PainNCT00738608
Etoricoxib as a Pre-emptive Analgesic in Therapeutic Arthroscopy
An observational study of Pain, run by Marienkrankenhaus Soest at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to demonstrate that compared to placebo the preoperative administration of a single dose of 120 mg etoricoxib can provide adequate pain relief in the postoperative phase while reducing the need for systemic opioids. The primary endpoint is the decrease of systemic opioid use. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Jun 2006to Sep 2009
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 66 pat. with knee arthrosocpy
Who may be able to join
- Knee arthroscopy
Who cannot join
- Opiate addiction
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Known hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients of the film tablet
- Active peptic ulcer or active gastrointestinal bleeding, inflammatory bowel disease, severe hepatic dysfunction (serum albumin <25 g/l or Child-Pugh score ≥10).
- Further exclusion criteria are congestive heart failure (NYHA II-IV), hypertension with not adequately controlled blood pressure, established ischemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and/or cerebrovascular disease.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aim of this study is to demonstrate that compared to placebo the preoperative administration of a single dose of 120 mg etoricoxib can provide adequate pain relief in the postoperative phase while reducing the need for systemic opioids. The primary endpoint is the decrease of systemic opioid use.
Read the detailed description
Depending on the pain intensity, various analgesics are used in the prevention of surgical wound pain. For severe pain, opioids like piritramide and morphine are used. These can be given at fixed intervals, continuously, as required or by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The method used depends on the equipment and supervision available and on the patient's cooperation. However, with all the methods of administration mentioned there is a risk of respiratory depression because strong opioids are used. Weak opioids like tramadol can be given as alternatives to piritramide and morphine, a combination of tramadol and metamizol having proven effective. Often an antiemetic is given as well, as many patients who receive the combination experience nausea and vomiting. For mild pain metamizol or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) is often sufficient on its own.
As some controversy is attached to the use of metamizol because of the risk of agranulocytosis (metamizol was withdrawn from the Scandinavian market in 1999), some hospitals do not use the drug. The use of NSAIDs is likewise problematic. They can cause, for example, gastric ulcers in predisposed patients. In the setting of the stress accompanying surgery, however, even previously unremarkable patients can quickly develop stress ulcers. Another problem with NSAIDs is that they affect blood clotting to various extents by inhibiting platelet aggregation. This aspect is particularly crucial in the early treatment of postoperative pain when intact blood clotting is essential. An ideal analgesic for postoperative pain would not induce respiratory depression nor affect blood clotting nor cause gastric ulcers. Because inhibiting the enzyme cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) increases the effects on the gastric mucosa and on platelet aggregation, an analgesic should selectively inhibit only the enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), which mediates inflammatory processes. This is the rationale behind using COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of acute pain. With selective COX-2-inhibiting analgesics it is possible to inhibit inflammatory processes without favoring the occurrence of clotting disturbances or gastric mucosal lesions. Such an analgesic is available in the form of etoricoxib, which exhibits greater COX-2 selectivity than other coxibs so far approved. Etoricoxib has mainly been used for the treatment of pain associated with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis pain and for chronic pain (lower back pain). However, coxibs have also been used with impressive results in the treatment of acute peri- and postoperative pain. Thus, a 50 mg preoperative dose of rofecoxib not only significantly decreased the postoperative need for analgesics but also reduced postoperative pain.
Etoricoxib exhibits similar properties to rofecoxib. It is already approved for the treatment of acute pain in Australia, Latin America (except Argentina), Mexico, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Indonesia. The preoperative use of Etoricoxib could provide reliable analgesia in the postoperative phase with a potency comparable to that of NSAIDs and other coxibs but without affecting blood clotting processes or favoring the occurrence of gastric ulcers
- Conditions
- Pain
- Keywords
- morphine, consumption, postoperative, pain, Pain during 24h postoperative, Morphine consumption in 24h postoperative
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33 pat. with verum | |
| 2 | 33 Pat. with placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain
Measured: 24h
Secondary outcomes (1)
Pain drugs
Measured: 24h
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2006
- Primary completionAug 2009
- Study completionSep 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Marienkrankenhaus Soest
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Peter Lierz, MD, Study chair, Marienkrankenhaus Soest
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00738608
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2006-000451-17
- Status last verified
- Sep 2009
- First submitted
- 18 Aug 2008
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Etoricoxib as a Pre-emptive Analgesic in Therapeutic Arthroscopy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00738608
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2006-000451-17
- Conditions
- Pain
- Keywords
- morphine, consumption, postoperative, pain, Pain during 24h postoperative, Morphine consumption in 24h postoperative
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Marienkrankenhaus SoestUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2006
- Primary completion
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to demonstrate that compared to placebo the preoperative administration of a single dose of 120 mg etoricoxib can provide adequate pain relief in the postoperative phase while reducing the need for systemic opioids. The primary endpoint is the decrease of systemic opioid use.
Detailed description
Depending on the pain intensity, various analgesics are used in the prevention of surgical wound pain. For severe pain, opioids like piritramide and morphine are used. These can be given at fixed intervals, continuously, as required or by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The method used depends on the equipment and supervision available and on the patient's cooperation. However, with all the methods of administration mentioned there is a risk of respiratory depression because strong opioids are used. Weak opioids like tramadol can be given as alternatives to piritramide and morphine, a combination of tramadol and metamizol having proven effective. Often an antiemetic is given as well, as many patients who receive the combination experience nausea and vomiting. For mild pain metamizol or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) is often sufficient on its own.
As some controversy is attached to the use of metamizol because of the risk of agranulocytosis (metamizol was withdrawn from the Scandinavian market in 1999), some hospitals do not use the drug. The use of NSAIDs is likewise problematic. They can cause, for example, gastric ulcers in predisposed patients. In the setting of the stress accompanying surgery, however, even previously unremarkable patients can quickly develop stress ulcers. Another problem with NSAIDs is that they affect blood clotting to various extents by inhibiting platelet aggregation. This aspect is particularly crucial in the early treatment of postoperative pain when intact blood clotting is essential. An ideal analgesic for postoperative pain would not induce respiratory depression nor affect blood clotting nor cause gastric ulcers. Because inhibiting the enzyme cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) increases the effects on the gastric mucosa and on platelet aggregation, an analgesic should selectively inhibit only the enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), which mediates inflammatory processes. This is the rationale behind using COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of acute pain. With selective COX-2-inhibiting analgesics it is possible to inhibit inflammatory processes without favoring the occurrence of clotting disturbances or gastric mucosal lesions. Such an analgesic is available in the form of etoricoxib, which exhibits greater COX-2 selectivity than other coxibs so far approved. Etoricoxib has mainly been used for the treatment of pain associated with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis pain and for chronic pain (lower back pain). However, coxibs have also been used with impressive results in the treatment of acute peri- and postoperative pain. Thus, a 50 mg preoperative dose of rofecoxib not only significantly decreased the postoperative need for analgesics but also reduced postoperative pain.
Etoricoxib exhibits similar properties to rofecoxib. It is already approved for the treatment of acute pain in Australia, Latin America (except Argentina), Mexico, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Indonesia. The preoperative use of Etoricoxib could provide reliable analgesia in the postoperative phase with a potency comparable to that of NSAIDs and other coxibs but without affecting blood clotting processes or favoring the occurrence of gastric ulcers
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | –33 pat. with verum |
| 2 | – | –33 Pat. with placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 66 pat. with knee arthrosocpy
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Knee arthroscopy
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Opiate addiction
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Known hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients of the film tablet
- Active peptic ulcer or active gastrointestinal bleeding, inflammatory bowel disease, severe hepatic dysfunction (serum albumin <25 g/l or Child-Pugh score ≥10).
- Further exclusion criteria are congestive heart failure (NYHA II-IV), hypertension with not adequately controlled blood pressure, established ischemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and/or cerebrovascular disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Pain
Time frame: 24h
1 secondary outcome
Pain drugs
Time frame: 24h
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2009.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter Lierz, MD study chair
Marienkrankenhaus Soest
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pain, run by Marienkrankenhaus Soest at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain (time frame: 24h). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2009.