AzTrials
AzTrials

Spontaneous Bacterial PeritonitisPhase 4NCT00761098

Randomized Comparison of Two Albumin Administration Schedules for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP)

A Phase 4 study testing Experimental in people with Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Cirrhosis, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 2 sites in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common and frequently fatal complication of end-stage liver disease with a mortality of up to 10%, primarily due to the development of kidney failure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis, Cirrhosis
What is being tested?
Experimental
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
May 2005to Aug 2010
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 to 75
  • End Stage Liver Disease / Cirrhosis
  • Documented SBP (ANC > 250 or positive ascites culture)
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Serum Creatinine > 1.0 and/or Total Bilirubin > 4.0

Who cannot join

  • Nonportal hypertensive ascites (i.e. malignancy)
  • Hepatic Encephalopathy precluding informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Samuel H Sigal, MD contact

646-962-5483

shs2015@med.cornell.edu

Ilan S Weisberg, MD contact

646-962-4800

iw2104@columbia.edu

United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10021

    Samuel H Sigal, MD, 646-962-5483, shs2015@med.cornell.edu

    Ilan S Weisberg, MD, 646-962-4800, iw2104@columbia.edu

    Recruiting
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital - Columbia University Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

    Samuel H Sigal, MD, 212-305-9140, shs2015@med.cornell.edu

    Ilan S Weisberg, MD, 212-305-9140, iw2104@columbia.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Comparison of Two Albumin Administration Schedules for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common and frequently fatal complication of end-stage liver disease with a mortality of up to 10%, primarily due to the development of kidney failure. Current standard practice is to treat this infection with broad spectrum antibiotics and salt-poor albumin administration on day one and three of treatment. In this study the investigators test the hypothesis that the administration of a second dose of albumin at 48 hours only to patients with renal insufficiency, is as effective at preventing kidney failure as administering the second dose to all patients at 72 hours.

Read the detailed description

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), infection of the peritoneal fluid(ascites) without evidence of a surgically treatable source, is a common and frequently fatal complication of patients with endstage hepatic cirrhosis. It originates with the passage of bacteria from the intestinal lumen to the systemic circulation and then to the ascitic fluid. Early diagnosis with paracentesis (aspiration of an ascites fluid sample to assess for evidence of infection) and the development of nonnephrotoxic third generation cephalosporin antibiotics have decreased the in hospital mortality from nearly 100% to approximately 30%. Mortality in patients with SBP is invariably associated with the development of functional renal failure. Recently, the administration of two large doses of human serum albumin at diagnosis and at 72 hours has been reported to further reduce mortality and renal failure to 10%. These findings have lead to the recommendation that patients with SBP be treated with albumin. However, no study has evaluated the necessary amount and timing of albumin administration required for its beneficial action.

In this study we test the hypothesis that the administration of a second dose of albumin at 48 hours only to patients with renal insufficiency, is as effective at preventing kidney failure as administering the second dose to all patients at 72 hours.

80 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and SBP who are at risk for renal failure will be enrolled at either the Columbia University Medical Center or The New York Hospital Weill Cornell Medical Center. Baseline clinical and biochemical data will be obtained for etiology and severity of liver disease. All patients will receive antibiotics and salt poor albumin at 1.5g/kg at time of diagnosis and diuretics discontinued (current standard of care). Patients will be randomized to receive the second dose (1.0 gm/kg) at 72 hours (group 1, standard of care) or at 48 hours only if renal function remains elevated after two days of therapy (Group 2). For the latter group of patients, albumin will be administered if the Cr is > 1.0 mg/dl or if the BUN or creatinine levels are higher than admission levels at 48 hours. If albumin is not administered at 48 hours, renal function will be monitored daily, and it will be administered should the BUN or creatinine increase to levels greater than those on admission. Renal failure rates, duration of transient azotemia, mortality, and albumin utilization rated will be compared between the groups who receive albumin in the usual manner at 72 hours versus those who receive it at 48 hours based on renal function.

Being tested
Standard Care, Experimental
Keywords
Cirrhosis, SBP
Medical subject headings
Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard CareDrug

    Standard Care: 25% salt poor albumin administered day 1 (1.5g/kg) and day 3 (1.0g/kg)

  • ExperimentalDrug

    25% Salt Poor Albumin administered per standard care on day 1 (1.5g/kg). Second dose administered on day 2 only to those individuals with renal insufficiency and risk for renal failure.

Study groups in NCT00761098
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorStandard Care (albumin administered day 1 (1.5g/kg) and day 3 (1.0g/kg)
Receives: Drug: Standard Care
2ExperimentalAlbumin administered per standard care on day 1 (1.5g/kg). Second dose administered on day 2 only to those individuals with renal insufficiency and risk for renal failure.
Receives: Drug: Experimental

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Renal Failure

    Measured: Duration of Hospital Admission

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. All Cause Mortality

    Measured: Duration of Hospital Admission

  2. Albumin Utilization

    Measured: Duration of Hospital Admission

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Sep 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2005
  3. Primary completionMay 2010 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2010 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00761098
Sponsor's protocol ID
#0410007526/1104-564
Status last verified
Jan 2011
First submitted
25 Sep 2008
Last updated
4 Jan 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Sort P, Navasa M, Arroyo V, Aldeguer X, Planas R, Ruiz-del-Arbol L, Castells L, Vargas V, Soriano G, Guevara M, Gines P, Rodes J. Effect of intravenous albumin on renal impairment and mortality in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 5;341(6):403-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908053410603.

    PubMed 10432325

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Experimental in people with Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Cirrhosis, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Samuel H Sigal, MD (646-962-5483, shs2015@med.cornell.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Renal Failure (time frame: Duration of Hospital Admission). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00761098, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in