Pediatric Acute Leukemia InductionPhase 3NCT00624143
Antifungal Prophylaxis in Pediatric Acute Leukemia
A Phase 3 study testing ORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin B in people with Pediatric Acute Leukemia Induction, run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
Hypothesis:Oral Voriconazole will be as effective as intravenous Amphotericin B as antifungal prophylaxis in induction of acute leukemia (ALL, AML) in pediatric patients, with less toxicity and more convenience. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 15 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pediatric Acute Leukemia Induction
- What is being tested?
- ORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin B
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- Feb 2008to Dec 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 15 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Patients age </= 15 years with de novo acute leukemia (AML, ALL) undergoing induction chemotherapy.
- No evidence of fungal infection at randomization
- No pneumonia at presentation on CXR.
- No systemic antifungal therapy within 7 days before randomization.
- Febrile patients with no pneumonia, systemic fungal infection and hemodynamically stable will be eligible for study.
Who cannot join
- Patients with baseline pneumonia on CXR.
- Laboratory evidence of significant hepatic or renal dysfunction (defined as a SGOT or SGPT >5 times, Total bilirubin>2 times and Serum creatinine > 2 times upper limit of normal)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
India1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110029
SAMEER BAKHSHI, MD, 91-11-26588153, sambakh@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: Oral Voriconazole vs IV Low Dose Amphotericin B for Primary Antifungal Prophylaxis in Pediatric Acute Leukemia Induction:A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial.
Hypothesis:Oral Voriconazole will be as effective as intravenous Amphotericin B as antifungal prophylaxis in induction of acute leukemia (ALL, AML) in pediatric patients, with less toxicity and more convenience.
Read the detailed description
RATIONALE OF STUDY:
- In induction chemotherapy for childhood acute leukemia, our experience and international studies has shown that 30% of ALL and approximately 50% of AML patients require antifungal therapy. Mortality rates associated with documented fungal infection due to opportunistic yeasts and filamentous fungi have been high, ranging from 50-90% despite use of therapeutic amphotericin B or voriconazole.
- Currently licensed drug for use in pediatric patients are amphotericin B and its lipid derivatives; 5-flucytosine; azoles like fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole; and caspofungin.
- Limitation with Fluconazole- inactive against Aspergilosis, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis and filamentous fungi.
- Limitation with Itraconazole- erratic oral absorption of capsule form, frequent drug interactions, non availability of oral suspension form for use in very small children who would not be able to take capsules.
- Amphotericin B and Voriconazole both have proven activity against filamentous fungi and candida species.
- There is no prospective, randomised trial comparing voriconazole and amphotericin B in prophylaxis of pediatric acute leukemia during induction.
Hence there is need to study their role in prophylaxis of this infection which has a high mortality despite therapy.
Study design: Prospective, Randomized, concealed, single institutional study.
Study population:
Pediatric patients of acute leukaemia who undergo induction chemotherapy at IRCH between Jan 2008 to Dec 2009 will be eligible for the study.
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients age less than or equal to 15 years with de novo acute leukemia undergoing induction chemotherapy.
- No evidence of fungal infection at randomization
- No pneumonia at presentation.
- No systemic antifungal therapy within 7 days before randomization.
Febrile patients with no pneumonia, systemic fungal infection and hemodynamically stable will be eligible for study.
Exclusion criteria:
- Patients with baseline pneumonia.
- Laboratory evidence of significant hepatic or renal dysfunction (defined as a SGOT or SGPT more than 5 times, Total bilirubin more than 2 times and Serum creatinine more than 2 times upper limit of normal)
End points:
- Proven or probable invasive fungal infection.
- Initiation of full dose parental antifungal therapy for proven or probable invasive fungal infection.
- Successful recovery of ANC more than 1000/cumm or completion of induction.
Study protocol:
- After signing informed consent forms patients will be randomly assigned to a regimen of oral Voriconazole or IV low dose Amphotericin B.
- Oral Voriconazole will be given in dose of 6mg/kg 12 hourly on day1 then 4mg/kg 12 hourly daily or IV Amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day weekly thrice.
- Patient will be started at the time of initiation of induction till completion of induction.
Evaluation:
- Patients will be evaluated at baseline, twice weekly for duration of study and at completion of study.
Baseline evaluation:
- History and physical examination.
- Hemogram and biochemistry
- Chest X ray
Evaluation of patients with baseline fever:
For the patient presenting with fever at baseline (randomization), blood and urine culture for fungus and bacteria will be send, X- ray chest to rule out consolidation at baseline will be done in all patients. The patients will be started on antibiotics as per the routine institutional policy. If patient becomes afebrile before day 5, then antibiotics will be continued for 5 days after becoming afebrile. If patient is still febrile at day 5, then empiric therapeutic antifungal therapy will be added.
Evaluation of patients with breakthrough fever:
In case of patient developing fever >38 degree C (axillary) during induction chemotherapy, patient will be evaluated by clinical examination, hemogram ,biochemistry, chest X ray, blood and urine culture for fungus and bacterial for three consecutive days. Patients with evidence of chest infection on chest X ray/signs and symptoms of chest infection/febrile even after receiving 5 days of appropriate antibiotics will be subjected to HRCT scan of chest. Patients showing consolidation , or signs of chest infection on chest CT will be subjected for broncoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage. The brochoalveolar lavage will be sent for microscopy (gram staining), culture for fungal and bacterial growth. Full dose therapeutic antifungal will be started earlier in case of development of pneumonia, hemodynamic instability even if before 5 days of antibiotics which will be considered as failure of prophylaxis. Whenever feasible (not mandatory) depending on the patient's clinical condition, we will try to obtain tissue sample for histology by FNAC/Biopsy from the suspected infected site.
- Conditions
- Pediatric Acute Leukemia Induction
- Being tested
- ORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin B
- Keywords
- Antifungal prophylaxis, acute leukemia induction,
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin BDrug
Oral Voriconazole will be given in dose of 6mg/kg 12 hourly on day1 then 4mg/kg 12 hourly daily or IV Amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day weekly thrice till the completion of induction or recovery of ANC >1000/MM3 or development of fungal infection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Oral Voriconazole Receives: Drug: ORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin B |
| 2 | Active comparator | IV Amphotericin B Receives: Drug: ORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin B |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prevention of possible, probable or proven fungal infection.
Measured: Completion of Induction Chemotherapy or successful recovery of ANC > 1000/mm3
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2008
- Primary completionDec 2009 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pediatric Acute Leukemia InductionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- SAMEER BAKHSHI, MD, Principal investigator, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00624143
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- antifungal prophylaxis
- Other IDs
- Dr. SAMEER BAKHSHI
- Status last verified
- Jan 2008
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2008
- Last updated
- 26 Feb 2008
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Mandhaniya S, Iqbal S, Sharawat SK, Xess I, Bakhshi S. Diagnosis of invasive fungal infections using real-time PCR assay in paediatric acute leukaemia induction. Mycoses. 2012 Jul;55(4):372-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2011.02157.x. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
PubMed 22420668Mandhaniya S, Swaroop C, Thulkar S, Vishnubhatla S, Kabra SK, Xess I, Bakhshi S. Oral voriconazole versus intravenous low dose amphotericin B for primary antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric acute leukemia induction: a prospective, randomized, clinical study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011 Dec;33(8):e333-41. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3182331bc7.
PubMed 22042283
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Feb 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Oral Voriconazole vs IV Low Dose Amphotericin B for Primary Antifungal Prophylaxis in Pediatric Acute Leukemia Induction:A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00624143
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- antifungal prophylaxis
- Conditions
- Pediatric Acute Leukemia Induction
- Keywords
- Antifungal prophylaxis, acute leukemia induction,
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- All India Institute of Medical SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2008
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hypothesis:Oral Voriconazole will be as effective as intravenous Amphotericin B as antifungal prophylaxis in induction of acute leukemia (ALL, AML) in pediatric patients, with less toxicity and more convenience.
Detailed description
RATIONALE OF STUDY:
- In induction chemotherapy for childhood acute leukemia, our experience and international studies has shown that 30% of ALL and approximately 50% of AML patients require antifungal therapy. Mortality rates associated with documented fungal infection due to opportunistic yeasts and filamentous fungi have been high, ranging from 50-90% despite use of therapeutic amphotericin B or voriconazole.
- Currently licensed drug for use in pediatric patients are amphotericin B and its lipid derivatives; 5-flucytosine; azoles like fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole; and caspofungin.
- Limitation with Fluconazole- inactive against Aspergilosis, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis and filamentous fungi.
- Limitation with Itraconazole- erratic oral absorption of capsule form, frequent drug interactions, non availability of oral suspension form for use in very small children who would not be able to take capsules.
- Amphotericin B and Voriconazole both have proven activity against filamentous fungi and candida species.
- There is no prospective, randomised trial comparing voriconazole and amphotericin B in prophylaxis of pediatric acute leukemia during induction.
Hence there is need to study their role in prophylaxis of this infection which has a high mortality despite therapy.
Study design: Prospective, Randomized, concealed, single institutional study.
Study population:
Pediatric patients of acute leukaemia who undergo induction chemotherapy at IRCH between Jan 2008 to Dec 2009 will be eligible for the study.
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients age less than or equal to 15 years with de novo acute leukemia undergoing induction chemotherapy.
- No evidence of fungal infection at randomization
- No pneumonia at presentation.
- No systemic antifungal therapy within 7 days before randomization.
Febrile patients with no pneumonia, systemic fungal infection and hemodynamically stable will be eligible for study.
Exclusion criteria:
- Patients with baseline pneumonia.
- Laboratory evidence of significant hepatic or renal dysfunction (defined as a SGOT or SGPT more than 5 times, Total bilirubin more than 2 times and Serum creatinine more than 2 times upper limit of normal)
End points:
- Proven or probable invasive fungal infection.
- Initiation of full dose parental antifungal therapy for proven or probable invasive fungal infection.
- Successful recovery of ANC more than 1000/cumm or completion of induction.
Study protocol:
- After signing informed consent forms patients will be randomly assigned to a regimen of oral Voriconazole or IV low dose Amphotericin B.
- Oral Voriconazole will be given in dose of 6mg/kg 12 hourly on day1 then 4mg/kg 12 hourly daily or IV Amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day weekly thrice.
- Patient will be started at the time of initiation of induction till completion of induction.
Evaluation:
- Patients will be evaluated at baseline, twice weekly for duration of study and at completion of study.
Baseline evaluation:
- History and physical examination.
- Hemogram and biochemistry
- Chest X ray
Evaluation of patients with baseline fever:
For the patient presenting with fever at baseline (randomization), blood and urine culture for fungus and bacteria will be send, X- ray chest to rule out consolidation at baseline will be done in all patients. The patients will be started on antibiotics as per the routine institutional policy. If patient becomes afebrile before day 5, then antibiotics will be continued for 5 days after becoming afebrile. If patient is still febrile at day 5, then empiric therapeutic antifungal therapy will be added.
Evaluation of patients with breakthrough fever:
In case of patient developing fever >38 degree C (axillary) during induction chemotherapy, patient will be evaluated by clinical examination, hemogram ,biochemistry, chest X ray, blood and urine culture for fungus and bacterial for three consecutive days. Patients with evidence of chest infection on chest X ray/signs and symptoms of chest infection/febrile even after receiving 5 days of appropriate antibiotics will be subjected to HRCT scan of chest. Patients showing consolidation , or signs of chest infection on chest CT will be subjected for broncoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage. The brochoalveolar lavage will be sent for microscopy (gram staining), culture for fungal and bacterial growth. Full dose therapeutic antifungal will be started earlier in case of development of pneumonia, hemodynamic instability even if before 5 days of antibiotics which will be considered as failure of prophylaxis. Whenever feasible (not mandatory) depending on the patient's clinical condition, we will try to obtain tissue sample for histology by FNAC/Biopsy from the suspected infected site.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Drug: ORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin BOral Voriconazole |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: ORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin BIV Amphotericin B |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 15 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients age </= 15 years with de novo acute leukemia (AML, ALL) undergoing induction chemotherapy.
- No evidence of fungal infection at randomization
- No pneumonia at presentation on CXR.
- No systemic antifungal therapy within 7 days before randomization.
- Febrile patients with no pneumonia, systemic fungal infection and hemodynamically stable will be eligible for study.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with baseline pneumonia on CXR.
- Laboratory evidence of significant hepatic or renal dysfunction (defined as a SGOT or SGPT >5 times, Total bilirubin>2 times and Serum creatinine > 2 times upper limit of normal)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin BOral Voriconazole will be given in dose of 6mg/kg 12 hourly on day1 then 4mg/kg 12 hourly daily or IV Amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day weekly thrice till the completion of induction or recovery of ANC >1000/MM3 or development of fungal infection | Drug | 1, 2 |
Primary outcome
Prevention of possible, probable or proven fungal infection.
Time frame: Completion of Induction Chemotherapy or successful recovery of ANC > 1000/mm3
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Feb 2008.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22420668Mandhaniya S, Iqbal S, Sharawat SK, Xess I, Bakhshi S. Diagnosis of invasive fungal infections using real-time PCR assay in paediatric acute leukaemia induction. Mycoses. 2012 Jul;55(4):372-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2011.02157.x. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22042283Mandhaniya S, Swaroop C, Thulkar S, Vishnubhatla S, Kabra SK, Xess I, Bakhshi S. Oral voriconazole versus intravenous low dose amphotericin B for primary antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric acute leukemia induction: a prospective, randomized, clinical study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011 Dec;33(8):e333-41. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3182331bc7.
Related trials for Pediatric Acute Leukemia Induction
Recruiting
Low Dose Induction for Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients
Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Induction
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Efficacy of Quizartinib in Children and Young Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), a Cancer of the Blood
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Selinexor Combined With Induction Chemotherapy for Children With NUP98-positive AML
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
Pharmacogenomic Association Study in Indian Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
ALL, Childhood, Pediatric Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
SAMEER BAKHSHI, MD principal investigator
Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing ORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin B in people with Pediatric Acute Leukemia Induction, run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact SAMEER BAKHSHI, MD (91-11-26588153, sambakh@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prevention of possible, probable or proven fungal infection. (time frame: Completion of Induction Chemotherapy or successful recovery of ANC > 1000/mm3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00624143, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2008.