AzTrials
AzTrials

CholesteatomaNCT00682409

Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging in the Post Operative Follow-up of Cholesteatoma in Children

A study testing MR Imaging in people with Cholesteatoma, run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Classical imaging techniques are inaccurate to detect residual cholesteatoma. The aim of our study is to evaluate the value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and delayed contrast enhanced T1 weighted spin-echo sequences in the detection of residual cholesteatoma in children, in a large serie of surgically verified… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Cholesteatoma
What is being tested?
MR Imaging
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
37 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jan 2008to Apr 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female or male child enters 5 and 18 years
  • Child having benefited from a surgical operation for cholesteatoma of the average ear acquired or congenital, one-sided or bilateral
  • Child for whom an additional operating time is indicated
  • Child without contraindication in the MRI
  • Child having signed a enlightened assent
  • Child among whom the parents or the legal representatives signed a enlightened assent

Who cannot join

  • Child of less than 5 years old and more than 18 years
  • Child presenting a chronic renal insufficiency
  • Child for whom an additional operating time is not indicated
  • Child having a contraindication in the MRI
  • Child not having signed the assent or the parents of which did not sign the assent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hôpital de la Timone- Service de radiologie pédiatrique et d'ORL pédiatrique

    Marseille, 13005

Other trials in France

About this study

Classical imaging techniques are inaccurate to detect residual cholesteatoma. The aim of our study is to evaluate the value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and delayed contrast enhanced T1 weighted spin-echo sequences in the detection of residual cholesteatoma in children, in a large serie of surgically verified cases.

Read the detailed description

Classical imaging techniques are inaccurate to detect residual cholesteatoma. Thin-section CT detects that the postoperative cavity is filled with a soft tissue mass. Classical MR imaging (T2 and T1 weighted spin-echo sequences) can not provide additionnal information about the nature of this filling : cholesteatoma, granulation or fibrous tissue.

Conditions
Cholesteatoma
Being tested
MR Imaging
Medical subject headings
Cholesteatoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MR ImagingOther

    MR imaging in the post operative follow-up of cholesteatoma in children

Study groups in NCT00682409
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1OtherAnalysis of the value of the imaging of distribution and the late sequence to differentiate the cholesteatoma of the fibrosis in the follow-up operating post at the child
Receives: Other: MR Imaging

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Technical characteristics of the examination MRIs represented by the sensibility and the specificity of the test, with regard to the results stemming from the surgical operation

    Measured: 24 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Only a surgical operation will confirm the diagnosis of cholesteatoma doing it again or residual.

    Measured: 24 months

  2. It is necessary to test the following diagnostic method: the analysis of the morphological sequences in T1 and in T2 will allow to appreciate the existence or not of a filling of the cavity tympanique or the mastoïde and to clarify its localization.

    Measured: 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionApr 2011
  4. Study completionApr 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
37 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00682409
Sponsor's protocol ID
2007-A00743-50
Other IDs
2007-22
Status last verified
Aug 2014
First submitted
16 May 2008
Last updated
28 Aug 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MR Imaging in people with Cholesteatoma, run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Technical characteristics of the examination MRIs represented by the sensibility and the specificity of the test, with regard to the results stemming from the surgical operation (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in