AzTrials
AzTrials

Major Depressive DisorderPhase 3NCT00596817

Efficacy of Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in the Prevention of Relapse of Major Depressive Episodes

A Phase 3 study testing Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by H. Lundbeck A/S.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy of Vortioxetine in the prevention of relapse of major depressive episodes in patients who responded to open-label treatment with Vortioxetine. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Major Depressive Disorder
What is being tested?
Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
639 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2007to Oct 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Major Depressive Episode (MDE) as the primary diagnosis according to DSM-IV TR criteria
  • At least one other MDE before the current one
  • Moderate to severe depression

Who cannot join

  • Any current psychiatric disorder other than Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) as defined in the DSM-IV TR
  • Any substance disorder within the previous 6 months
  • Female patients of childbearing potential who are not using effective contraception
  • Use of any psychoactive medication 2 weeks prior to screening and during the study
  • Randomisation Criteria: Patients in remission (MADRS total score <=10) at both Week 10 and Week 12
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria may apply.

About this study

Official title: A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Multicentre, Relapse-prevention Study With Two Doses of [Vortioxetine] Lu AA21004 in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

This study will evaluate the efficacy of Vortioxetine in the prevention of relapse of major depressive episodes in patients who responded to open-label treatment with Vortioxetine.

Being tested
Placebo, Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)
Keywords
Relapse prevention, Antidepressants, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multicentre study
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Major

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PlaceboDrug

    capsules, daily, orally

  • Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)Drug

    Also called Brintellix

    encapsulated tablets, daily, orally

Study groups in NCT00596817
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Vortioxetine: 5 or 10 mgExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Relapse Within First 24 Weeks of the Double-blind Period Based on a MADRS Total Score >=22 or an Unsatisfactory Treatment Effect (Lack of Efficacy) as Judged by the Investigator

    The Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 (no symptom) to 6 (severe symptom). The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The rating should be based on a clinical interview with the patient, moving from broadly phrased questions about symptoms to more detailed ones, which allow a precise rating of severity, covering the last 7 days. Total score from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the more severe.

    Measured: Within first 24 weeks of the double-blind period

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Relapse During the Entire Double-blind Period Based on a MADRS Total Score >=22 or an Unsatisfactory Treatment Effect (Lack of Efficacy) as Judged by the Investigator

    Measured: Within 64 weeks of the double-blind period

  2. Change From Double-blind Baseline in MADRS Total Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment

    Measured: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period

  3. Change From Double-blind Baseline in HAM-D-17 Total Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment

    The Hamilton Depression Scale - 17 items (HAM-D-17) measures depression severity. Items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptoms not present) to a maximum of 2 to 4 (symptom extremely severe) for a total score range of 0 to 52. The higher the score, the more severe.

    Measured: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period

  4. Change From Double-blind Baseline in HAM-A Total Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment

    The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) consists of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behaviour at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic, and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total score from 0 to 56. The higher the score, the more severe.

    Measured: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period

  5. Change From Double-blind Baseline in CGI-S Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment

    The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale rated from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). The investigator should use his/her total clinical experience with this patient population to judge how mentally ill the patient is at the time of rating.

    Measured: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period

  6. Proportion of Responders at Week 24 of the Double-blind Period (Response Defined as a >=50% Reduction in MADRS Total Score From Open-label Baseline)

    Measured: Week 24 of the double-blind period (Counted From Open-label Baseline)

  7. Proportion of Remitters at Week 24 of the Double-blind Period (Remission Defined as a MADRS Total Score <=10)

    Measured: Week 24 of the double-blind period

  8. Change From Double-blind Baseline in SDS Total Score at Week 24 of the Double-blind Period

    The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) comprises self-rated items designed to measure impairment. The patient rates the extent to which his or her (1) work, (2) social life or leisure activities and (3) home life or family responsibilities are impaired on a 10-point visual analogue scales, on which 0 = normal functioning and 10 = severe functional impairment. The three items may be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). The higher the score, the more severe.

    Measured: Week 24 of the double-blind period (Counted From Double-blind Baseline)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jan 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2007
  3. Primary completionSep 2009
  4. Study completionOct 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
639 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00596817
Sponsor's protocol ID
11985A
Other IDs
2007-001871-13
Status last verified
Feb 2014
First submitted
8 Jan 2008
Last updated
31 Mar 2014
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Boulenger JP, Loft H, Florea I. A randomized clinical study of Lu AA21004 in the prevention of relapse in patients with major depressive disorder. J Psychopharmacol. 2012 Nov;26(11):1408-16. doi: 10.1177/0269881112441866. Epub 2012 Apr 9.

    PubMed 22495621
  • Christensen MC, Florea I, Loft H, McIntyre RS. Efficacy of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder reporting childhood or recent trauma. J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 15;263:258-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.074. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

    PubMed 31818787
  • McIntyre RS, Florea I, Tonnoir B, Loft H, Lam RW, Christensen MC. Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Functioning in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;78(1):115-121. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m10744.

    PubMed 27780334

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by H. Lundbeck A/S.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Mar 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Relapse Within First 24 Weeks of the Double-blind Period Based on a MADRS Total Score >=22 or an Unsatisfactory Treatment Effect (Lack of Efficacy) as Judged by the Investigator (time frame: Within first 24 weeks of the double-blind period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00596817, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in