AzTrials
AzTrials

Plaque PsoriasisPhase 4NCT00658606

Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Alefacept With Narrow Band Ultraviolet B Phototherapy (nbUVB) vs. Alefacept Alone in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Subjects

A Phase 4 study testing alefacept and Narrow Band UVB Phototherapy in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 12 sites in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Assess the efficacy and safety of alefacept with nbUVB compared to alefacept alone in chronic plaque psoriasis subjects. Combination therapy may improve the clinical response to psoriatic subjects as both modalities have an effect on T cells Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Plaque Psoriasis
What is being tested?
alefacept and Narrow Band UVB Phototherapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
98 participants
Where
12 sitesCanada
Study dates
Oct 2007to Dec 2009
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject has given written informed consent
  • Subject has a diagnosis of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis involving >=10% with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score >=10 at Baseline
  • Subject has CD4+ T lymphocyte (CD4) count at or above the lower limit of normal
  • Male and female subjects must use an adequate means of contraception from screening to end of study.

Who cannot join

  • Subject who received alefacept in the past
  • Subject who has shown no improvement following an adequate course of nbUVB in the past
  • Subject who has been treated in the past with either therapy or cyclosporine
  • Subject with any active cancer, including skin cancer at Baseline
  • Subject with erythrodermic, pustular or predominantly guttate psoriasis
  • Subject who has used treatment for psoriasis prior to Baseline as follows:
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Topical treatment within 14 days
  • Oral treatment within 28 days
  • Broad band UVB (bbUVB) or nbUVB treatment within 56 days
  • Biological treatment within 84 days
  • Serious local infection or serious systemic infection within the 3 months prior to the first dose of study drug
  • Subject with a history of drug or alcohol abuse within the past 2 years
  • Subject that is known to be infected with the AIDS virus
  • Subject with any other skin disease or other disease that might interfere with psoriasis status assessments
  • Female subject who is nursing, pregnant or planning to become pregnant while in this study
  • Subject who is currently enrolled in any other investigational drug or device study

Trial locations and contacts

12 sites in 1 country.

12 sites in 1 country

Canada12 sites
  • Study site

    Calgary, Alberta, T2S 3B3

  • Study site

    London, Ontario, N5X 2P1

  • Study site

    Markham, Ontario, L3P 1A8

  • Study site

    Montreal, Quebec, H2K 4L5

  • Study site

    Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1V4

  • Study site

    Québec, Quebec, G1J 1X7

  • Study site

    Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1V 4X7

  • Study site

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8

  • Study site

    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1C 2H5

  • Study site

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B6

  • Study site

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Alefacept in Combination With Narrow-band UVB (nbUVB) Compared to Alefacept Alone in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

Assess the efficacy and safety of alefacept with nbUVB compared to alefacept alone in chronic plaque psoriasis subjects. Combination therapy may improve the clinical response to psoriatic subjects as both modalities have an effect on T cells

Being tested
alefacept, Narrow Band UVB Phototherapy
Keywords
plaque psoriasis, alefacept, Amevive, narrow band ultraviolet B, phototherapy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • alefaceptDrug

    Also called Amevive, ASP0485

    IM

  • Narrow Band UVB PhototherapyProcedure or surgery

    UVB Phototherapy

Study groups in NCT00658606
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Alefacept aloneActive comparator15 mg alefacept intramuscularly (IM) once weekly for 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: alefacept
Alefacept + nbUVBExperimental15 mg alefacept intramuscularly once weekly and narrow band Ultraviolet B (nbUVB) phototherapy 3 times per week for 12 weeks
Receives: Procedure: Narrow Band UVB Phototherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 at Week 16

    The PASI score is a tool that allows investigators to assign an objective number to the degree of severity of a person's psoriasis, and considers: redness, scaling and thickness. Values for PASI score range from 0 (least) to 72 (worst).

    PASI 75 was defined as an improvement of at least 75% in PASI as compared to Baseline.

    The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Percentage of Subjects Reaching PASI 75 Over the Entire Course of the Study

    The PASI score is a tool that allows investigators to assign an objective number to the degree of severity of a person's psoriasis, and considers: redness, scaling and thickness. Values for PASI score range from 0 (least) to 72 (worst).

    PASI 75 was defined as an improvement of at least 75% in PASI as compared to Baseline.

    The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

    Measured: Week 36

  2. Change in Body Surface Area (BSA) Covered With Psoriasis at Week 16

    A negative change from Baseline represents improvement.

    Change is calculated as Week 16- Baseline.

    The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  3. Change in Body Surface Area (BSA) Covered With Psoriasis Over the Entire Course of the Study

    A negative change from Baseline represents improvement.

    Change is calculated as Week 36- Baseline.

    The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  4. Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Physical Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 16

    The PGA scale is a tool used to evaluate the degree of overall lesion severity. The scale ranges from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe). Clear is defined as a score of 0; Almost Clear is defined as a score of 1.

    Subjects who achieved PGA of clear or almost clear at any visit during the study were assigned to the YES category for their respective groups.

    The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

    Measured: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Physical Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear or Almost Clear Over the Entire Course of the Study

    The PGA scale is a tool used to evaluate the degree of overall lesion severity. The scale ranges from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe). Clear is defined as a score of 0; Almost Clear is defined as a score of 1.

    Subjects who achieved PGA of clear or almost clear at any visit during the study were assigned to the YES category for their respective groups.

    The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

    Measured: Week 36

  6. Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve PASI 90 at Week 16

    The PASI score is a tool that allows investigators to assign an objective number to the degree of severity of a person's psoriasis, and considers: redness, scaling and thickness. Values for PASI score range from 0 (least) to 72 (worst).

    PASI 90 was defined as an improvement of at least 90% in PASI as compared to Baseline.

    The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

    Measured: Week 16

  7. Time to Relapse

    The analysis only included subjects who achieved a 75% improvement in PASI and then relapsed.

    Relapse is defined by a loss of 50% of improvement in PASI.

    Measured: Week 36

  8. Time for 50% Decrease in PASI

    The PASI score is a tool that allows investigators to assign an objective number to the degree of severity of a person's psoriasis, and considers: redness, scaling and thickness. Values for PASI score range from 0 (least) to 72 (worst).

    Only subjects who experienced 50% decrease in PASI were included in the analysis.

    Measured: Week 36

  9. Time for a 75% Decrease in PASI

    The PASI score is a tool that allows investigators to assign an objective number to the degree of severity of a person's psoriasis, and considers: redness, scaling and thickness. Values for PASI score range from 0 (least) to 72 (worst).

    Only subjects who experienced 75% decrease in PASI were included in the analysis.

    Measured: Week 36

  10. Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)

    The DLQI questionnaire is intended to measure how much a subject's skin problem affects the subject's life. Subjects provide answers considering the past week. The scale of the DQLI ranges from 0 (best) to 30 (worst).

    A negative change from Baseline represents improvement.

    Change is calculated as Week 36- Baseline.

    The Last Observation Carry Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Apr 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2007
  3. Primary completionDec 2009
  4. Study completionDec 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
98 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00658606
Sponsor's protocol ID
AME-001
Status last verified
Jan 2013
First submitted
10 Apr 2008
Last updated
8 Jan 2013
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Lui H, Gulliver W, Tan J, Hong CH, Hull P, Shear NH, Paradiso-Hardy F, Bissonette R. A randomized controlled study of combination therapy with alefacept and narrow band UVB phototherapy (UVB) for moderate to severe psoriasis: efficacy, onset, and duration of response. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012 Aug;11(8):929-37.

    PubMed 22859237

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing alefacept and Narrow Band UVB Phototherapy in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 12 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 12 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Apr 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00658606, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in