Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)NCT00702598
The WORKER Study: Escitalopram and Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) for Depressed Working People
A study testing Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) and Telephone reminder calls in people with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This study will investigate the additional benefits of telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy (Tel-CBT) as added treatment to an antidepressant (escitalopram) in working people with major depressive disorder (MDD) versus treatment with escitalopram alone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
- What is being tested?
- Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) and Telephone reminder calls
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 105 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jun 2008to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male and female outpatients aged 18-65 years.
- Patients will meet DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder as determined by the mood disorders section of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI, Sheehan et al, 1998).
- Currently employed (or off work for 2 weeks or less, and expecting to return to work at the start of study).
- A score of 18 or greater on the self-rated version of the MADRS, indicating at least moderately severe depression.
- Competency to give informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Patients on short-term (except for circumstances under Inclusion Criteria) or long-term disability.
- Pregnant women, lactating women and sexually active women of childbearing potential who are not using medically accepted means of contraception.
- Serious suicidal risks as judged by the study doctor.
- The following DSM-IV diagnoses (to ensure a homogenous diagnostic group): Organic mental disorders; Substance abuse/dependence, including alcohol, active within the last year; Schizophrenia, Paranoid or Delusional Disorders; Other Psychotic disorders; Panic disorder; Generalized Anxiety Disorder; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, if a primary diagnosis; Bipolar Disorder;Bulimia Nervosa; Anorexia Nervosa.
- Serious illness including cardiac, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrinologic, neurologic and hematologic disease that is not stabilized.
- Regular or current use of other psychotropic drugs.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors within 14 days of Visit 1, fluoxetine within 5 weeks of Visit 1, and other antidepressants within 7 days of Visit 1 (to ensure adequate drug washouts prior to starting escitalopram).
- Previous use of escitalopram.
- Treatment resistance in the current episode, as defined by failure (lack of clinically significant response) of two or more antidepressants given at therapeutic doses for at least 6 weeks.
- Patients who start formal psychotherapy (e.g. cognitive-behavioural or interpersonal psychotherapy) within 3 months of Visit 1, or who plan to initiate such psychotherapy during this study.
- Patients involved in any other form of treatment for depression.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
UBC Hospital Mood Disorders Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2A1
About this study
Official title: The WORKER Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Escitalopram and Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
This study will investigate the additional benefits of telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy (Tel-CBT) as added treatment to an antidepressant (escitalopram) in working people with major depressive disorder (MDD) versus treatment with escitalopram alone. Outcomes will include depression symptom rating scales and measures of work absence and productivity. The hypothesis is that Tel-CBT and escitalopram will result in better outcomes than escitalopram alone in working patients with MDD.
Read the detailed description
Rationale CBT is recognized as an effective psychological treatment for MDD. However, there are still considerable barriers to access CBT. Newer methods of delivering CBT, such as over the telephone (Tel-CBT), allow for greater access and convenience, at potentially lower cost. This is especially relevant for working people because the service can be delivered during evenings and weekends, so they do not need to leave work to attend clinic appointments. Ease of access is also important for rural settings where distance to health facilities can be a barrier to care. The ease of delivery of Tel-CBT, both in setup and maintenance costs, may also make it an important component of enhanced support for primary care. Preliminary studies have shown that addition of Tel-CBT leads to better outcomes than usual care alone (Simon et al, 2004; Wang et al, 2007).
This study will investigate the added value of Tel-CBT as adjunctive treatment to an antidepressant (escitalopram) in working people with MDD versus treatment with escitalopram alone, focusing on work-related outcomes. Escitalopram offers advantages as a first-choice treatment for depressed working people, given its superior efficacy compared to other antidepressants, excellent tolerability and simplicity of use for family physicians. Observational studies have shown significant reductions in sick leave when depressed patients are treated with escitalopram (Winkler et al, 2007). Outcome will be rigorously evaluated by assessing absenteeism and work productivity, response and remission rates, and quality of life, after acute (3 month) treatment and longer-term (6 month) follow-up.
Research Method This is a 6-month, multi-centre, single-blind (rater), randomized, parallel-design study to assess the efficacy of escitalopram and Tel-CBT in the treatment of working subjects with MDD, compared to treatment with escitalopram alone. A total of 150 depressed patients meeting entry criteria will be enrolled over a 1 year period.
Eligible patients will be treated with escitalopram 10-20 mg/d for the entire treatment period (6 months). Patients will be randomized to addition of telephone-based CBT with 8 sessions conducted over a 3 month period, or to a (placebo) control condition of reminder telephone calls. Outcomes (HAM-D, MADRS) will be primarily assessed over the telephone by raters blind to treatment assignment. Other outcome measures will be assessed by patient-rated questionnaires administered over the internet using a secure web site, and by ratings from the treating physician (CGI and adverse events).
Statistical Analysis All randomized subjects who have at least one follow-up visit will be included in the analysis based on intent-to-treat. Ineligible subjects who are inappropriately randomized will be excluded from the analysis. Missing data will be imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). For the analyses the treatment variables will remain coded and the analysts and investigators will remain blinded to variable identity during analysis and interpretation.
The pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint is the adjusted mean change from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks) in the HAM-D score using LOCF. All comparisons will be analyzed using ANCOVA adjusting for baseline value and centre. The secondary outcomes will also be analyzed using a similar analysis, when appropriate. Post hoc analyses will also examine observed case data. Categorical data (such as proportions of the sample with adverse events) will be analyzed using chi-square tests or Fisher's test where cell sizes warrant.
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
- Being tested
- Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT), Telephone reminder calls
- Keywords
- Depression, occupational function, rating scales, RCT, cognitive behaviour therapy, CBT, escitalopram, antidepressants
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Major, Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT)Behavioural
Telephone-based CBT: Eight sessions of telephone-based CBT (Tel-CBT) will be delivered over 8-10 weeks, based on a published manual (Simon et al, 2004). Tel-CBT has been modified to be briefer than traditional CBT (30-40 minutes instead of 60 minutes per session) and will be offered at convenient times (including evening sessions). The initial Tel-CBT session will occur within 2 weeks of randomization, with subsequent sessions occurring every 1-2 weeks depending on scheduling and patient preference. The initial session focuses on motivation enhancement exercises, subsequent sessions emphasize identifying, challenging and distancing from negative thoughts, and the final session focuses on a personal care plan and self-management skills.
Telephone reminder callsBehavioural
Telephone reminder calls: Weekly telephone calls for 8 weeks to inquire on progress and remind patients to take their medications properly
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Receives: Behavioral: Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Telephone reminder calls Receives: Behavioral: Telephone reminder calls |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in adjusted HAM-D and MADRS scores at 3 month followup
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
At 3 and 6 month followup: clinical response and remission rates, absenteeism and work productivity, adverse events, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2008
- Primary completionApr 2011
- Study completionDec 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Raymond W. Lam, MD, FRCPC, Principal investigator, University of British ColumbiaSagar V. Parikh, Study director, University of British ColumbiaErin E. Michalak, Study director, University of British ColumbiaKevin Solomons, Study director, University of British ColumbiaSidney H. Kennedy, Ph.D, Study director, University of British ColumbiaEdwin M. Tam, Study director, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00702598
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H07-03029
- Status last verified
- May 2012
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2008
- Last updated
- 9 May 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Simon GE, Ludman EJ, Tutty S, Operskalski B, Von Korff M. Telephone psychotherapy and telephone care management for primary care patients starting antidepressant treatment: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Aug 25;292(8):935-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.8.935.
PubMed 15328325Wang PS, Simon GE, Avorn J, Azocar F, Ludman EJ, McCulloch J, Petukhova MZ, Kessler RC. Telephone screening, outreach, and care management for depressed workers and impact on clinical and work productivity outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007 Sep 26;298(12):1401-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.12.1401.
PubMed 17895456Winkler D, Pjrek E, Moser U, Kasper S. Escitalopram in a working population: results from an observational study of 2378 outpatients in Austria. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2007 Jun;22(4):245-51. doi: 10.1002/hup.839.
PubMed 17443491Lam RW, Parikh SV, Ramasubbu R, Michalak EE, Tam EM, Axler A, Yatham LN, Kennedy SH, Manjunath CV. Effects of combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for improving work functioning in major depressive disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;203(5):358-65. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.125237. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
PubMed 24029535
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 May 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The WORKER Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Escitalopram and Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00702598
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H07-03029
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
- Keywords
- Depression, occupational function, rating scales, RCT, cognitive behaviour therapy, CBT, escitalopram, antidepressants
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2008
- Primary completion
- Apr 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jun 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will investigate the additional benefits of telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy (Tel-CBT) as added treatment to an antidepressant (escitalopram) in working people with major depressive disorder (MDD) versus treatment with escitalopram alone. Outcomes will include depression symptom rating scales and measures of work absence and productivity. The hypothesis is that Tel-CBT and escitalopram will result in better outcomes than escitalopram alone in working patients with MDD.
Detailed description
Rationale CBT is recognized as an effective psychological treatment for MDD. However, there are still considerable barriers to access CBT. Newer methods of delivering CBT, such as over the telephone (Tel-CBT), allow for greater access and convenience, at potentially lower cost. This is especially relevant for working people because the service can be delivered during evenings and weekends, so they do not need to leave work to attend clinic appointments. Ease of access is also important for rural settings where distance to health facilities can be a barrier to care. The ease of delivery of Tel-CBT, both in setup and maintenance costs, may also make it an important component of enhanced support for primary care. Preliminary studies have shown that addition of Tel-CBT leads to better outcomes than usual care alone (Simon et al, 2004; Wang et al, 2007).
This study will investigate the added value of Tel-CBT as adjunctive treatment to an antidepressant (escitalopram) in working people with MDD versus treatment with escitalopram alone, focusing on work-related outcomes. Escitalopram offers advantages as a first-choice treatment for depressed working people, given its superior efficacy compared to other antidepressants, excellent tolerability and simplicity of use for family physicians. Observational studies have shown significant reductions in sick leave when depressed patients are treated with escitalopram (Winkler et al, 2007). Outcome will be rigorously evaluated by assessing absenteeism and work productivity, response and remission rates, and quality of life, after acute (3 month) treatment and longer-term (6 month) follow-up.
Research Method This is a 6-month, multi-centre, single-blind (rater), randomized, parallel-design study to assess the efficacy of escitalopram and Tel-CBT in the treatment of working subjects with MDD, compared to treatment with escitalopram alone. A total of 150 depressed patients meeting entry criteria will be enrolled over a 1 year period.
Eligible patients will be treated with escitalopram 10-20 mg/d for the entire treatment period (6 months). Patients will be randomized to addition of telephone-based CBT with 8 sessions conducted over a 3 month period, or to a (placebo) control condition of reminder telephone calls. Outcomes (HAM-D, MADRS) will be primarily assessed over the telephone by raters blind to treatment assignment. Other outcome measures will be assessed by patient-rated questionnaires administered over the internet using a secure web site, and by ratings from the treating physician (CGI and adverse events).
Statistical Analysis All randomized subjects who have at least one follow-up visit will be included in the analysis based on intent-to-treat. Ineligible subjects who are inappropriately randomized will be excluded from the analysis. Missing data will be imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). For the analyses the treatment variables will remain coded and the analysts and investigators will remain blinded to variable identity during analysis and interpretation.
The pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint is the adjusted mean change from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks) in the HAM-D score using LOCF. All comparisons will be analyzed using ANCOVA adjusting for baseline value and centre. The secondary outcomes will also be analyzed using a similar analysis, when appropriate. Post hoc analyses will also examine observed case data. Categorical data (such as proportions of the sample with adverse events) will be analyzed using chi-square tests or Fisher's test where cell sizes warrant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Behavioral: Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT)Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: Telephone reminder callsTelephone reminder calls |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male and female outpatients aged 18-65 years.
- Patients will meet DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder as determined by the mood disorders section of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI, Sheehan et al, 1998).
- Currently employed (or off work for 2 weeks or less, and expecting to return to work at the start of study).
- A score of 18 or greater on the self-rated version of the MADRS, indicating at least moderately severe depression.
- Competency to give informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients on short-term (except for circumstances under Inclusion Criteria) or long-term disability.
- Pregnant women, lactating women and sexually active women of childbearing potential who are not using medically accepted means of contraception.
- Serious suicidal risks as judged by the study doctor.
- The following DSM-IV diagnoses (to ensure a homogenous diagnostic group): Organic mental disorders; Substance abuse/dependence, including alcohol, active within the last year; Schizophrenia, Paranoid or Delusional Disorders; Other Psychotic disorders; Panic disorder; Generalized Anxiety Disorder; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, if a primary diagnosis; Bipolar Disorder;Bulimia Nervosa; Anorexia Nervosa.
- Serious illness including cardiac, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrinologic, neurologic and hematologic disease that is not stabilized.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT)Telephone-based CBT: Eight sessions of telephone-based CBT (Tel-CBT) will be delivered over 8-10 weeks, based on a published manual (Simon et al, 2004). Tel-CBT has been modified to be briefer than traditional CBT (30-40 minutes instead of 60 minutes per session) and will be offered at convenient times (including evening sessions). The initial Tel-CBT session will occur within 2 weeks of randomization, with subsequent sessions occurring every 1-2 weeks depending on scheduling and patient preference. The initial session focuses on motivation enhancement exercises, subsequent sessions emphasize identifying, challenging and distancing from negative thoughts, and the final session focuses on a personal care plan and self-management skills. | Behavioural | 1 |
| Telephone reminder callsTelephone reminder calls: Weekly telephone calls for 8 weeks to inquire on progress and remind patients to take their medications properly | Behavioural | 2 |
Primary outcome
Change in adjusted HAM-D and MADRS scores at 3 month followup
Time frame: 6 months
1 secondary outcome
At 3 and 6 month followup: clinical response and remission rates, absenteeism and work productivity, adverse events, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 May 2012.
- Background: PubMed 15328325Simon GE, Ludman EJ, Tutty S, Operskalski B, Von Korff M. Telephone psychotherapy and telephone care management for primary care patients starting antidepressant treatment: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Aug 25;292(8):935-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.8.935.
- Background: PubMed 17895456Wang PS, Simon GE, Avorn J, Azocar F, Ludman EJ, McCulloch J, Petukhova MZ, Kessler RC. Telephone screening, outreach, and care management for depressed workers and impact on clinical and work productivity outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007 Sep 26;298(12):1401-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.12.1401.
- Background: PubMed 17443491Winkler D, Pjrek E, Moser U, Kasper S. Escitalopram in a working population: results from an observational study of 2378 outpatients in Austria. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2007 Jun;22(4):245-51. doi: 10.1002/hup.839.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24029535Lam RW, Parikh SV, Ramasubbu R, Michalak EE, Tam EM, Axler A, Yatham LN, Kennedy SH, Manjunath CV. Effects of combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for improving work functioning in major depressive disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;203(5):358-65. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.125237. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
Related trials for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
RecruitingPhase 1
Open-Label Psilocybin Study in Transdiagnostic Population
Transdiagnostic, Depression - Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Assessing of Behavioral Risk and Response to Electromagnetic and Psychedelic Therapies
PTSD, PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate TNX-102 SL Monotherapy Versus Placebo in Participants With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Major Depressive Episode (MDE), Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
RecruitingPhase 1
Mechanism of Action Underlying Ketamine's Antidepressant Effects: The AMPA Throughput Theory in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Major Depression
Depression, Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Acceptance and Committment Therapy Combined With Ketamine in Difficult-to-Treat Depression.
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Raymond W. Lam, MD, FRCPC principal investigator
University of British Columbia
Sagar V. Parikh study director
University of British Columbia
Erin E. Michalak study director
University of British Columbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) and Telephone reminder calls in people with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in adjusted HAM-D and MADRS scores at 3 month followup (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00702598, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2012.