and functional information from the human body. To test clinical protocols on the various MR systems available at Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH).
Detailed description
Magnetic resonance (MR) scanners use computer software, called pulse sequences, to extract different types of information from the human body. Though MR has largely matured to become a routine clinical imaging modality, substantial development is still underway in order to fully exploit the technology. BWH Radiology has been a leader in pulse sequence development and the protocol under review has played a large part in this development over the last several years.
The importance of further development in MR cannot be understated. In particular, biochemical information, detailed properties of water diffusion and perfusion in tissue, cardiac imaging, and high-resolution brain imaging, all hold great potential for improving medical diagnosis and monitoring.
MR pulse sequence software is typically developed in small incremental steps. For example, an investigator may receive a new state of the art sequence from the manufacturer of the scanner equipment. (S)he may then decide to add flow-sensitizing gradients. This process is not straightforward, but requires extensive testing, first in phantoms and then in-vivo, to determine if the pulse sequence is capable of performing the new task and, moreover, to see if the new feature does not introduce undesired artifacts.
Some modifications, like the introduction diffusion-sensitizing gradients, must be tested in patients, since changes of tissue diffusion can only be observed in stroke victims. Once the researcher attained the first goal, (s)he may proceed with other modifications, e.g., modifications which will improve the temporal resolution. The completion of a new sequence, which ultimately may be used in a large normal subject or patient study, may involve a large number of design steps, where each step must be tested in one or a few subjects before development proceeds. Another scenario is the application of an existing patient protocol to different, existing, and FDA approved equipment. For example the need may arise to use a different radiofrequency coil (surface coil instead of head coil) or a scanner system with different magnetic field strength (3.0 Tesla instead of 1.5 Tesla). Several parameters, such as signal-to-noise ratio, or T1 and T2 weighting may change under such circumstances. In most cases only a study in a subject will reveal if protocol parameter settings are adequate. Therefore, this protocol is different from a conventional study, where exactly the same protocol will be applied to each of a large number of subjects. However, the protocol and the general procedures of data handling used during the different scans is similar enough, so it can be summarized into a general development protocol.
The purpose of this protocol is to test and validate newly developed MR pulse sequences.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled for an MRI | – | –Clinically Indicated Adults |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Community sample.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Healthy volunteers
- Patients undergoing clinical indicated MRI
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with contraindication for MRI
- Pregnant women will be excluded from this study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 May 2012.
- Background: PubMed 16735177Mulkern RV, Barnes AS, Haker SJ, Hung YP, Rybicki FJ, Maier SE, Tempany CM. Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Jun;24(5):563-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.12.008. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
- Background: PubMed 17449767Ersoy H, Goldhaber SZ, Cai T, Luu T, Rosebrook J, Mulkern R, Rybicki F. Time-resolved MR angiography: a primary screening examination of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and contraindications to administration of iodinated contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 May;188(5):1246-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.0901.
- Background: PubMed 18046702McDannold N, Barnes AS, Rybicki FJ, Oshio K, Chen NK, Hynynen K, Mulkern RV. Temperature mapping considerations in the breast with line scan echo planar spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Dec;58(6):1117-23. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21322.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Frank J Rybicki, MD, PhD principal investigator
Brigham and Women's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of The Focus of This Study Are New Pulse Sequences., run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Frank J Rybicki, MD, PhD (617-732-7206, frybicki@partners.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00590252, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2012.