Breast CancerNCT00721058
Pre-operative Contrast Enhanced CT to Improve Delineation of the Tumorbed in Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer.
A study testing CT-scan in people with Breast Cancer, run by Maastricht Radiation Oncology at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Rationale: Whole breast irradiation with 50 Gy after lumpectomy has been shown to reduce the local recurrence rate with a factor 3 to 4. An additional boost of 16 Gy to the tumorbed has been shown to improve the local control rate even further. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- CT-scan
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Aug 2008to Oct 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligible for breast conserving therapy i.e. histologically proven breast cancer
- Operable disease
- Visible mass on mammography or ultrasound > 0.5 c
Who cannot join
- All contra-indications for breast conserving therapy, i.e. previous radiotherapy of the breast, multicentricity, inoperable disease, or too large tumor in a relatively too small breast, pregnancy.
- Contra-indications for intravenous contrast, i.e. iodine allergy, renal malfunction (kreatinine clearance < 60 ml/min), , previous allergic reaction to i.v. contrast, M. Kahler, use of NSAIDs, Diuretics or Metformine.
- Absence of tumor mass > 0.5 cm on conventional mammography or ultrasound
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Rationale: Whole breast irradiation with 50 Gy after lumpectomy has been shown to reduce the local recurrence rate with a factor 3 to 4. An additional boost of 16 Gy to the tumorbed has been shown to improve the local control rate even further. However, this boost dose appears to reduce not only the local recurrences in the tumorbed, but also elsewhere in the breast, suggesting that the boost may not always be delivered at the correct region. In addition, even with the boost dose of 16 Gy, the local recurrence rate in young patients is still quite high - with the majority of recurrences in the tumorbed. Consequently, further improvement of the local control, especially in young women, is still an important aim to pursue, in order to maintain breast conserving therapy (BCT) as an acceptable treatment option in young women. One way to improve local control may be to increase the dose [Young Boost Trial], but also to improve the definition of the tumorbed, i.e. the target volume for boost irradiation.
Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of incorporating a contrast-enhanced (CE)-CT-thorax in the target volume delineation process on 1) the coverage of the tumorbed by the 85% isodose, 2) the size of the irradiated boost volumes, and 3) the interobserver variation in target volume delineation.
Read more
Study design: A CE-CT scan of the thorax will be made prior to surgery, with the patient in radiation treatment position. After breast conserving surgery, patients will be referred for post-operative radiotherapy according to the standard guidelines. Prior to radiotherapy, a standard CT thorax scan will be made for treatment planning.
The planning target volume (PTV) for the boost will be delineated according to the MAASTRO protocol, by three independent observers (PTV-1A-C), using the planning CT only. Delineation of the boost will be repeated after 3D registration of the pre-operative CT scan with the planning CT-scan (PTV-2A-C). Thereafter, consensus will be obtained for the PTV-1A-C and the PTV-2A-C, resulting in one PTV-1 and one PTV-2 for each patient. Radiation treatment plans (RT-plans) will subsequently be designed for PTV-1 and PTV-2. Coverage of the treatment plans by the 85% isodose for both PTV-1- and PTV-2, and the irradiated volumes (percentage of the volume receiving 95% or more (V95)) will be calculated. Patients will be treated with the treatment plan for PTV-2.
Study population: 60 breast cancer patients, to be treated with BCT, with a mass visible on mammography and/or ultrasound > 0.5 cm, without contraindications for a CE-CT-thorax scan will be included.
Intervention: < 3 weeks prior to lumpectomy a CE-CT-thorax scan will be made of the entire thorax, with the patient in the same position as planned during the post-operative radiotherapy. Intravenous contrast will be given according to the standard thorax protocol of MAASTRO clinic.
Main study parameters/endpoints:
Primary endpoints are:
- The percentage of the PTV-2 receiving < 85% of the dose, if treated with the RT-plan for PTV-1.
- Difference in V95 for the RT-plan designed for PTV-1- versus for PTV-2. Other endpoints will be interobserver variation, as measured by 1) percent volume overlap; 2) difference in standard deviation of the average PTV-1 and PTV-2; 3) center of mass assay.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will only be included after written informed consent. The preoperative CE-CT-thorax-scan yields little additional radiation exposure, which will however be negligible compared to the radiation treatment to be given because of the breast cancer. In addition, there is a small risk on an allergic reaction to the intravenous contrast, and on renal complications. Therefore, renal function will be checked prior to giving contrast. A kreatinine clearance < 60 ml/min will be a contra-indication for contrast. The pre-operative CT-scan will be made in MAASTRO clinic, requiring an additional visit to MAASTRO clinic. A possible benefit may be that the pre-operative CE-CT thorax may improve the definition of the target volume, and thereby reduce the risk on a local recurrence.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- CT-scan
- Keywords
- Eligible, Operable, Disease, Conserving, Therapy, Visible mass on mammography, Ultrasound > 0.5 cm, Histologically, Proven
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CT-scanOther
A pre-operative CT-scan will be made
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other | Not described Receives: Other: CT-scan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The percentage of the PTV-2 receiving < 85% of the dose, if treated with the RT-plan for PTV-1.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Difference in V95 for the RT-plan designed for PTV-1- versus for PTV-2
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2008
- Primary completionOct 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Atrium Medical Center, Maasland Hospital, Maastricht University Medical Center
- Investigators
- Liesbeth Boersma, Principal investigator, Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00721058
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Delineation of tumourbed mamma
- Status last verified
- Jan 2010
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2008
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pre-operative Contrast Enhanced CT to Improve Delineation of the Tumorbed in Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00721058
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Delineation of tumourbed mamma
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Eligible, Operable, Disease, Conserving, Therapy, Visible mass on mammography, Ultrasound > 0.5 cm, Histologically
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht Radiation OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Atrium Medical Center, Maasland Hospital, Maastricht University Medical Center
- Study start
- Aug 2008
- Primary completion
- Oct 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jul 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rationale: Whole breast irradiation with 50 Gy after lumpectomy has been shown to reduce the local recurrence rate with a factor 3 to 4. An additional boost of 16 Gy to the tumorbed has been shown to improve the local control rate even further. However, this boost dose appears to reduce not only the local recurrences in the tumorbed, but also elsewhere in the breast, suggesting that the boost may not always be delivered at the correct region. In addition, even with the boost dose of 16 Gy, the local recurrence rate in young patients is still quite high - with the majority of recurrences in the tumorbed. Consequently, further improvement of the local control, especially in young women, is still an important aim to pursue, in order to maintain breast conserving therapy (BCT) as an acceptable treatment option in young women. One way to improve local control may be to increase the dose [Young Boost Trial], but also to improve the definition of the tumorbed, i.e. the target volume for boost irradiation.
Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of incorporating a contrast-enhanced (CE)-CT-thorax in the target volume delineation process on 1) the coverage of the tumorbed by the 85% isodose, 2) the size of the irradiated boost volumes, and 3) the interobserver variation in target volume delineation.
Study design: A CE-CT scan of the thorax will be made prior to surgery, with the patient in radiation treatment position. After breast conserving surgery, patients will be referred for post-operative radiotherapy according to the standard guidelines. Prior to radiotherapy, a standard CT thorax scan will be made for treatment planning.
The planning target volume (PTV) for the boost will be delineated according to the MAASTRO protocol, by three independent observers (PTV-1A-C), using the planning CT only. Delineation of the boost will be repeated after 3D registration of the pre-operative CT scan with the planning CT-scan (PTV-2A-C). Thereafter, consensus will be obtained for the PTV-1A-C and the PTV-2A-C, resulting in one PTV-1 and one PTV-2 for each patient. Radiation treatment plans (RT-plans) will subsequently be designed for PTV-1 and PTV-2. Coverage of the treatment plans by the 85% isodose for both PTV-1- and PTV-2, and the irradiated volumes (percentage of the volume receiving 95% or more (V95)) will be calculated. Patients will be treated with the treatment plan for PTV-2.
Study population: 60 breast cancer patients, to be treated with BCT, with a mass visible on mammography and/or ultrasound > 0.5 cm, without contraindications for a CE-CT-thorax scan will be included.
Intervention: < 3 weeks prior to lumpectomy a CE-CT-thorax scan will be made of the entire thorax, with the patient in the same position as planned during the post-operative radiotherapy. Intravenous contrast will be given according to the standard thorax protocol of MAASTRO clinic.
Main study parameters/endpoints:
Primary endpoints are:
- The percentage of the PTV-2 receiving < 85% of the dose, if treated with the RT-plan for PTV-1.
- Difference in V95 for the RT-plan designed for PTV-1- versus for PTV-2. Other endpoints will be interobserver variation, as measured by 1) percent volume overlap; 2) difference in standard deviation of the average PTV-1 and PTV-2; 3) center of mass assay.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will only be included after written informed consent. The preoperative CE-CT-thorax-scan yields little additional radiation exposure, which will however be negligible compared to the radiation treatment to be given because of the breast cancer. In addition, there is a small risk on an allergic reaction to the intravenous contrast, and on renal complications. Therefore, renal function will be checked prior to giving contrast. A kreatinine clearance < 60 ml/min will be a contra-indication for contrast. The pre-operative CT-scan will be made in MAASTRO clinic, requiring an additional visit to MAASTRO clinic. A possible benefit may be that the pre-operative CE-CT thorax may improve the definition of the target volume, and thereby reduce the risk on a local recurrence.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other | Other: CT-scan |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Eligible for breast conserving therapy i.e. histologically proven breast cancer
- Operable disease
- Visible mass on mammography or ultrasound > 0.5 c
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- All contra-indications for breast conserving therapy, i.e. previous radiotherapy of the breast, multicentricity, inoperable disease, or too large tumor in a relatively too small breast, pregnancy.
- Contra-indications for intravenous contrast, i.e. iodine allergy, renal malfunction (kreatinine clearance < 60 ml/min), , previous allergic reaction to i.v. contrast, M. Kahler, use of NSAIDs, Diuretics or Metformine.
- Absence of tumor mass > 0.5 cm on conventional mammography or ultrasound
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CT-scanA pre-operative CT-scan will be made | Other | 1 |
Primary outcome
The percentage of the PTV-2 receiving < 85% of the dose, if treated with the RT-plan for PTV-1.
Time frame: 1 year
1 secondary outcome
Difference in V95 for the RT-plan designed for PTV-1- versus for PTV-2
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2010.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Liesbeth Boersma principal investigator
Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CT-scan in people with Breast Cancer, run by Maastricht Radiation Oncology at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The percentage of the PTV-2 receiving < 85% of the dose, if treated with the RT-plan for PTV-1. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2010.