AzTrials
AzTrials

Deep Vein ThrombosisPhase 4Exten-DACUSNCT00623987

Absence of Residual Vein Thrombosis Permits to Withdrawn Oral Anticoagulants

A Phase 4 study testing warfarin accordingly INR value in people with Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background. The optimal duration of oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with idiopathic Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)of the lower limbs is still uncertain. Residual Vein Thrombosis (RVT) has been found able to establish the patient' risk for recurrent thrombotic events. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Deep Vein Thrombosis
What is being tested?
warfarin accordingly INR value
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
500 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Jun 1999to Jan 2008
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • First episode of unprovoked proximal DVT of the lower limbs and treated for 3 month with oral anticoagulants

Who cannot join

  • Active cancer,
  • Limited life expectancy,
  • Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, or an other known thrombophilic status (such as antithrombin deficiency),
  • Serious liver disease,
  • Pregnancy
  • Conditions requiring anticoagulation (atrial fibrillation, etc)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Sergio Siragusa

    Palermo, 90127

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Absence of Residual Vein Thrombosis After an Episode of Unprovoked Deep Vein Thrombosis: Short-Term Anticoagulation is Safe.

Background. The optimal duration of oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with idiopathic Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)of the lower limbs is still uncertain. Residual Vein Thrombosis (RVT) has been found able to establish the patient' risk for recurrent thrombotic events. In the present study we conducted a RVT-based therapeutic strategy, withholding OAT after 3 months in patients without RVT while continuing anticoagulants for at least additional 9 months in those in whom RVT persists.

Methods Patients with a first episode of symptomatic unprovoked proximal Vein Thrombosis (VT) were given Oral Anticoagulant Treatment (OAT) for 3 months. Residual Vein Thrombosis (RVT), ultrasonographically-detected, will be then assessed. Patients without RVT did not continue OAT (Group B), whereas those with RVT will continue OAT for at least additional 9 months. Patients were followed-up prospectively focusing on the study outcomes: occurrence of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding over a period of at least 12 months after OAT discontinuation.

Read the detailed description

INTRODUCTION Long-term anticoagulant treatment with adjusted doses of vitamin K antagonists is highly effective in preventing recurrent events after a first episode of unprovoked Venous ThromboEmbolism (VTE), even if the optimal duration of this therapy is still uncertain. Since the risk of recurrency is greatest in the first year after the initial thrombotic episode and gradually diminishes thereafter, the benefit of an extended course of anticoagulant treatment may be offset over time by the persisting risk of clinically important bleeding.

A potential clinically relevant approach for establishing the optimal duration of Oral AntCoagulant Therapy (OAT) is that of predicting the individual risk for thrombotic recurrency after the index Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT). Although the current scheme for establishing the duration of OAT is based on the nature of index DVT (idiopathic or provoked), some new data starting to select other parameters to optimize this decision. Recently, the use of D-dimer has been proven to be effective for selecting OAC duration; however, this investigation evaluated only patients with idiopathic DVT and, moreover, the use of D-dimer can not be easily handle by most of Institutions.

In earlier prospective studies conducted in patients with symptomatic DVT, the presence of a residual thrombus was associated with an increased risk of thrombotic recurrencies either in idiopathic or provoked venous thrombosis. Interestingly, recurrent events occurred not only in the previously affected veins but also in other sites, thus suggesting that Residual Vein Thrombosis (RVT) may express a pro-thrombotic status. Based on these findings, the detection of RVT may be, therefore, of help in establishing the duration of anticoagulation. Recently, we have conducted a randomized, prospective, follow-up study in patients with a first episode of symptomatic DVT treated with OAT for 3 months in whom OAT duration was based upon RVT findings. In patients without RVT, the risk of recurrent DVT was low even if the treatment was stopped after only 3 months.

To further confirm our preliminary data and to enforce the safety of withholding OAT after 3 months in patients without RVT, we conducted a prospective study in patients with idiopathic DVT of the lower limbs.

METHODS Study patients. Patients with a first episode of documented unprovoked and provoked proximal DVT will be eligible for the study if they had completed at least three months of OAT (target INR 2.5, range 2.0-3.0). Unprovoked DVTs are defined as thrombotic episodes occurred in apparently healthy individuals. Patients with active cancer, limited life expectancy, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, or an other known thrombophilic status (such as antithrombin deficiency), serious liver disease, those who lived too far from the center will be excluded from the study. The study has been approved by the institutional review boards of all participating centers. All enrolled patients will provide written informed consent.

Study Design. This is a multicenter prospective study in patients with a first episode of symptomatic proximal DVT detected by Compression UltraSonography (C-US) and receiving OAT [warfarin (Coumadin, Bristol Myers Squibb) for 3 months. At this time, subjects who agreed to participate have a physical examination to assess baseline clinical conditions and to exclude contraindications. C-US of the proximal deep vein system in both legs will be performed, measuring the diameters of any detectable thrombus in the Common Femoral Vein (CFV) and Popliteal Veins (PV). Images will be obtained in transverse section only. Lumen compressibility will be then evaluated on CFV and PV by gentle pressure of the probe, as previously described. Briefly, the major and the minor diameters of the vein segment are measured and recorded before and after compression. C-US findings are scored as "absence of RVT" when residual thrombus occupied, at maximum compressibility, less than 40% of the vein area. Patients without RVT will not continue anticoagulation (Group B), whereas those with RVT will continue OAT (INR 2.0-3.0) for at least additional 9 months.

Study outcomes and Follow-up. From the assignment visit, patients will be followed up for at least one year after OAT discontinuation; during the follow-up period, patients will be contacted by the clinical centers every 3 months. C-US will be performed only when recurrent symptomatic DVT is suspected. The study outcome is the composite of confirmed recurrent venous thromboembolism (including DVT and/or fatal or non-fatal pulmonary embolism) and major bleeding events from the index DVT to the last day of follow-up. In cases of suspected DVT recurrence the results of ultrasonography will be compared with the previous examination. A diagnosis of recurrent venous thrombosis is made if a previously fully compressible segment (contralateral or ipsilateral) became incompressible. In absence of a previous normal C-US, DVT recurrence is diagnosed if a previously non-occlusive thrombus shifted to occlusive thrombus, provided the vein area before compression had increased > 4 mm); in undetermined cases, contrast venography was performed. In patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, diagnosis of recurrence is based on objective algorithms using clinical probability, ventilation-perfusion lung scanning/helical computed tomography, compression ultrasonography and/or D-dimer if indicated. The diagnosis of clinically relevant haemorrhage will be made in case of decrease of haemoglobin levels > 2.0 gr/dl, retroperitoneal, intracranial or life-threatening. Patients has been instructed to contact the clinical center immediately if symptoms developed suggestive of venous thromboembolism or bleeding. All suspected outcome events and all deaths will be evaluated by a central adjudication committee whose members were unaware of the name of the subject, the enrolling center, the C-US findings and the assigned group.

Statistical analysis. Baseline differences between groups will be assessed by the chi-square test (Yates' correction) for categorical variables and t-test or Mann-Withney U test for continuous variables, as appropriate. Data will be analyzed on intention-to-treat basis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves are plotted to estimate the cumulative incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding. Patients who during the study will develop clinical conditions interfering with the study outcomes (such as ischemic heart disease, cancer, stroke, superficial vein thrombosis, etc) and left the assigned group will be regularly followed-up and included in analysis. Hazard ratios and their 95 percent confidence intervals will be calculated using the Cox's proportional hazards model. The data will be analyzed using the Prism statistical software package (Version 3.0, GraphPad Software Incorporated, San Diego, CA) and the SPSS statistical package (Version 14.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Being tested
warfarin accordingly INR value
Keywords
Residual vein thrombosis, Optimal duration, Oral anticoagulants
Medical subject headings
Venous Thrombosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • warfarin accordingly INR valueDrug

    Also called warfarin

    warfarin accordingly to INR value between 2.0-3.0

Study groups in NCT00623987
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AActive comparatorwarfarin treatment
Receives: Drug: warfarin accordingly INR value
BNo interventionwithholding warfarin therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism

    Measured: for the entire study

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. major and minor haemorrhage, death

    Measured: for the entire study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Feb 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 1999
  3. Primary completionJun 2006
  4. Study completionJan 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
500 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00623987
Sponsor's protocol ID
0036/99
Acronym
Exten-DACUS
Status last verified
Mar 2008
First submitted
19 Feb 2008
Last updated
25 Mar 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Siragusa S, Malato A, Saccullo G, Iorio A, Di Ianni M, Caracciolo C, Coco LL, Raso S, Santoro M, Guarneri FP, Tuttolomondo A, Pinto A, Pepe I, Casuccio A, Abbadessa V, Licata G, Battista Rini G, Mariani G, Di Fede G. Residual vein thrombosis for assessing duration of anticoagulation after unprovoked deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs: the extended DACUS study. Am J Hematol. 2011 Nov;86(11):914-7. doi: 10.1002/ajh.22156. Epub 2011 Sep 22.

    PubMed 21953853

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing warfarin accordingly INR value in people with Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism (time frame: for the entire study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00623987, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in