Generalized Anxiety DisorderPhase 3NCT00744627
Efficacy and Safety of Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) for Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Adults.
A Phase 3 study testing Vortioxetine in people with Generalized Anxiety Disorder, run by Takeda at 38 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vortioxetine, once daily (QD), in adults with Generalized Anxiety Disorders. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Vortioxetine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 301 participants
- Where
- 38 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2008to Jul 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Suffers from a primary diagnosis of Generalized Anxiety Disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria.
- Has a Hamilton Anxiety Scale total score ≥20 at Screening and Baseline.
- Has a Hamilton Anxiety Scale score ≥2 on both Item 1 (anxious mood) and Item 2 (tension) at Screening and Baseline.
- Has a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score ≤16 at Screening and Baseline.
- Male and females of childbearing potential who are sexually active agree to use adequate contraception from Screening throughout the duration of the study and for 1 month after the last dose of study medication.
Who cannot join
- Has received any investigational compound <30 days before Screening or 5 half-lives prior to Screening.
- Has received Lu AA21004 in a previous clinical study or as a therapeutic agent.
- Has 1 or more of the following:
- Any current psychiatric disorder other than Generalized Anxiety Disorder as defined in the DSM-IV-TR.
- Current or past history of: manic or hypomanic episode, schizophrenia or any other psychotic disorder, including major depression with psychotic features, mental retardation, organic mental disorders, or mental disorders due to a general medical condition as defined in the DSM-IV-TR.
- Any substance disorder (except nicotine and caffeine) within the previous 6 months as defined in the DSM-IV-TR.
Show all 37Show fewer
- Presence or history of a clinically significant neurological disorder (including epilepsy).
- Neurodegenerative disorder (Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, Huntington disease, etc).
- Any Axis II disorder that might compromise the study.
- Is required to take excluded medications or it is anticipated that the participant will require treatment with at least 1 of the disallowed concomitant medications during the study including:
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- Rifampin
- Macrolide antibiotics
- Hormones
- Hypoglycemic agents and Insulin
- Systemic steroids
- Antineoplastics
- Antiobesity agents
- Antidiarrheal agents (episodic use allowed)
- Antifungal agents (episodic topical use allowed)
- Antihistamines (episodic use of loratadine, desloratadine, cetirizine allowed)
- Cough/cold agents (episodic use allowed but preparations containing pseudoephedrine and narcotics are NOT allowed)
- Diuretics (episodic use allowed)
- Has a significant risk of suicide according to the investigator's opinion or has a score ≥5 on item 10 (suicidal thoughts) of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale or has made a suicide attempt in the previous 6 months.
- Has previously failed to respond to adequate treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and/or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.
- Has received electroconvulsive therapy within 6 months prior to Screening.
- Is currently receiving formal cognitive or behavioral therapy, systematic psychotherapy, or plans to initiate such therapy during the study.
- Has a clinically significant unstable illness, for example, hepatic impairment or renal insufficiency, or a cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurological, rheumatologic, immunologic, infectious, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, or metabolic disturbance.
- Has an alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase or bilirubin level >1.5 times the upper limits of normal.
- Has a serum creatinine of >1.5 times the upper limits of normal.
- Has a previous history of cancer that had been in remission for less than 5 years prior to the first dose of study medication. This criterion does not include those participants with basal cell or stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
- Has clinically significant abnormal vital signs as determined by the investigator.
- Has 1 or more laboratory values outside the normal range, based on the blood or urine samples taken at Screening, that are considered by the investigator to be clinically significant.
- Has thyroid stimulating hormone value outside the normal range at Screening and is deemed clinically significant by the investigator.
- Has an abnormal electrocardiogram as determined by the central reader and confirmed as clinically significant by the investigator.
- Has a disease or takes medication that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the assessments of safety, tolerability, or efficacy.
- Has previously participated in this study.
Trial locations and contacts
38 sites in 8 countries.
38 sites in 8 countries
Russia9 sites
Study site
Kazan'
Study site
Lipetsk
Study site
Moscow
Study site
Rostov-on-Don
Study site
Saint Petersburg
Study site
Samara
Study site
Smolensk
Study site
Stavropol
Study site
Yekaterinburg
Germany7 sites
Study site
Bad Saarow
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Bochum
Study site
Hüttenberg
Study site
Rodgau
Study site
Schwerin
Study site
Wiesbaden
Poland7 sites
Study site
Bialystok
Study site
Gdynia
Study site
Gorlice
Study site
Leszno
Study site
Skórzewo
Study site
Torun
Study site
Tuszyn
Ukraine5 sites
Study site
Dnipro
Study site
Kharkiv
Study site
Liev
Study site
Luhansk
Study site
Simferopol
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose of Lu AA21004 in Acute Treatment of Adults With Generalized Anxiety Disorder
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vortioxetine, once daily (QD), in adults with Generalized Anxiety Disorders.
Read the detailed description
The drug that was tested in this study is called Vortioxetine. Vortioxetine is being tested to treat anxiety in adults who have general anxiety disorder (GAD). This study looked at GAD relief in people who took vortioxetine.
The study enrolled 301 patients. Participants were randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of the two treatment groups-which remained undisclosed to the patient and study doctor during the study (unless there was an urgent medical need):
- Vortioxetine 5 mg
- Placebo (dummy inactive pill) - this was a capsule that looked like the study drug but had no active ingredient.
All participants were asked to take one capsule at the same time each day throughout the study.
This multi-center trial was conducted in Europe. The overall time to participate in this study was up to 13 weeks. Participants made 7 visits to the clinic, and were contacted by telephone 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug for a follow-up assessment.
- Conditions
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder
- Being tested
- Vortioxetine, Placebo
- Keywords
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Anxiety Disorders, Drug Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VortioxetineDrug
Also called Lu AA21004, Brintellix®
Encapsulated vortioxetine immediate-release tablets.
PlaceboDrug
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Vortioxetine 5 mg | Experimental | Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. Receives: Drug: Vortioxetine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 8
The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56 where <17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. Least Squares (LS) means were from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Week 8
Secondary outcomes (24)
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Week 8
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety sub-scale consists of 7 items that are assessed on a scale from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety). The anxiety subscale determines a state of generalized anxiety including anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts and panic attacks. Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21 (maximal severity). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Week 8
Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Week 8
The Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement scale assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician relative to Baseline on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. LS means were from a MMRM with baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Week 8
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 8
The Sheehan Disability Scale assesses functional impairment in 3 domains: work/school, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each aspect is impaired on a 10-point visual analog scale, from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The 3 scores are added together to calculate the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more impairment. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Week 8
Percentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Week 8
Response was defined as participants with a ≥ 50% decrease from Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) total score. The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 56 (maximum severity).
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 8 in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25
The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56 where <17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Week 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Week 8
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The social functioning subscale assesses limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Week 8
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56 where <17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6.
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Other Weeks Assessed
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety sub-scale consists of 7 items that are assessed on a scale from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety). The anxiety subscale determines a state of generalized anxiety including anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts and panic attacks. Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21 (maximal severity). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1 and 4
Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks Assessed
The Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement scale assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician relative to Baseline on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
The Sheehan Disability Scale assesses functional impairment in 3 domains: work/school, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each aspect is impaired on a 10-point visual analog scale, from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The 3 scores are added together to calculate the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more impairment. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2 and 4
Percentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Response was defined as participants with a ≥ 50% decrease from Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) total score. The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 56 (maximum severity).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25
The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56 where <17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6
Percentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week Assessed
Remission is defined as a Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) total score ≤ 7. The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 56 (maximum severity).
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week Assessed
The Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of mental illness on the following scale: 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Depression Subscale at Each Week Assessed
The HAD-Depression subscale is completed by the participant and measures depression, focusing on the state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response. The subscale is made up of 7 items that are assessed on a scale from 0 (no depression) to 3 (severe feeling of depression). Participants are required to indicate the response which most accurately reflects the way they have felt over the last few days. The item scores are summed and the total subscore ranges from 0 to 21 (maximal severity). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Other Weeks Assessed
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The social functioning subscale assesses limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at Each Week Assessed
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The physical functioning subscale assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at Each Week Assessed
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The role-physical subscale assesses limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at Each Week Assessed
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The bodily pain sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at Each Week Assessed
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The general health sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at Each Week Assessed
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The vitality sub-score assesses energy and fatigue, and ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at Each Week Assessed
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The role-emotional subscale assesses limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at Each Week Assessed
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The mental health sub-score assesses general mental health (psychological distress and well-being) and ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Health Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire
Healthcare resource utilization was assessed by the Health Economic Assessment (HEA) questionnaire, which monitors the participants absenteeism from work, as well as resource use such as visits to a general practitioner, outpatient and inpatient services, hospitalization, medications, and other relevant services over the past 8 weeks.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2008
- Primary completionJul 2009
- Study completionJul 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Generalized Anxiety DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by TakedaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 301 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Takeda
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Clinical Science, Study director, Takeda
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00744627
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LuAA21004_311
- Other IDs
- 2008-001766-90, U1111-1112-3487, 2008
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 29 Aug 2008
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Bidzan L, Mahableshwarkar AR, Jacobsen P, Yan M, Sheehan DV. Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in generalized anxiety disorder: results of an 8-week, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012 Dec;22(12):847-57. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
PubMed 22898365Christensen MC, Loft H, Florea I, McIntyre RS. Efficacy of vortioxetine in working patients with generalized anxiety disorder. CNS Spectr. 2019 Apr;24(2):249-257. doi: 10.1017/S1092852917000761. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
PubMed 29081307
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose of Lu AA21004 in Acute Treatment of Adults With Generalized Anxiety Disorder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00744627
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LuAA21004_311
- Conditions
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder
- Keywords
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Anxiety Disorders, Drug Therapy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 301 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- TakedaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- Study start
- Sep 2008
- Primary completion
- Jul 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Mar 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vortioxetine, once daily (QD), in adults with Generalized Anxiety Disorders.
Detailed description
The drug that was tested in this study is called Vortioxetine. Vortioxetine is being tested to treat anxiety in adults who have general anxiety disorder (GAD). This study looked at GAD relief in people who took vortioxetine.
The study enrolled 301 patients. Participants were randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of the two treatment groups-which remained undisclosed to the patient and study doctor during the study (unless there was an urgent medical need):
- Vortioxetine 5 mg
- Placebo (dummy inactive pill) - this was a capsule that looked like the study drug but had no active ingredient.
All participants were asked to take one capsule at the same time each day throughout the study.
This multi-center trial was conducted in Europe. The overall time to participate in this study was up to 13 weeks. Participants made 7 visits to the clinic, and were contacted by telephone 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug for a follow-up assessment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboVortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
| Vortioxetine 5 mg | Experimental | Drug: VortioxetineVortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Suffers from a primary diagnosis of Generalized Anxiety Disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria.
- Has a Hamilton Anxiety Scale total score ≥20 at Screening and Baseline.
- Has a Hamilton Anxiety Scale score ≥2 on both Item 1 (anxious mood) and Item 2 (tension) at Screening and Baseline.
- Has a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score ≤16 at Screening and Baseline.
- Male and females of childbearing potential who are sexually active agree to use adequate contraception from Screening throughout the duration of the study and for 1 month after the last dose of study medication.
Key exclusion criteria (37 listed)
- Has received any investigational compound <30 days before Screening or 5 half-lives prior to Screening.
- Has received Lu AA21004 in a previous clinical study or as a therapeutic agent.
- Has 1 or more of the following:
- Is required to take excluded medications or it is anticipated that the participant will require treatment with at least 1 of the disallowed concomitant medications during the study including:
- Has a significant risk of suicide according to the investigator's opinion or has a score ≥5 on item 10 (suicidal thoughts) of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale or has made a suicide attempt in the previous 6 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VortioxetineAlso: Lu AA21004, Brintellix®Encapsulated vortioxetine immediate-release tablets. | Drug | Vortioxetine 5 mg |
| PlaceboVortioxetine placebo-matching capsules | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56 where <17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. Least Squares (LS) means were from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
24 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Percentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 8 in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6.
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Other Weeks Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1 and 4
Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2 and 4
Percentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6
Percentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week Assessed
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Depression Subscale at Each Week Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Other Weeks Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at Each Week Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at Each Week Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at Each Week Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at Each Week Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at Each Week Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at Each Week Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at Each Week Assessed
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Health Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 22898365Bidzan L, Mahableshwarkar AR, Jacobsen P, Yan M, Sheehan DV. Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in generalized anxiety disorder: results of an 8-week, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012 Dec;22(12):847-57. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29081307Christensen MC, Loft H, Florea I, McIntyre RS. Efficacy of vortioxetine in working patients with generalized anxiety disorder. CNS Spectr. 2019 Apr;24(2):249-257. doi: 10.1017/S1092852917000761. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
Related trials for Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
RecruitingObservational study
Student Precarity and Psychiatry
Depressive Disorder, Major, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Active, not recruitingObservational study
BreathinG-induced Myocardial and Cerebral Perfusion in Anxiety Disorders
Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Oxygenation Sensitive CMR
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Asses Safety and Tolerability of ITI-1284 Given Alone or as an Additional Treatment in Participants With Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of JNJ-99245354 (ITI-1284) as an Adjunctive Treatment in Participants With Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) Who Have an Inadequate Response to GAD Treatment
Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director, Clinical Science study director
Takeda
38 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Vortioxetine in people with Generalized Anxiety Disorder, run by Takeda at 38 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 37 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 38 sites in Russia, Germany, Poland, Ukraine, Latvia and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Mar 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 8 (time frame: Baseline to Week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00744627, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2014.