AzTrials
AzTrials

Self-Injurious BehaviorPhase 2/3DSHNCT00694668

The (Cost-) Effectiveness of Mindfulness-training and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in Adolescents and Young Adults With Deliberate Self Harm

A Phase 2/3 study testing Cognitive Behavioral treatment and Mindfulness based cognitive therapy in people with Self-Injurious Behavior, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 3 sites in Netherlands.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: In recent years, there has been a marked rise in the frequency of young people engaging in Deliberate Self-Harm (DSH). DSH refers to all kinds of self-harming behaviour, with and without suicidal intent. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 35 years
Conditions the study is for
Self-Injurious Behavior
What is being tested?
Cognitive Behavioral treatment and Mindfulness based cognitive therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
84 participants
Where
3 sitesNetherlands
Study dates
May 2008to Oct 2012
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 35 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Recently engaged in an act of DSH including overdose of medication, ingestion of chemical substances and self-inflicted injuries according to the definition which is used in the WHO/Euro Multicentre Study on parasuicide:"An act with non-fatal outcome in which an individual deliberately initiates a non-habitual behavior, that without intervention from other will cause self-harm, or deliberately ingests a substance in excess of the prescribed or generally recognized dosage, and which is aimed at realizing changes that the person desires via the actual or expected physical consequences"(Platt et al., 1992).
  • Aged between 15 and 35
  • Living in the region of Leiden or Nijmegen

Who cannot join

  • Severe psychiatric disorder or substance abuse requiring intensive inpatient treatment
  • Serious cognitive impairments
  • Not be able to converse in Dutch

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Suzanne de Klerk, MSc. contact

31-71-527-3995

SKlerk@fsw.leidenuniv.nl

Anne van Giezen, Dr. contact

31-71-527-3729

Giezen@fsw.leidenuniv.nl

Netherlands3 sites, 3 recruiting
  • Leiden University Medical Centre

    Leiden, South Holland

    Anne van Giezen, PhD, +31-71-527-3729, Giezen@fsw.leidenuniv.nl

    Recruiting
  • Rivierduinen Mental Health Centre

    Leiden, South Holland

    Anne van Giezen, PhD, +715273729, Giezen@fsw.leidenuniv.nl

    Recruiting
  • University Medical Centre St. Radboud

    Nijmegen, Gelderland

    Speckens, Prof. dr., a.speckens@psy.umcn.nl

    de Klerk, MSc, S.deklerk@psy.umcn.nl

    Recruiting

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Background:

In recent years, there has been a marked rise in the frequency of young people engaging in Deliberate Self-Harm (DSH). DSH refers to all kinds of self-harming behaviour, with and without suicidal intent. Early identification and treatment of persons who engaged in DSH is important because every episode of DSH increases the risk of future episodes and, eventually, suicide. A number of comprehensive treatment programs have been developed and proven to be effective in reducing DSH in adults. Especially the modification of inadequate emotion regulation strategies seems to be essential in the prevention of future episodes of DSH. The first short-term results of a Dutch time-limited and structured individual cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for DSH in adolescents and young adults also showed positive effects on repetition of DSH and associated problems.

Read more

Objective:

To study the effects and costs of the total individual CBT package and one of the components of the total CBT treatment package (i.e. mindfulness training) in a group format compared to Treatment-as-Usual (TAU) on the short and long term.

Design:

Multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial with repeated measurements at baseline (M0),and posttreatment (M6)), 12 (M12) and 18 months (M18) after baseline.

Procedure:

Young persons aged 15-35 who recently have engaged in DSH and have been referred to the Leiden University Medical Centre, the mental health centre Rivierduinen or the University Medical Centre St. Radboud following an act of DSH will be invited to participate. Persons reporting severe psychiatric disorders requiring intensive inpatient treatment or serious cognitive impairments will be excluded.

Interventions:

Participants are randomly allocated to CBT, Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy(MBCT) or Treatment-as-Usual (TAU). The CBT treatment consists of up to 12 weekly sessions of individual treatment mainly consisting of emotion regulations skills, cognitive restructuring, and behavioural skills training. The MBCT training consists of 8 2-hour sessions in a group format within a three months time frame.

Outcome measures:

The same outcome measures to assess the clinical effects of treatment as in the previous study will be used (repetition of DSH, depression (BDI-II), anxiety (SCL-90), self-concept(RSC-Q), and suicide cognitions (SCS)) allowing a historical comparison of treatment effectiveness across both randomized clinical trials. In addition at all assessments health-related quality of life, use of medical resources and loss of productivity will be assessed (EuroQol, VAS and TTO). In addition,problems in emotion regulation (an important risk mechanism for repetition of DSH) will be assessed before and after treatment.

Economic evaluation:

Differences in societal costs (intervention, other (health) care and productivity)will be compared to differences in the frequency of DSH and quality adjusted life years (EuroQol, VAS and TTO).

Data-analysis/power:

Based on our previous study at least a medium effect of treatment on repetition of DSH may be expected. Assuming a medium effect of one of the treatments compared to TAU (delta =.75) and an attrition rate of about 20 %, at least 42 patients per study arm are needed to detect a minimal clinical relevant difference in repetition of DSH with a power of 80% and alpha set at .05.

Being tested
Cognitive Behavioral treatment, Mindfulness based cognitive therapy
Keywords
Deliberate Self-Harm, Self-Injurious Behaviour, Suicidal Behaviour, Cognitive behavioural therapy, Mindfulness Based cognitive therapy
Medical subject headings
Self-Injurious Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive Behavioral treatmentBehavioural

    Brief cognitive behavioral therapy (12 sessions)

  • Mindfulness based cognitive therapyBehavioural

    9 sessions MBCT in a group-format (up to 8 persons)

Study groups in NCT00694668
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalCognitive Behavioural Treatment
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral treatment
2ExperimentalMindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy-training
Receives: Behavioral: Mindfulness based cognitive therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Repetition of DSH, measured by the suicide attempt and self injury interview (SASII). Frequency, method and other characteristics of deliberate self-harm and suicide attempts are assessed.

    Measured: M0, M6, M12, M18

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. depression, as measured by the Beck depression Inventory II

    Measured: M0, M6, M12, M18

  2. Anxiety, as measured by the symptom checklist '90

    Measured: M0, M6, M12, M18

  3. Hostility, as measured by the symptom checklist '90

    Measured: M0, M6, M12, M18

  4. Self-concept, as measured by the Robson self-concept questionnaire

    Measured: M0, M6, M12, M18

  5. Suicidal cognitions, as measured by the suicidal cognitions scale

    Measured: M0, M6, M12, M18

  6. QALYs, assessed by the EQ5D

    Measured: M0, M6, M12, M18

  7. COSTS, assessed by a 6-monthly diary

    Measured: M0 - M6, M6 - M12, M12 - M18

  8. Problem-solving skills, as measured by the Means Ends Problem-Solving Test

    Measured: M0, M6

  9. Experimental avoidance, as measured by the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire

    Measured: M0, M6

  10. difficulties in emotion-regulation, as measured by the difficulties in emotion regulation scale

    Measured: M0, M6

  11. general tendency to ruminate, as measured by the Ruminative Response Scale

    Measured: M0, M6

  12. mindfulness skills, as measured by the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire

    Measured: M0, M6

  13. pathological dissociation, as measured by the dissociative experiences scale - taxon

    Measured: M0, M6

  14. Autobiographical memory, assessed by the autobiographical memory task

    Measured: M0, M6

  15. worrying, as measured by the Penn State Worry Questionnaire

    Measured: M0 M6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jun 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2008
  3. Primary completionNov 2010 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2012 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
84 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00694668
Sponsor's protocol ID
120610008
Acronym
DSH
Status last verified
Nov 2009
First submitted
5 Jun 2008
Last updated
6 Nov 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Cognitive Behavioral treatment and Mindfulness based cognitive therapy in people with Self-Injurious Behavior, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 3 sites in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Suzanne de Klerk, MSc. (31-71-527-3995, SKlerk@fsw.leidenuniv.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Repetition of DSH, measured by the suicide attempt and self injury interview (SASII). Frequency, method and other characteristics of deliberate self-harm and suicide attempts are assessed. (time frame: M0, M6, M12, M18). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in