AzTrials
AzTrials

Femur FractureRIANCT00594438

Randomized, Prospective Comparison of Two Femoral Reaming Systems

A study testing Synthes Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA) and Zimmer Sentinel Reamer in people with Femur Fracture, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the quantity of fat that is released into the venous system (blood) by reaming the femoral canal during intramedullary nailing of the femur using two different reaming systems. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Femur Fracture
What is being tested?
Synthes Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA) and Zimmer Sentinel Reamer
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2007to Dec 2007
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • injuries include isolated or multiple trauma which includes a femur fracture requiring operative fixation using an intramedullary nail using antegrade approach
  • Adult patients ages 19-50 years old

Who cannot join

  • pathologic fractures
  • femoral deformities which would preclude intramedullary nailing
  • pregnancy
  • previous ipsilateral femoral nailing
  • pediatric femoral fractures (<19 years old)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Orthopaedic Trauma

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to compare the quantity of fat that is released into the venous system (blood) by reaming the femoral canal during intramedullary nailing of the femur using two different reaming systems.

Read the detailed description

Twenty patients who meet criteria for inclusion in this study will be assigned to one of two groups by means of a computer-generated random number. Group A will consist of 10 patients who undergo reaming with the Synthes reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA). Group B will consist of 10 patients who undergo conventional reaming with the Zimmer Sentinel reamer.

The patient will be transported to the operating room and will undergo general anesthesia. After correct positioning of the patient on the radiolucent table, baseline data will be collected. This data will consist of a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) and arterial blood gas.

A standard lateral approach to the proximal femur will be utilized. The starting point will be identified using a guide pin and fluoroscopy using standard technique. Though the resident may perform the approach, the attending surgeon will perform the case from the opening of the canal with a drill through the completion of reaming. A TEE will be recorded from the time the initial reamer engages the cortex until it is removed from the bone. A guide wire will be passed across the fracture site and its position confirmed by fluoroscopic imaging. The femoral canal will be reamed using either a conventional reaming technique or the RIA device.

For conventional reaming, successive reamers will be used beginning with an 8mm end-cutting reamer and increasing by 1.0 mm increments until cortical "chatter" is detected, then reaming will proceed at 0.5 mm increments for two passes. This is the standard practice using current technology. A Synthes titanium nail of the appropriate length which is 1.0 - 1.5mm less than the last reaming will be chosen for implantation. TEE will be monitored during the pass of the first reamer and the last.

For reaming with the RIA, a reamer-irrigator-aspirator of the appropriate size based on pre-operative evaluation of the femoral canal size will be used to perform a single pass down the femoral canal. A Synthes titanium femoral nail of the appropriate length will be selected for implantation. TEE will be recorded during the reaming. An arterial blood gas will be sent after positioning of the patient, when the guide wire is passed down the femoral canal and after the proximal locking screws are placed.

Proximal and distal locking screws will be placed in standard fashion. Wound closure and post-operative care will be according to standard protocols.

The TEE will be evaluated in a blinded manner by two anesthesiology attendings certified to use and evaluate the TEE. A grading system of 1 through 5 will be used, with 1 representing little to no fat emboli and 5 representative of a large number of fat emboli. This data will be forwarded to the principal investigator and used to fill the appropriate data sheet.

Outpatient follow-up will be performed in the usual manner, with sutures/staples being removed at approximately 2 weeks, and radiographs being obtained at 6 and 12 weeks as the attending physician deems clinically necessary. Follow-up for both limbs of the study will be the same as patients not in the study who undergo femoral nailing.

Conditions
Femur Fracture
Being tested
Synthes Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA), Zimmer Sentinel Reamer
Keywords
Synthes Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA), Zimmer Sentinal Reamer, Transesophageal Echocardiogram (TEE)
Medical subject headings
Femoral Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Synthes Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA)Device

    Also called Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator, Synthes

    A standard lateral approach to the proximal femur will be utilized. The starting point will be identified using a guide pin and fluoroscopy using standard technique. The attending surgeon will perform the case from the opening of the canal with a drill through the completion of reaming. A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) will be recorded from the time the initial reamer engages the cortex until it is removed from the bone. A guide wire will be passed across the fracture site and its position confirmed by fluoroscopic imaging. The femoral canal will be reamed using the RIA device.

  • Zimmer Sentinel ReamerDevice

    A standard lateral approach to the proximal femur will be utilized. The starting point will be identified using a guide pin and fluoroscopy using standard technique. The attending surgeon will perform the case from the opening of the canal with a drill through the completion of reaming. A transesophageal echocardiogram TEE will be recorded from the time the initial reamer engages the cortex until it is removed from the bone. A guide wire will be passed across the fracture site and its position confirmed by fluoroscopic imaging. The femoral canal will be reamed using either a conventional reaming technique or the RIA device.

Study groups in NCT00594438
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1, AExperimentalFemoral reaming with the Synthes Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA)
Receives: Device: Synthes Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA)
2 BActive comparatorFemoral reaming with a Zimmer Sentinel Reamer.
Receives: Device: Zimmer Sentinel Reamer

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Determine which of 2 femoral reamers is best for patients.

    Measured: Surgery: 2-3 hours; Follow-up: 3-6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jan 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2007
  3. Primary completionDec 2007
  4. Study completionDec 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00594438
Sponsor's protocol ID
F061204007
Acronym
RIA
Status last verified
Nov 2013
First submitted
21 Dec 2007
Last updated
26 Nov 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Synthes Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA) and Zimmer Sentinel Reamer in people with Femur Fracture, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Determine which of 2 femoral reamers is best for patients. (time frame: Surgery: 2-3 hours; Follow-up: 3-6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Nov 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in