OsteoporosisPhase 3NCT00757393
Growth Hormone Therapy and Bone Quality in Pediatric Osteoporosis
A Phase 3 study testing Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program and Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program + Humatrope in people with Osteoporosis, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that growth hormone, administered daily by subcutaneous injection for 2 years will result in a significantly greater BMD Z-score over optimal standard therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 16 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoporosis
- What is being tested?
- Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program and Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program + Humatrope
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Sep 2008to Sep 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 16 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Adynamic form of osteoporosis based on bone biopsy findings
- Age range 5-16 years
- Willingness to comply with the protocol
- Underlying primary disorder (when present) in a maintenance phase of treatment and the patient considered to be clinically stable
Who cannot join
- Previous treatment with an antiresorptive agent within 1 year of commencement of the study
- Unstable primary disorder (when present)
- Significant psychosocial difficulties that will likely preclude compliance with the protocol
- Any contraindication to the use of growth hormone
- Patients with severe osteoporosis and past medical history of malignancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The primary objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that growth hormone, administered daily by subcutaneous injection for 2 years will result in a significantly greater BMD Z-score over optimal standard therapy.
Read the detailed description
Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by a parallel loss of bone mineral and matrix which results in enhanced bone fragility and an increased risk of fractures. The associated fractures, and the morbidity and mortality that ensue, make osteoporosis a public health problem of enormous proportions. Clinical and research observations strongly suggest that most adult osteoporosis has its roots in childhood and have identified both genetic and environmental factors as central to the pathogenesis of this disorder.
Osteoporosis is not only a major public health problem in the adult population but is increasingly diagnosed during childhood. Most cases are secondary to chronic illnesses (secondary osteoporosis). In chronically ill children several factors, in addition to the underlying chronic illness itself, may predispose to either reduced bone mass or impairment of bone quality. Osteoporosis in the otherwise healthy child (primary osteoporosis) is generally classified as either osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) or juvenile idiopathic osteoporosis (JIO).
Optimizing Vitamin D and calcium intake as well as a weight bearing exercise program are central approaches in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Despite increased awareness of this disorder in the pediatric population and more active implementation of these principles, an ever increasing number of children with osteoporosis present with symptomatic disease; that is progress to the stage of frequent peripheral fractures, vertebral compression fracture and/or deliberating pain. Bisphosphonates are often then added to the therapeutic regiment. However, it is widely acknowledged that little is currently known about the key factors that might predict the safe and effective use of these agents in this population.
Children whose bone biopsy results indicate an adynamic form of osteoporosis and who have low bone turnover markers make up a significant number of the children with symptomatic osteoporosis. Many of these patients have in addition growth failure (due to prolonged glucocorticoid usage and chronic illness) and some may have low growth hormone secretion. In this circumstance, the agent of choice would be an anabolic agent known to increase osteoblast activity, normalize histomorphometric parameters and improve bone quality. Unfortunately, one of the most promising of these agents, recombinant PTH (Teripeptide) is precluded from use in pediatric patients because of concerns regarding induction of osteosarcoma. It is unclear to what extent antiresorptive therapy might achieve these goals, although it has become the therapy of choice by default.
The Growth hormone (GH)/IGFI- axis plays a central role in longitudinal bone growth as well as in the acquisition and maintenance of bone mass in children. Studies, in both growth hormone excess and deficiency, suggest that growth hormone may be useful as an anabolic agent in children with osteoporosis. In acromegaly, bone turnover markers indicate activation of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Both markers correlate with circulating GH and IGF-1 levels. IGF-1 levels are increased in cortical bone suggesting that the anabolic actions of GH are mediated by local production. The impact on bone density in unclear, as some studies show no differences from healthy controls. However, other studies indicate an increase in cortical bone mass while trabecular mass appears to be unchanged or somewhat reduced. Furthermore rates appear not to be increased.
The Growth hormone (GH)/IGFI-axis plays a central role in the longitudinal bone growth as well as in the acquisition and maintenance of bone mass in children. Studies, in both growth hormone excess and deficiency, suggest that growth hormone may be useful as an anabolic agent in children with osteoporosis. Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is recognized to result in reduced bone mass, decreased bone turnover markers, secondary osteoporosis and increased fracture rate. Epidemiological studies suggest that GHD alone may explain the increased fracture rate seen in these patients. Treatment of GHD patients with GH results in an increase in turnover markers. While short-term studies showed little improvement in bone mass, longer term studies with treatment periods of 2 years or more have shown significant increases in bone mass.
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis
- Being tested
- Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program, Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program + Humatrope
- Keywords
- Growth hormone, Pediatrics, Vitamin D, Calcium, Exercise
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise programDietary supplement
Subjects is this arm of the study will receive a) a supplementation with vitamin D3, 1000 IU daily b) a dietary calcium intake set at DRI for age and a supplement used as needed to meet the requirement and c) a weight bearing exercise program appropriate for the underlying medical condition
Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program + HumatropeDrug
Also called Growth Hormone
Subjects in this arm will receive the same as those in arm 1 as well as Humatrope by subcutaneous infection 7 days a week at a dose of 0.05 mg.kg/day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program |
| 2 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program + Humatrope |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Test the hypothesis that growth hormone administered daily by subcutaneous injection for 2 years will result in a significantly greater BMD Z-score over optimal standard therapy
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Test the hypothesis that subcutaneous growth hormone administration will significantly improve and/or normalize baseline values of fracture frequency
Measured: 2 years
Test the hypothesis that subcutaneous growth hormone administration will significantly improve and/or normalize baseline values of bone histomorphometric measures osteoid volume, surface, and width
Measured: 2 years
Test the hypothesis that subcutaneous growth hormone administration will significantly improve and/or normalize baseline measures of bone quality
Measured: 2 years
Test the hypothesis that subcutaneous growth hormone administration will significantly improve and/or normalize baseline values of BMC corrected for height
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2008
- Primary completionSep 2015
- Study completionSep 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Hospital for Sick ChildrenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Hospital for Sick Children
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Etienne Sochett, The Hospital for Sick Children
- Investigators
- Etienne Sochett, MD, Principal investigator, The Hospital for Sick Children
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00757393
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1000012269
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Sep 2008
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Growth Hormone Therapy and Bone Quality in Pediatric Osteoporosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00757393
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1000012269
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis
- Keywords
- Growth hormone, Pediatrics, Vitamin D, Calcium, Exercise
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2008
- Primary completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Sep 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that growth hormone, administered daily by subcutaneous injection for 2 years will result in a significantly greater BMD Z-score over optimal standard therapy.
Detailed description
Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by a parallel loss of bone mineral and matrix which results in enhanced bone fragility and an increased risk of fractures. The associated fractures, and the morbidity and mortality that ensue, make osteoporosis a public health problem of enormous proportions. Clinical and research observations strongly suggest that most adult osteoporosis has its roots in childhood and have identified both genetic and environmental factors as central to the pathogenesis of this disorder.
Osteoporosis is not only a major public health problem in the adult population but is increasingly diagnosed during childhood. Most cases are secondary to chronic illnesses (secondary osteoporosis). In chronically ill children several factors, in addition to the underlying chronic illness itself, may predispose to either reduced bone mass or impairment of bone quality. Osteoporosis in the otherwise healthy child (primary osteoporosis) is generally classified as either osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) or juvenile idiopathic osteoporosis (JIO).
Optimizing Vitamin D and calcium intake as well as a weight bearing exercise program are central approaches in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Despite increased awareness of this disorder in the pediatric population and more active implementation of these principles, an ever increasing number of children with osteoporosis present with symptomatic disease; that is progress to the stage of frequent peripheral fractures, vertebral compression fracture and/or deliberating pain. Bisphosphonates are often then added to the therapeutic regiment. However, it is widely acknowledged that little is currently known about the key factors that might predict the safe and effective use of these agents in this population.
Children whose bone biopsy results indicate an adynamic form of osteoporosis and who have low bone turnover markers make up a significant number of the children with symptomatic osteoporosis. Many of these patients have in addition growth failure (due to prolonged glucocorticoid usage and chronic illness) and some may have low growth hormone secretion. In this circumstance, the agent of choice would be an anabolic agent known to increase osteoblast activity, normalize histomorphometric parameters and improve bone quality. Unfortunately, one of the most promising of these agents, recombinant PTH (Teripeptide) is precluded from use in pediatric patients because of concerns regarding induction of osteosarcoma. It is unclear to what extent antiresorptive therapy might achieve these goals, although it has become the therapy of choice by default.
The Growth hormone (GH)/IGFI- axis plays a central role in longitudinal bone growth as well as in the acquisition and maintenance of bone mass in children. Studies, in both growth hormone excess and deficiency, suggest that growth hormone may be useful as an anabolic agent in children with osteoporosis. In acromegaly, bone turnover markers indicate activation of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Both markers correlate with circulating GH and IGF-1 levels. IGF-1 levels are increased in cortical bone suggesting that the anabolic actions of GH are mediated by local production. The impact on bone density in unclear, as some studies show no differences from healthy controls. However, other studies indicate an increase in cortical bone mass while trabecular mass appears to be unchanged or somewhat reduced. Furthermore rates appear not to be increased.
The Growth hormone (GH)/IGFI-axis plays a central role in the longitudinal bone growth as well as in the acquisition and maintenance of bone mass in children. Studies, in both growth hormone excess and deficiency, suggest that growth hormone may be useful as an anabolic agent in children with osteoporosis. Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is recognized to result in reduced bone mass, decreased bone turnover markers, secondary osteoporosis and increased fracture rate. Epidemiological studies suggest that GHD alone may explain the increased fracture rate seen in these patients. Treatment of GHD patients with GH results in an increase in turnover markers. While short-term studies showed little improvement in bone mass, longer term studies with treatment periods of 2 years or more have shown significant increases in bone mass.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program |
| 2 | Experimental | Drug: Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program + Humatrope |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 16 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adynamic form of osteoporosis based on bone biopsy findings
- Age range 5-16 years
- Willingness to comply with the protocol
- Underlying primary disorder (when present) in a maintenance phase of treatment and the patient considered to be clinically stable
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Previous treatment with an antiresorptive agent within 1 year of commencement of the study
- Unstable primary disorder (when present)
- Significant psychosocial difficulties that will likely preclude compliance with the protocol
- Any contraindication to the use of growth hormone
- Patients with severe osteoporosis and past medical history of malignancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise programSubjects is this arm of the study will receive a) a supplementation with vitamin D3, 1000 IU daily b) a dietary calcium intake set at DRI for age and a supplement used as needed to meet the requirement and c) a weight bearing exercise program appropriate for the underlying medical condition | Dietary supplement | 1 |
| Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program + HumatropeAlso: Growth HormoneSubjects in this arm will receive the same as those in arm 1 as well as Humatrope by subcutaneous infection 7 days a week at a dose of 0.05 mg.kg/day. | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
Test the hypothesis that growth hormone administered daily by subcutaneous injection for 2 years will result in a significantly greater BMD Z-score over optimal standard therapy
Time frame: 2 years
4 secondary outcomes
Test the hypothesis that subcutaneous growth hormone administration will significantly improve and/or normalize baseline values of fracture frequency
Time frame: 2 years
Test the hypothesis that subcutaneous growth hormone administration will significantly improve and/or normalize baseline values of bone histomorphometric measures osteoid volume, surface, and width
Time frame: 2 years
Test the hypothesis that subcutaneous growth hormone administration will significantly improve and/or normalize baseline measures of bone quality
Time frame: 2 years
Test the hypothesis that subcutaneous growth hormone administration will significantly improve and/or normalize baseline values of BMC corrected for height
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Aug 2021.
Related trials for Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
A Clinical Study to Collect Real-wordt Data on Safety and Clinical Performance of the VCFix Spinal System for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures of (Suspected) Osteoporotic Origin.
Vertebra Compression Fracture
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Impact of Osteosarcopenia on Falls, Kinesiophobia, and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women
Osteosarcopenia, Sarcopenia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
TCM Formula vs. HMB in Pre-Frail Elders: Muscle Strength and Bone Status
Pre-Frailty, Sarcopenia
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Romosozumab and Denosumab Combination Therapy for Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment and Comparison of Osteoporosis Risk Factors After Stroke
Stroke, Osteoporosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Etienne Sochett, MD principal investigator
The Hospital for Sick Children
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program and Vitamin D + Calcium + Exercise program + Humatrope in people with Osteoporosis, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Test the hypothesis that growth hormone administered daily by subcutaneous injection for 2 years will result in a significantly greater BMD Z-score over optimal standard therapy (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2021.