AzTrials
AzTrials

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)NCT00702598

The WORKER Study: Escitalopram and Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) for Depressed Working People

A study testing Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) and Telephone reminder calls in people with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will investigate the additional benefits of telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy (Tel-CBT) as added treatment to an antidepressant (escitalopram) in working people with major depressive disorder (MDD) versus treatment with escitalopram alone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
What is being tested?
Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) and Telephone reminder calls
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
105 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jun 2008to Dec 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male and female outpatients aged 18-65 years.
  • Patients will meet DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder as determined by the mood disorders section of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI, Sheehan et al, 1998).
  • Currently employed (or off work for 2 weeks or less, and expecting to return to work at the start of study).
  • A score of 18 or greater on the self-rated version of the MADRS, indicating at least moderately severe depression.
  • Competency to give informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients on short-term (except for circumstances under Inclusion Criteria) or long-term disability.
  • Pregnant women, lactating women and sexually active women of childbearing potential who are not using medically accepted means of contraception.
  • Serious suicidal risks as judged by the study doctor.
  • The following DSM-IV diagnoses (to ensure a homogenous diagnostic group): Organic mental disorders; Substance abuse/dependence, including alcohol, active within the last year; Schizophrenia, Paranoid or Delusional Disorders; Other Psychotic disorders; Panic disorder; Generalized Anxiety Disorder; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, if a primary diagnosis; Bipolar Disorder;Bulimia Nervosa; Anorexia Nervosa.
  • Serious illness including cardiac, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrinologic, neurologic and hematologic disease that is not stabilized.
  • Regular or current use of other psychotropic drugs.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors within 14 days of Visit 1, fluoxetine within 5 weeks of Visit 1, and other antidepressants within 7 days of Visit 1 (to ensure adequate drug washouts prior to starting escitalopram).
  • Previous use of escitalopram.
  • Treatment resistance in the current episode, as defined by failure (lack of clinically significant response) of two or more antidepressants given at therapeutic doses for at least 6 weeks.
  • Patients who start formal psychotherapy (e.g. cognitive-behavioural or interpersonal psychotherapy) within 3 months of Visit 1, or who plan to initiate such psychotherapy during this study.
  • Patients involved in any other form of treatment for depression.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • UBC Hospital Mood Disorders Centre

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2A1

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: The WORKER Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Escitalopram and Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

This study will investigate the additional benefits of telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy (Tel-CBT) as added treatment to an antidepressant (escitalopram) in working people with major depressive disorder (MDD) versus treatment with escitalopram alone. Outcomes will include depression symptom rating scales and measures of work absence and productivity. The hypothesis is that Tel-CBT and escitalopram will result in better outcomes than escitalopram alone in working patients with MDD.

Read the detailed description

Rationale CBT is recognized as an effective psychological treatment for MDD. However, there are still considerable barriers to access CBT. Newer methods of delivering CBT, such as over the telephone (Tel-CBT), allow for greater access and convenience, at potentially lower cost. This is especially relevant for working people because the service can be delivered during evenings and weekends, so they do not need to leave work to attend clinic appointments. Ease of access is also important for rural settings where distance to health facilities can be a barrier to care. The ease of delivery of Tel-CBT, both in setup and maintenance costs, may also make it an important component of enhanced support for primary care. Preliminary studies have shown that addition of Tel-CBT leads to better outcomes than usual care alone (Simon et al, 2004; Wang et al, 2007).

This study will investigate the added value of Tel-CBT as adjunctive treatment to an antidepressant (escitalopram) in working people with MDD versus treatment with escitalopram alone, focusing on work-related outcomes. Escitalopram offers advantages as a first-choice treatment for depressed working people, given its superior efficacy compared to other antidepressants, excellent tolerability and simplicity of use for family physicians. Observational studies have shown significant reductions in sick leave when depressed patients are treated with escitalopram (Winkler et al, 2007). Outcome will be rigorously evaluated by assessing absenteeism and work productivity, response and remission rates, and quality of life, after acute (3 month) treatment and longer-term (6 month) follow-up.

Research Method This is a 6-month, multi-centre, single-blind (rater), randomized, parallel-design study to assess the efficacy of escitalopram and Tel-CBT in the treatment of working subjects with MDD, compared to treatment with escitalopram alone. A total of 150 depressed patients meeting entry criteria will be enrolled over a 1 year period.

Eligible patients will be treated with escitalopram 10-20 mg/d for the entire treatment period (6 months). Patients will be randomized to addition of telephone-based CBT with 8 sessions conducted over a 3 month period, or to a (placebo) control condition of reminder telephone calls. Outcomes (HAM-D, MADRS) will be primarily assessed over the telephone by raters blind to treatment assignment. Other outcome measures will be assessed by patient-rated questionnaires administered over the internet using a secure web site, and by ratings from the treating physician (CGI and adverse events).

Statistical Analysis All randomized subjects who have at least one follow-up visit will be included in the analysis based on intent-to-treat. Ineligible subjects who are inappropriately randomized will be excluded from the analysis. Missing data will be imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). For the analyses the treatment variables will remain coded and the analysts and investigators will remain blinded to variable identity during analysis and interpretation.

The pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint is the adjusted mean change from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks) in the HAM-D score using LOCF. All comparisons will be analyzed using ANCOVA adjusting for baseline value and centre. The secondary outcomes will also be analyzed using a similar analysis, when appropriate. Post hoc analyses will also examine observed case data. Categorical data (such as proportions of the sample with adverse events) will be analyzed using chi-square tests or Fisher's test where cell sizes warrant.

Being tested
Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT), Telephone reminder calls
Keywords
Depression, occupational function, rating scales, RCT, cognitive behaviour therapy, CBT, escitalopram, antidepressants
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Major, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT)Behavioural

    Telephone-based CBT: Eight sessions of telephone-based CBT (Tel-CBT) will be delivered over 8-10 weeks, based on a published manual (Simon et al, 2004). Tel-CBT has been modified to be briefer than traditional CBT (30-40 minutes instead of 60 minutes per session) and will be offered at convenient times (including evening sessions). The initial Tel-CBT session will occur within 2 weeks of randomization, with subsequent sessions occurring every 1-2 weeks depending on scheduling and patient preference. The initial session focuses on motivation enhancement exercises, subsequent sessions emphasize identifying, challenging and distancing from negative thoughts, and the final session focuses on a personal care plan and self-management skills.

  • Telephone reminder callsBehavioural

    Telephone reminder calls: Weekly telephone calls for 8 weeks to inquire on progress and remind patients to take their medications properly

Study groups in NCT00702598
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalTelephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Receives: Behavioral: Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT)
2Placebo comparatorTelephone reminder calls
Receives: Behavioral: Telephone reminder calls

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in adjusted HAM-D and MADRS scores at 3 month followup

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. At 3 and 6 month followup: clinical response and remission rates, absenteeism and work productivity, adverse events, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jun 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2008
  3. Primary completionApr 2011
  4. Study completionDec 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
105 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00702598
Sponsor's protocol ID
H07-03029
Status last verified
May 2012
First submitted
18 Jun 2008
Last updated
9 May 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Simon GE, Ludman EJ, Tutty S, Operskalski B, Von Korff M. Telephone psychotherapy and telephone care management for primary care patients starting antidepressant treatment: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Aug 25;292(8):935-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.8.935.

    PubMed 15328325
  • Wang PS, Simon GE, Avorn J, Azocar F, Ludman EJ, McCulloch J, Petukhova MZ, Kessler RC. Telephone screening, outreach, and care management for depressed workers and impact on clinical and work productivity outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007 Sep 26;298(12):1401-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.12.1401.

    PubMed 17895456
  • Winkler D, Pjrek E, Moser U, Kasper S. Escitalopram in a working population: results from an observational study of 2378 outpatients in Austria. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2007 Jun;22(4):245-51. doi: 10.1002/hup.839.

    PubMed 17443491
  • Lam RW, Parikh SV, Ramasubbu R, Michalak EE, Tam EM, Axler A, Yatham LN, Kennedy SH, Manjunath CV. Effects of combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for improving work functioning in major depressive disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;203(5):358-65. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.125237. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

    PubMed 24029535

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Telephone-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) and Telephone reminder calls in people with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in adjusted HAM-D and MADRS scores at 3 month followup (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00702598, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in